Tainted Minds - A Black Tower Mafia Game: Game over - Town wins

[BFG]

Doubt Sooh and Chris are m/m and not going to worry about the traitor unless I need to :p

[Clovdyx]

  On 9/17/2017 at 6:16 PM, cory caboose said:

 

  On 9/17/2017 at 6:13 PM, Clovdyx said:

If you try to argue that you contribute no thoughts and blow off multiple people questioning you throughout the first day and a half, I'm going to laugh at you.  Yes, you ramp up close to EOD - that's why I don't think it's alignment indicative that you haven't been here.  But even beyond not giving many reads, you have been far more absent from the thread so far than you usually are.

 

Tell me I'm wrong.

 

I just imagine it's not something you'd find particularly relevant. I also don't think you'd have the level of care to actually express disappointment. Even if I'm lethargic, your villager game has plenty of lethargy as well. Doesn't feel like something you'd really think. Hard to vocalize it beyond "I feel its something you'd be more like to say as a wolf because it 'sounds better'

 

Just my gut response to it, I could be wrong, iunno

 

 

Not disappointment in the condescending dinosaur hat sense.  Disappointment as in "I have an expectation of what his contribution would be based on how he plays, and he is not yet at that level."

[Cory Caboose]

Clov for the sake of football Sunday I am going to shelve this and see how I feel later

I dice roll started Gillislee as FLEX. Am pleased

[Clovdyx]

  On 9/17/2017 at 6:20 PM, cory caboose said:

Clov for the sake of football Sunday I am going to shelve this and see how I feel later

 

I dice roll started Gillislee as FLEX. Am pleased

 

The Saints are making Tom Brady look like Alex Smith.

[Nolder]

Justice ain't gonna dispense itself.

[Nolder]

Here's the list so far btw, there have been a couple updates.

 

N0 Results

1. Nolder - Ben is Innocent

2. BFG

3. Ironeyes - Clov is Innocent

4. Dar'Jen Ab Owain

5. LedZepMan - Leyrann is Innocent

6. Niniel - Niniel is Innocent

7. Leyrann - BFG is Guilty

8. cory caboose - Nolder is Innocent

9. Clovdyx

10. Shitsure Kamimashita - LZM is Guilty

11. Sooh - Clov is Guilty

12. Gentled Ben

13. dicetosser1 

[Andrej]

  On 9/17/2017 at 6:22 PM, Clovdyx said:

The Saints are making Tom Brady look like Alex Smith.

Did that hurt to type?

[Clovdyx]

  On 9/17/2017 at 6:25 PM, Andrej said:

 

  On 9/17/2017 at 6:22 PM, Clovdyx said:

The Saints are making Tom Brady look like Alex Smith.

Did that hurt to type?

 

 

I drink a lot.

[BFG]

  On 9/17/2017 at 6:31 PM, Clovdyx said:

 

  On 9/17/2017 at 6:25 PM, Andrej said:

 

  On 9/17/2017 at 6:22 PM, Clovdyx said:

The Saints are making Tom Brady look like Alex Smith.

Did that hurt to type?

I drink a lot.

<3

[Sooh]

  On 9/17/2017 at 5:59 PM, BFG said:

Oh, Sooh the tinfoil is that the way you're treating Chris reminds me of the way you treated me in FF(? the game you were mafia with Nyn)

 

I have equally dumb reasons to think you're town (and less dumb reasons to do with focus and stuff)

Listen. I'm treating Chris like I have a town read on him while at the same time having a scum peek. At this point I'm just enjoying the ride.

[Sooh]

  On 9/17/2017 at 6:07 PM, Nolder said:

  Reveal hidden contents

 

  On 9/17/2017 at 5:05 PM, Sooh said:

 

  On 9/17/2017 at 4:51 PM, Nolder said:

 

  On 9/17/2017 at 4:43 PM, Leyrann said:

That vote was made under the impression that "breaking the game" meant trying to, well, destroy it, which was incorrect, and he since unvoted.

 

 

  On 9/17/2017 at 4:44 PM, Leyrann said:

In other words (sorry, but I was managing 3 things at once), he had an incorrect impression of what was happening. And with the impression he had, that vote is logical.

