Jump to content

DRAGONMOUNT

A WHEEL OF TIME COMMUNITY

[BASIC] Star Wars Mafia GAME OVER!!!


Sakaea

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 509
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

i think you are attaching to much attention to a JOKE vote and not enough attention to the reactions of those who have beren joke-voted. Jack knows that k\joke-voting is universal at this time, why make such a deal otu of 3 votes? when 7 are needed to be lynched?

 

he claims that he was worried about becoming the only viable lynch, but we have three days, which is ample time for bandwagons to form an public opinion to shift. he is clearly nervous nd overreacting, and that makes him scummy in my books.

 

unvote

 

vote jack

while I agree with what blackhoof is saying here I think he's just using the opportunity to bandwagon onto jack and take out a good player quickly

 

Vote: Blackhoof

Posted

UNVOTE and vote hoof

 

After all three votes isn't that big of a deal, right hoof? I like your lynch better then Nolder's for reasons previously stated.

Posted
OFFICIAL VOTE COUNT

 

Nolder (2) -- Red, bg

 

Millon (1) -- Lessa

 

Jack (3) -- Kate, Blackhoof, Millon

 

Blackhoof (3) -- Amadine, Nolder, Jack

 

Not voting: Liathiana*, Adella*, Wolfbrother

 

* Not checked in yet.

Posted

Unvote

 

I'm going to reread later. I'm really tired from work so hopefully before I go to bed I'll get my thoughts and vote in.

Posted
OFFICIAL VOTE COUNT

 

Nolder (2) -- Red, bg

 

Jack (3) -- Kate, Blackhoof, Millon

 

Blackhoof (3) -- Amadine, Nolder, Jack

 

Not voting: Christine*, Adella*, Wolfbrother, Lessa

 

* Not checked in yet.

 

MODSPEAK: Christine is replacing Liathiana.

Posted

Ok, I couldn't resist. Stupid mafia sucks the life out of me. School can wait... for now.

 

 

Thoughts so far: Nolder and Hoof seem a little scummy, BUT, they always seem a little scummy to me. I think it is just that I am not used to their play style. So, no alarms are raised there. The same thing happens to Jack.

 

Just because someone is casing another person doesn't mean they are scum. Also, walls of text do not equal scum either.

 

 

Now, I am also a little surprised at how fast the voting went onto Jack, and now it seems there is 3 votes on 2 people and 2 votes on one person... and none of these do I find scummy or troublesome or have any flags raised. They are simply playing how I always see them play.

 

 

Not going to vote yet...

Posted

Wow, a LOT going on! I didn't think I would have missed so much. So, let's dig in!

 

Jack (I may call him Pete on accident, sorry in advance, it's how I think of him) got us off to a rip-rolling start! Yes, he is right to defend himself when he is about half way to a lynch, especially since day 1 people will finalize a lynch without waiting to hear from the lynchee. However, I also agree with others that he went a bit over the top. It has been way too long since I have played with him, so I can't remember if it is normal or not.

 

Nolder is pinging me, possibly just for not removing his vote after being accused of a bandwagon, or realizing his vote was the third on a player so soon in the game. He may have missed it at first, but it was blatantly pointed out to him, and he didn't remove his vote until he had someone else to point to and say that they voted Jack later than himself. I feel something else pulling at the back of my brain, but can't put my finger on it. Paranoia maybe.

 

Blackhoof just jumped on something that was already SCREAMING bandwagon, but he had a fair reason so I guess I can see why he would vote for Jack.

 

This is why I like hammer games. I have been so busy this past week I wouldn't have minded being killed from inactivity. I did have a chance to post a few times at least and get a re-read done. Now, the project at work that has been the bane of my existence has been shipped out as of last night so now I cna loiter on DM some more. YAYYYYYYY. I hope it's just coincidance but this just kind of makes Jack stand out more as scum. All this hoopla comes out about bandwagons and his over reacting and now everyone goes quiet when there is no threat of majority. So, I am going to vote Jack_D. The way you reacted just keeps pinging me in my head.

 

 

A re-read? of 4 pages? You've been working hard I see.

This irritates me BG, even just as a WoT fan you should know that going back and re-reading even one page can help you pick up something that you missed. In mafia, we could all stand to do a re-read.

 

The deadline is tomorrow, 10am PST.

WOOOOT! This is the first time I have ever played with a mod in my time zone! *happy dance*

 

For now I'm going to Vote Nolder because he is currently pinging me the worst and the only person I see as acting unreasonable.

Posted

well, i had a nice long reply typed up, but i lost it, :P well, here goes a summary.

 

i am not worried about the 3 votes, however i AM worried about the fact that i am now really the only viable lynch with less than a day to go.

 

 

while I agree with what blackhoof is saying here I think he's just using the opportunity to bandwagon onto jack and take out a good player quickly

 

Vote: Blackhoof

whuuuuh?

 

128787088501862738.jpg

 

so.... you agree with me.... but are voting with the guy who has been hounding you for the last few pages..... when we have been on the same page since this began?

 

this is the DEFINITION of opportunistically voting someone. i no longer am on the same page as you, nolder, and i believe that you are scummier than jack given your recent actions. i was willing to write off your bandwagoning of jack as as a mistake, but not any more.

 

mind you i still think jack overreacted, but if no-one else agrees, well..... i am not the most astute mafia player :P

 

i will be on before the deadline, so i hope i shall not be hammered until the deadline is nearly reached. do not give up on me yet people, there is still time.

