August 9, 2013: CONCLUDED

[Yates]

 

 

Vote Nolder

 

Why aren't you voting for Csarmi? :(

 

 

Let the man live in at least one game.

???

 

FoS: BG

[Yates]

Well - that was not meant to be beating a dead horse.  lol

[bgrishinko]

Ok I'll put it this way. We stagger the lynch, heck doesn't matter which thread to me, so I arbitrarily chose this one.

[_CLOUD]

Ok I'll put it this way. We stagger the lynch, heck doesn't matter which thread to me, so I arbitrarily chose this one.

 

Why would you want to stagger his lynch in one thread?

[Nolder]

Ok I'll put it this way. We stagger the lynch, heck doesn't matter which thread to me, so I arbitrarily chose this one.

Doesn't address the fact that that ruins the strategy of lynching him at all in any thread.

[bgrishinko]

Well, I'm only voting him in one. I figure the odds would be astronomically high he'd be mafia in all 3 so take him out one at a time. Most info gained this way.

[Yates]

That completely defeats the purpose of lynching him at all really.

Are you and him scum together in this game?

 

 

Ok I'll put it this way. We stagger the lynch, heck doesn't matter which thread to me, so I arbitrarily chose this one.

Doesn't address the fact that that ruins the strategy of lynching him at all in any thread.

 

 

Handsome.

Charming.

An excellent mod.

Can eat a bag of dic#s hotdogs.

Reads my mind.

 

Welcome to Town Pile, Nolder, population 2!

[Lenlo]

I think it's just unnecessary spam which we don't need. Everyone is already reading all three threads anyway.

No, cross referencing threads like this to look for inconsistencies is a great idea. If people are weird in one thread and normal in the other 2 then somethings going on.

 

Unvote, Vote: Csarmi

 

Jokes aside, this is actually a really good idea.

Just noticed this, and Csarmi's was alot scummier def, but you guys are lynching him for pretty much copy pasting the same thing in all 3 threads when our good buddy Yates here did the same thing with this post.

[Nolder]

 

That completely defeats the purpose of lynching him at all really.

Are you and him scum together in this game?

 

 

Ok I'll put it this way. We stagger the lynch, heck doesn't matter which thread to me, so I arbitrarily chose this one.

Doesn't address the fact that that ruins the strategy of lynching him at all in any thread.

 

 

Handsome.

Charming.

An excellent mod.

Can eat a bag of dic#s hotdogs.

Reads my mind.

 

Welcome to Town Pile, Nolder, population 2!

 

Aw yeeeaaah. Me and my buddy Yates here gonna wreck some scum today.

[Nolder]

Well, I'm only voting him in one. I figure the odds would be astronomically high he'd be mafia in all 3 so take him out one at a time. Most info gained this way.

Explain?

I don't understand how we gain more info from lynching him in one game at a time as opposed to all at once.

[_CLOUD]

 

I think it's just unnecessary spam which we don't need. Everyone is already reading all three threads anyway.

No, cross referencing threads like this to look for inconsistencies is a great idea. If people are weird in one thread and normal in the other 2 then somethings going on.

 

Unvote, Vote: Csarmi

 

Jokes aside, this is actually a really good idea.

Just noticed this, and Csarmi's was alot scummier def, but you guys are lynching him for pretty much copy pasting the same thing in all 3 threads when our good buddy Yates here did the same thing with this post.

 

 

To the first: When I wrote that I was thinking about Nolder posting the three quotes from Salami in all threads, which I thought would become overkill because everyone reads all three threads anyway.

 

To the second: Csarmi didn't copy paste his posts. He voted for three different people using the exact same reasoning.

[peacesells]

VOTE CHARMI.

 

A charmi lynch in this thread is best.  Not yet sure about the other 2.

[peacesells]

 

Well, I'm only voting him in one. I figure the odds would be astronomically high he'd be mafia in all 3 so take him out one at a time. Most info gained this way.

Explain?

I don't understand how we gain more info from lynching him in one game at a time as opposed to all at once.

 

 

He can be lynched on Day 1 in all three threads..but that doesn't mean they have to end at the same time.  Doing 1 at a time has the most opportunity to gain info on possible team mates or opportunistic scum.