Don't care, his stated reason for his vote isn't why I have a problem with it.

 

Eh?

 

His reason for the vote isn't why you have a problem with it? What does that even mean?

 

You have a problem with a vote for another reason than somebody's reason for it? Only other way I see one could have a problem with a vote which is unrelated to the person giving it is if that vote is on a scum mate.

 

 

 

Let me put it this way. He says his reason for voting is X, I think his reason is Y.

I could be wrong but my point is that I am disregarding X as the real reason for his action.

Hope that makes more sense.

 

Only if you tell me Y.

[BFG]

Inb4 that's what she said?

[Sooh]

  On 9/17/2017 at 6:17 PM, cory caboose said:

I think I understand BFG's more elevated sense of worry now

If there is some world where Clov and Sooh are scum, the village needs to get a head start XD

I wish!

[Clovdyx]

  On 9/17/2017 at 7:09 PM, Sooh said:

 

  On 9/17/2017 at 6:07 PM, Nolder said:

  Reveal hidden contents

 

  On 9/17/2017 at 5:05 PM, Sooh said:

 

  On 9/17/2017 at 4:51 PM, Nolder said:

 

  On 9/17/2017 at 4:43 PM, Leyrann said:

That vote was made under the impression that "breaking the game" meant trying to, well, destroy it, which was incorrect, and he since unvoted.

 

 

  On 9/17/2017 at 4:44 PM, Leyrann said:

In other words (sorry, but I was managing 3 things at once), he had an incorrect impression of what was happening. And with the impression he had, that vote is logical.

Don't care, his stated reason for his vote isn't why I have a problem with it.

 

Eh?

 

His reason for the vote isn't why you have a problem with it? What does that even mean?

 

You have a problem with a vote for another reason than somebody's reason for it? Only other way I see one could have a problem with a vote which is unrelated to the person giving it is if that vote is on a scum mate.

 

 

 

Let me put it this way. He says his reason for voting is X, I think his reason is Y.

I could be wrong but my point is that I am disregarding X as the real reason for his action.

Hope that makes more sense.

 

Only if you tell me Y.

 

 

I feel he's already explained it pretty well  Unless I'm missing something.

[Sooh]

  On 9/17/2017 at 7:12 PM, Clovdyx said:

 

  On 9/17/2017 at 7:09 PM, Sooh said:

 

  On 9/17/2017 at 6:07 PM, Nolder said:

  Reveal hidden contents

 

  On 9/17/2017 at 5:05 PM, Sooh said:

 

  On 9/17/2017 at 4:51 PM, Nolder said:

 

  On 9/17/2017 at 4:43 PM, Leyrann said:

That vote was made under the impression that "breaking the game" meant trying to, well, destroy it, which was incorrect, and he since unvoted.

 

 

  On 9/17/2017 at 4:44 PM, Leyrann said:

In other words (sorry, but I was managing 3 things at once), he had an incorrect impression of what was happening. And with the impression he had, that vote is logical.

Don't care, his stated reason for his vote isn't why I have a problem with it.

 

Eh?

 

His reason for the vote isn't why you have a problem with it? What does that even mean?

 

You have a problem with a vote for another reason than somebody's reason for it? Only other way I see one could have a problem with a vote which is unrelated to the person giving it is if that vote is on a scum mate.

 

 

 

Let me put it this way. He says his reason for voting is X, I think his reason is Y.

I could be wrong but my point is that I am disregarding X as the real reason for his action.

Hope that makes more sense.

 

Only if you tell me Y.

 

 

I feel he's already explained it pretty well  Unless I'm missing something.

 

He did?

 

I must have missed it.

[Nolder]

  On 9/17/2017 at 7:09 PM, Sooh said:

 

  On 9/17/2017 at 6:07 PM, Nolder said:

  Reveal hidden contents

 

  On 9/17/2017 at 5:05 PM, Sooh said:

 

  On 9/17/2017 at 4:51 PM, Nolder said:

 

  On 9/17/2017 at 4:43 PM, Leyrann said:

That vote was made under the impression that "breaking the game" meant trying to, well, destroy it, which was incorrect, and he since unvoted.

