Jump to content

DRAGONMOUNT

A WHEEL OF TIME COMMUNITY

[Basic] Disney Heroes vs. Villains Mafia C9++ Town Wins


Kaylee

Recommended Posts

Posted

Well he did tell me we were speed lynched before I first checked into the game, so at least he's keeping me informed on the important stuff.

  • Replies 2.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

 

Sili, pls explain your "wolf trying to read correctly" comment wrt me giving AJ's post Towny points there.

 

Where do you stand on AJ right now?

 

FYI I'm not reading him either way, nor was that post hard-pushing anyone anywhere. It was me voicing the vibes I picked up on skim at work (ie. Gerrrofff me if you're not a Wolf. I'll re-look at everything when I get home).

 

What makes Wi-Fi a weak player?

Do you have alignment meta on her?

Why is questioning her reacting badly to pressure a bad thing?

Have you gone back and looked/got thoughts on her AJ stance?

 

answered about aj a while ago. you should have read that i think.

 

wifi's new

 

it's bad because it's easy lol

 

i'm not trying to read wifi at the moment.

 

How long does WIFI get the green pass?  This is game four or five and she had BFG as her mentor last game.  That's not to say that she absolutely needs to be scrutinized at what level we all are, but I'd feel amiss if we didn't give her some more weight now.

Posted

Well he did tell me we were speed lynched before I first checked into the game, so at least he's keeping me informed on the important stuff.

who are you with again?

Posted

I think I'm gonna retract my town lean on Belieber and slot him back to null. Him being out there doesn't make a lot of sense as scum in a general sense, but from what I understand he's not a terrible player and his case on Celeste is pretty terrible - most importantly because I think he's reiterated enough times now that I'm ruling out another reaction test. I appreciate Cass doing the leg work and checking him out in the Star Fox game cause tbh I was never going to.

Posted

 

Sili you've set the standard to read you by.

 

And yeah, apparently it's a thing to wagon me for past games. Considering four people have voted me stats say at least one wolf did.

 

Kat, Wifi, Tiink, Zander

 

Kill one imo

 

fwiw, I think Zander's vote felt natural and i don't feel like he was taking advantage of what was going on. The other ones, debatable. Kat and Wifi seem paranoid. But would they be playing off of it? Between the two, Kat not willing to commit and sticking with it looks eh, but i think she struggles early on for reads and maybe she's just letting herself get stuck on the wrong thing, so I'd like to see where she goes from here. Wildfire backing off after dice and, I think also Hallia, chastised her, doesn't bother me. But I didn't like her egging B-dog to vote there before that, it was pretty gross. Sili's vote? I'm not even going to venture a guess. I have no freaking clue.

 

To be clear I wasn't declaring a scum read on each individual in that group just for voting me, just stating that there's ~plausibility of a wolf being in there because of simple probability. I'm not really bothered by Sili's vote and Shander reads fine to me. WiFi is being WiFi as far as I can tell, but I'm beginning to wonder when she's going to get off this crutch of voting people for 'claiming' scum in games when it's been more or less proven in several games that it means nothing. Kat is the new founding member of the AJ fan club. I agree that I'll wait for her to do some other things, but she should probably learn that parking a policy vote on me gives me an easy excuse to push her when I'm scum. It worked for me last game :wink:

Posted

To be clear I wasn't declaring a scum read on each individual in that group just for voting me, just stating that there's ~plausibility of a wolf being in there because of simple probability.

 

I didn't think you were. Just thinking out loud.

Posted

 

You don't believe Believer believes what he says?

 

You lack faith, friend. Now vote Celeste.

Well, some of your points against her seemed pretty arbitrary, like derailing the thread when there was nothing to derail except some sexychat, or calling out a derp clear attempt when she claimed that she did know from the start that Zander and I were hydra. I don't have a clue where the second "derailing" comment comes from.

 

Other points were ok. The "ellipse instead of a period" thing is kind of Darthe-esque scum-hunting. Penny does try to pocket people pretty actively as a wolf. "I'm totally harmless" read weird to me too but it's Penny.

 

And generally you're expressing a level of conviction which is kind of beyond the scope of the evidence you've provided, which made me take the whole things as real/faked reaction test more than honest read.

 

This is good. The bold was an especially bad point that he made. The only one he made that had legitimate merit imo was saying that Celeste was attempting to pocket you by throwing out that town read.

 

Generally have a hard time believing he's legitimate with that push but it's gone beyond what I would expect was an attempt to see who would react, etc.

