Ithillian Turambar Posted April 4, 2016 Author Posted April 4, 2016 I think the Poll generating a post in the Poll Thread could solve that ... I just don't know how that's even possible. And Verbal's going to kill me ...
Shad_ Posted April 4, 2016 Posted April 4, 2016 Temporarily removing my Calder vote while he's in thread. LMK when he's afk again or at L-1.
Ithillian Turambar Posted April 4, 2016 Author Posted April 4, 2016 Your all cheaters. You're welcome.
Calder Posted April 4, 2016 Posted April 4, 2016 I bet if I got lynched in here I would still flip scum.
Cory Caboose Posted April 4, 2016 Posted April 4, 2016 I bet if I got lynched in here I would still flip scum. It's basically guaranteed
Turin Turambar Posted April 4, 2016 Posted April 4, 2016 I bet if I got lynched in here I would still flip scum. Magic 8-ball says "yes"
Zander? Posted April 4, 2016 Posted April 4, 2016 payback.... It's not going to work - unless you can get the Poll to make a voting statement in the poll thread. People are voting without sayin they're voting. It's going to kill all those ISOs and re-reads. I do some of my best work at night....
Calder Posted April 4, 2016 Posted April 4, 2016 I bet if I got lynched in here I would still flip scum. Magic 8-ball says "yes" I thought it was 50/50 you were the seer last game. Shame.
Ithillian Turambar Posted April 4, 2016 Author Posted April 4, 2016 There's a little blue star that reminds you where your own vote is. cool.
Ithillian Turambar Posted April 4, 2016 Author Posted April 4, 2016 [unvote][v]Dice[/v] I think he's waking up.
Cory Caboose Posted April 4, 2016 Posted April 4, 2016 Yeah there needs to be something documented ITT for votes cast for the sake of both player/moderator sanity and game integrity And if in thread votes are god, without something tying poll votes / thread votes, the poll is just a "potentially extremely inaccurate vote count" we can add to games But if we can tie them together with the magic of COMPUTERS
Turin Turambar Posted April 4, 2016 Posted April 4, 2016 I bet if I got lynched in here I would still flip scum.Magic 8-ball says "yes" I thought it was 50/50 you were the seer last game. Shame. Funny thing is that I think you got that off of my inadvertent seer-like post. I didn't even read how unsubtle it looked until Darthe quoted after I died.
Cory Caboose Posted April 4, 2016 Posted April 4, 2016 Then we'll just need more than 20 posts per page, LDO
WWWwombat Posted April 4, 2016 Posted April 4, 2016 Problem is polls don't really leave a permanent enough record. Would probably be relatively easy for someone to write a script to automate vote counts as long as people only used accepted syntax.
Ithillian Turambar Posted April 4, 2016 Author Posted April 4, 2016 we don't even know how many w's to put in your name - let alone write syntax lol My own experience of 'syntax' was invariably coupled with 'error'
Calder Posted April 4, 2016 Posted April 4, 2016 Wouldnt it be easier to have the poll lock once the 6 votes are reached then have to worry about the poll connecting to posts in thread?
Calder Posted April 4, 2016 Posted April 4, 2016 Then you wouldnt have to worry about unvotes following a lynch.
WWWwombat Posted April 4, 2016 Posted April 4, 2016 Basically just means using the vote/unvote tags and spelling peoples' handles out fully.
Turin Turambar Posted April 4, 2016 Posted April 4, 2016 Do the other sites with auto VC have an archive of the changes or do the MODS just do a VC every so often? If the latter then it would just be the same. every so often and then as DL approached or someone got close to lynch then more often.
Cory Caboose Posted April 4, 2016 Posted April 4, 2016 Wouldnt it be easier to have the poll lock once the 6 votes are reached then have to worry about the poll connecting to posts in thread? This would require custom programming I think the idea is if custom programming is possible, why not do all our voting from polls and just program a vote receipt when someone does vote
Shad_ Posted April 4, 2016 Posted April 4, 2016 Just make posts per page user-specific so I can stay at 20. <_<
Calder Posted April 4, 2016 Posted April 4, 2016 Wouldnt it be easier to have the poll lock once the 6 votes are reached then have to worry about the poll connecting to posts in thread? This would require custom programming I think the idea is if custom programming is possible, why not do all our voting from polls and just program a vote receipt when someone does vote I guess it would. I was just wondering if that was simpler to achieve than the latter.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.