Terror in the Bakery - Game Thread

[beadsman]

I figure if we successfully lynch anyone, even if we're wrong, we still make more progress than if no one is lynched. You only run into trouble if the doctor or another important role dies, so honestly, I'm not a bad choice (if you have to lynch town, that is).

[Krakalakachkn]

So why follow Darthe?

[beadsman]

Hence why I voted crusher. Honestly, I don't have a reason to believe they are either town or Mafia (which goes for just about everyone this time around), so someone successfully lynched is better than nothing.

[beadsman]

What? What do you mean, follow Darthe?

[beadsman]

I just figured I'd try to add my vote to the one most likely to reach 7, provided they weren't likely town.

[beadsman]

Even if I die, though, I get to help the town out (probably more than actually surviving, lol, because I always look like a wolf), so win-win!

[Krakalakachkn]

  On 1/10/2019 at 5:10 AM, beadsman said:

Who do you recommend voting?

Expand  

 

[beadsman]

Right! I want to find the best option, of course, so I don't mind asking literally anyone. I mean, I'll take suggestions from anyone, but that didn't mean I'll actually change my vote. Still, I find it enlightening to ask who people recommend.

[beadsman]

That explains a lot, actually.

[Krakalakachkn]

Did you read the thread to find people's opinions?

[beadsman]

Yes.

[beadsman]

I'm admit, though, I've only been able to use a phone, so it's quite possible I missed things. It's why I ask as well, just to be sure.

[beadsman]

If you get six votes on me, I'll cast the seventh if it means making headway.

[Krakalakachkn]

I'm good?

[Wildfire Sedai]

A. The only reason I am unvoting for it is because after much thought (and I am probably wrong on this so maybe I should vote you back again) I realized that your crankiness is just how you play the game and to not to take it personally.  Cause seriously, the only reasons I voted you was because 1. I felt you were picking on me earlier itt and 2. random.org picked your number.

 

B. Excuse me! Who said I need your permission to unvote you?  I didn't unvote you because you asked me to or because you complained about it or didn't complain about it.  I unvoted you because I felt like I was being unfair to you for voting the way I did:  taking things too personally and using random.org.  I realize that you are a PITA and that is the way you will always be.  Only you can change that no one else can.  so, if you want to be contrary thats your issue not mine.  For NOW you are SLIGHTLY TOWN.  If I decide to I will change my mind.  However, I feel that there are other candidates more worthy of the name wolf. 

 

  On 1/10/2019 at 4:34 AM, Darthe said:

 

This feels like low hanging fruit but I gotta respond for my own sanity.  

 

1) why do you have two totally different responses to the same post?

Expand  

 

It's not really a different response if you actually read them right, also B is an add-on to A.: 

 

A. I voted you because I felt you were picking on me and Random.org.  I unvoted you because I realized that your being "cranky/mean" was just your personality.

 

B. I felt I was being unfair for voting you for being "cranky/mean"/me taking things too personally and random.org.  

 

Are they really so different?

  5 hours ago, Darthe said:

 

2) I've yet to be grumpy once this game.  Not sure where that came from.

Expand  

 

Well maybe grumpy is the wrong word.  Like I said I was taking things way too personally.  I just reread thread up to point where I first said you were being mean and the only post I can find that I remember that I was upset about was: 

 

It's strange how unsurprised I am to see that you can't even hide your shame on an anonymous forum.

 

 

 

  5 hours ago, Darthe said:

3) why do you have a rationale for a vote if it was *random*..?

Expand  

 

Simple: Because I didn't want to look like a baby for taking things too personally.  Especially something so stupid as that.

 

  5 hours ago, Darthe said:

4) there is no four. 

 

5) what could possibly have been taken personally already?  

Expand  

 

Look above.   

[Nynaeve]

  On 1/10/2019 at 7:00 AM, beadsman said:

Hence why I voted crusher. Honestly, I don't have a reason to believe they are either town or Mafia (which goes for just about everyone this time around), so someone successfully lynched is better than nothing.

Expand  

 

Then why Crusher? There were several players that had votes on them ...if all you were going for is a successful lynch.

 

Plus it's a hybrid game if I recall so majority isn't a must.

[Nynaeve]

  On 1/10/2019 at 7:00 AM, Krakalakachkn said:

So why follow Darthe?

Expand  

 

Feels more like an existential inquiry 

[Nynaeve]

  On 1/10/2019 at 12:51 AM, Krakalakachkn said:

 

so villagacity necessitates blending?

Expand  

 

Huh?

[Darthe]

## vote beads

 

 

[Darthe]

  On 1/10/2019 at 3:35 AM, beadsman said:

Hmm. Not bold.

Expand  

 

  On 1/10/2019 at 3:35 AM, beadsman said:

Vote: Crusher

Expand  

 

  On 1/10/2019 at 3:35 AM, beadsman said:

There we go.

Expand  

 

  On 1/10/2019 at 5:11 AM, beadsman said:

Crush hasn't been around, so I figured that was as good a reason as any for a d1 lynch.

 

 

Expand  

 

  On 1/10/2019 at 6:54 AM, beadsman said:

I mean, do what you want. I AM vanilla town, so it's not like you're killing your doctor or anything.

 

Honestly, I just don't have enough to go on yet.

 

 

Expand  

 

  On 1/10/2019 at 6:59 AM, beadsman said:

I figure if we successfully lynch anyone, even if we're wrong, we still make more progress than if no one is lynched. You only run into trouble if the doctor or another important role dies, so honestly, I'm not a bad choice (if you have to lynch town, that is).

Expand  

 

  On 1/10/2019 at 7:00 AM, beadsman said:

Hence why I voted crusher. Honestly, I don't have a reason to believe they are either town or Mafia (which goes for just about everyone this time around), so someone successfully lynched is better than nothing.

Expand  

 

  On 1/10/2019 at 7:03 AM, beadsman said:

Even if I die, though, I get to help the town out (probably more than actually surviving, lol, because I always look like a wolf), so win-win!

Expand  

 

  On 1/10/2019 at 7:13 AM, beadsman said:

If you get six votes on me, I'll cast the seventh if it means making headway.

Expand  

 

[Darthe]

Like what even happened here? The above was almost entirely unprovoked.

[divagreen]

  On 1/10/2019 at 4:01 AM, Andrej said:

 

Yeah. I’m looking more at Beads of the three for now

 

going from zero to lead wagon in about 10 minutes is a problem though. Means we’re on the right track with one of the other wagons 

Expand  

 

I don't think that is what it means at all. 

 

there are 7 "wagons" total, 1 with 3 votes, 2 with 2 votes and 4 vanity wagons. none of the wagons really got any traction at any point, there hasn't been any build-up nor any real interrogation. there hasn't been a single thing for scum to jump on, so scum are hanging back trying to look harmless, hoping no one will notice them IMO.

 

most of the votes were made during rvs. I don't think wagonomics is even possible at this point.

 

there really isn't much to go on. I think the noisy players are likely town and that is as about as far as I got.

 

I don't want to lynch any1 who is actually playing the game. that rarely turns out well. I think we have a better shot at hitting scum with lynching a lurker.

 

just my 4 cents. cory has our vote and I think he said he wld be around for eod. I will be at school and then hopping on a plane. 

 

 

 

 

[Darthe]

I'm out for now glgl

[Cory Caboose]

Morning

[Cory Caboose]

I dont particularly wanna lynch beads anymore