Posted

 

 

 

Would anyone be so kind as to give me a short rundown of meta on the following players:

 

Zander

Andrej

Darthe

Cass

 

 

That would be super helpful. <3

 

GOAT

BOSS

DERF

WOLF

 

 

Or this

 

FTR I'm pretty sure Zander was just soft claiming here

 

 

I didnt do that in this post.

Posted

If I had two minutes to win or lose the game I'd probably kill Sili right now, but it's garbage.

 

How come?

 

I didn't have an issue with his content as I was reading up. I don't agree with the Cass push but his meta on me was pretty accurate after the Spirited Away game. Sili calling someone's reads generic/weak/easy or whatever without taking account for the fact that there wasn't a ton of a good content to make them on is very Sili like. His approach didn't feel predatory imo.

Posted

 

 

Sili you've set the standard to read you by.

 

And yeah, apparently it's a thing to wagon me for past games. Considering four people have voted me stats say at least one wolf did.

 

Kat, Wifi, Tiink, Zander

 

Kill one imo

 

fwiw, I think Zander's vote felt natural and i don't feel like he was taking advantage of what was going on. The other ones, debatable. Kat and Wifi seem paranoid. But would they be playing off of it? Between the two, Kat not willing to commit and sticking with it looks eh, but i think she struggles early on for reads and maybe she's just letting herself get stuck on the wrong thing, so I'd like to see where she goes from here. Wildfire backing off after dice and, I think also Hallia, chastised her, doesn't bother me. But I didn't like her egging B-dog to vote there before that, it was pretty gross. Sili's vote? I'm not even going to venture a guess. I have no freaking clue.

 

To be clear I wasn't declaring a scum read on each individual in that group just for voting me, just stating that there's ~plausibility of a wolf being in there because of simple probability. I'm not really bothered by Sili's vote and Shander reads fine to me. WiFi is being WiFi as far as I can tell, but I'm beginning to wonder when she's going to get off this crutch of voting people for 'claiming' scum in games when it's been more or less proven in several games that it means nothing. Kat is the new founding member of the AJ fan club. I agree that I'll wait for her to do some other things, but she should probably learn that parking a policy vote on me gives me an easy excuse to push her when I'm scum. It worked for me last game :wink:

 

 

It has also been proven to be true.  Its not common but it has happened. It is something that I will do at times as im sure you have seen so I cant really whinge at wifi doing it.

Posted

[v]Tiink[/v]

 

Of the three that wagoned me for BS policy lynch reasons, Tiink had the least reason to considering the context.

 

He gets grilled first.

 

Well considering i voted you for not liking GoT can you elaborate on the bold please?

 

Why does there HAVE to be a Wolf on your wagon?

Posted

@Dice - yeah, I know that you'll forever refer to that game where Tommy claimed scum and was actually scum. I think the action itself is null at best and by now I think WiFi should know that.

Posted

[v]aj[/v]

 

=D

 

I honestly cant explain it but this kinda pinged me for some reason.

 

WHHHHHHHHHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!

 

A shiny new era is tiptoeing near!!!

 

TOWN AGAIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! COME @ ME, PERFECT PRETTIES!!

 

Cass!!!!!!!

 

GOATENFPMUSICTWIN!!!!!!

 

<3

Posted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sup Hally. How goes it? Why people votin AJ?

 

Why aren't you is the question?

 

[v]Andrej[/v]

 

 

I didn't quote this, but later he gives his reads....says Cass can be scum or town trying to get involved. Which seems like a null read to me. Which i guess isn't a huge deal, she literally posted twice up until this point. The first post is just her shaking her booty. The second post is her general impressions. So I would expect him to keep tabs on her and decide which is it?  Instead, minutes later he agrees with Sili that her content seems convenient and fluffy, and votes her. The transition seems wonky to me. No me gusta.

 

 

It's not no opinion -> opinion suddenly. If I had no opinion I would've said null. Her responses seemed fairly pointless and it was noticeable.  

 

 

Let's talk.

 

I've said a helluva lot since that second post, which is what your vote was based on. 

 

I don't see Nyn saying you went from no opinion -> opinion. I see her saying that you didn't keep tabs and decide. I have to agree with the transition seeming wonky. The sticking with it here, without updating your read even moreso.

 

Wanna go through my ISO and see where you agree/disagree/have thoughts?

 

 

She said I went from null to coming to a conclusion. I've been following what you've been saying but I mean it doesn't really add much to your defence. 

