November 7th, 1606: Day 4 (CONCLUDED)

[Verbal32]

ROFL

You'd laugh harder if you got the inside joke and had witnessed it. Each time. >_<

[Verbal32]

@Mods: please edit post title to night

[Tiinker]

 

ROFL

You'd laugh harder if you got the inside joke and had witnessed it. Each time. >_<

 

I was laughing at the fail lynch.

[Tiinker]

 

 

ROFL

You'd laugh harder if you got the inside joke and had witnessed it. Each time. >_<

 

I was laughing at the fail lynch.

 

You can show me blind lynch tomorrow.

[John E. Kelley]

 

ROFL

You'd laugh harder if you got the inside joke and had witnessed it. Each time. >_<

Next JN game, you shall live. For what we recently shared together.

 

Oops, did I say that out loud?

[hazelkrs1]

Wow Des, don't even catch up on this thread, just jump in and throw the hammer vote with no information at all. Terrible.

 

 

 

That's how I roll!

 

Seriously tho, I already stated that I thought it best to lynch him in all 3 because that would be the only way to find out if the meta-mask thing was legit.

 

And I was caught up enough to know he was already being strung up in this one as well, and what his claim was, which was a very wifomy claim indeed.

 

Haha Des did the same 6 posts in every thread and no one gives a shit.

 

I really don't think you can say that I did the same as Csarlami. I c/p my checking in post and "I'm bout to catch up" post for each thread, that's it. What Csarlami did was much different imo.

 

But if you feel different, CAMB.

 

 

Haha Des did the same 6 posts in every thread and no one gives a shit.

This. Call Salami out on doing it, yet Des gets a pass?

 

You're all idiots.

 

 

Oh please add more hindsight mock frustration please. How did I get a "pass" Did anyone defend me or my posts or anything? And once again, what I did is a far cray from Csarlami's "trap"

 

This plan, the lynch-Salami-in-all-three-threads? It's horrible.

 

Why?

 

 

 

This plan, the lynch-Salami-in-all-three-threads? It's horrible.

And if he's indeed scum in one of them, will you still think it horrible?

If he's scum in ONE of them, I intend to catch him and lynch him. I've already stated, and my play will continue as such, that I consider each thread its' own separete, unique game. What happens in one, has zero bearing on the other two. You want to play it a different way? Fine, go ahead, but I'm not.

 

 

That's fine, that's all your prerogative bro. But majority decides, and majority is already leaning heavily in the cross-thread meta strategy. As I said, it's a bit lazy, but could also be very effective.

 

And again, I think each thread will branch out more in what happens in each as more info comes to light in the respective thread, but these threads are collectively a unique game. I don't see a problem with taking a unique approach to them. The cross meta thing could be what Darthe and Wombat were anticipating the whole time they were designing the game.

 

And now, on to the next one...

[Darthe]

 

 

 

 

 

This plan, the lynch-Salami-in-all-three-threads? It's horrible.

And if he's indeed scum in one of them, will you still think it horrible?

Yesterday he was pushing the trains for the lulz, now it's a horrible idea.

Don't even try this, you know damn well that we push the lulz angle to get a reveal, not to blind lynch them.

 

Unless it's Verb.

I was never pushing this as a lulz vote, so that is all on you.

 

And -_- rule 14 on JN

In the language of the time, Copulate with Thy Self!

[Tiinker]

Assigning the same meta was by posting in very similar ways over the three threads. The people who were active, but ignored you are suspect. Will do an analysis later. Plentyy of time tomorrow for looking things up since I'm off work because I screwed up my arm being a retard. Day off woo!

[michellem]

Caught up in this one. See my gut on Csarmi was correct in this one at least.Cloud pings me here, and someone else too but I've already forgotten who, bah. See if I'll have time to go through it one more time before I go to bed.

[hazelkrs1]

Assigning the same meta was by posting in very similar ways over the three threads. The people who were active, but ignored you are suspect. Will do an analysis later. Plentyy of time tomorrow for looking things up since I'm off work because I screwed up my arm being a retard. Day off woo!

