Jump to content

DRAGONMOUNT

A WHEEL OF TIME COMMUNITY

Tarmon Gaidon [Advanced Mafia] Game Over


BFG

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

im not thinking you MISUNDERSTOOD anything 

 

 

try asking me if I think you purposely MISREPRESENTED stuff tho

 

im not thinking you MISUNDERSTOOD anything 

 

 

try asking me if I think you purposely MISREPRESENTED stuff tho

I promise I can understand what you're writing without the caps lock, no joke.

 

This comes down to how good of a player you think that I am.

Let's list some facts about me.

 

1. I voted and prefered JS as a lynch yesterday, now known scum.

2. I participated on D1 only to the extent that I answered specific questions directed at me.

3. I spent the entire QT discussing night actions and mechanics, possibly had a post count equal to Zanders and Shads.

4. I was the lynch target of JS, now known scum.

5. I was wrong about mechanics.

 

1. Would I vote a scum friend on D1?

2. Would I lurk D1 as scum?

3. Would I spark the mechanics discussion in the QT as scum?

4. Would JS push me as hard as he did if I was scum?

5. Would I misrepresent mechanics on purpose as scum?

 

If you think I'm scum after these then you think that I am an extremely poor player. If you think I am at least decently capable then I can't see any scenario in which you would think I'm scum, unless you are.

im not thinking you MISUNDERSTOOD anything 

 

 

try asking me if I think you purposely MISREPRESENTED stuff tho

I promise I can understand what you're writing without the caps lock, no joke.

 

This comes down to how good of a player you think that I am.

Let's list some facts about me.

 

1. I voted and prefered JS as a lynch yesterday, now known scum.

2. I participated on D1 only to the extent that I answered specific questions directed at me.

3. I spent the entire QT discussing night actions and mechanics, possibly had a post count equal to Zanders and Shads.

4. I was the lynch target of JS, now known scum.

5. I was wrong about mechanics.

 

1. Would I vote a scum friend on D1?

2. Would I lurk D1 as scum?

3. Would I spark the mechanics discussion in the QT as scum?

4. Would JS push me as hard as he did if I was scum?

5. Would I misrepresent mechanics on purpose as scum?

 

If you think I'm scum after these then you think that I am an extremely poor player. If you think I am at least decently capable then I can't see any scenario in which you would think I'm scum, unless you are.

Posted

It would easily fall into "coded message" part. Since half the game can't read what you're talking about.

No.

 

mmmmmmmmmmNo.

 

There's nothing coded or hidden about it. I'm not implying anything new that was not there on the surface last night. If I wasn't allowed to refer to it the rules would not say that I am allowed to refer to it.

Posted

I can vouch for my statements in the QT. I said exactly what I meant and I havent seen anything beyond hally trying to twist it as a slip to give me any reason to not want to say that. I didnt submit a requested place between tel and stedding and it goes to reason that if others didnt that it was selected for them too.

 

Tbqh, im fairly offended that I was accused of making a scum slip as I take a good amount of pride in never having made an unintended slip, something hally should know damn well.

Posted

I can vouch for my statements in the QT. I said exactly what I meant and I havent seen anything beyond hally trying to twist it as a slip to give me any reason to not want to say that. I didnt submit a requested place between tel and stedding and it goes to reason that if others didnt that it was selected for them too.

 

Tbqh, im fairly offended that I was accused of making a scum slip as I take a good amount of pride in never having made an unintended slip, something hally should know damn well.

"If you say that you are offended, I am still waiting to hear what your argument is".

Posted

Honestly the thing that set my hair on edge most about you all game was when you accused Dice of claiming credit for your ideas when he said there was probably a wolf in both QTs.

/shrug
 

But Snow was a wolf and you/Snow w/w did not make much sense from the perspective I was looking at last night.  I just thought it was more likely you than him.  I have to reevaluate.

Posted

Honestly the thing that set my hair on edge most about you all game was when you accused Dice of claiming credit for your ideas when he said there was probably a wolf in both QTs.

 

/shrug

 

But Snow was a wolf and you/Snow w/w did not make much sense from the perspective I was looking at last night.  I just thought it was more likely you than him.  I have to reevaluate.

I still think that he did that.

 

If he had read the QT then he would've seen my 5-10 posts dealing with precisely that. Then a good while after he makes a post pretty much copying my reasoning and leaves it at that. To me, that is not contributing, rather stealing conclusions.

Posted

I didnt submit a requested place between tel and stedding and it goes to reason that if others didnt that it was selected for them too.

This would not be a slip.

Posted

I still think that he did that.

 

If he had read the QT then he would've seen my 5-10 posts dealing with precisely that. Then a good while after he makes a post pretty much copying my reasoning and leaves it at that. To me, that is not contributing, rather stealing conclusions.

What?  He used it as a precursor to voicing the opinion that he did not think wolves would send Wifi alone.  I corrected you on this in QT and you acknowledged it.  You said well he still borrowed the initial idea as if that was a bad thing.