 

 

 

 

 

But, @Believer

- Why did you ISO Alette?

- Have you ISO'd anyone else?

 

 

Here's the link to (Town) Believer Star Fox ISO

 

And current game to here

 

The main things standing out are:

 

Hangs back a lot in the beginning of the mash;

Attitude in mash initially more helpful/conversant/questioning than straight-out accusatory. Seems willing to answer questions;

Change in tone later in mash game to more flippant/aggressive, somewhat similar to here;

No post-by-post ISO commentary on any player;

Focuses suspicion on several different players at a time in mash.

 

TLDR:

I see some differences in tone and content but am not sure how much can be attributed to giant mash volume/re-entry to mafia environment. 

The early involvement and quickly accusatory attitude here differs to the beginning of the mash, but could be more an indicator of confidence than alignment given shifts towards end of mash.

The heavy/single-minded tunnel on Celeste seems like nothing seen in the mash.

 

 

 

@ Sili - To clarify the monster multi-quote above, these were the questions you missed answering:

 

 

 

Sili, pls explain your "wolf trying to read correctly" comment wrt me giving AJ's post Towny points there.

 

Where do you stand on AJ right now?

 

FYI I'm not reading him either way, nor was that post hard-pushing anyone anywhere. It was me voicing the vibes I picked up on skim at work (ie. Gerrrofff me if you're not a Wolf. I'll re-look at everything when I get home).

 

What makes Wi-Fi a weak player?

Do you have alignment meta on her?

Why is questioning her reacting badly to pressure a bad thing?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

gah it's so quiet this morning... and we can all feel Zander's presence in the thread..... *sighs* *tapes Z's hands together so it's harder for him to type*  

 

How serious is your policy lynch on AJ?

Thoughts/feels on anyone yet?

 

 

 

 

 

Well, what you've been primarily doing just seems like you're overly trying to fit in and the recent posts haven't really convinced me of anything.

 

Questions like "How serious is the policy lynch?" "Why is applying pressure a bad thing?" What kind of answers are you actually expecting here? Just comes off as if you've been prodded and now are overly defensive. 

 

You vote Sili for not answering your questions they're not really questions of substance and to me it comes off as more of a panicked retaliation than a genuine scum read.

 

I'm fine keeping my vote where it is.

 

 

Are those the specific posts you have problems with?

 

FYI I get crap for my question style in every game I've ever played. It's null, and I seem unable to change so  :biggrin: .  It's not about fitting in, it's about getting people to put thought processes on record so there's more for me to analyse. 

 

Eg.

"How serious is the policy lynch?" - Kat's response to this wasn't straight out and the logic adds up imo. The fact that I can understand the reason for her vote, coupled with the fact that she didn't try to push it onto anyone else/longer than was logical means I can worry about that vote, on our quickest/largest train to date, less for now.

 

"Why is applying pressure a bad thing?" is not something I said.

If you look properly at the questions, I'm focusing on WiFi and her meta as per Sili's opinion, and seeing if there was a logical reason for him to think me commenting on something of hers I found odd was wolfy. His responses give me nothing. 

 

I voted him for not commenting on anything beyond a stance he formed on my second post, and for not investigating/giving explanations/being cooperative, and that'll do for now  :tongue:  . 

 

1. What's wrong with my questions to Believer/comparison of his ISOs? (You quote them but there's no comments)

2. What's your take on Sili's actions? Especially considering that he said he hadn't looked at WiFi's actual posts/reactions when he made that "Cass is wolfy for pushing WiFi" call? 

3. Thoughts on Believer's case against Celeste?

Posted

 

 

 

Lenlo I'm gonna town read you based on pure soul reads.

I appreciate the effort.

It just might be my finest work yet. Standby for that

 

Im well known for being the catalyst for other peoples great achievements. 

 

 

<3 <3 <3

Posted

 

[v]Tiink[/v]

 

Of the three that wagoned me for BS policy lynch reasons, Tiink had the least reason to considering the context.

 

He gets grilled first.

 

Well considering i voted you for not liking GoT can you elaborate on the bold please?

 

Why does there HAVE to be a Wolf on your wagon?

 

I knew your vote meant nothing. Kat/Wifi wagoned me for policy lynch reasons. Tiink does not have that reason because he wasn't in any of those games that they are voting me over except for like the last two phases of the last one.

 

It's not a perfect theory, it's just a matter of probability. I am town, 5 different players have voted me by now. Simple math dictates that not all of those players are town too.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...