Jump to content

DRAGONMOUNT

A WHEEL OF TIME COMMUNITY

[ADVANCED] BG's 007 Mafia - Game Over - KAYLEE WINS!


bgrishinko

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 411
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

I don't think I trust the Despo train here. There's too many votes with not enough explanation. If one person has a gut feeling and votes based on that, fine. But three? I wouldn't be susprised if one of these three votes is scum, and Blofeld seems like too important a character to leave out of the game. He also seems too prominent to have a scum member use it as a fakeclaim cause there's got to be a real Blofeld somewhere. So I am leaning toward Des as town. With that in mind, I will vote Darthe. His vote seems the scummiest out of the three for the way he referenced Peace's vote without really delving into it, and Des is right in that it seemed offhanded.

 

Never mind that Sean Connery's archenemy is really Alex Trebek.

Posted

I never took my vote off of you, because I hadn't had a reason to yet.

 

Your accusation of fence sitting holds no water. You haven't posted enough for me to get a read on you this game.

 

So I see you're claiming early and OMGUSing. That will be taken into account in my decision how to read you. :smile:

 

Regardless, you were fence sitting. You first came out and said you never trusted me, or something like that. You then semi-defended me by saying I hadn't been active enough to get a read on, which would make it seem like I hadn't set off a lot of pings.

 

And since when do you need a reason to remove a joke vote? It's pretty much standard protocol that if someone you've joke voted for starts getting a bandwagon on them, it's only right to remove the joke vote.

 

Getting big pings from you so far. Oh and notice how even tho I claimed and posted a lot more gameplay, you still apparently have no read on me?

 

I wasn't asking for one reason for both of us, I wanted a seperate reason for both of us. I always ask for a reason for an FoS/vote unless it is plain in sight, which is what I did here.

 

You were still linking us. No likee the linking this early. You don't need to clarify the fos's on me or really anyone other than yourself.

 

Actually my vote was a direct reference to Peaces vote, not offhand at all. More importantly, it was a reaction poke. 24 minutes for you, who has been essentially inactive for the last 4-5 days, to reply with gusto and manage to implicate several players. While the vote was initially baseless I feel pretty good about this. And a pretty weak claim with no pressure Despo? Looks like the D1 scum catching streak will continue.

 

But you didn't mention Peace's name outright. You simply referenced the gut feeling thing, that way it would seem more like you were following the lead, not connecting yourself to the person. It's a sly tactic that I have used myself many times.

 

As for my activity level, I stated, around 5 days ago, that my activity would be lower than usual

 

Need to go ahead and get this out of the way- I'm on my 5 days off so I'll be a little less active for a bit

 

It's on page 3 so you can check for yourself. And Darthe, the fact that you are in multiple games with me right now and have seen me say the same thing in all of them, plus you should know what my schedule is normally like, being that I make it very clear that I work nights, all looks like you trying your darnedest to make me look scummy. Fact is, I got back to work tonight, so I had a lot more time to invest into my mafia games.

 

And how exactly is my claim weak? If you imply that the character wouldn't be in a James Bond game, then I have two syllables for you: Ha. Ha. As for my role, I'm sorry that I won't be giving your team more info so that you can try and weasel out of something later on when I pin you down on it. Tough cookies if you don't like that I won't give out all the details of my role. Fish somewhere else.

 

And that last bit? "Looks like the D1 scum catching streak will continue". Your attempt to lead the town is laughable. Good job trying to get me lynched even after I claimed. Valiant effort indeed.

 

Unvote Vote Darthe

Posted

I don't see Tress's post as fence-sitting. Also at this point I believe the claim. I'd like a vote count before placing a vote. That and to hear what Darthe had to say.

Posted

Hmm, well an early claiming Despo combined with otherwise odd behavior (meta) seemed a good place to stick a bit of weak pressure to me but I got good town replies from Despo, a weak couple of votes from Basel and NS, and nothing from peace. All of which is good, it is at least moving the game somewhat now. I have to say I am glad to see you back Des so unvote and I am interested in hearing more of your thoughts on others since I feel you're reliable now.

Posted

Despo, I asked for his reasons on you since if they were good I imightfos you too, and if they werent, I might fos wom at for weak fosing. I was trying to scumhunt with that.

Posted

UNVOTE.

