Jump to content

DRAGONMOUNT

A WHEEL OF TIME COMMUNITY

There Goes the Neighborhood (Game Thread) - GAME OVER MAFIA WIN


SBoydW

Recommended Posts

Posted

Oh I'be heard of this role- you kill yourself.

 

Hmmmm should I hammer? Odds are he will kill a townie tonight and die himself anyway.

  • Replies 1.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

I assure you should you leave both of us alive I will shoot at Mynd

I don't trust him at all this game

 

Sounds more like a vendetta to me.

Posted

I assure you should you leave both of us alive I will shoot at Mynd

I don't trust him at all this game

 

Sounds more like a vendetta to me.

Vigilante, helloooo

Posted

DEADLINE WEDNESDAY 9TH @ 3 PM EST (GMT-5)

 

WITH 24 ALIVE IT TAKES 13 TO LYNCH.

 

http://www.timeandda...0&sec=00&p0=412

 

Vote Count:

 

Nolder (11) - Mynd, Darthe, BG, songstress, Razen, Kaylee, kae, Nyn, Little Miss, Lenlo, Key

Mynd (5) - Nolder, Arez, Nae, Tina, Blackhoof

Hoof (2) peace, Basel

Kae (1) - Ishy

 

NOLDER L-2

Posted

Unvote, on the condition that I will vote you again tomorrow unless you do exactly as you said you would.

if Mynd is lynched I'll hold my shot

just to make it clear to everybody

Posted

Having a vig around isn't necessarily good for us. It can be just as bad for the town as it is for the mafia. And are you town aligned? Or third party?

 

And planning to use it on Mynd? We're not all agreed that that's the best thing to do for the town - obviously, hence the split vote. In fact, with how he led the vote in the first place, it's most likely that he's town rather than scum, so why would getting rid of him be a good idea?

Posted

Unvote, on the condition that I will vote you again tomorrow unless you do exactly as you said you would.

if Mynd is lynched I'll hold my shot

just to make it clear to everybody

 

Why would a vigilante player make such an aggressive, unrelenting push for my lynch with nothing but his own stubborn purpose to back it up? If you truly are a vigilante player then you've blown it with your aggressive play. Personally, I don't buy this desperate claim.

Posted

We've got less than a day left. I really don't see a Mynd lynch happening...I mean c'mon..he nailed EP. He has to get some credit for that. Also, there is no reason to lynch Mynd if Nolder is just gonna shoot him during the night phase.

 

Nolder claiming Vig could be useful if he is willing to take action through consensus. But, we need to decide if it's worth lynching a claimed Vig to keep Mynd from being night killed. The Vig could also do more harm than could.

 

 

So, basically it's Mynd or Nolder and if Mynd is town it looks like both of them would die if Nolder uses his shot on Mynd.

 

Does this make sense?

Posted

And are you town aligned? Or third party?

A Vigilante is town. A third party killer is a Serial Killer.

 

I'm town aligned dude.

 

Unvote, on the condition that I will vote you again tomorrow unless you do exactly as you said you would.

if Mynd is lynched I'll hold my shot

just to make it clear to everybody

 

Why would a vigilante player make such an aggressive, unrelenting push for my lynch with nothing but his own stubborn purpose to back it up? If you truly are a vigilante player then you've blown it with your aggressive play. Personally, I don't buy this desperate claim.

I'm an aggressive player sometimes

I'm sure you of all people can appreciate that playstyle

 

I must say, i feel QUITE certain Nolder is lying.

would you be willing to roleclaim tomorrow if you're wrong?

Posted

Not when you have a role like vig. Besides, vigs are dangerous when they are not sure about who they kill. With the way you are playing, I'd be afraid to let you remain in the game with that power. Still, I'm pretty sure you are bullshanking us.

Posted

Honestly, I don't know whether I believe that he's lying. It seems like a pretty stupid thing to claim if he is indeed lying since we would be all up in arms about it (like we are).

 

BUT I've been in games where you've had a vig power, nolder, or at least a third party role where you pretended to do what the group agreed on and then chose someone else on your own because it was your power and that's what you wanted to do. That's dangerous to have in a game, imo so...I think I'm going to keep my vote where it is in order to not see chaos killing later.

