[Advanced] Lost Mafia--Game Over!

[Calder]

 

AJ and Nyn need some discipline. I'll fetch the belt.

 

 

Why are you being weird?

Calder already told you why

[Andrej]

 

AJ and Nyn need some discipline. I'll fetch the belt.

 

Interesting selection.

What is?

[Sooh]

 

 

AJ and Nyn need some discipline. I'll fetch the belt.

Interesting selection.

What is?

 

AJ and Nyn, coupling you together like that.

[DPR]

 

You're a kick.

 

Eldrick seemed nervous to me. I shared the opinion. It's not an overly strong opinion or a game-changer, just something I noticed. I also noticed bop posting multiple times to prop him up (the positive feedback). Now you're defending him, which is confusing because you just said he didn't need it?

 

You can't possibly be criticizing a no-pressure opinion, on d1, from a newly returned player who hasn't played with over half the players - that wouldn't make any sense.

 

We'll see what happens.

Red, you humored that Bop might have rushed to Eldrick's defense because they're scum bros.  What on earth does me sticking up for both of them have to do with it?

 

Blue, new people rand scum too.  If I don't question you I'm not really sure how you expect me to read you.

 

 

 

They're two different points: the first is noting that bop possibly provided cover for Eldrick's possible sloppy play. The second was that you declared Eldrick's play to be on the level and noted that he needed no defense. You follow that statement by continuing to defend him. The entire point of your post is to criticize the opinion that I offered, even though according to your statement, there was no need to respond to it as Eldrick's posts seemed fine to you.

 

Your attempt to falsely tie these points together while criticizing the fact that I offered an opinion at all seems a bit of a design on your part. You got a boner for me?  

[DPR]

 

 

 

 

I'm agreeing with Sooh's lol. Could be bop laying down cover for Eldrick after he was called on his posting.

That's a pretty paranoid way of looking at it. Eldrick was getting more positive feedback than negative, so it's not like he needed to be bailed out of anything.Eldrick is very likely a villager in this game, and Bop's a good wolf but seems entirely villagery so far.

I thought it was a bit of a stretch personally. I think voting Eldrick when you're not familiar with him is probably more null than anything. See Calder in Hackers as an example. I agree irt to the other two.

You've played with Bop before too?

 

Nope. I've only played with a few of the folks here - less than half.

I'm aware and that's kind of my point. I don't think it's unreasonable for someone who has never played with Eldrick to think he looks scummy. The buzzsaw defense connection was sort of out there though. I think Bop's read was pretty spot on despite Eldrick's insistence that his post count is null.

 

 

I call 'em like I see 'em. You're welcome to your opinion. I'll stick to mine.

[Sooh]

 

 

 

 

You're a kick.

 

Eldrick seemed nervous to me. I shared the opinion. It's not an overly strong opinion or a game-changer, just something I noticed. I also noticed bop posting multiple times to prop him up (the positive feedback). Now you're defending him, which is confusing because you just said he didn't need it?

 

You can't possibly be criticizing a no-pressure opinion, on d1, from a newly returned player who hasn't played with over half the players - that wouldn't make any sense.

 

We'll see what happens.

Red, you humored that Bop might have rushed to Eldrick's defense because they're scum bros.  What on earth does me sticking up for both of them have to do with it?

 

Blue, new people rand scum too.  If I don't question you I'm not really sure how you expect me to read you.

 

 

 

 

 

They're two different points: the first is noting that bop possibly provided cover for Eldrick's possible sloppy play. The second was that you declared Eldrick's play to be on the level and noted that he needed no defense. You follow that statement by continuing to defend him. The entire point of your post is to criticize the opinion that I offered, even though according to your statement, there was no need to respond to it as Eldrick's posts seemed fine to you.

 

Your attempt to falsely tie these points together while criticizing the fact that I offered an opinion at all seems a bit of a design on your part. You got a boner for me?  

 

Don't all the boys have that?

[Calder]

 

 

 

 

 

 

You're a kick.

 

Eldrick seemed nervous to me. I shared the opinion. It's not an overly strong opinion or a game-changer, just something I noticed. I also noticed bop posting multiple times to prop him up (the positive feedback). Now you're defending him, which is confusing because you just said he didn't need it?

 You can't possibly be criticizing a no-pressure opinion, on d1, from a newly returned player who hasn't played with over half the players - that wouldn't make any sense.

