August 9, 2013: CONCLUDED

[peacesells]

 

 

I think you're overanalyzing a game that is after all, only three hours old.

That said, I'm just pushing his lynch for the lulz.

 

 

So..you want Nolder to stop posting his thoughts?  Why?

Never said that, don't put words in my mouth. But when I see a logic fail in something he says, I'm certainly going to say something.

 

Let's be honest and call this what it is. A lynch for lulz.

 

 

Maybe you and the mouse in your pocket.  Cause I'm not voting him for that reason.  Plus, this is a great way to hide your thoughts, pretending its all jokes votes. 

[John E. Kelley]

Then allow me to assuage your fears by letting you know that your perspective is the incorrect one.

[bgrishinko]

lynch him now in this thread..see what happens, then lynch in another. Not a big deal.

i suppose that would accomplish the same goal.

[Darthe]

OFFICIAL VOTE COUNT 2:

 

Verb (1/12): Salami

Krak (1/12): Tink

Salami (7/12): Nol, Yates, Verb, Leelou, Razen, Cloud, Peace

Hally (1/12): Krak

Nol (1/12): BG

 

Not Voting (12/23):

Chuckles, Mish, Hally, Ishy, Len, Crush, Des, Dap, Tina, Ree, Pral, Sera

[Hallia]

Hallia, still waiting on that case =P

 

That being said, if  the idea is to lynch him in one, then move on to the next thread regardless, wouldn't it be better to only lynch him in 1 at a time, instead of all three simultaneously?

[dapianoplay3r]

God this is fun

We need more of these parallel games

 

and darthe said, i cant think why anyone would want to post stuff from different threads

 

 evidence

This is the best meta analysis time you will ever get. Finally we can all talk about current games and weigh people's reactions between games without having to wait for them to end

 

 

 

 

I suggest it be dropped by tomorrow unless there's a good reason for it or we're going to all get way too twisted.

 

Translation: "I am also scum in one of these threads and don't want to forget which one!"

 

Thanks for making tomorrow's choice easy, brother!

 

Lol. Well played. If you are town in all games Monsignor Nolder, not too hard to get twisted. Treat them as independent games and its simple.

Now lets bring up this lovely bit of inconsistency

  

And I'm already confused between the three game >.>

  

 

BG ignored it when cloud did it

Cloud who is being very careful to appear consistent

 

Lol

 

Ok I'll put it this way. We stagger the lynch, heck doesn't matter which thread to me, so I arbitrarily chose this one.

 

Arbitrarily. Yea right

 

Can you over sell how much which thread doesn't matter to you any more?

 

 

I think the mistake you're all making is considering all three threads to be interconnected in some way. Other than theme, they're not. Since roles and alignments vary from thread to thread, you have to consider them three different and seperate games.

Are you drunk?

Of course they are interconnected. All mafia games always are connected but this game especially so

The games alignments are separate but the metas shouldn't be

Everything is connected and its great

[dapianoplay3r]

vote csarmi

[Yates]

I think the mistake you're all making is considering all three threads to be interconnected in some way. Other than theme, they're not.

I think the mistake YOU are making is NOT considering all three threads are interconnected via "Live Meta."

 

Think about it.  Three wagons to look at.  If BG is voting for Salami in 2 games but not the third, why is that?  What would it mean for BG if Salami flips scum in that ONE game?  He was down for the plan in the first two, why not the third?  See what I'm saying?

 

This is the last time I'm going to explain this.  Please bookmark for future reference.

[Darthe]

Seriously, multi thread is awesome. I've been laughing all day.

[Darthe]

Seriously, multi thread is awesome. I've been laughing all day.

[Darthe]

Seriously, multi thread is awesome. I've been laughing all day.

[Yates]

Me and my buddy Yates here gonna wreck some scum today.

Brofist - engaged.

[Verbal32]

Say it again, but slower.

[Verbal32]

 

Me and my buddy Yates here gonna wreck some scum today.

Brofist - engaged.

Get a room.

[Nolder]

 

Ok. He flips town ITT. Now what?

Same question again only he flipped mafia.

Why would that change anything?

 

If town...next thread.

 

If scum..you think a bit cause it's less likely he is scum elsewhere.  Not impossible but a pause button would be appropriate. Especially if we are doing this because we think he is just creating a meta across all 3 threads to hide his scum persona. 

 

"Think a bit".

I'm sorry but that is so meaningless. Just like "getting info".

It's intangible promises and expectations. You are not presenting me with hard reasons just "what if" arguments.

 

It looks to me like you and others are trying to stall his lynch under the guise of being the voice of reason. And I don't think you'd be doing it in just this thread if that's all this was.

You'd argue it out over the three threads like everyone was doing with Csarmi before he left. That indicates it was a calculated choice which would mean you're either scum in this game and trying to buy credit off of defending Csarmi whom you know to be town in this game or you're trying to save your teammate. I doubt you'd be so bold this early so it's probably the former.

 

Once Csarmi hangs you're next in this game IMO.

[John E. Kelley]

 

I think the mistake you're all making is considering all three threads to be interconnected in some way. Other than theme, they're not.

 

I think the mistake YOU are making is NOT considering all three threads are interconnected via "Live Meta."

