Jump to content

DRAGONMOUNT

A WHEEL OF TIME COMMUNITY

SinisterDeath

DM - Staff
  • Content Count

    17200
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About SinisterDeath

  • Birthday September 7

Contact Methods

  • MSN
    theforsaken15@hotmail.com

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

9303 profile views
  1. SinisterDeath

    Who should/will the Dems run in 2020?

    And if you want a D win, they can just as easily farm out those positions to the best qualified people in the party. And then all Tom Hanks has to do, is act presidential.
  2. SinisterDeath

    House Resolution #1 (2019)

    nah. Because then we'd spend nothing on nothing, and have no need for government. Understandable. I'm sure there's bots on both sides. But I also think that the Russian bots out there, are playing both sides. They make up crazy liberals to stir up conservatives, and they create crazy conservatives to stir up liberals. Bernie was arguably more popular at rallies than Trump. Definitely more so than Hillary. so IRL support doesn't mean as much as the actual voter turnout. Of course Trump is popular among his base. But what the Russian bots have done is far more insidious than simply adding numbers to his supporters. Because there was either no federal taxes as we know them today for the earliest presidents, or the kind of money and donors to presidents wasn't is like it is today. So Modern being from what, Kennedy and up? (I'm pretty sure republicans were always asking if his money came from the mob). I think the hope is that said tax return would disclose where said money originated from. Sure we did. It was even a running point among Conservatives for years. What we didn't know is how many tendrils the Russians had going on. We were all to focused on the Middle East & China. As for the Clinton foundation. I'm not making excuses for them. However, public speaking is something both sides do. Debatable. They, like other's are mad at policies he's done, but on the other hand he helps them with others. Sometimes it's like he does things that come off as a dick move just to see who's loyal to him. Absentee voting is awesome dude. And it also requires A) Valid ID B) A witness Which makes it a legally binding document that purgers yourself an the witness with fraud if the ballot is exploited/illegal. So double penalty. See, I think there is room for them to grow, it's just getting people out of this mind-set of it's only D & R. We're playing into the Dems and Republicans hands by acting like they are the only option. They are the ones who stay in power as long as we allow that belief to run rampant. Definitely. Pelosi always stuck me as someone who's going to make the tax return the whole issue.
  3. SinisterDeath

    House Resolution #1 (2019)

    Think of a Bill these days as a giant list of negotiations, or a Christmas list. You throw in something completely insane and expensive, just on the off chance someone actually agrees to it, if not, it's one of the first things thrown out so they can bargain. Like I said, some goals are decent, some are just no-goes right from the start. Personally, I'd rather they break a bill up into individual parts, to get the individual (good) sections of reform unilaterally passed through congress, while the weaker ones just sit on the sidelines until all the good reform sections are passed, then they can slog through that mess later. There's quite a few people in my state alone that don't want any federal money going to California for any reason, whats-so-ever. Often federal money is used to fund a lot of things, a lot of people don't want it to. So.. the government doesn't really care what you think it should be spent on. This comes out of the whole Russian shit & Facebook/Twitter/etc. One of the biggest attack ads against politicians, on both sides is corporate sponsors. Super-pacs, and other methods of hiding donors during the current election, prevents you from attacking them for getting paid off by Banks, Oil Companies, Anti-Semite organizations, etc. Maybe they'll flesh it out? Facebook/Twitter though, have had some weird dealings with Russian twitter bots. I don't know that, that has anything to do with googles adsense? (Plus, Facebook has been getting a LOT of shit recently for what they've done. Maybe it can finally be put on it's death bed?) It's all about Trump not disclosing it. Every other president has done so when asked? Part of it is related to the above who's funding your campaign thing? Imagine if Trump was just given $50,000,000 to win the election by a known Russian government official? Imagine if Trump was given $25,000,000 by the Koch Brothers? Or even worse. Imagine if Trump was given $10,000,000 by Bill Clinton. But yea, the bill will never pass the president if this is in it. So this is clearly fodder for being thrown out. Pretty much the consensus here on that. Yep its all very vague atm. Maybe we'll actually get the written specifics of all of these, as this is just a list of what the goals are.. The goals in this case are just.. vague as hell. Maybe they think this happens? lol, well that's one way to look at it. I still say we just send everyone absentee ballots that they can just bring in if they don't mail it. Why not? You'd probably fit in a lot better with certain 3rd parties than a straight republican party. I just don't know enough on how they classify what flights are required, where this money comes from, and as Cubarey mentioned, is there salary also considered public money? If so, that kind of shits on non-rich people running for office. Possibly. It just really depends on how much each side is willing to give/take. Some reason I have a hunch that Pelosi isn't going to rest about the tax returns.
  4. SinisterDeath

