Jump to content

DRAGONMOUNT

A WHEEL OF TIME COMMUNITY

Create-Your-Own-Role Mafia 7: Everybody Wins *game over*


cosmicpanda

Recommended Posts

Posted

pandy is just a hinderance to the town whether or not he is town, because of his being counted among the needed to vote but never voting I get where Mynd is coming from but scholar role (if indeed pandy has it) is very important.

 

Well, you ninjaed me with this post, EP, so I have to answer it separately. A good deal of your case against me has been that I've used the same argument against you that has been used against me. Considering I've made this point a couple of times already before you did just now, your whole Basel case just became one big hypocrisy.

  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

Basel wehen you voted me the only reason you gave was I appeared to townie, if you wanted to build a solid case you would have stated anything you might have suspected as you did not do that I did not count your comment as part of your case. Gain more bearing and try again next time. Until then your case is a weak case and shall forever be deemed WEAK CASE.

 

I'm sorry, who is the one that accuses someone of arguing the same reasoning used against them and then goes and does the exact same thing?

Posted

um no Ive been trying to figure pandy out since Mynd commented on him and tried to build a case (go back and read earlier where I agreed with mynd kinda), I did not vote you for anything you said about pandy you are not making any sense and everything you say is now turning into mindless ramblings thanky you Basel for basically saying here I am town lynch me

Posted

I don't see how basel is making since my vote on basel had nothing to do with his info on pandy

 

I did not even vote pandy or build a case,

 

earlier I stated the pandy confusion can be ignored for a time and still stick with that,

 

I was just pointing out my views on pandy

 

how does that make me hypocritical at all none of this has anything to do with while I voted Basel. I voted basel because he was trying to make a weak case just appear out of thin air I went back and read just to make sure he voted me after my comment about not knowing who my "team" is and his first mention of my comment is after I voted him, he seems to be Scum trying to cover up a slip and yet now he makes since to you womby? please explain this reasoning

Posted

just want to point out Basel quieting down once I turned his lack of logic against him

 

EP, there are other parts of DM I would like to keep up with. Including other Mafia games that I am in.

 

I don't see how basel is making since my vote on basel had nothing to do with his info on pandy

 

I did not even vote pandy or build a case,

 

earlier I stated the pandy confusion can be ignored for a time and still stick with that,

 

I was just pointing out my views on pandy

 

how does that make me hypocritical at all none of this has anything to do with while I voted Basel. I voted basel because he was trying to make a weak case just appear out of thin air I went back and read just to make sure he voted me after my comment about not knowing who my "team" is and his first mention of my comment is after I voted him, he seems to be Scum trying to cover up a slip and yet now he makes since to you womby? please explain this reasoning

 

And this post strikes me as a bit overdefensive.

Posted

over defensive my tail bone i was hust making a statement you are getting just as defensive as I am being we are both at 3 votes (last I checked) and both of us is voting the other, there is a slight possibility you're town but you made a slip up (I don't believe that to be the case but the possibility is there) and as I know I am town there is that if I am the one that is lynched you have probablly just pulled wombat down with you for defending you so the question is lynch me and then go straight to basel tomorrow? or Lynch basel and test to see if I'm wrong (which I don't think I am) and in that case will pretty much end me the next day if I am wrong.

Posted

lets put it this way if I'm right I'm nightkilled bcus of womby sticking his neck out for basel (which seems a bit uncharacteristic of womby as most say he usually votes with little to no reason?), if I'm wrong I'm lynched tomorrow, it's a lose lose situation for me so might as well lynch basel to see how he flips.

Posted

I long for the day that Thorum actually plays the game.

 

"He lies so he must be scum!" is a great way to say "Let's lynch him and if he flips town, its his fault" without attempting to understand why.

 

Like plenty of people have said, it's a very good reason. Most seem to think you (Mynd) should be allowed to lie. I don't agree.

 

I don't like the bus driver power being in the game in light of the other powers showing, but if we can use it wisely, we may be able to put it to good use.

Create-Your-Own-Role Mafia

Posted
Lil, I don't see how you could think this was the least bit scummy. Are you telling me that you don't find it odd that a bus driver would announce to everyone who he was using his power on? Mynd made it know that he was switching himself and Pandy, so that the whole thread knew that if they wanted to target Mynd with anything, all they had to do was target Pandy. This kind of makes his power totally pointless, since a bus driver's power doesn't strike me as the sort of thing that is all that effective if it isn't used in secret. It seemed like the only reasonable explanation was that Mynd was laying down some kind of WIFOM, and possibly lying about who he really did use his power on, so that anyone wanting to target Mynd would aim for Pandy, and actually get someone else while thinking the results come from Mynd. If you think this is the mark of scum, then you so completely lost me that I need a map.

 

He was creating a WIFOM, Basel, but it's odd that you assume that is bad for the town. If he is town, then he is creating a WIFOM for scum. It's a good tactic.

 

All this business about Mynd lying automatically making him scum is ridiculous. I don't like that take. And it's not that Mynd is allowed to lie and no one else is - townies lie sometimes, and automatically lynching anyone who lies is dumb. It's also ridiculous that he should have advocated his own lynch to get rid of the bus driver role. What player would have done that, townie or mafia?

 

I'n not saying I trust Mynd or even that I'm thinking he's town, but I think we have better candidates right now.

  • Club Leader
Posted

I'd still rather see a Basel lynch, although I could go in the direction of EP if that's how y'all go today. I wouldn't mind eliminating that role.