 

Think about it.  Three wagons to look at.  If BG is voting for Salami in 2 games but not the third, why is that?  What would it mean for BG if Salami flips scum in that ONE game?  He was down for the plan in the first two, why not the third?  See what I'm saying?

 

This is the last time I'm going to explain this.  Please bookmark for future reference.

I've seen this explanation. And summarily rejected it. If BG is voting Salami in two games and not the third, I just attribute it to Salami playing scummy in two and not the third. Simple.

 

As far as meta goes, I'm already well versed on everyone heres metas. Except for you newer people. I don't need to rely on differences between these three games alone to tell me anything. I'll take each one on a seperate case by case basis.

[Nolder]

Seriously, multi thread is awesome. I've been laughing all day.

 

 

Seriously, multi thread is awesome. I've been laughing all day.

 

 

Seriously, multi thread is awesome. I've been laughing all day.

NOW SAY THAT AGAIN 10 TIMES FAST

[Yates]

If town...next thread.

 

If scum..you think a bit cause it's less likely he is scum elsewhere.  Not impossible but a pause button would be appropriate. Especially if we are doing this because we think he is just creating a meta across all 3 threads to hide his scum persona. 

Your logic here is false.  This is the logic casinos use to take down suckers in roulette.

 

Think about it.  In roulette the chances of any random spin of the wheel landing on black is 18 out of 38 [there's a 0 and a 00 on the wheel].  If the results come out like this:

 

Black - Black - Black - Black -Black -Black

 

What are the odds of the wheel landing on Black again?  It's GOT to land on Red eventually, right?  Wrong.  Odds are STILL 18 out of 38 on spins #7 through infinity.

[Nolder]

 

 

I suggest it be dropped by tomorrow unless there's a good reason for it or we're going to all get way too twisted.

Translation: "I am also scum in one of these threads and don't want to forget which one!"

 

Thanks for making tomorrow's choice easy, brother! 

 

 

Lol. Well played. If you are town in all games Monsignor Nolder, not too hard to get twisted. Treat them as independent games and its simple.

 

Didn't see this before, thanks for quoting it Player.

And THAT right there is a perfect example of what I mean. 

I don't have to be scum in any game to get what people say confused or miss things or whatever because the fact is despite some people making an effort to say the exact same thing in all threads not everyone is doing that and it's going to be difficult to remember who said what in which thread.

Did it occur to either of you that it would make casing people a LOT easier if you only had to go through one thread and not three?

Wanting to keep some semblance of sanity does not make me scum.

[Nolder]

 

If town...next thread.

 

If scum..you think a bit cause it's less likely he is scum elsewhere.  Not impossible but a pause button would be appropriate. Especially if we are doing this because we think he is just creating a meta across all 3 threads to hide his scum persona. 

Your logic here is false.  This is the logic casinos use to take down suckers in roulette.

 

Think about it.  In roulette the chances of any random spin of the wheel landing on black is 18 out of 38 [there's a 0 and a 00 on the wheel].  If the results come out like this:

 

Black - Black - Black - Black -Black -Black

 

What are the odds of the wheel landing on Black again?  It's GOT to land on Red eventually, right?  Wrong.  Odds are STILL 18 out of 38 on spins #7 through infinity.

 

 

 

 

I think the mistake you're all making is considering all three threads to be interconnected in some way. Other than theme, they're not.

I think the mistake YOU are making is NOT considering all three threads are interconnected via "Live Meta."

 

Think about it.  Three wagons to look at.  If BG is voting for Salami in 2 games but not the third, why is that?  What would it mean for BG if Salami flips scum in that ONE game?  He was down for the plan in the first two, why not the third?  See what I'm saying?

 

This is the last time I'm going to explain this.  Please bookmark for future reference.

I've seen this explanation. And summarily rejected it. If BG is voting Salami in two games and not the third, I just attribute it to Salami playing scummy in two and not the third. Simple.

 

I'd agree with you if it weren't for the fact that Csarmi tried to create a meta across all three games. As I said he bridged them.

He made himself the same player in each of the three games. Therefore he's playing all three games at once so to speak, not each one individually.

Meaning, for the moment, we have to do the same. And we are.

[Yates]

Unvote, Vote: Csarmi

 

Jokes aside, this is actually a really good idea.

Just noticed this, and Csarmi's was alot scummier def, but you guys are lynching him for pretty much copy pasting the same thing in all 3 threads when our good buddy Yates here did the same thing with this post.

Bit of a stretch there, Lenlo.  Are you claiming that you don't see the difference between hiding your meta and promoting a game plan that requires cooperation across all three boards at the same time?

 

Remember to be honest.  You will be judged on your answer tomorrow.

[Nolder]

Ooops

 

Can we edit? To Yate's quote I just meant to link to the Gambler's Fallacy page.

In case anyone wasn't aware of it.

[Darthe]

Editing is allowd

[Nolder]

Editing is allowd

kk

Will keep that in mind for the future

[Yates]

Ooops

 

Can we edit? To Yate's quote I just meant to link to the In case anyone wasn't aware of it.

Hang on - I'm not done editing the wiki to my advantage.