Jump to content

DRAGONMOUNT

A WHEEL OF TIME COMMUNITY

[Advanced/Experimental] No Roles Disney Game - Game Over - Town Wins!


LilyElizabeth

Recommended Posts

Posted

 

Did you ignore the 3rd point? Especially the part about Len completely contradicting himself?

 

 

No, I didn't ignore it.  I brought those points up in the first place.  Let us know when you're caught up.

  • Replies 2.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted
 

Yeah I am. Why?

 

And I didn't say you're scum. I said it's weird Lenlo didn't point if out, when he freaked out about Mish.

 

Your extreme selectiveness of what of my posts you read and what you don't is starting to get frustrating. Do you have a reason or is it just not to lose face because you already decided I'm scum?

Again you misunderstanding why I made a big deal of Mish's. The way Mish handled it was horrible imo. Just plain bad.

 

 

For example Len was the first to come out saying he didn't like AJs point on claiming. Then doing a 180 and contributing to D1 being consistently about characters, which is why he is my main suspect at this point (ISOing him now). Especially where he says claims are null, yet going on and on about it, especially towards Mishs' coyness about her character. I'll be back with my thoughts on him in a sec. 

 

You're misunderstanding here - character claims themselves are null. As I've said, no singular claim is likely to lead directly to saving/lynching someone. The actions around these claims (Mish's for instance - her 'coyness') along with what players say in arguments for or against claims are very much gameplay and should not be ignored. THAT was the agreement Wombat and Len came to.

 

^

 

 

 

This is really bad.  You are casing Len on weak semantic grounds imo.  Who cares exactly how Len defines the difference between main and secondary?  Gaston may not be a title character, but he's pretty important in his movie.  This is the kid of case scum makes to drive home a mislynch.

 

Bold: that's only part of my case against him. The rest is how he went back and forth between talking about character claims, saying their null, to talking about them again. He questioned me when I said he went back and forth on it, I just pointed it out for him as he asked. I also don't care how he defines the two, it was that he had asked her about being a main character, esp if it was bad, then denied ever saying it that I was pointing out.

 

I wasnt talking about claims explicitly thank you very much. I was talking about what people did around them. All of Mish's gameplay has in some way or the other been around her claim, so ofc if I want to case her I have to talk about it.

 

Posted

Hey guys, I apologize if I was snappish with anyone earlier. I found out today that I was passed over for a promotion that I had been all but assured I would get, so I'm frankly very pissed off right now. I'll be back in the evening. I just want to step away from the game for a little while so my bad mood doesn't bleed into it.

Posted

I just want to say real quick that this recent post of Len's makes me feel a lot better about him:

 

 


You misunderstand. Characters are null. It doesnt matter who someone picks. What isnt null is the gameplay around how, when and why people claim. For instance Mish's claim compared to AJ's. The way AJ claimed is towny to me, the when he claimed is towny to me and the why he claimed is towny to me. Thus, it all points to AJ being town. Mishs though, well here: 

How: Hints, FOS's at my pushs, lots of dodging and then a claim.

When: After pages and pages of confrontation on it.

Why: To reveal that she laid a trap. A horrible trap imo.

Posted

Btw, did you see how Kaylee uted herself as scum and spewed Len town?

 

Not really.  I did see that 40 pages later you're starting to work with AJ though.  

 

@Verb, has your read of AJ changed?

Posted

Len part 2:

 

Here he tells Pral he should catch and and reiterates that him and Womby agree that character claims are null and get to gameplay. Now he's back to talking about claims. He says " if we lock people into a claim then they cant BS anything later on. Force them into it now while people are still establishing their town/scumminess." (So back to character talk and how it's important. What happened to making it about gameplay and characters being null?) More secondary character talk

 

This quote is partly in response to Womby questioning his back and forth on character talk and partly to Mish about her claim. (I'm going to respond to several things so I'll put each point on a bullet to make it easier to follow. The part of Len's post I'm talking about will be in quotation marks).