 

The difference is that the thing I was posting similar in three threads was filler posts while I hadn't caught up yet. I wasn't making a conscious attempt to mask meta, I was simply making the same announcement in each one.

 

The fact that Csarlami did the thing he did with a vote in each one makes a big difference imo. That was actual gameplay there, not him saying he would add his thoughts soon or something.

 

And if he DOES turn out to be town in all 3? Well it was a poor play regardless, and worth looking into. And there will still be plenty of info to be gained from cross analysis of the threads. Someone defending him in one while voting him in another could be an attempt to gain town cred, for instance.

[hazelkrs1]

Darthe, Wade Darrath, Flyin' Pumpkin What Shoots Fire 'n' Brimstone from'is Nethers, 'as been "carved a new one."

 

Heh.

 

 

Wombat, Constable Wherrin, 'as been killed by a strange man's balls.

 

Heh.

 

 

Speaking of playing these games collectively, I noticed this before but forgot to mention it. In T1, Wombat dies. T3, Darthe dies. T2, they both die. I think this could end up possibly being significant... like maybe this thread connects the other two in some way.

 

I could be over analyzing, but I don't really feel they would drop such an obvious hint/clue unless we were supposed to note it.

[dapianoplay3r]

 

Assigning the same meta was by posting in very similar ways over the three threads. The people who were active, but ignored you are suspect. Will do an analysis later. Plentyy of time tomorrow for looking things up since I'm off work because I screwed up my arm being a retard. Day off woo!

 

 

The difference is that the thing I was posting similar in three threads was filler posts while I hadn't caught up yet. I wasn't making a conscious attempt to mask meta, I was simply making the same announcement in each one.

 

The fact that Csarlami did the thing he did with a vote in each one makes a big difference imo. That was actual gameplay there, not him saying he would add his thoughts soon or something.

 

And if he DOES turn out to be town in all 3? Well it was a poor play regardless, and worth looking into. And there will still be plenty of info to be gained from cross analysis of the threads. Someone defending him in one while voting him in another could be an attempt to gain town cred, for instance.

That'd be me and a few others

But I thought I'd point tht out in light of the fact I'm about to say this lol

 

SERRA

I know it's a little hollow now (Csarmi is lynched) but the reason I put you as T1 scummy and not here is I have the scummy read on Csarmi in Thread 1 and was leaning more town on him here

However gotta say with that reveal and his posts around it, if I'd been awake I probably would of left my vote. He kinda destroyed the slim town vibe I had on him here

Either way, thread 1 is still my top pick as the thread Csarmi is mafia on

[hazelkrs1]

Even if I was all the way caught up, I still would have voted Csarlami. And not just because of the trilynch thing either.

 

He changed his story about his role, at first saying it was a 1 time BPV, then saying it grew stronger the longer he stayed alive. That looked extremely sketchy to me.

 

FWIW, he seems slightly more townish in T3 because he's not scrambling in his own defense as much. Doesn't mean I think we should ditch the trilynch idea tho.

 

And yeah, I find Serra pretty scummy in T1 as well

[dapianoplay3r]

I don't have much on T3

Gotta read that now. It's kind of the neglected kid of the group. The parents figured they have paid enough attention to the first two. Kinda a "she'll be right attitude" to the third thread lol

[Nolder]

 

Darthe, Wade Darrath, Flyin' Pumpkin What Shoots Fire 'n' Brimstone from'is Nethers, 'as been "carved a new one."

 

Heh.

 

 

Wombat, Constable Wherrin, 'as been killed by a strange man's balls.

 

Heh.

 

 

Speaking of playing these games collectively, I noticed this before but forgot to mention it. In T1, Wombat dies. T3, Darthe dies. T2, they both die. I think this could end up possibly being significant... like maybe this thread connects the other two in some way.

 

I could be over analyzing, but I don't really feel they would drop such an obvious hint/clue unless we were supposed to note it.

 

More likely to be flavor than anything to do with us.

