White Tower Mafia *Starting*

[Illiara]

Did you get a PM from Pete telling you which Ajah you were in?  There should have been a link in it to the Ajah's quicktopic thread.  If you don't have the link, I would PM Pete and ask him.

[Elgee]

I know Damon hasn't posted, but Vanion has - I'm not sure about anyone else.

 

And as Illiara said, mc, check your private messages again  :D

[Mirshann Uuranor]

Is there anyone who would like to replace me?  I don't think I'm going to be able to keep up with this right now.

[mcs0083]

I will!

Double role! :P

lol

[Vanion]

The people demand pants!

 

...Or failing that.... TOGAS!!!

[Ludmian]

What people? Are you speaking about yourself in the plural?

[Illiara]

*throws the pants she channeled down from her Ajah quarters earlier at Vanion*

 

The time for silliness has ended.  We need to start getting down to business.  What do you all think about this?  Is it fair to lynch someone who hasn't checked in yet?

[Elgee]

Seems as good an idea as any to me, Illiara.

[Vanion]

You are speaking of the killing of someone who has not had a chance to defend themselves. Give them the day as we formulate plans for figuring this all out, then, if they have still failed to make an appearance, we will act as needed.

[Illiara]

I think that is going to be what it comes down to.  There's just too much at stake for all of the teams to risk going after anyone here right now.  Nobody wants to have their voting power lessened or to have less of a chance to win the game.

 

There are good points to going both ways.  I think that it is unfair to lynch someone who isn't here playing.  On the other hand, voting for someone who isn't here may be the only way to get a lynch.  I think that it will end up being for the majority to decide how we approach this problem.

 

With teams of three, it would make perfect sense for there to be eight teams.  If this is the case, no matter who we pick, there will always be two people who do not want to see their third person lynched.  I now understand why some people propose a no lynch, but I feel that we don't gain anything by that.

[Elgee]

How long do we have to decide on someone?

[mmeeshal]

With teams of three, it would make perfect sense for there to be eight teams.  If this is the case, no matter who we pick, there will always be two people who do not want to see their third person lynched.

 

Actually, I just wanted to point out, there IS a solo winner.  I believe that's in Pete's first post.  So, one team may well have only 2 people, and someone out there doesn't care who's lynched at all.

 

Just wanted to remind everyone. >.>

[Illiara]

We have until 9pm EDT on Monday to figure out a lynch.  That means that those people who haven't posted yet may very well be able to before the deadline.

[Verbal32]

With teams of three, it would make perfect sense for there to be eight teams.  If this is the case, no matter who we pick, there will always be two people who do not want to see their third person lynched.

 

Actually, I just wanted to point out, there IS a solo winner.  I believe that's in Pete's first post.  So, one team may well have only 2 people, and someone out there doesn't care who's lynched at all.

 

Just wanted to remind everyone. >.>

 

That would likely mean the Ammy & Keeper are a team, and the last is something.....else.

[Zania]

YAY I made it! ;D

 

Was I lynched already? I didnt get thru the 10+ threads to find out

[Illiara]

We haven't even come close to lynching anyone yet, although I believe you do have one vote.  We don't get a lynch until there are 13 votes on one person, so you should be fine.

[Elgee]

Lol ... hi there, Zany! Nope, no one has been lynched yet - we're still trying to figure out how to go about picking someone  :D

 

And thanks, Illiara - that means those who can't post much during the week might still post over the weekend.

[Illiara]

Of those people that have posted so far, I wouldn't mind hearing a little bit on the subject of how to pick someone to lynch from those who have stayed quiet.  We need everyone's opinion in order to move forward on this.

[Jaydena]

OMG there have been 5 pages since I left last night. Geez! I guess it is based on activity so that makes sense. Personally I am not a big fan of the no lynch thing. My feeling is that we have a 50 percent chance of getting one of the mafia and you can't tell me there isn't mafia in this game. That's what makes it a mafia game. If we don't lynch we give the Mafia a night to kill an innocent and to be one more up on us. On top of that, is the cult in this game, they could also turn someone that night as well. Gah, crazy games.

[a pale tanned lover]

I feel that choosing someone who hasn't posted yet a bad way to pick a person to lynch, remember we get points for posting so the person who gets the most points gets an increased chance of being able to do something, although i am confused does the points gained go towards an individual or their ajah?

 

We could of course discuss this and not lynch anyone for the first day, giving people a chance to post but also to see what kind of points can be gathered, then i think we can start to see who is likely to be a threat to each others Ajah.

[Illiara]

So far, we have two votes.

 

Mystica (1)- Panda

Zania (1)- Verb

 

What interests me is the fact that nobody has stepped forward to defend them.  This makes me think that one of them could be the solo winner.

[Elgee]

Uhh ... I hadn't realised anyone seriously voted for them. Shouldn't that be highlighted?

[Illiara]

What I posted is just a tally of the current votes.  It helps people see how the game is progressing and is indicative of how others are voting.

[a pale tanned lover]

I thought they were tongue in cheek votes?

[Illiara]

They could have just been random votes, but since they were glowed by the people who voted for Zania and Myst, they count.