Jeannaisais Posted February 23, 2013 Share Posted February 23, 2013 1. No spilling brew, to include (but not exclusive to) Battle Brew, Bandy, Flaming Shots, Guinfantry, Infantry Brew, Cavalry Brew, Archer Brew, Brew Tea, and MG Special Brew. . 2. No channelling, to include the One Power and the True Power. 3. No assaulting a senior officer, excepting when said senior officer either instigates an incident, or posts in a declared brawl. Random brawling among enlisted members or officers of the same rank is encouraged. 4. No inter-Band pranks without prior consent of the CG of the Regiment being pranked and either the Senior Staff or one's own CG. ("Prank" is a subjective term; the purpose of this law is to both provide a quality check on pranks, and avoid pranks going too far.) 5. No pranks on other Social Groups without consent of the Marshal-General. 6. Band members may not use another member's regimental weapon (sword, bow, horse, lance, or dagger) without permission from the owner. (Additional items formally given to the Band members out of appreciation for service are included.) 7. Signing in to the monthly roll call is mandatory to receive promotion points and/or game points for that month. Should you miss one month's roll call and sign in to the next, however, you will retain all of the points for those two months, BUT if you fail to sign in to two roll calls in a row, you will forfeit any points received regardless of activity level. After six months of not signing in to the roll call you will be placed as MIA and after 6 months as MIA, you will be purged from the usergroups. Any member who has attained a rank of Lieutenant or above will retain his/her points and has only to sign in to the roll call once to be considered active again. 8. Failure to follow any and all rules either here or in the RedArms guidebook will result in a form of punishment by spotfine from a RedArm. 9. Any offence deemed above the RedArms jurisdiction will be given to the Senior Staff to punish. This will not be in the form of a spotfine, but will be in the form the Senior Staff (the MG, UC, XO), along with site adminstrators if necessary, deem appropriate. Please note: Captain-Generals are obliged to make the SS aware of such offences but will not be allowed to dole out the necessary punishment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeannaisais Posted February 23, 2013 Author Share Posted February 23, 2013 If you choose the second or third options, please leave your comments as to why! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BFG Posted February 23, 2013 Share Posted February 23, 2013 voted 2... 7. Wasn't there a provision that once you achieved a certain rank you were kept on even without signing in? Given the recent numbers of the Old Guard coming back, it would be an idea to keep this addition, although maybe they forfeit rank above that minimum? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BridMorgan Posted February 24, 2013 Share Posted February 24, 2013 G1.3 A Lieutenant or higher can not have their membership disabled on the off board site regardless of their status. They will not, however, appear on the bi-monthly points roster.G1.4 Prior to being placed on the MIA/Presumed Dead list, a member just has to sign into Roll Call to be considered active. Once placed on the MIA/Presumed Dead list, they will have to sign into Roll Call and request reactivation of their account on the off board site. A Lieutenant or higher just has to sign into Roll Call to be active again. I think these are the provisions you were talking about BFG. I agree that this should be included. People do work hard to get to these higher ranks and as we can see, if they dissapear, they may come back. Good thinking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeannaisais Posted February 24, 2013 Author Share Posted February 24, 2013 That better guys? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BridMorgan Posted February 24, 2013 Share Posted February 24, 2013 Awesome boss lady. :) *changes vote* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Basel Gill Posted February 24, 2013 Share Posted February 24, 2013 I voted for the first one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BFG Posted February 24, 2013 Share Posted February 24, 2013 Thanks Jea Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dicetosser1 Posted February 24, 2013 Share Posted February 24, 2013 there is nothing there about RedArms and their ability to punish transgressions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BridMorgan Posted February 24, 2013 Share Posted February 24, 2013 I think that would be in the Red Arms Guidebook. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeannaisais Posted February 25, 2013 Author Share Posted February 25, 2013 Agreed, but I can add a tidbit here as well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeannaisais Posted February 25, 2013 Author Share Posted February 25, 2013 Dice - reread #8 and let me know if that works for you! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BridMorgan Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 True, if you put it in the Laws section that the RA are the "police" and do have the authority to punish Banders it's easier to make sure people do listen to them and their spotfines. Good point Diceypoo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeannaisais Posted February 25, 2013 Author Share Posted February 25, 2013 Any other suggestions? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BridMorgan Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 Jea, it sounds like the Sr. Staff or CG can also dole out spotfines the way it's worded. Is that what is meant? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taymist Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 I think Jea means that the Senior Staff can hand out punishments if need be rather than spotfines per se. It's a little misleading with the way it's worded though. The rest looks good to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dicetosser1 Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 I read it like Brid which means as CG i like it!! Im RA too....can i hand out double punishments? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Auld Manriva Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 ..... will result in a form of punishment either by spotfine from a RedArms or any of the Senior Officers (the MG, UC, XO or CG's with the senior staffs approval) .... Sorry your Dice-ness, as written, your anticipated reign of terror has been "nipped in da' Bud" .. All Hail The All Wise Jea! I like what's here. I vote You Betcha! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
F Horn of Valere Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 Regardless of the wording, I don't think the senior staff should be able to pass out spot fines. Actual moderator punishments maybe, but not spot fines, only because it throws a wrench into the whole process if there is an appeal and the Redarms have to do their thing in voting, etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mayleigh Aes Sedai Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 yea I agree with Horn here, leave the spotfines to the red arms or it will just get messy!! and then anything seriouscan be delth with by the SS as moderators, should the need arrise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Katiora Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 I don't think they should be able to either. I mean haven't we always used the SS as the judges over protests?? If they give the spotfine out, who will judge if there is a protest? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BridMorgan Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 I think it's just the way it's worded. *nods* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Auld Manriva Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 I already voted yes, but I can live with either. SS giving spots, then judging just acknowledges our age old tradition of corruption concerning fines etc. If one SS hands out a spotty, and a judge is needed (other than the RAL) then there is STILL another SS to hear the case. On the other hand, an active group of RA's alone, should be well able to provide all the spotty's needed, create sufficient chaos and engage in all the corruption we need with no assistance from SS or CG's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BridMorgan Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 I'm definately for the RA's being the only ones to hand out spotties. More fun that way I think., Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dicetosser1 Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 i think only ras and cavalry cgs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.