 

 

  On 9/17/2017 at 4:44 PM, Leyrann said:

In other words (sorry, but I was managing 3 things at once), he had an incorrect impression of what was happening. And with the impression he had, that vote is logical.

Don't care, his stated reason for his vote isn't why I have a problem with it.

 

Eh?

 

His reason for the vote isn't why you have a problem with it? What does that even mean?

 

You have a problem with a vote for another reason than somebody's reason for it? Only other way I see one could have a problem with a vote which is unrelated to the person giving it is if that vote is on a scum mate.

 

 

 

Let me put it this way. He says his reason for voting is X, I think his reason is Y.

I could be wrong but my point is that I am disregarding X as the real reason for his action.

Hope that makes more sense.

 

Only if you tell me Y.

 

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

[Nolder]

Kidding,

 

Umm I feel like Ben is just trying to draw attention away from himself so he's flailing towards others.

[Sooh]

  On 9/17/2017 at 7:18 PM, Nolder said:

 

  On 9/17/2017 at 7:09 PM, Sooh said:

 

  On 9/17/2017 at 6:07 PM, Nolder said:

  Reveal hidden contents

 

  On 9/17/2017 at 5:05 PM, Sooh said:

 

  On 9/17/2017 at 4:51 PM, Nolder said:

 

  On 9/17/2017 at 4:43 PM, Leyrann said:

That vote was made under the impression that "breaking the game" meant trying to, well, destroy it, which was incorrect, and he since unvoted.

 

 

  On 9/17/2017 at 4:44 PM, Leyrann said:

In other words (sorry, but I was managing 3 things at once), he had an incorrect impression of what was happening. And with the impression he had, that vote is logical.

Don't care, his stated reason for his vote isn't why I have a problem with it.

 

Eh?

 

His reason for the vote isn't why you have a problem with it? What does that even mean?

 

You have a problem with a vote for another reason than somebody's reason for it? Only other way I see one could have a problem with a vote which is unrelated to the person giving it is if that vote is on a scum mate.

 

 

 

Let me put it this way. He says his reason for voting is X, I think his reason is Y.

I could be wrong but my point is that I am disregarding X as the real reason for his action.

Hope that makes more sense.

 

Only if you tell me Y.

 

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

 

Ok, sold.

 

You can't do that to an old bsb fan. It's not fair.

[Niniel]

  On 9/17/2017 at 2:18 PM, Clovdyx said:

 

  On 9/17/2017 at 1:50 PM, Niniel said:

* same thoughts as me

Talk to me about Leyrann?

 

 

You are one of those I´m most suspicious of but you don´t comment on that, but ask me about my read on Ley. That is weird. But okay. 

 

My main reason for reading him town is his vote on Cory. It´s how he is typically playing. Finding stuff that doesn´t make sense to him and vote people because of it. (At least that is how I think it is.) It´s not a top town read and he has fooled me before but right now it´s enough for a town read. 

 

  On 9/17/2017 at 5:08 PM, Sooh said:

 

  On 9/17/2017 at 4:51 PM, Nolder said:

Ahhhhh! All caught up. 

 

See ya later!

Now THIS is what I find scummy.

 

Constantly hanging behind, catching up, immediately leaving so that nobody can interact in real time. 

 

 

This is basically how I play all the time. lol I really don´t interacting in real time because then I don´t get the overview of things. I guess it´s like I don´t have any sense of direction in a place where I haven´t been before. I need to look at a map and watch it from above. 

[Niniel]

To clarify: I see Ley as a mostly black and white player. Things are right or wrong and there is not much in between. What do you think about that, Ley? Am I correct? 

[Sooh]

  On 9/17/2017 at 7:33 PM, Niniel said:

 

  On 9/17/2017 at 2:18 PM, Clovdyx said:

 

  On 9/17/2017 at 1:50 PM, Niniel said:

* same thoughts as me

Talk to me about Leyrann?

 

 

You are one of those I´m most suspicious of but you don´t comment on that, but ask me about my read on Ley. That is weird. But okay. 

 

My main reason for reading him town is his vote on Cory. It´s how he is typically playing. Finding stuff that doesn´t make sense to him and vote people because of it. (At least that is how I think it is.) It´s not a top town read and he has fooled me before but right now it´s enough for a town read. 

