Jump to content

DRAGONMOUNT

A WHEEL OF TIME COMMUNITY

[DPR Mafia] Call-Your-Shot Mafia- Points being posted...


DPR

Recommended Posts

Posted

Personally if I were Barm I would neither confirm nor deny anything. It's so early in the game, it doesn't matter one lick whether we know for sure or not he's finder. He's put himself into a position where if he turns out to be wrong, he's most likely going to be lynched immediately after DS. Besides, who's to say we would believe him one way or the other anyway?

 

All I know is that we've got too many people outed right now (for it being this early in the game) for us to out anymore townie roles. The Healer(s) are probably crying right now as it is. :P

  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

OK, for those disenters, explain exactly why barms would do that? There is no role on the list that actually would benefit from this that is anti town. If he's the anti something, he's just going to die, so I don't see it as a solo. The most benefit a mafia team would get is to buy time for their third and only if there was no interaction previous to this. So... since none of that makes enough sense to risk on DAY 2!! I think I have to try to follow through with this. Especially after you guys followed me on nothing but trust.

Posted

Personally if I were Barm I would neither confirm nor deny anything. It's so early in the game, it doesn't matter one lick whether we know for sure or not he's finder. He's put himself into a position where if he turns out to be wrong, he's most likely going to be lynched immediately after DS. Besides, who's to say we would believe him one way or the other anyway?

 

All I know is that we've got too many people outed right now (for it being this early in the game) for us to out anymore townie roles. The Healer(s) are probably crying right now as it is. :P

 

Well, that's kind of why the "confirm or deny" is important.  If he's not claiming finder, if he's really doing this on a pure hunch . . . well, he'd better say so before we lynch DS and find out DS is innocent, instead of coming in after the fact and saying "oh, you thought I was claiming finder?  No, no.  I was just hunching."

 

Bottom line - if we lynch DS and Barm hasn't denied being the finder beforehand, and DS flips innocent . . . I'm not going to buy any "I wasn't claiming finder" line from him.

 

So I guess what I'm saying is, if Barm isn't claiming Finder, he'd better tell us now.

  • Club Leader
Posted

Knowing my brother and why he's doing this (or at least why I THINK he's doing this) I'd say we've gotten some pretty good info here so far. Keep going, guys.... my suspect list is filling out nicely.

 

 

Posted

Current Vote Count:

 

Pete/Dragonsworn (7) - Kivam, Barm, ed, Nae, Lia, Alys, Talya

Nae (1) - Pete

 

 

Not voting:

 

Pandy

Wombat

Lavinya

Tigs

Lily

Hybrid

FDM

Pale

Dae

 

The folks in bold have checked in since Talya placed the 7th vote on Pete early yesterday morning (6am EST on Sat.) and haven't voted.

 

Lily says she thinks Pete is innocent, and is suspicious of his voters

FDM drops in only to say Barm should not confirm as finder, but doesn't vote or offer suggestions for voting (odd, for someone who jumped into this game with "MAFIA I WILL TRACK YOU DOWN!!!!!")

Dae said he was going to review the thread . . . and promptly disappeared

Lavinya showed up only to spam

Tigs, like Lily, seems concerned by the wagon on Pete

 

Worth noting

 

  • Club Leader
Posted

I disagree and I think we have enough to go on here. Pete? Do you want my vote now?

 

And I don't THINK Pete is innocent. I KNOW he is. We never fool each other for long.

 

Posted

Well, that's kind of why the "confirm or deny" is important.  If he's not claiming finder, if he's really doing this on a pure hunch . . . well, he'd better say so before we lynch DS and find out DS is innocent, instead of coming in after the fact and saying "oh, you thought I was claiming finder?  No, no.  I was just hunching."

 

Bottom line - if we lynch DS and Barm hasn't denied being the finder beforehand, and DS flips innocent . . . I'm not going to buy any "I wasn't claiming finder" line from him.

 

So I guess what I'm saying is, if Barm isn't claiming Finder, he'd better tell us now.

 

I agree 110%...I think that Barm knows that people remember this tactic that he used in a previous game and if it gets Pete lynched and he is innocent then he will do exactly as Kivam said and say "I wasn't claiming finder. 

 

Once I hear from Barm and he addresses this concern then I will probably vote Pete but until then I don't trust a veteran using tactics that he used previously.

 

I know that was basically repeating everything Kivam said but I wanted to say it in my own words and hope it makes sense! :D

Guest dragonsworn1991
Posted

I disagree and I think we have enough to go on here. Pete? Do you want my vote now?

 

And I don't THINK Pete is innocent. I KNOW he is. We never fool each other for long.

 

 

Lily we think so much alike and I have just about got all I need from this day so you can throw a vote on me if you got enough information, or any leads. I have been vocal about my suspicouns but I would suggest you keep yours locked down tight until you have everything formulated.  :-*

 

Glad to see it looks like we are on the same page.

 

That's a bold statement, Lily.  I still don't get Rey's play.