[Krakalakachkn]

 

 

Darthe, Wade Darrath, Flyin' Pumpkin What Shoots Fire 'n' Brimstone from'is Nethers, 'as been "carved a new one."

 

Heh.

 

 

Wombat, Constable Wherrin, 'as been killed by a strange man's balls.

 

Heh.

 

 

Speaking of playing these games collectively, I noticed this before but forgot to mention it. In T1, Wombat dies. T3, Darthe dies. T2, they both die. I think this could end up possibly being significant... like maybe this thread connects the other two in some way.

 

I could be over analyzing, but I don't really feel they would drop such an obvious hint/clue unless we were supposed to note it.

 

More likely to be flavor than anything to do with us.

 

 

I can't get Doctor Who out of my head regarding all this.

[bgrishinko]

I can't help but think of Cloud Atlas.

[Krakalakachkn]

A series of events concerning Csarmi.

 

 

Claim Thread 1: Samhain

 

Anyway, I'll be back in an hour or two.

I'm Selma Ross, Vanilla Town in this game.

 

Claim Thread 2: November 1st, 1603

 

 

Full claim:

Marian Rose, a wise woman who's always prepared. Town with a BPV (Vest+Helmet), good vs 1 NK.

 

 

Claim Thread 3: October 31, 2000

 

 

Full claim: Chandler Rose, I'm uninspired (in other words, I suck) - vanilla town

 

 

csarmi claims one power role and two vanillas.  The BPV is a solid town role and one that the scum would definitely want to get rid of.  Let's see what happens following his claim on thread 2...

 

 

I've seen nothing to cast doubt on the fact that Salami is scum in at least 1 thread, and I think this thread will give us the best chance.

VOTE: Csarmi

 

 

At this time of posting (Today at 10:50AM), there were 9 votes on csarmi in this thread (2).

 

However, according to Leelou's unofficial vc in thread 1, which Darthe confirms on the next page:

 

 

UNOFFICIAL VOTE COUNT 3: 

Salami (10/12): Leelou, Cloud, Nol, Yates, Verb, Ishy, Razen , BG, Dap, Krak

Chuckles(1/12): Salami

 

Verbal (1/12): Crush

 

Not Voting (11/23): 
Chuckles, Mish, Hally, Lenlo, Des, Peace, Tiink, Tina, Ree, Pral, Serra

 

 

There are 10 votes on csarmi.  Thread 3 had 8 votes, so that one was true, but I'm curious as to why Serra chose thread 2, the one csarmi claimed BPV in, I'm curious as to why his justification was untrue regarding thread 1.  csarmi even asks as much:

 

 

 

Thanks Leelou, you're a darling! (I usually leave an updated vote count in the opening post *hint, hint*)
 
I've seen nothing to cast doubt on the fact that Salami is scum in at least 1 thread, and I think this thread will give us the best chance.
 
VOTE: Csarmi

Why is it the best thread btw?

 

He is hammered before Serra replies.

 

 

[hazelkrs1]

I can't help but think of Cloud Atlas.

This is exactly what I thought! I forgot to mention that

[Krakalakachkn]

If my post didn't make it clear...Serra is scum in this thread.

[Krakalakachkn]

*at least in this thread

[hazelkrs1]

I personally think its most likely atm that he's scum in T1, but of course he could be scum in multiple games at once.

[hazelkrs1]

And I don't think mafia would be scared or worried about a BPV claim at all. They'd understand the inherent wifom with the claim and would be glad to not have to worry about wasting a NK on him.

[Yates]

And I don't think mafia would be scared or worried about a BPV claim at all. They'd understand the inherent wifom with the claim and would be glad to not have to worry about wasting a NK on him.

I wasn't here for the BPV claim.  Not saying it would have changed my vote.  But I'm not sure I'm following your logic on the wifom argument.  If Salami wanted to spread wifom, why not claim BPV in all three?

[hazelkrs1]

Well that would obviously make the claims MUCH less believable as a whole.

 

The wifom inherent in the claim is obvious tho, you understand what I mean there, right?