 

My vote was based on his silly stance on Nolder. Nolder has made it obvious lately he's gonna bandwagon vote day 1 no matter his alignment. It's a null tell. His character claim makes it pretty apparent he's not scum unless a CC shows up.

 

JLM and Darthe are pinging right now.

Posted

I never took my vote off of you, because I hadn't had a reason to yet.

 

Your accusation of fence sitting holds no water. You haven't posted enough for me to get a read on you this game.

 

So I see you're claiming early and OMGUSing. That will be taken into account in my decision how to read you. :smile:

 

Regardless, you were fence sitting. You first came out and said you never trusted me, or something like that. You then semi-defended me by saying I hadn't been active enough to get a read on, which would make it seem like I hadn't set off a lot of pings.

 

And since when do you need a reason to remove a joke vote? It's pretty much standard protocol that if someone you've joke voted for starts getting a bandwagon on them, it's only right to remove the joke vote.

 

Getting big pings from you so far. Oh and notice how even tho I claimed and posted a lot more gameplay, you still apparently have no read on me?

 

You can say the words fence sitting all you like, and it doesn't make it true.

 

Seems like a claim that could be the real deal. Pretty major character. Although maybe it could just as well be a trick to draw the real Blofeld out? Blofeld is the arch enymy, so he/she is probably someone with an important role.

 

This is closer to fence sitting than what I said. When I said you hadn't said enough for me to get a good read on you, it wasn't an attempt at WIFOM or a refusal to take a position, it was the honest truth. Mischaracterizing my statements gets added to the early claim and the OMGUS'ing in my read on you.

 

Regarding removing a joke vote... when the game is going this slow, I have no better suspects, I actually wonder whether the person I joke voted might be mafia, and a train starts building that might help the game to move along, why would I have removed my joke vote? It wound up contributing to the gameplay, which was the best reason to keep it where it was.

 

Oh, and notice that I said I was taking your gameplay into account in deciding how to read you. Sometimes these things require a bit of thought, especially since I've already flat out stated how I form my impression of you based on your meta. I wouldn't put it past you to use that to manipulate me into trusting you, although it would be a fine line to walk.

 

I don't actually know the source material on this one (never watched a Bond movie in my life), so the character claim I had to look up. The role claim interests me more than anything. I want to see how this plays out, so I'll choose to trust you're not manipulating me. Yet.

 

Unvote.

 

With that said, Darthe is pinging hard, but I distrust anything that appears obvious when it comes to Darthe. He manipulates as easily as breathing.

Posted

This has been a very spammy game for how few pages and how long it's been going.

 

Highly disliking the Darthe train, at least he's scumhunting.

 

Chatty wombat, I forgot what that's like.

 

I'm not too sure about Strike and Kaylee right now.

 

Is deadline today or tomorrow?

Posted

I don't think I trust the Despo train here. There's too many votes with not enough explanation. If one person has a gut feeling and votes based on that, fine. But three? I wouldn't be susprised if one of these three votes is scum, and Blofeld seems like too important a character to leave out of the game. He also seems too prominent to have a scum member use it as a fakeclaim cause there's got to be a real Blofeld somewhere. So I am leaning toward Des as town. With that in mind, I will vote Darthe. His vote seems the scummiest out of the three for the way he referenced Peace's vote without really delving into it, and Des is right in that it seemed offhanded.

 

Never mind that Sean Connery's archenemy is really Alex Trebek.

I think I will go ahead and trust the Blofeld claim also. I too suspect there might be scum on that train, so I'll be willing to vote Darthe .

I never took my vote off of you, because I hadn't had a reason to yet.

 

Your accusation of fence sitting holds no water. You haven't posted enough for me to get a read on you this game.

 

So I see you're claiming early and OMGUSing. That will be taken into account in my decision how to read you. :smile:

 

Regardless, you were fence sitting. You first came out and said you never trusted me, or something like that. You then semi-defended me by saying I hadn't been active enough to get a read on, which would make it seem like I hadn't set off a lot of pings.

 

And since when do you need a reason to remove a joke vote? It's pretty much standard protocol that if someone you've joke voted for starts getting a bandwagon on them, it's only right to remove the joke vote.

 

Getting big pings from you so far. Oh and notice how even tho I claimed and posted a lot more gameplay, you still apparently have no read on me?

 

I wasn't asking for one reason for both of us, I wanted a seperate reason for both of us. I always ask for a reason for an FoS/vote unless it is plain in sight, which is what I did here.