    political meme's & lolz

    Oh? You mean like calling everyone a Snowflake or NPC when they disagree with ya? Hypocrite. Yea, you went total strawman there. I said nothing about Islam or made commentary about it. You read way too much into it. Literally all that was said Lawyers are hated more than Isis. Aka lawyer jokes Go listen to some System of a Down, toxicity. So uh. Yea...
  5. SinisterDeath

    political meme's & lolz

    Nah, I wasn't calling you a jew lawyer. I was just stating that Lawyers are more hated then ISIS, the Jews, and Blacks, even among conservatives who tend to hate all 3 of those groups the most. Kinda like why liberals are hated by all you ignorant conservatives for telling the truth?
  6. SinisterDeath

    political meme's & lolz

    Yet you represent a society that deems being a rapist is more credible than someone with the allegation of being slutty/whores. To put it another way, Many rapists have claimed the victim was/is a slut/whore, thus they aren't credible. It doesn't matter if making the allegation of them being sluts/whores is true. Often it's false. But somehow, having the allegation that you were a slut makes you less credible, than the allegation of being a rapist. Nah. I actually want crimes to be investigated thoroughly and for a court of law to decide their fate. You on the other hand, want investigations squashed because it might tarnish any mans (well, Conservative men, you'd throw a liberal under a bus) reputation, and deem any and all victims as non-credible by making allegations that their character is non-credible. Here's my modus operandi. If a police officer shoots a human being. Put them on Paid leave. Conduct an Investigation via 3rd party to conclude whether it was justifiable or not. In-house investigations are highly scrutinized by the public, and prone to extreme bias and corruption. If a rape allegation is made, take it seriously. (IF society takes rape allegations/charges seriously, we may not have to deal with 5+ year old allegations in the future, that can't really be proved.) That's it. Investigate, test rape kits (instead of letting them rot in storage) determine if charges can be made. based on the evidence. Don't shelve it because the mayor's kid is involved. Don't shelve it because you think she's a whore. Conservatives and whites in general. Conservative? Or actually a libertarian? That doesn't fit your narrative of Liberals blindly supporting things like BLM and racial identity politics. Honestly I don't think you care about whether someone is guilty or innocent of heinous crimes. You just care if they are on your side, and if what they do hurts your side or not. And if it does, how can you protect them while they are in power long enough so that it doesn't backfire on your politics. But hey, you're a lawyer, there's a reason your hated more than the Jews, Blacks, and Isis.
  7. SinisterDeath

    political meme's & lolz

    Ever thought that perhaps those rape victims weren't sluts/whore to begin with? That society used that logic, to brand those victims as Sluts and Whores to make them less credible? Has that ever.. occurred to you? It's like the black market, or illegal Aliens, we can only guess how many tens of thousands there were. I hazzard a guess the numbers are FAR greater than you believe. Welp, you guy's don't care about executing potentially innocent people with the Death Penalty, so what's it matter right? Via conservative logic, It's better to put someone in prison wrongfully and get all the bad guys in prison, then to let one bad guy out. Better to make voting as hard as possible, lest one person make a fraudulent vote. There's clearly a middle ground, and the court of law helps establish innocent versus Guilty. But that doesn't mean society isn't allowed to Ostracize people they believe did it, even if the court of law doesn't believe they did. Just look at how many Conservatives still think OJ killed his wife. Ya'll ostracized the shit out of the man.
  8. SinisterDeath