  • "1) Yes I believe and have always believed this will be a game of supporting characters." (Only supporting characters? Mish claimed a main one. She may not be the only one with a main character. Again what happened to looking at gameplay and focusing on that?)
  • "3) I didn't push Mish for hinting a main Character" (I just find this funny with his first point in the same quote. May be true, but it's still odd.)
  • "I never said if you were a "bad guy" that I wanted to know, I said I wanted to know because your hinting is stupid." (Not true. In my part 1 I pointed out his exact wording where he did in fact say...oh I'll copy it here: "If its a main character like Wombys, a bad main character, than I want to know." Yeah you did Len, I just quoted and bolded it for you.)

 

Summary: Len goes back and forth on his views about character claiming. (from the time he says he's interested to telling Womby he's not to back to being interested and pushing it.) Alanna: that's why I singled him out on it against the others pushing it. He also contradicts himself above. (Tells Mish he wants to know if she's a main character, esp a bad one. Then when she brings it up he says he didn't say that.) I know Womby asked him about his back and forth and he said he only said he wanted to focus on gameplay and that character claims are null because otherwise Wombat wouldn't leave him alone, or something like that, but then why also say it to Pral? Inconsistent maybe is a better word than back and forth. I'm comfortable leaving my vote here.

 

 

 

 

[unvote]

 

[v]Krak[/v]

 

I'm not finding Len overly scummy right now. Wombat and Krak are sticking out a bit more to me on my initial read. Krak for his weird reasoning on Lenlo and Wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwombat seems to be trying to figure out if the pasta is done yet by flinging it against the wall to see if it will stick.

I actually agree with Leelou about Krak, not so much about Wombat.

 

I just went back and looked at Krak's posts.

 

He joke votes Lenlo, picks a minor point in wording to FoS him, fluff posts a bit, and then he defends his decision of why he voted Lenlo, along with nudging Alanna a bit.

 

Not liking the tone in the last post and sounds a bit of fencesitting

 

[v]krak[/v]

 

You might be onto something with Krak. Definately want to hear more from him.

 

 

Here you go, Darthe.  Scumposts.

Posted

Can someone summarize the case on me?  :huh: Except "I don't agree with your views". 

 

Your reads are fairly misrepresented, your tone is scummy and your views look like you are pushing an angle.  You're the best chance at finding scum D1 because you're scum.  I can prove it, just link me your QT.

Posted

 

Btw, did you see how Kaylee uted herself as scum and spewed Len town?

 

Not really.  I did see that 40 pages later you're starting to work with AJ though.  

 

@Verb, has your read of AJ changed?

 

 

You quoted Wombat and mentioned working with AJ then ask Verb if his view changed?

Posted

^Read the thread TG.  Jesus, you going backwards is ridiculous since you clearly have no clue what is going on.  Two people had issue with AJ early game for something I townread him for, Womby and Verb.  

Posted

 

Len part 2:

 

Here he tells Pral he should catch and and reiterates that him and Womby agree that character claims are null and get to gameplay. Now he's back to talking about claims. He says " if we lock people into a claim then they cant BS anything later on. Force them into it now while people are still establishing their town/scumminess." (So back to character talk and how it's important. What happened to making it about gameplay and characters being null?) More secondary character talk

 

This quote is partly in response to Womby questioning his back and forth on character talk and partly to Mish about her claim. (I'm going to respond to several things so I'll put each point on a bullet to make it easier to follow. The part of Len's post I'm talking about will be in quotation marks).

  • "1) Yes I believe and have always believed this will be a game of supporting characters." (Only supporting characters? Mish claimed a main one. She may not be the only one with a main character. Again what happened to looking at gameplay and focusing on that?)
  • "3) I didn't push Mish for hinting a main Character" (I just find this funny with his first point in the same quote. May be true, but it's still odd.)
  • "I never said if you were a "bad guy" that I wanted to know, I said I wanted to know because your hinting is stupid." (Not true. In my part 1 I pointed out his exact wording where he did in fact say...oh I'll copy it here: "If its a main character like Wombys, a bad main character, than I want to know." Yeah you did Len, I just quoted and bolded it for you.)