 

We'll see what happens.

 

Red, you humored that Bop might have rushed to Eldrick's defense because they're scum bros.  What on earth does me sticking up for both of them have to do with it?

 

Blue, new people rand scum too.  If I don't question you I'm not really sure how you expect me to read you.

 

 

 

 

They're two different points: the first is noting that bop possibly provided cover for Eldrick's possible sloppy play. The second was that you declared Eldrick's play to be on the level and noted that he needed no defense. You follow that statement by continuing to defend him. The entire point of your post is to criticize the opinion that I offered, even though according to your statement, there was no need to respond to it as Eldrick's posts seemed fine to you.

 

Your attempt to falsely tie these points together while criticizing the fact that I offered an opinion at all seems a bit of a design on your part. You got a boner for me?  

Don't all the boys have that?

Not at DPR's age.

[Shad_]

 

 

You're a kick.

 

Eldrick seemed nervous to me. I shared the opinion. It's not an overly strong opinion or a game-changer, just something I noticed. I also noticed bop posting multiple times to prop him up (the positive feedback). Now you're defending him, which is confusing because you just said he didn't need it?

 

You can't possibly be criticizing a no-pressure opinion, on d1, from a newly returned player who hasn't played with over half the players - that wouldn't make any sense.

 

We'll see what happens.

Red, you humored that Bop might have rushed to Eldrick's defense because they're scum bros.  What on earth does me sticking up for both of them have to do with it?

 

Blue, new people rand scum too.  If I don't question you I'm not really sure how you expect me to read you.

 

 

 

They're two different points: the first is noting that bop possibly provided cover for Eldrick's possible sloppy play. The second was that you declared Eldrick's play to be on the level and noted that he needed no defense. You follow that statement by continuing to defend him. The entire point of your post is to criticize the opinion that I offered, even though according to your statement, there was no need to respond to it as Eldrick's posts seemed fine to you.

 

Your attempt to falsely tie these points together while criticizing the fact that I offered an opinion at all seems a bit of a design on your part. You got a boner for me?

 

I'm ready to put my head through my monitor already.

[Sooh]

 

 

 

 

 

 

You're a kick.

 

Eldrick seemed nervous to me. I shared the opinion. It's not an overly strong opinion or a game-changer, just something I noticed. I also noticed bop posting multiple times to prop him up (the positive feedback). Now you're defending him, which is confusing because you just said he didn't need it?

 You can't possibly be criticizing a no-pressure opinion, on d1, from a newly returned player who hasn't played with over half the players - that wouldn't make any sense.

 

We'll see what happens.

Red, you humored that Bop might have rushed to Eldrick's defense because they're scum bros.  What on earth does me sticking up for both of them have to do with it?

 

Blue, new people rand scum too.  If I don't question you I'm not really sure how you expect me to read you.

 

 

 

 

They're two different points: the first is noting that bop possibly provided cover for Eldrick's possible sloppy play. The second was that you declared Eldrick's play to be on the level and noted that he needed no defense. You follow that statement by continuing to defend him. The entire point of your post is to criticize the opinion that I offered, even though according to your statement, there was no need to respond to it as Eldrick's posts seemed fine to you.

 

Your attempt to falsely tie these points together while criticizing the fact that I offered an opinion at all seems a bit of a design on your part. You got a boner for me?  

Don't all the boys have that?

Not at DPR's age.

 

Oh

[Shad_]

You: "Could be bop laying down cover for Eldrick after he was called on his posting."

Me: "Eldrick was getting more positive feedback than negative, so it's not like he needed to be bailed out of anything."

 

I then go on to point out that Eldrick is probably a villager, because I think Eldrick is probably a villager.

 

What the tijuana donkey show are you even babbling about?

[Shad_]

It's like trying to hold a conversation with Nolder.

 

I'll just ISO some old wolf games tonight and hope you haven't changed much.

[DPR]

 

 

 

You're a kick.

 

Eldrick seemed nervous to me. I shared the opinion. It's not an overly strong opinion or a game-changer, just something I noticed. I also noticed bop posting multiple times to prop him up (the positive feedback). Now you're defending him, which is confusing because you just said he didn't need it?

 

You can't possibly be criticizing a no-pressure opinion, on d1, from a newly returned player who hasn't played with over half the players - that wouldn't make any sense.