Posted

Nolder is pinging me, possibly just for not removing his vote after being accused of a bandwagon, or realizing his vote was the third on a player so soon in the game. He may have missed it at first, but it was blatantly pointed out to him, and he didn't remove his vote until he had someone else to point to and say that they voted Jack later than himself. I feel something else pulling at the back of my brain, but can't put my finger on it. Paranoia maybe.

if I had you'd just have accused me of taking my vote off because I "got caught"

kind of a lose-lose situation for me here =P

 

and the only person I see as acting unreasonable.

what have I been unreasonable about?

 

so.... you agree with me.... but are voting [me]...?

 

this is the DEFINITION of opportunistically voting someone. i no longer am on the same page as you, nolder, and i believe that you are scummier than jack given your recent actions. i was willing to write off your bandwagoning of jack as as a mistake, but not any more.

 

mind you i still think jack overreacted, but if no-one else agrees, well..... i am not the most astute mafia player :P

yeah I agree with what you said about Jack

I don't agree with you placing the 4th vote on him

Jack's reaction was a bit scummy but maybe he was just really surprised or something

it shouldn't be a death sentence

that vote you placed on the other hand screams scum

 

also way to flip a 180 on me when I vote you

before we were on the same page and now we're not? are you sure we ever were in the first place?

sounds to me like you were just trying to buddy up and it backfired on you

Posted

well, i had a nice long reply typed up, but i lost it, :P well, here goes a summary.

 

i am not worried about the 3 votes, however i AM worried about the fact that i am now really the only viable lynch with less than a day to go.

 

 

while I agree with what blackhoof is saying here I think he's just using the opportunity to bandwagon onto jack and take out a good player quickly

 

Vote: Blackhoof

whuuuuh?

 

so.... you agree with me.... but are voting with the guy who has been hounding you for the last few pages..... when we have been on the same page since this began?

 

this is the DEFINITION of opportunistically voting someone. i no longer am on the same page as you, nolder, and i believe that you are scummier than jack given your recent actions. i was willing to write off your bandwagoning of jack as as a mistake, but not any more.

 

mind you i still think jack overreacted, but if no-one else agrees, well..... i am not the most astute mafia player :P

 

i will be on before the deadline, so i hope i shall not be hammered until the deadline is nearly reached. do not give up on me yet people, there is still time.

 

1. nah, you seem pretty worried. Our trains are at the same amount hoof. Quit being a drama queen. Several of the players are yet to vote. Your woe as me post is hypocritical.

 

2. So Nolder's vote was suspicious because it was a bandwagon, but then he said he didn't know so it wasn't suspicious anymore. You Then have to realize that your trumped up fourth vote on me. With Nolder's original reason yo be suspicious of me was also a bandwagon. More so then Nolders vote because you put me over the half way mark. So yo should be suspicious of yourself.

Posted

Jack, Hoof, and Nolder. Oh boy. You three are too much.

 

 

I think none of you are mafia. You three all play such an agressive game, and I think this is the wrong track. Unfortunately, everyone else is going to see your aggressive nature and assume Mafia, or else vote you because you have so much to say.

 

I wish you three would chill out so we could really hunt some scum!

Posted

Unvote

 

At first, I only voted for Jack because he voted for me. It was Day One banter. Of course, when I figured the time was to give a proper vote, I couldn't decide between Nolder and Jack, so I kept my vote as is. You both were pinging hard on my radar for your reactions. I still have trouble believing Nolder didn't know he was the third vote, but being that it was the first day, maybe he just threw it out there. Whatever. Jack's reaction seemed a little bit much, too. So, you both seemed a little scummy.

 

Now, it seemed like blackhoof saw those of us voting for Jack as some kind of bandwagon and he hopped right on.. that seems really scummy to me. That pings worse than Nolder or Jack.

 

Calling a third vote "bandwagon" could be true... a fourth vote is certainly bandwagon.

 

So, you can call this bandwagoning, but I think hoof is the most likely scum of the three. And as we are nearing the deadline, here is my proper vote: Vote Blackhoof.

Posted

i hate to throw this out there, but this Jack/Nol thing stinks of a gambit. it feels too planned honestly for my liking.

 

first Nol bandwagons but claims he didn't know it was the 3rd vote. Jack immediately jumps on Nol and calls him out for it as do many others. Nol refuses to accept that his vote is a bandwagon vote and focuses mostly on Jack out of everyone FoSing him over this.

 

 

i think we shoudl go with one or the other today, it's more likely one or both of these players are scum imo given the reactions. Nols over reation to 1 vote on him is pinging me hard tbh, but so is Jacks actions in this whoel thing.

 

then we have Blackie, who is seeimg more like an opportunistic player and is siding himself with Nol. i'd be good with a lynch on any of these 3, but i think we' get more info from lynching either jack or Nol and letting the finder veiw one of the remaining two.

Posted

In an effort for a controlled lynch, Vote Blackhoof

 

 

Chrissy's Vote Count

 

Nolder (3) -- Red, bg, Adella

 

Jack (2) -- Blackhoof, Millon

 

Blackhoof (5) -- Amadine, Nolder, Jack, Kate, Christine

 

Not voting: Wolfbrother, Lessa

 

 

 

Now, why are the couple not voting? Perhaps they are mafia together?

Posted

I find the fact BG is online, and concerned about a deadline, but he hasnt voted for consolidation to be interesting

Posted

I find the fact BG is online, and concerned about a deadline, but he hasnt voted for consolidation to be interesting

 

 

Should hoof flip scum, attention should be on BG, I think.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...