 

Summary: Len goes back and forth on his views about character claiming. (from the time he says he's interested to telling Womby he's not to back to being interested and pushing it.) Alanna: that's why I singled him out on it against the others pushing it. He also contradicts himself above. (Tells Mish he wants to know if she's a main character, esp a bad one. Then when she brings it up he says he didn't say that.) I know Womby asked him about his back and forth and he said he only said he wanted to focus on gameplay and that character claims are null because otherwise Wombat wouldn't leave him alone, or something like that, but then why also say it to Pral? Inconsistent maybe is a better word than back and forth. I'm comfortable leaving my vote here.

 

 

 

 

[unvote]

 

[v]Krak[/v]

 

I'm not finding Len overly scummy right now. Wombat and Krak are sticking out a bit more to me on my initial read. Krak for his weird reasoning on Lenlo and Wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwombat seems to be trying to figure out if the pasta is done yet by flinging it against the wall to see if it will stick.

I actually agree with Leelou about Krak, not so much about Wombat.

 

I just went back and looked at Krak's posts.

 

He joke votes Lenlo, picks a minor point in wording to FoS him, fluff posts a bit, and then he defends his decision of why he voted Lenlo, along with nudging Alanna a bit.

 

Not liking the tone in the last post and sounds a bit of fencesitting

 

[v]krak[/v]

 

You might be onto something with Krak. Definately want to hear more from him.

 

 

Here you go, Darthe.  Scumposts.

 

 

What makes them scum posts? Specifics.  

Posted

Unoffical Vote count:

 

Lenlo (4) - Krak, Kaylee, Mish, Vos
Mish (1) - Lenlo
Vos (4) - Darthe, Womby, AJ, Leelou
Krak (1) - Pralaya
Wombat(1) - TG


Not voting - Alanna, Hallia, Amega, Lia, Verb,

Posted

 

Can someone summarize the case on me?  :huh: Except "I don't agree with your views". 

 

Your reads are fairly misrepresented, your tone is scummy and your views look like you are pushing an angle.  You're the best chance at finding scum D1 because you're scum.  I can prove it, just link me your QT.

 

 

 

 

Can someone summarize the case on me?  :huh: Except "I don't agree with your views". 

 

No.  Die.

 

 

Riiiiight.

 

Well, good luck with that. 

Posted

Sorry to hear that Alanna :sad:

 

 

Reading the thread backwards is recipe for confusion, why would you do it? O.o

 

 

Vos, it seemed like the whole deadline thing boiled down to: It was super early in the game, and you're already asking if there is a deadline?  Having time is the best thing for town, so the mention of it was suspicious, and your defensiveness afterwards didn't look much better.

Posted

Len: I can see what's you're saying. 

 

Womby: I know it was the same points as yours against Len, the only reason I laid it out was because Len asked me to. I never claimed I came to that conclusion on my own. I did start the game behind everyone after all.

 

Unvote

Posted

I like the way Kaylee has approached it so far Womby.  Nothing says she can't have a similar train of thought to you and considering that you likely think your own is right I fail to see how that gives you much more than slight uneasiness.

Posted

^Read the thread TG.  Jesus, you going backwards is ridiculous since you clearly have no clue what is going on.  Two people had issue with AJ early game for something I townread him for, Womby and Verb.  

 

Reading the thread backwards is recipe for confusion, why would you do it? O.o

 

Is it the best plan I've ever had?  Maybe not.  But I was doing it that way so I could start to participate in events more quickly rather than only getting to really start posting after hours and hours of reading.  And yes, it's a bit confusing so far, but it's like a fun storybook with lots of spoilers, lol

Posted

Probably came off a bit passive aggresive there. Sorry. Just banging my head in the wall this game, which is frustrating, to the point where I was abit whatever. Then I figured I owed it to town to try to actually clear my alignment and help avoid mislynch D1, so I wanted to properly address my case. Then Darthe comes with a pretty vague sentence, mostly about tone - and Wombat comes and... well, with his reply. 

 

I'll try to post a complete set of reads later, so it's there ;)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...