 

We'll see what happens.

Red, you humored that Bop might have rushed to Eldrick's defense because they're scum bros.  What on earth does me sticking up for both of them have to do with it?

 

Blue, new people rand scum too.  If I don't question you I'm not really sure how you expect me to read you.

 

 

 

They're two different points: the first is noting that bop possibly provided cover for Eldrick's possible sloppy play. The second was that you declared Eldrick's play to be on the level and noted that he needed no defense. You follow that statement by continuing to defend him. The entire point of your post is to criticize the opinion that I offered, even though according to your statement, there was no need to respond to it as Eldrick's posts seemed fine to you.

 

Your attempt to falsely tie these points together while criticizing the fact that I offered an opinion at all seems a bit of a design on your part. You got a boner for me?

 

I'm ready to put my head through my monitor already.

 

 

 

Might clear your thoughts. I say go for it!

[Nynaeve]

I'm ready to put my head through my monitor already.

 

I thought that was my responsibility.

[Shad_]

Might clear your thoughts. I say go for it!

I would but I'd be out about three monitors per Mafia game. :P

[Nynaeve]

I feel robbed

[Shad_]

You can help if you buy me a new one? 

[Calder]

It's like trying to hold a conversation with Nolder.

 

I'll just ISO some old wolf games tonight and hope you haven't changed much.

Recommendation - Do anything else. It would be more fun.

[Nynaeve]

You can help if you buy me a new one? 

 

Nah

[Tiinker]

 

 

 

AJ and Nyn need some discipline. I'll fetch the belt.

Interesting selection.

What is?

 

AJ and Nyn, coupling you together like that.

 

 

 

 

I'm just poking fun a bit since she gave me some shade for not responding to her statement that didn't need responding to.

 

Yeah, I'm petty.

 

All you're doing is making yourself look bad, honestly. And not necessarily game related, even.

 

 

You asked me for reads. I brushed you off and you said... nothing. That's not how I expect you to react.

 

I made an observation about finding your behaviour odd. you addressed it. I have nothing to say about it for now.

 

 

So... yeah... totes the same thing. 

 

 

Following this quote I don't think it was strange for me to address their interaction.

[Shad_]

Alright I'm out for a while.

 

Sooh, what's my alignment?

[Sooh]

 

 

 

 

 

 

AJ and Nyn need some discipline. I'll fetch the belt.

Interesting selection.

What is?

 

AJ and Nyn, coupling you together like that.

 

 

 

 

I'm just poking fun a bit since she gave me some shade for not responding to her statement that didn't need responding to.

 

Yeah, I'm petty.

 

All you're doing is making yourself look bad, honestly. And not necessarily game related, even.

 

 

You asked me for reads. I brushed you off and you said... nothing. That's not how I expect you to react.

 

I made an observation about finding your behaviour odd. you addressed it. I have nothing to say about it for now.

 

 

So... yeah... totes the same thing. 

 

 

 

 

Following this quote I don't think it was strange for me to address their interaction.

 

Odd way of addressing it, but ok?

[Sooh]

Alright I'm out for a while.

 

Sooh, what's my alignment?

Do you think after last game I'm going to make a guess early D1? Think again!

[Shad_]

 

Alright I'm out for a while.

 

Sooh, what's my alignment?

Do you think after last game I'm going to make a guess early D1? Think again!

 

 

Psshh, weak but we'll work on it.

[Nynaeve]

Pral, when you're caught up, I'd like to hear preliminary thoughts.

[Tiinker]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AJ and Nyn need some discipline. I'll fetch the belt.

Interesting selection.

What is?

 

AJ and Nyn, coupling you together like that.

 

 

 

 

I'm just poking fun a bit since she gave me some shade for not responding to her statement that didn't need responding to.

 

Yeah, I'm petty.

 

All you're doing is making yourself look bad, honestly. And not necessarily game related, even.

 

 

You asked me for reads. I brushed you off and you said... nothing. That's not how I expect you to react.

 

I made an observation about finding your behaviour odd. you addressed it. I have nothing to say about it for now.

 

 

So... yeah... totes the same thing. 

 

 

 

 

Following this quote I don't think it was strange for me to address their interaction.

 

Odd way of addressing it, but ok?

 

 

What was odd about it? I thought it was funny.

 

 

But I've been wrong before.