[Lenlo]

 

 

Well, I'm only voting him in one. I figure the odds would be astronomically high he'd be mafia in all 3 so take him out one at a time. Most info gained this way.

Explain?

I don't understand how we gain more info from lynching him in one game at a time as opposed to all at once.

 

 

He can be lynched on Day 1 in all three threads..but that doesn't mean they have to end at the same time.  Doing 1 at a time has the most opportunity to gain info on possible team mates or opportunistic scum.

 

Oh that was something I hadnt thought of, timing things between threads. Thats smart Peace.

[Nolder]

 

 

Well, I'm only voting him in one. I figure the odds would be astronomically high he'd be mafia in all 3 so take him out one at a time. Most info gained this way.

Explain?

I don't understand how we gain more info from lynching him in one game at a time as opposed to all at once.

 

 

He can be lynched on Day 1 in all three threads..but that doesn't mean they have to end at the same time.  Doing 1 at a time has the most opportunity to gain info on possible team mates or opportunistic scum.

 

Still isn't clear to me. In that case we could just wait in all 3 threads until mods decided to set a deadline. And then wait until last minute of the deadline to lynch.

 

The argument "but info" is not very convincing. Especially given the fact that the longer we wait the more interest will wane on the lynch because someone will say something that may or may not seem scummy to one or two people and so on and so forth and next thing you know Csarmi lives in all 3 threads to Day 8 or somesuch.

 

I say strike while the iron is hot and let the chips fall where they may.

[_CLOUD]

I agree. Csarmi must get lynched now or it will never happen and then this strategy will have become obsolete.

[peacesells]

lynch him now in this thread..see what happens, then lynch in another.  Not a big deal.

[Nolder]

Ok. He flips town ITT. Now what?

Same question again only he flipped mafia.

Why would that change anything?

[John E. Kelley]

I think the mistake you're all making is considering all three threads to be interconnected in some way. Other than theme, they're not. Since roles and alignments vary from thread to thread, you have to consider them three different and seperate games.

[Nolder]

I think the mistake you're all making is considering all three threads to be interconnected in some way. Other than theme, they're not. Since roles and alignments vary from thread to thread, you have to consider them three different and seperate games.

I think most of us understand that.

What some of us are saying though is we think Csarmi is scum in one of these games and pulled a meta move to cover up his scuminess and muddy the waters.

The best way to clear the water is by lynching him in all three games.

 

They are separate games but Csarmi built a bridge between them and now we have to deal with that.

[John E. Kelley]

I think you're overanalyzing a game that is after all, only three hours old.

 

That said, I'm just pushing his lynch for the lulz.

[peacesells]

Ok. He flips town ITT. Now what?

Same question again only he flipped mafia.

Why would that change anything?

 

If town...next thread.

 

If scum..you think a bit cause it's less likely he is scum elsewhere.  Not impossible but a pause button would be appropriate. Especially if we are doing this because we think he is just creating a meta across all 3 threads to hide his scum persona. 

[peacesells]

I think you're overanalyzing a game that is after all, only three hours old.

 

That said, I'm just pushing his lynch for the lulz.

 

 

So..you want Nolder to stop posting his thoughts?  Why?

[John E. Kelley]

 

I think you're overanalyzing a game that is after all, only three hours old.

That said, I'm just pushing his lynch for the lulz.

 

 

 

So..you want Nolder to stop posting his thoughts?  Why?

Never said that, don't put words in my mouth. But when I see a logic fail in something he says, I'm certainly going to say something.

 

Let's be honest and call this what it is. A lynch for lulz.

[peacesells]

 

 

I think you're overanalyzing a game that is after all, only three hours old.

That said, I'm just pushing his lynch for the lulz.

 

 

So..you want Nolder to stop posting his thoughts?  Why?

Never said that, don't put words in my mouth. But when I see a logic fail in something he says, I'm certainly going to say something.

 

Let's be honest and call this what it is. A lynch for lulz.

 

 

You pointed out no logic fail, you stated he was over analyzing.  Where is the reference to logic fail there?  And by stating you think he is over analyzing things you are suggesting he stop...which means you don't want him to voice his thoughts.

 

From my perspective...looks like you are discouraging him from posting thoughts.