 

  On 9/17/2017 at 5:08 PM, Sooh said:

 

  On 9/17/2017 at 4:51 PM, Nolder said:

Ahhhhh! All caught up. 

 

See ya later!

Now THIS is what I find scummy.

 

Constantly hanging behind, catching up, immediately leaving so that nobody can interact in real time. 

 

 

This is basically how I play all the time. lol I really don´t interacting in real time because then I don´t get the overview of things. I guess it´s like I don´t have any sense of direction in a place where I haven´t been before. I need to look at a map and watch it from above. 

 

With you it's more a meta read of other things though. I don't expect you to be around all the time, but it's more the tone in your posts when you are here that gives me a read. The constantly catching up read is not a universal read, but it's accurate more often than not in my experience.

[Niniel]

  On 9/17/2017 at 6:20 PM, BFG said:

Doubt Sooh and Chris are m/m and not going to worry about the traitor unless I need to :p

 

What makes you think that?

[Niniel]

  On 9/17/2017 at 7:34 PM, Sooh said:

 

  On 9/17/2017 at 7:33 PM, Niniel said:

 

  On 9/17/2017 at 2:18 PM, Clovdyx said:

 

  On 9/17/2017 at 1:50 PM, Niniel said:

* same thoughts as me

Talk to me about Leyrann?

 

 

You are one of those I´m most suspicious of but you don´t comment on that, but ask me about my read on Ley. That is weird. But okay. 

 

My main reason for reading him town is his vote on Cory. It´s how he is typically playing. Finding stuff that doesn´t make sense to him and vote people because of it. (At least that is how I think it is.) It´s not a top town read and he has fooled me before but right now it´s enough for a town read. 

 

  On 9/17/2017 at 5:08 PM, Sooh said:

 

  On 9/17/2017 at 4:51 PM, Nolder said:

Ahhhhh! All caught up. 

 

See ya later!

Now THIS is what I find scummy.

 

Constantly hanging behind, catching up, immediately leaving so that nobody can interact in real time. 

 

 

This is basically how I play all the time. lol I really don´t interacting in real time because then I don´t get the overview of things. I guess it´s like I don´t have any sense of direction in a place where I haven´t been before. I need to look at a map and watch it from above. 

 

With you it's more a meta read of other things though. I don't expect you to be around all the time, but it's more the tone in your posts when you are here that gives me a read. The constantly catching up read is not a universal read, but it's accurate more often than not in my experience.

 

 

Aha. Maybe. I guess people are more likely to make mistakes in rlt, so that is how the braver people play. lol 

[Niniel]

A little more of Dice would be good. 

[Clovdyx]

  On 9/17/2017 at 7:33 PM, Niniel said:

 

  On 9/17/2017 at 2:18 PM, Clovdyx said:

 

  On 9/17/2017 at 1:50 PM, Niniel said:

* same thoughts as me

Talk to me about Leyrann?

 

 

You are one of those I´m most suspicious of but you don´t comment on that, but ask me about my read on Ley. That is weird. But okay. 

 

My main reason for reading him town is his vote on Cory. It´s how he is typically playing. Finding stuff that doesn´t make sense to him and vote people because of it. (At least that is how I think it is.) It´s not a top town read and he has fooled me before but right now it´s enough for a town read. 

 

  On 9/17/2017 at 5:08 PM, Sooh said:

 

  On 9/17/2017 at 4:51 PM, Nolder said:

Ahhhhh! All caught up. 

 

See ya later!

Now THIS is what I find scummy.

 

Constantly hanging behind, catching up, immediately leaving so that nobody can interact in real time. 

 

 

This is basically how I play all the time. lol I really don´t interacting in real time because then I don´t get the overview of things. I guess it´s like I don´t have any sense of direction in a place where I haven´t been before. I need to look at a map and watch it from above. 

 

 

I have no read on Leyrann whatsoever, and it seems like most people haven't really discussed him.  You had no problem calling him townie, so obviously you had seen something most everybody else hadn't.  I don't need to ask what stemmed your read on me  - you already explained it, and beyond that, I'm not really concerned about it....I know my alignment.