 

You were still linking us. No likee the linking this early. You don't need to clarify the fos's on me or really anyone other than yourself.

 

Actually my vote was a direct reference to Peaces vote, not offhand at all. More importantly, it was a reaction poke. 24 minutes for you, who has been essentially inactive for the last 4-5 days, to reply with gusto and manage to implicate several players. While the vote was initially baseless I feel pretty good about this. And a pretty weak claim with no pressure Despo? Looks like the D1 scum catching streak will continue.

 

But you didn't mention Peace's name outright. You simply referenced the gut feeling thing, that way it would seem more like you were following the lead, not connecting yourself to the person. It's a sly tactic that I have used myself many times.

 

As for my activity level, I stated, around 5 days ago, that my activity would be lower than usual

 

Need to go ahead and get this out of the way- I'm on my 5 days off so I'll be a little less active for a bit

 

It's on page 3 so you can check for yourself. And Darthe, the fact that you are in multiple games with me right now and have seen me say the same thing in all of them, plus you should know what my schedule is normally like, being that I make it very clear that I work nights, all looks like you trying your darnedest to make me look scummy. Fact is, I got back to work tonight, so I had a lot more time to invest into my mafia games.

 

And how exactly is my claim weak? If you imply that the character wouldn't be in a James Bond game, then I have two syllables for you: Ha. Ha. As for my role, I'm sorry that I won't be giving your team more info so that you can try and weasel out of something later on when I pin you down on it. Tough cookies if you don't like that I won't give out all the details of my role. Fish somewhere else.

 

And that last bit? "Looks like the D1 scum catching streak will continue". Your attempt to lead the town is laughable. Good job trying to get me lynched even after I claimed. Valiant effort indeed.

 

Unvote Vote Darthe

 

I love that these three posts are directly in a row. Scummy speed lynch is scummy. Despo is probably cleared due to the claim but as for the other two.. I am interested in more pressure here.

Posted

I love that these three posts are directly in a row. Scummy speed lynch is scummy. Despo is probably cleared due to the claim but as for the other two.. I am interested in more pressure here.

 

You have your logic backwards, IMO. In the event of a speed lynch, I'd be more suspicious of the later votes as scum looking to pile on a good opportunity. Since I think Des is town, I think a look at NS might be called for. But the way you backed off and unvoted when your Des case started to backfire on you is pingy.

Posted

I have stated that I think Des is town as well and I didn't have a real case on Despo. The vote was weak, because it was a D1 draw more than a direct play and that I have to repeat this is redundant.

Posted

I'll be back tomorrow. Deadline will be at 4 PM CT tomorrow.

 

Sorry for lack of vote counts. I've been driving to Salt Lake City from Houston and back again.

Posted

I love that these three posts are directly in a row. Scummy speed lynch is scummy. Despo is probably cleared due to the claim but as for the other two.. I am interested in more pressure here.

 

You have your logic backwards, IMO. In the event of a speed lynch, I'd be more suspicious of the later votes as scum looking to pile on a good opportunity. Since I think Des is town, I think a look at NS might be called for. But the way you backed off and unvoted when your Des case started to backfire on you is pingy.

 

eh, you could also argue that the scum team could slightly try to make a lynch seem faster near the beginning to make more people join. i am just generally untrustful of people on speed lynch trains in general.

Posted

I went back through this thread and realized that there are some people I had completely forgotten were in this game.

 

It's been very quiet, and very slow... but there's been absolutely zero input from several people for nearly a week.

 

*tosses BG a cattle prod* Have at 'em.

Posted

On that note, here are the post counts so far:

 

Who posted in: [ADVANCED] BG's 007 Mafia - Day 1

 

Member name Posts RandA lThor 17 Kaylee 15 Nolder 15 Songstress 14 Sakaea 12 Darthe 11 LedZepMan 8 Despothera 8 WWWwombat 8 bgrishinko 8 JenLenaMom 6 Nightstrike 6 Basel Gill 5 Tiinker 4 peacesells 4 John Snow 2 The Bard Babe 1

 

 

Only one that really stands out to me from the bottom is Peace, he's usually a bit more active than this. Snow used to play a lot more actively, but lately has been lurker mode to the extreme. More to the point tho, a lot of people came in for some day 1 spam, but have been absent since.