    political meme's & lolz

    I seem to recall within the last 18 years (Probably during the Bush Era) either an 18 or 19 year old Highschool Senior, going to jail & becoming a sex offender for having sex with his 17/16 year old highschool senior girlfriend. The only reason it happened is because the parents filed a lawsuit when they found out. I believe age of consent was a given in this case, but they used some technicality of still a minor to make the guy a sex offender. I don't believe this happened too much back in your day, specially in the 60s & 70s. Earlier than that, you were likely to get shot by parents for having sex outside of marriage. Eh, I'm pretty sure back in the 70s and 80s, only a few women would step forward to the police if they felt they were raped during such an occasion. Society & police were rather uncaring about it. Oh? You were wearing a short skirt? Must have asked for it. Oh? You were drunk? Oh well. How many thousands went on with their lives because society at the time would brand you as a slut/whore/liar for trying to make a rape allegation? Specially if the woman didn't come from an affluent family. I'm not viewing the 60s-80s with the same rosey tinted glasses ya'll older folks do.
  9. SinisterDeath

    House Resolution #1 (2019)

    Eternally depressed? Nah. That's Russians your thinking of. For many, you don't feel depressed if you're to drunk to feel your feet. Sure you can. Never had baby corn? /thread
  10. SinisterDeath

    Political Musings

    If a Refugee from Slovakia is fleeing genocide from the Ukraine, heading to Germany through Czechia. By Cubarey's definition they would not be refugees if Czechia is willing to grant them refugee status, even if they are really just pulling a bait and switch scheme with the Ukraine.
  11. SinisterDeath

    Who should/will the Dems run in 2020?

    Being a surgeon, and being the president are two completely different things. There is no 8+ year degree requirement to be president. You aren't required to be a lawyer, a businessman, or even ex-military. Literally any tom dick or harry can be President. So you're argument is nonsense. Trump is a horrible president, NOT because he's an glorified reality tv star. He's a bad president, precisely because he is a horrible human being. Any actor in Hollywood, are just as much of a businessman/woman as reality tv star Trump. Sometimes Hollywood actors have agents, sometimes they represent themselves. They all negotiate, and make deals, some like Sienfield are better at it then others.
  12. SinisterDeath

    House Resolution #1 (2019)

    Like a corn on the cob. *Note* There is a part of me, jumping for joy that I made you take time out of your day trying to figure this out. 🤣
  13. SinisterDeath

    Who should/will the Dems run in 2020?

    Do you want Trump out? Also: Why does being a celebrity, automatically disqualify you from public office? It has always been more of a popularity contest over candidates that actually having knowledge/experience about the office or the issues. This is the exact line of logic conservatives use when telling celebrities/nfl players to sit down, and shut up and get back in their isle. You want to beat Trump? Use someone popular. Don't choose someone who's qualified but universally hated. Still blaming bernie bros on the Trump election I see... Bernie Bros didn't lose the democrat election. Hillary did.
  14. SinisterDeath

    House Resolution #1 (2019)

    This reminds me. If I ever go to New York, I fully plan to eat a slice of Pizza with a Fork and Knife, just to screw with native New Yorkers. Similar thing with Chicago and Hot Dogs, but not loading it up, and eating it sideways.
  15. SinisterDeath

    Who should/will the Dems run in 2020?

    Tom Hanks should run. Everyone loves him, no one has a bad thing to say about him, and even if he doesn't even know what he's doing. All he has to do is use his acting skill and act like a good president and he'll do a great job. Perhaps Samuel L Jackson? I'd love to see Mike Rowe run. But I'd doubt he'd run Republican or Democrat... Plus he lacks the will to run. It's not something he would ever want to do. Which is precisely why he should get the vote. I say, Vote for the guy that doesn't want power. Last time we did that.. Was George Washington.
×