Posted

I don't see how basel is making since my vote on basel had nothing to do with his info on pandy

 

I did not even vote pandy or build a case,

 

earlier I stated the pandy confusion can be ignored for a time and still stick with that,

 

I was just pointing out my views on pandy

 

how does that make me hypocritical at all none of this has anything to do with while I voted Basel. I voted basel because he was trying to make a weak case just appear out of thin air I went back and read just to make sure he voted me after my comment about not knowing who my "team" is and his first mention of my comment is after I voted him, he seems to be Scum trying to cover up a slip and yet now he makes since to you womby? please explain this reasoning

 

Basel quoted the "team" comment in the same post that he voted you. He didn't say what Christine said, but he did point the comment out by quoting it and saying it looked like you trying to seem town. I have to agree with Basel on that point. That being said, Basel saying that Christine sheeped his case seems kind of odd to me since she took the same comment and brought up a different aspect of it. Basel ignoring that nuance could be him trying to take credit for Christine's case or just sloppy town play.

Posted

over defensive my tail bone i was hust making a statement you are getting just as defensive as I am being we are both at 3 votes (last I checked) and both of us is voting the other, there is a slight possibility you're town but you made a slip up (I don't believe that to be the case but the possibility is there) and as I know I am town there is that if I am the one that is lynched you have probablly just pulled wombat down with you for defending you so the question is lynch me and then go straight to basel tomorrow? or Lynch basel and test to see if I'm wrong (which I don't think I am) and in that case will pretty much end me the next day if I am wrong.

lets put it this way if I'm right I'm nightkilled bcus of womby sticking his neck out for basel (which seems a bit uncharacteristic of womby as most say he usually votes with little to no reason?), if I'm wrong I'm lynched tomorrow, it's a lose lose situation for me so might as well lynch basel to see how he flips.

 

Are you going to FoS everyone who votes you?

Posted

The thing with the Mynd lynch is that it is not about the fact he lied. It is the fact he is Mynd and he lied.

 

EP stings me as scummy. Can't help that he pings me.

 

As for the Basel lynch, I could go with that. Gonna have to go back over all the evidence first, however, and I am out running errands. So, gonna have to wait a bit.

Posted

Basel quoted the "team" comment in the same post that he voted you. He didn't say what Christine said, but he did point the comment out by quoting it and saying it looked like you trying to seem town. I have to agree with Basel on that point. That being said, Basel saying that Christine sheeped his case seems kind of odd to me since she took the same comment and brought up a different aspect of it. Basel ignoring that nuance could be him trying to take credit for Christine's case or just sloppy town play.

 

Womby, I don't feel that Chrissy was sheeping anything. I think that it's more likely that she independently noticed the same thing in EP's posting that I did. I am leaning toward Chrissy being town. My mention of her sheeping me was part of examining things from the point of view of EP's logic, because I found it extremely odd that he could claim I am scum and not think that she is scum for sheeping me. I think that any argument which takes into account the mention of EP's comment not knowing who is on his team (which EP noted her mentioning but failed to account for me using it first) and which paints me as scum must therefore have Chrissy as scum. I could believe he is town just barking up the wrong tree if he had scum-Basel and scum-Christine, or town-Basel and town-Christine, or even town-Basel and scum-Christine. But given the circumstances, his case for scum-Basel and town-Christine is out of left field and gives me a ping.

 

In short, my issue is not with Chrissy pointing out the same thing that I already did. It's with EP overlooking that I had already pointed it out, and I wonder if he overlooked it on purpose.

Posted

God forbid anyone find the same statement scummy...

 

Is that directed at me or EP or Womby?

 

 

All of you.

 

Well, like I said, I think you're town. I didn't think anything was pingy about your argument. I probably wouldn't even have brought up you mentioning it if it weren't for EP's downright peculiar claim that the first person to notice something is scummier than the second.

Posted

Pandy player mode:

 

um no Ive been trying to figure pandy out since Mynd commented on him and tried to build a case (go back and read earlier where I agreed with mynd kinda)

 

Ooh, baby.

 

 

~~~

 

 

Pandy mod mode:

 

 

Votecount 13.5:

 

Basel: 3 (Lily, EP, Mynd)

Thorum: 1 (Nolder)

EP: 3 (Basel, Christine, Wombat)

Mynd: 3 (Blackhoof, Ironeyes, Thorum)

 

Not voting: (2) Alanna, Pandy

 

Deadline. With 12 alive, it takes 7 to lynch!

 

 

 

Pandy Points Count:

 

Christine: 13

Ironeyes: 13

Lily: 4

Nolder: 2

Mynd: 1

Pandy: -5

EP: -7

 

NB: I've just added Chrissy's points in 480 onto these, with the presumption that she's giving them out there, since she didn't count previous points. If this is somehow wrong, will have to go back and edit.

Posted

over defensive my tail bone i was hust making a statement you are getting just as defensive as I am being we are both at 3 votes (last I checked) and both of us is voting the other, there is a slight possibility you're town but you made a slip up (I don't believe that to be the case but the possibility is there) and as I know I am town there is that if I am the one that is lynched you have probablly just pulled wombat down with you for defending you so the question is lynch me and then go straight to basel tomorrow? or Lynch basel and test to see if I'm wrong (which I don't think I am) and in that case will pretty much end me the next day if I am wrong.

lets put it this way if I'm right I'm nightkilled bcus of womby sticking his neck out for basel (which seems a bit uncharacteristic of womby as most say he usually votes with little to no reason?), if I'm wrong I'm lynched tomorrow, it's a lose lose situation for me so might as well lynch basel to see how he flips.

 

Are you going to FoS everyone who votes you?

 

no the way you stuck your neck out for Basel seemes odd and I would have said it had you not voted me as well

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...