Posted

Hmm, well an early claiming Despo combined with otherwise odd behavior (meta) seemed a good place to stick a bit of weak pressure to me but I got good town replies from Despo, a weak couple of votes from Basel and NS, and nothing from peace. All of which is good, it is at least moving the game somewhat now. I have to say I am glad to see you back Des so unvote and I am interested in hearing more of your thoughts on others since I feel you're reliable now.

 

I have stated that I think Des is town as well and I didn't have a real case on Despo. The vote was weak, because it was a D1 draw more than a direct play and that I have to repeat this is redundant.

 

Okay so first off you didn't place your vote on me because I claimed early, you already had voted me before I ever claimed.

 

More importantly tho your sudden backtracking has me liking my vote even more. You were coming at me fairly hard yesterday, even going as far to act like my lynch was already in the bag. Your sudden reversal mixed with you claiming that the vote on me was more of a draw play than an actual vote is smelly.

 

Agreed tho, that you never had a real case on me

 

:biggrin:

 

Despo, I asked for his reasons on you since if they were good I imightfos you too, and if they werent, I might fos wom at for weak fosing. I was trying to scumhunt with that.

 

Fair enough I guess. I think it was mainly the way you worded it, grouping us together and saying "us". It's still technically linking, even if you were just trying to be efficient with words

 

Is this going to be another game where I get speed lynched for no apparent good reason. YAY! I don't have enough reasons to hate mafia yet, bring it on. :tongue:

 

Was this put in the wrong game or something? Don't remember seeing any pressure on you.

 

Oh and your defense of Darthe is... wait for it... wait for it- noted :tongue:

 

Incidentally tho I thought NS's vote on Darthe was pretty weak

 

Interesting. Leaning towards believing Des. Not sure where the Darthe pressure is coming from though. Still think Kae is a good lynch.

 

Anything else on Kae besides that bubblegum remark? I thought that was strange too

Posted

Interesting. Leaning towards believing Des. Not sure where the Darthe pressure is coming from though. Still think Kae is a good lynch.

 

The bit on Kae comes out of the blue somewhat.

Posted

Since I think Des is town, I think a look at NS might be called for. But the way you backed off and unvoted when your Des case started to backfire on you is pingy.

What does one have to do with the other? We're voting the same guy, and you haven't changed your vote yet.
Posted

Hmm, well an early claiming Despo combined with otherwise odd behavior (meta) seemed a good place to stick a bit of weak pressure to me but I got good town replies from Despo, a weak couple of votes from Basel and NS, and nothing from peace. All of which is good, it is at least moving the game somewhat now. I have to say I am glad to see you back Des so unvote and I am interested in hearing more of your thoughts on others since I feel you're reliable now.

 

I have stated that I think Des is town as well and I didn't have a real case on Despo. The vote was weak, because it was a D1 draw more than a direct play and that I have to repeat this is redundant.

 

Okay so first off you didn't place your vote on me because I claimed early, you already had voted me before I ever claimed.

 

More importantly tho your sudden backtracking has me liking my vote even more. You were coming at me fairly hard yesterday, even going as far to act like my lynch was already in the bag. Your sudden reversal mixed with you claiming that the vote on me was more of a draw play than an actual vote is smelly.

 

Agreed tho, that you never had a real case on me

 

:biggrin:

 

Despo, I asked for his reasons on you since if they were good I imightfos you too, and if they werent, I might fos wom at for weak fosing. I was trying to scumhunt with that.

 

Fair enough I guess. I think it was mainly the way you worded it, grouping us together and saying "us". It's still technically linking, even if you were just trying to be efficient with words

 

Is this going to be another game where I get speed lynched for no apparent good reason. YAY! I don't have enough reasons to hate mafia yet, bring it on. :tongue:

 

Was this put in the wrong game or something? Don't remember seeing any pressure on you.

 

Oh and your defense of Darthe is... wait for it... wait for it- noted :tongue:

 

Incidentally tho I thought NS's vote on Darthe was pretty weak

 

Interesting. Leaning towards believing Des. Not sure where the Darthe pressure is coming from though. Still think Kae is a good lynch.

 

Anything else on Kae besides that bubblegum remark? I thought that was strange too

 

Yeah, I see how that technically could be called linking.

Posted

Considering the pace of this game I do not believe that I will live through the day if I do not claim. This greatly displeases me to do but I am 006, Alec Trevelyan.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...