Posted

 

I can vouch for my statements in the QT. I said exactly what I meant and I havent seen anything beyond hally trying to twist it as a slip to give me any reason to not want to say that. I didnt submit a requested place between tel and stedding and it goes to reason that if others didnt that it was selected for them too.

 

Tbqh, im fairly offended that I was accused of making a scum slip as I take a good amount of pride in never having made an unintended slip, something hally should know damn well.

"If you say that you are offended, I am still waiting to hear what your argument is".

Lol witty quotes dont make for valid points, but this ones pretty simple. My arguments in bold in your quoted post.

Posted

 

I didnt submit a requested place between tel and stedding and it goes to reason that if others didnt that it was selected for them too.

This would not be a slip.

It would not.

Posted

 

I still think that he did that.

 

If he had read the QT then he would've seen my 5-10 posts dealing with precisely that. Then a good while after he makes a post pretty much copying my reasoning and leaves it at that. To me, that is not contributing, rather stealing conclusions.

What?  He used it as a precursor to voicing the opinion that he did not think wolves would send Wifi alone.  I corrected you on this in QT and you acknowledged it.  You said well he still borrowed the initial idea as if that was a bad thing.

 

I didn't acknowledge it, you're misremembering or misrepresenting. I said that he borrowed my analysis as his own, nothing more.

 

 

I kind of want you to be a wolf atp.   :ph34r:

I'm sorry to disappoint you.

I kind of want you to be a wolf atp.   :ph34r:

I'm sorry to disappoint.

Posted

 

 

I can vouch for my statements in the QT. I said exactly what I meant and I havent seen anything beyond hally trying to twist it as a slip to give me any reason to not want to say that. I didnt submit a requested place between tel and stedding and it goes to reason that if others didnt that it was selected for them too.

 

Tbqh, im fairly offended that I was accused of making a scum slip as I take a good amount of pride in never having made an unintended slip, something hally should know damn well.

"If you say that you are offended, I am still waiting to hear what your argument is".

Lol witty quotes dont make for valid points, but this ones pretty simple. My arguments in bold in your quoted post.

 

The scum slip isn't the QT you went to, it's the posts you made after the deadline at EoD.

 

The witty quote is the valid point, in this case.

Posted

Isn't this prime time for NA? Where's everybody?

 

Im here but have to watch PC

 

This is a little sketch.

 

I can see how it could be a mistake, I can.

 

Youve made some good points iyo on you bulletin point type post to DIce.

 

Some of your responses after seem a little meh imo.

 

But one thing that sticks out and youve used it more then once is the "if you think Im a good player or you don't"

 

Every player knows that ANYONE CAN AND HAVE made mistakes regardless of skill level man.

 

And as either alignment.

 

Its not sitting well with me.

Posted

I think I might readjust my read on believer....I think he might be scummy after all.....just saying.....cause if he can get the fact that posting a is against the rules and not just referring back to a conversation in the qt then I can totally believe that he understood full well that a person in TR could kill someone in either the stedding/TR.

 

Posted

 

But one thing that sticks out and youve used it more then once is the "if you think Im a good player or you don't"

 

Every player knows that ANYONE CAN AND HAVE made mistakes regardless of skill level man.

 

 

Misleading the thread into accepting incorrect game mechanics would be a calculated move. I'd have to think about that and then weigh the pros and cons of it.

When I post a mechanical analysis I know that it's going to be fact checked, people aren't just going to take my word for it. Am I really that stupid/bad as to try to pull that scam off? When I know for a fact that it's going to get called out? That would be incredibly poor play.

 

Indeed, my analysis puts the spotlight on myself if I have it right. Remember that the cornerstone of my argument was that there has to be scum in the Stedding. I included myself in that list.

So I screw myself in either case, if I'm scum. Either people believe me and I'm in a group of 5 that will be looked at very closely, or I get called out and called scum for misleading the thread.

 

Am I going to pull that, knowing that both outcomes bite me in the behind?

Posted

I think I might readjust my read on believer....I think he might be scummy after all.....just saying.....cause if he can get the fact that posting a is against the rules and not just referring back to a conversation in the qt then I can totally believe that he understood full well that a person in TR could kill someone in either the stedding/TR.

How do you get from one to the other? These things are so unrelated I can't even.

 

I wouldn't be so bold. I've played in 100+ Mafia games and never rolled scum. I wouldn't start my first one by playing so risky.

 

I've explained that I find that reprehensible, I wouldn't do it. Take me at my word or don't, it's the reason.

 

Eyes weren't on me, I had consensus time until D2. I was actively trying to solve the game together with the players I chatted with.

 

 

To each their own, to me it seems stupid to push hardcore for a scumbuddy when the leading wagon is also your scumbuddy, you're not trying to save either of them. Arguably it's playing against your wincon at that point.

 

I explain in my last post why this doesn't make sense.

 

 

I'm glad you come to the correct conclusion, despite the above. :)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...