Jump to content

DRAGONMOUNT

A WHEEL OF TIME COMMUNITY

Tainted Minds - A Black Tower Mafia Game: Game over - Town wins


Andrej

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 9/16/2017 at 6:51 AM, Niniel said:

Read this while eating breakfast. As I said in the sign up thread I won´t be here today. Because I´m going to see Iain Glen!!!!!!!! 

 

I won´t reveal my N0 peek right now but I think this might be a good game to view yourself. I read Kivam´s Police Academy game years ago and there everyone were some kind of cop. They figured out their own sanity by watching themselves and comparing their views with others later on. I´m not sure it would work here since there are less player in this game (I think at least) and there are framers. I´ll leave it to the more intelligent players to see if this would be good or not in a game like this. 

FWIW I would say it's probably a bad idea in this game, but I understand the merit. Sanity testing isn't really reliable with framers, and in a smaller format each peek has more value than a larger game where it might be worth sacrificing one as a sanity check.

 

There are some merit to having the peeks later when we may be able to deduct sanity. For example if we can figure out who the insane seer is (which could be done if, for example, they had a inno peek on a confirmed mafia), we at least know any true seers have reliable v peeks since the mafia framers power is mitigated by the fact they cannot appear innocent to real seers, which means any true seers would have their village peeks confirmed

 

The set-up has some fun nuances XD

  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

You know whatscoming :P

 

Can ihave yournotepadread on LZN?

 

Pretty please with cherries on top

Posted
  On 9/18/2017 at 1:47 PM, BFG said:

You know whatscoming :P

 

Can ihave yournotepadread on LZN?

 

Pretty please with cherries on top

 

Like his general focus and approach (#38) ability to manage multiple suspects and have believable developments (#86) does not avoid frays (#90) rational well-timed responses to events (#136)

 

Had to remove 2 things bc they weren't worth saying out loud :P

 

I'm not super sure why you care about this :shrug: haha

Posted
  On 9/18/2017 at 1:33 PM, LedZepMan said:

 

  On 9/18/2017 at 1:27 PM, cory caboose said:

 

  On 9/18/2017 at 1:23 PM, Nolder said:

 

  On 9/18/2017 at 1:01 PM, cory caboose said:

Does anyone have a decent amount of familiarity with LZM?

He was mafia in an ongoing game on JN. I've played with him more than I have several others here. Not entirely sure what that is worth read wise though.

My notepad is very confident he is a villager. I am less so on a personal level, but I generally adhere to the notepad, for it is far wiser than me

 

I'm putting a note to peruse some some wolf games for reference before committing to that read

You're gonna have to travel back to the beginning of DM (are we on V8 now or is it still 7) to find those.

 

I haven't played a scum game on DM since 2011.

 

 

8 or 9, I'm not sure.

 

I like Dice a little bit more after his last few posts by the way.

Posted
  On 9/18/2017 at 1:45 PM, cory caboose said:

There are some merit to having the peeks later when we may be able to deduct sanity. For example if we can figure out who the insane seer is (which could be done if, for example, they had a inno peek on a confirmed mafia), we at least know any true seers have reliable v peeks since the mafia framers power is mitigated by the fact they cannot appear innocent to real seers, which means any true seers would have their village peeks confirmed*

 

* the traitor would need to be dead in this scenario

 

thanks BFG for getting me to reread the OP :P

Posted
  On 9/18/2017 at 1:52 PM, cory caboose said:

 

  On 9/18/2017 at 1:47 PM, BFG said:

You know whatscoming :P

 

Can ihave yournotepadread on LZN?

 

Pretty please with cherries on top

Like his general focus and approach (#38) ability to manage multiple suspects and have believable developments (#86) does not avoid frays (#90) rational well-timed responses to events (#136)

 

Had to remove 2 things bc they weren't worth saying out loud :P

 

I'm not super sure why you care about this :shrug: haha

Because you're in tell not show mode and that always worries me :(

Posted

More that the if the traitor isn't recruited before the framers die game ends. So mis-peeking the traitor doesn't matter unless they're recruited

Posted
  On 9/18/2017 at 1:57 PM, BFG said:

Because you're in tell not show mode and that always worries me :(

 

You can trust me this game. Not that you will just because I said that, but I'm going to be me and you typically get there, so I'm not worried

 

(Or I could just lynch a wolf today :flamingsword: )

Posted
  On 9/18/2017 at 2:00 PM, BFG said:

More that the if the traitor isn't recruited before the framers die game ends. So mis-peeking the traitor doesn't matter unless they're recruited

Which we'll know if it happens.

Posted
  On 9/18/2017 at 2:00 PM, BFG said:

More that the if the traitor isn't recruited before the framers die game ends. So mis-peeking the traitor doesn't matter unless they're recruited

 

And we will know if they are recruited since there will be no NK

 

Setup is quite interesting :P

Posted
  On 9/18/2017 at 2:03 PM, BFG said:

Also I don't know why you say mafia can't cop hunt :(

 

To some extent they can, but it's much more difficult since peeks are more likely to be valid in some form in general

Posted
  On 9/18/2017 at 2:01 PM, cory caboose said:

 

  On 9/18/2017 at 1:57 PM, BFG said:

Because you're in tell not show mode and that always worries me :(

You can trust me this game. Not that you will just because I said that, but I'm going to be me and you typically get there, so I'm not worried

 

(Or I could just lynch a wolf today :flamingsword: )

Please do, that would be very helpful :p

Posted

I think pondering the setup any deeper is pretty useless on d1. The idea is just to have a safe place for the seers to drop their peeks and nothing further. They may be become useful later in the game; they may not. Nobody knows until we get there.

Posted
  On 9/18/2017 at 2:08 PM, cory caboose said:

I think pondering the setup any deeper is pretty useless on d1. The idea is just to have a safe place for the seers to drop their peeks and nothing further. They may be become useful later in the game; they may not. Nobody knows until we get there.

 

Cory is my spirit animal.

Posted
  On 9/18/2017 at 2:10 PM, Clovdyx said:

 

  On 9/18/2017 at 2:03 PM, cory caboose said:

Clov ur a greedy soab you know that

 

Yeah, but am I the most smug person you know?

 

 

I was facing IR this week. I have Mariota & DeMarco Murray. He has Delanie Walker.

 

The Titans had the ball at their own 1.

 

I thought "well, Derrick Henry might poach the TD from DeMarco, but at least I'll get points from Mariota if he throws a TD to Delanie".

 

The Titans ran a sweep play handing off to the TE. It was Delanie Walker's first ever rush attempt in the NFL. 1 yard TD.

 

Thanks IR.

Posted
  On 9/18/2017 at 2:14 PM, cory caboose said:

 

  On 9/18/2017 at 2:10 PM, Clovdyx said:

 

  On 9/18/2017 at 2:03 PM, cory caboose said:

Clov ur a greedy soab you know that

 

Yeah, but am I the most smug person you know?

 

 

I was facing IR this week. I have Mariota & DeMarco Murray. He has Delanie Walker.

 

The Titans had the ball at their own 1.

 

I thought "well, Derrick Henry might poach the TD from DeMarco, but at least I'll get points from Mariota if he throws a TD to Delanie".

 

The Titans ran a sweep play handing off to the TE. It was Delanie Walker's first ever rush attempt in the NFL. 1 yard TD.

 

Thanks IR.

 

 

This is the most IR story I think I've ever heard.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...