Leaving us for another forum?!?!?

This whole election is DOA

Rams! Rams! Rams! I'd love to see them pull it out

That's my mom's job.

Nol what's your point? That there was a sex ring in the basement?

Lel

+1 dead dove do not eat

I wish someone like Rod Miller would run for President. I would even campaign for him.

Glad the Rams are going to the Super Bowl but that was a pretty egregious missed penalty

I for one enjoy conspiracy theories even though that phrase is often used perjoratively. At least people are thinking and not just passively accepting whatever they're told. The true goal should be to teach and encourage people to question and evaluate.

Might as well not start a debate on gender identity and sex in this thread, y'know?

that's why I said Social Studies. I'm not suggesting it's taught as fact or doctrine.

I'm not saying parents shouldn't be teachers, I'm saying that unless you're raised by an absentee figure or in the wild by yourself, whoever plays the parent role (whether it's uncle, grandma, neighbor, whatever) is the most active teacher in a child's life. Life is full of learning and what you learn in school is only a small part of that. Also, it's pretty ignorant of you to assume that hair dressers don't know anything about balancing a checkbook. I'm gonna chide you on that one. You're right, I'd rather have content specialists (whomever they are) teach my child about the respective discipline than someone who only has a cursory understanding. Of course this is the case. Regardless of this ideal, this isn't always the case. I'm a history teacher and I would hardly classify myself as a content specialist. An enormous part of teaching is deciding what and how to teach, not just teaching facts and figures and theorems. Teachers should not be expected to be lighthouses. As for creationism, that's like your opinion man. That's one way of looking at the world. Fortunately or unfortunately others have different belief systems than you. The theorist who believes this is all an illusion and we're in a computer simulation believes both you and the creationist are incorrect. So who is right? Anyway, I certainly wasn't suggesting that schools teach religious origin stories as part of biology, but they certainly should be taught. Probably in social studies. As for this, I'm not sure what to say. There's too much generalization and guesswork. Parents are often biased toward their children, humans are often biased toward their own way of thinking, teachers are biased toward their own discipline and way they see the world, etc. etc. and on and on ad nauseum. There's no perfect system for learning. Some parents know more than teachers. Some teachers know more than parents. Some kids know more than both. Some janitors would make amazing soldiers. Some soldiers would make bold hair dressers. Some teachers would be better suited in an unemployment line. I've met several of them. I'm happy to discuss this because as I posted above, I think it's interesting.

You're my mate, Lenlo, but I take issue with almost everything you wrote here. Parents are 100% teachers. They're the most active teachers in a child's life. Teacher is just a job description and you don't have to work at a school to be a teacher. I know that you know this but I think we should be careful about the way we phrase things. Teachers are often times idiots with no idea what to teach children Evolution vs. creation is a loaded idea. There are plenty of creationists who are intelligent and don't believe in a literal seven day creation. Again, I know what you mean though. Idk if stunt is the right word but yeah, ideally they would be taught in conjunction along with the beliefs of native peoples, muslims, jews, and hindus. What do you mean by best?

Not that I could ever scream at ❤️ Hallia ❤️ but I do love that for the most part we never see moves like screaming at someone until they feel terrible about themselves just to manipulate them.