 

I wouldn't expect anything less from Lily, and I can easily tell you Rey's play Kiv. He isn't as experienced as you, or Barm so you decided to use him as cannon fodder to give you something to argue around so you could avoid suspicoun

 

Posted

Heh, didn't mean to spam. I didn't want to vote for DS, purely because Barm said so with pretty pictures. I would have rather seen some sort of decisive argument, or him come out as finder, or even profess a gut hunch, as opposed to the big fat nothing he gave us. And why, since he has actually posted on DM since, has he not bothered to stop in here and answer questions? I smell scum. He's probably sitting back, watching everyone bandwagon DS with glee, without him having needed to do anything more but flash something shiny. Give me something more, and I will happily vote for DS, but I will not do it purely because scummy scum scum Barm told me to :P.

Posted

Okay, explanation for the weirdness yesterday - if somebody says "I agree with Pandy" then I am immune from night actions for the night. Hence my asking people to target me. My vagueness about the exact details of the role was an effort to make the mafia scared of whatever powers I would have, and thus to try and draw their nightkill (which I would have been immune from). This doesn't really seem to have worked.

 

Anyway, somebody want to agree with me today?

 

I'm catching up on what I've missed, anyway.

Guest dragonsworn1991
Posted

I agree with Pandy

  • Club Leader
Posted

Yes, it's a bold statement, but I'm tired of trying to pretend that our connection isn't there. I got totally busted on it in another game, and it was NOT a good time to explain it. So, now, I'm just upfront with it. Pete and I always know when the other is lying, after a few posts. That's just the way it is.

 

Okay, bro. I'll stay silent for now. [glow=red,2,300]Dragon[/glow]  :-*

 

Posted

I wouldn't expect anything less from Lily, and I can easily tell you Rey's play Kiv. He isn't as experienced as you, or Barm so you decided to use him as cannon fodder to give you something to argue around so you could avoid suspicoun

 

Kivam sacrificed Reyoru?  It was Kivam who advised keeping Reyoru around until Alys came out with her own reveal -- and you were the one who called him out on it:

 

Well Kivam I may have interpreted it wrong, but from what I saw anytime people wanted to lynch Rey you said we should keep him around and anyone he actually vies as being scum equates to being 66% accurate versus 50% accurate. I may be connecting too many dots but that is how I see it.

 

That's a rather strange 180 on the matter.  How coincidental that it came when Kivam backed up Barm's "hunch" that you were scum.

 

I'm fine with voting you right now, but I agree that we should see what Barm has to say before we hammer DS.

 

EDIT WHILE POSTING: Lily just voted for DS.  I'm not going to vote just yet until we get a vote count.  I'm not too worried about the double voter, but it's better to be safe than sorry.

 

Guest dragonsworn1991
Posted

In my opinion I think Kiv planned Rey's reveal. Kiv backed Rey and said we should keep him around. I think they are a team and Kivam is mastermining some devious plot. I can see it unfolding.

 

It doesn't matter if you vote for me or not, we are going into night without a lynch.  ;)

Posted

I disagree and I think we have enough to go on here. Pete? Do you want my vote now?

 

And I don't THINK Pete is innocent. I KNOW he is. We never fool each other for long.

 

 

Lily, unless you're the finder (which you aren't), or on a team with the player in question - and if you are a mason with Pete, you should say so - you can never know someone is innocent.

Guest dragonsworn1991
Posted

I disagree and I think we have enough to go on here. Pete? Do you want my vote now?

 

And I don't THINK Pete is innocent. I KNOW he is. We never fool each other for long.

 

 

Lily, unless you're the finder (which you aren't), or on a team with the player in question - and if you are a mason with Pete, you should say so - you can never know someone is innocent.

 

How do you know she isn't the finder, unless you are in a mason group with the finder, or you have that role.

Posted

I wouldn't expect anything less from Lily, and I can easily tell you Rey's play Kiv. He isn't as experienced as you, or Barm so you decided to use him as cannon fodder to give you something to argue around so you could avoid suspicoun

 

Kivam sacrificed Reyoru?  It was Kivam who advised keeping Reyoru around until Alys came out with her own reveal -- and you were the one who called him out on it:

 

Well Kivam I may have interpreted it wrong, but from what I saw anytime people wanted to lynch Rey you said we should keep him around and anyone he actually vies as being scum equates to being 66% accurate versus 50% accurate. I may be connecting too many dots but that is how I see it.

 

That's a rather strange 180 on the matter.  How coincidental that it came when Kivam backed up Barm's "hunch" that you were scum.

 

Funny, I was just about to make the same exact post.  I'm not sure what Lily's seeing, but Pete's exhibiting the typical signs of a scum caught dead to rights - rapid spinning, outright contradiction to previous theories, desperately reaching for any possible lifeline he can find.

 

I'm fine with voting you right now, but I agree that we should see what Barm has to say before we hammer DS.

 

EDIT WHILE POSTING: Lily just voted for DS.  I'm not going to vote just yet until we get a vote count.  I'm not too worried about the double voter, but it's better to be safe than sorry.

 

 

Lily puts DS at 8.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...