Posted

Not when you have a role like vig. Besides, vigs are dangerous when they are not sure about who they kill. With the way you are playing, I'd be afraid to let you remain in the game with that power. Still, I'm pretty sure you are bullshanking us.

Well if that "overcome with guilt" thing means i'll die if I kill a townie you shouldn't be too worried right?

I'll kill you and die at the same time if you're town

 

Honestly, I don't know whether I believe that he's lying. It seems like a pretty stupid thing to claim if he is indeed lying since we would be all up in arms about it (like we are).

 

BUT I've been in games where you've had a vig power, nolder, or at least a third party role where you pretended to do what the group agreed on and then chose someone else on your own because it was your power and that's what you wanted to do. That's dangerous to have in a game, imo so...I think I'm going to keep my vote where it is in order to not see chaos killing later.

are you talking about the jurassic park game?

I was a survivor that game, not town aligned

and as I recall you were mafia that game...

Posted

are you talking about the jurassic park game?

I was a survivor that game, not town aligned

and as I recall you were mafia that game...

 

Still the same kind of idea with that role, no matter your alignment. You often said you would shoot someone and then chose someone else.

 

Yes, I was. What does that have to do with anything?

Posted

Not when you have a role like vig. Besides, vigs are dangerous when they are not sure about who they kill. With the way you are playing, I'd be afraid to let you remain in the game with that power. Still, I'm pretty sure you are bullshanking us.

Well if that "overcome with guilt" thing means i'll die if I kill a townie you shouldn't be too worried right?

I'll kill you and die at the same time if you're town

If you are town..how in any since of the word is that outcome a benefit to town?

 

Are you town aligned?

Posted

are you talking about the jurassic park game?

I was a survivor that game, not town aligned

and as I recall you were mafia that game...

 

Still the same kind of idea with that role, no matter your alignment. You often said you would shoot someone and then chose someone else.

 

Yes, I was. What does that have to do with anything?

 

If he had a survivor role I wouldn't expect him to do otherwise. It's like saying someone lied last game they played..and btw they were scum. What else would you expect?

Posted

Not when you have a role like vig. Besides, vigs are dangerous when they are not sure about who they kill. With the way you are playing, I'd be afraid to let you remain in the game with that power. Still, I'm pretty sure you are bullshanking us.

Well if that "overcome with guilt" thing means i'll die if I kill a townie you shouldn't be too worried right?

I'll kill you and die at the same time if you're town

If you are town..how in any since of the word is that outcome a benefit to town?

 

Are you town aligned?

 

He already answered me that he is.

are you talking about the jurassic park game?

I was a survivor that game, not town aligned

and as I recall you were mafia that game...

 

Still the same kind of idea with that role, no matter your alignment. You often said you would shoot someone and then chose someone else.

 

Yes, I was. What does that have to do with anything?

 

If he had a survivor role I wouldn't expect him to do otherwise. It's like saying someone lied last game they played..and btw they were scum. What else would you expect?

 

It's not the same in my mind with the lying/scum bit, but I suppose we can agree to disagree.

 

Really? I'd actually expect him to go along with town as they have more numbers and have the best chance of winning. But maybe that's just me. I've never played a vig or SK that I can remember, so *shrugs*.

 

Just bringing it up as a possible problem later on as a vig is more likely to hit town than scum. Plus, nolder is already saying that he'll aim for Mynd. If he survives today and decides to try and kill Mynd, that's two townies down possibly, plus the mafia NK. So three possible townies in one night. It just does not seem like a good idea to me.

Posted

 

Plus, nolder is already saying that he'll aim for Mynd. If he survives today and decides to try and kill Mynd, that's two townies down possibly, plus the mafia NK. So three possible townies in one night. It just does not seem like a good idea to me.

 

Yeah..that's the big question in my eyes. It seems more like a personal grudge rather than scum hunting. I'm inclined to hammer because of it.

Posted

Scummy move to save himself is scummy. I would like to believe that about you Nol, but the way you are acting doesn't fit well. Besides which, you are now doubly a threat because you have the ability to do the scums work for them, twice! You have done nothing since your execution was stayed except rile people and WIFOM this.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...