Jump to content

DRAGONMOUNT

A WHEEL OF TIME COMMUNITY

Blackhoofs Warhammer 40'000 Game [BASIC]


Blackhoof

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 364
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

I'm not dismissing the idea, I just find it worried that you latched on to it so quickly, and now are defending it.

Posted
  On 2/1/2012 at 5:50 PM, Sakaea said:

I'm not dismissing the idea, I just find it worried that you latched on to it so quickly, and now are defending it.

 

Preaching to the choir sistah. Vote BG.

Posted

i liek the two trains personally. as well as the fact that we're getting the game started this early :happy:

 

  On 2/1/2012 at 5:04 PM, Nolder said:
  On 2/1/2012 at 4:34 PM, Red2111 said:

i dislike how your jumping to conclusions honestly.

please tell me what conclusion I "jumped" to

I thought I explained my thought process well myself

 

you took a simple explination and joke (i mena, i read it as her joking about all the games she's in) and jumped to the conclusion she was a 3rd party player.

 

 

reguardless of your explination, i felt that it was an opportunistic move and blown out of proportion.

Posted
  On 2/1/2012 at 6:54 PM, Red2111 said:

i liek the two trains personally. as well as the fact that we're getting the game started this early :happy:

 

  On 2/1/2012 at 5:04 PM, Nolder said:
  On 2/1/2012 at 4:34 PM, Red2111 said:

i dislike how your jumping to conclusions honestly.

please tell me what conclusion I "jumped" to

I thought I explained my thought process well myself

 

you took a simple explination and joke (i mena, i read it as her joking about all the games she's in) and jumped to the conclusion she was a 3rd party player.

 

 

reguardless of your explination, i felt that it was an opportunistic move and blown out of proportion.

I never said she was a 3rd party player

I said she was probably a serial killer

I took her actions and followed them to the most likely explanation

it was well reasoned based on the little information available to me

there is no "jumping" involved

Posted

Well... nolder, there was a little bit of jumping considering it was the 4th and 5th post of the game with only 1 post to go off of, of course saying "probably" is a jump, though not to a conclusion I suppose.

 

That being said, I think Sakaea's arguement against me is a fair one, but Ishy seems opportunistic. Red's attacks as well: likes my reasoning against Nolder enough to place a vote, but then promptly FoS's me for it right after. Can't have your cake and eat it too. We shall see.

 

Unvote

 

Vote Ishy

Posted

BG you mis-inturpret me. i agreed with voting Nol, for reasons below. i FoS you because of your "he ust be cyaing himself as a 3rd party"

 

i know you were just beating his grass to see how fast he bolted, but what pings is your latching onto the idea of a 3rd party in this game (same as Nol) and furthering that bit of WIFOM tby accusing Nol of being one.

 

so no, i'm not having my cake and eating it too, i'm taking piece from two different pies and eating those instead :tongue:

 

 

 

  On 2/1/2012 at 7:31 PM, Nolder said:

I never said she was a 3rd party player

I said she was probably a serial killer

I took her actions and followed them to the most likely explanation

it was well reasoned based on the little information available to me

there is no "jumping" involved

 

 

serial killer IS a 3rd party player Nol, stop waxing semantics with me.

 

imo, you didn't follow the most liekly explanation, you followed the one that would allow you to easily push a lynch on her.

 

that fact that there is so little reason and your making this conclusion is exactly why i say our jumping to conclusions.

Posted

well I don't know what else you want me to do

what I saw was suspicious to me

I could have waited around for something more to happen I suppose but when people have that kind of mentality games drag

is it the strongest case ever? nah not by a long shot but as of now I'm thinking it's pretty good considering we're only 2 pages into the game

Posted

I can see how Nolder started this with the hopes of kick starting the game. Well done. The problem is that even though his original accusation was weak and based on a 2-sentence post, he just won't let go of it. From that came his accusation of her planting the seeds of sympathy and her probable role of SK. I don't feel him as scum right now, but the stubborn clinging to a very weak 1-post case of a player is frustrating.

Posted
  On 2/2/2012 at 12:00 AM, aemonkristen said:

I can see how Nolder started this with the hopes of kick starting the game. Well done. The problem is that even though his original accusation was weak and based on a 2-sentence post, he just won't let go of it. From that came his accusation of her planting the seeds of sympathy and her probable role of SK. I don't feel him as scum right now, but the stubborn clinging to a very weak 1-post case of a player is frustrating.

 

Must lynch. Two sentences. SO convincing!

Posted

Vote Count

 

Christine (1)- Nolder

Nolder (1)- Red

Bg (1)- Sakaea, Ishy

Ishy (1)- BG

Ama (1)- Perfect

 

 

  On 2/1/2012 at 4:08 PM, Nolder said:

I've always wanted to make a game where everyone is a serial killer or a vigilante

 

wouldnt everyone die... like, within 2 nights? :huh:

 

what if..... half the game was serial killers, and half the game was survivors with a healing ability like a doctor? but they couldnt target themselves? Hmmmmmm...... interesting......

Posted

well at the moment i dont see much at the moment. I dont really think Nolder is latched to the idea just more or less not wanting people to point out the flaws. So im getting town from him atm... nothin else to add

Posted

Noobsheep~

 

But yeah, I don't know, that was an odd argument out of nowhere. We're not going to know what's in the game until it progresses, anyhow.

Posted
  On 2/2/2012 at 2:48 AM, Sakaea said:

Ping. But n00b ping, I think.

Quite right. It took quite awhile for me to get my feet under me at the beginning too. Len will be a pro by the end probably. We'll teach him as we go. For starters: "No Len!! Bad Len!!"

Posted

*Has learned his lesson... Wont do it again for the next vote.*

At least no one took a rolled up news paper into this.

Posted
  On 2/1/2012 at 8:10 PM, Red2111 said:
  On 2/1/2012 at 7:31 PM, Nolder said:

I never said she was a 3rd party player

I said she was probably a serial killer

I took her actions and followed them to the most likely explanation

it was well reasoned based on the little information available to me

there is no "jumping" involved

 

 

serial killer IS a 3rd party player Nol, stop waxing semantics with me.

 

imo, you didn't follow the most liekly explanation, you followed the one that would allow you to easily push a lynch on her.

 

that fact that there is so little reason and your making this conclusion is exactly why i say our jumping to conclusions.

it's not about semantics Red

I said Serial Killer becuase I had a reason to think Serial Killer which I clearly laid out

 

have I pushed a lynch on her as of yet? no

I voted her and was done with it

you and BG are the ones that turned this into an issue

Posted
  On 2/2/2012 at 12:27 AM, Blackhoof said:
  On 2/1/2012 at 4:08 PM, Nolder said:

I've always wanted to make a game where everyone is a serial killer or a vigilante

 

wouldnt everyone die... like, within 2 nights? :huh:

not necessarily

they could decide not to shoot

or multiple people could shoot the same person

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...