Jump to content

DRAGONMOUNT

A WHEEL OF TIME COMMUNITY

[Advanced/Experimental] Game of Thrones Mafia


Kivam

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 8/29/2011 at 5:01 PM, DreadPirateRoberts said:

If anyone wants o make a case on Krak's behalf, now would be the time. So far, I've seen Nae (original player before Krak) barely post, and Krak do the same. He's done zero to move the game forward, and we've got a good number of Lannister's and cult out there.

 

But by all means, sharing any information will only help the game.

 

so you cooked up this entire Unvote scheme so we would go along with your Idea, you made it sound like you had some real info, and now your going on what ??? they barely posted ? Are you basing this on the fact Nae hates being converted ? This IMO Is nonsense. my vote stays on Vic

  • Replies 3.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted
  On 8/29/2011 at 5:01 PM, DreadPirateRoberts said:

If anyone wants o make a case on Krak's behalf, now would be the time. So far, I've seen Nae (original player before Krak) barely post, and Krak do the same. He's done zero to move the game forward, and we've got a good number of Lannister's and cult out there.

 

But by all means, sharing any information will only help the game.

K .. if lynching for inactivty..

 

I don't have a case for him being innocent, I just think there's better cases on a few other people being cult.. like vic (described earlier) and hybrid (as a jn'er he'd be the DM'er I convert first as he seems respected, knowlegeable and calm) (WWWWormBat would be second)

 

I'm trying to put myself in slat's shoes.. he's kind of a conservative guy as scum.. and a lot of you folks I'd be cautious with converting cause many of you seem to be prone to trying to make wacky plays that blow up in your face (DPR, Lily, Mynd, Red) and generally come of as more hazardous to your team then dangerous to town.. Verb's a homo fin fan and kind of creepy so not teaming with him on anything.. Nae is one of JN'ers favorite people to lnch, not sure why but that would eliminate her as an early recruit I think.. Krak (newNae), Far, and some of the other girls seem levelheaded but again, I don't know you guys and I'd be leary that you turn out to be a DPR type...

Posted

I helped start the momentum onto slats. My vote made it Mynd 6, slats 4:

 

  On 8/23/2011 at 3:40 PM, Kivam said:

Vote Count

 

Mynd (7) - Barm, Hybrid, Sakaea, Verbal, the Dude, Wombat, Smash

Slats (3) - JF80, DPR, Bleedin

Wombat (1) - McClane

Barm (1) - CTM

DPR (2) - Slats, Vic

 

10 to lynch

 

 

  On 8/23/2011 at 4:52 PM, Hybrid said:
  On 8/23/2011 at 3:18 PM, WWWwombat said:

Does that slip up make him cult? Because otherwise I don't really care. If he's a Lannister, let the Starks take care of him.

 

This.

 

It was a little opportunistic of slats when he was starting to acquire pressure.

 

Unvote, vote slats

Posted

Bottom line, if anyone wants to really help - start making player/suspect lists with your case beside the name.

Posted
  On 8/26/2011 at 12:43 AM, CTM said:

I dunno how much I buy 2 killers at ape's last night.. expecially since vic didn't announce it in his first post of the day (why not take credit for it??), I have to guess he was there for nefarious means and was backed into a corner by smash..

 

Further, Red/Smmash vote buying was day 2.. Vic said he was paid 135 coins for his vote, which would mean he basically held onto his one and only sword for several nights. Considering theives were in play, I have a hard time buying that

 

unvote

vote VIC

 

on a side not, if I'm right now, it means ape was probably clean a few days ago and I was wrong then.. But as you'll see we'll get a lot more accomplished with him 6 feet under so I still wish I had killed him twice that first time

bump case on Vic

 

- He never volunteered that he killed ape, ignored smash's repeated remarks and tried to let us assume.. Only after he was forced to did he acknowledge that he went to kill him

- He claims to have held on to his sword for 3 nights. 1) the would mean nobody robbed him and 2) he decided to risk being robbed by not using it.. Why not shoot someone earlier?

Posted

Also, with DPR's grand sweeping statement about his grand old plan, it was very...anticlimactic. It almost seems like he has no reason to vote for me. It's kinda a bullshit plan/move.

Posted
  On 8/29/2011 at 6:10 PM, CTM said:
  On 8/26/2011 at 12:43 AM, CTM said:

I dunno how much I buy 2 killers at ape's last night.. expecially since vic didn't announce it in his first post of the day (why not take credit for it??), I have to guess he was there for nefarious means and was backed into a corner by smash..

 

Further, Red/Smmash vote buying was day 2.. Vic said he was paid 135 coins for his vote, which would mean he basically held onto his one and only sword for several nights. Considering theives were in play, I have a hard time buying that

 

unvote

vote VIC

 

on a side not, if I'm right now, it means ape was probably clean a few days ago and I was wrong then.. But as you'll see we'll get a lot more accomplished with him 6 feet under so I still wish I had killed him twice that first time

bump case on Vic

 

- He never volunteered that he killed ape, ignored smash's repeated remarks and tried to let us assume.. Only after he was forced to did he acknowledge that he went to kill him

- He claims to have held on to his sword for 3 nights. 1) the would mean nobody robbed him and 2) he decided to risk being robbed by not using it.. Why not shoot someone earlier?

 

Could you clarify -- you think that Vic lied about killing McClane?

Posted
  On 8/29/2011 at 6:19 PM, Hybrid said:
  On 8/29/2011 at 6:10 PM, CTM said:
  On 8/26/2011 at 12:43 AM, CTM said:

I dunno how much I buy 2 killers at ape's last night.. expecially since vic didn't announce it in his first post of the day (why not take credit for it??), I have to guess he was there for nefarious means and was backed into a corner by smash..

 

Further, Red/Smmash vote buying was day 2.. Vic said he was paid 135 coins for his vote, which would mean he basically held onto his one and only sword for several nights. Considering theives were in play, I have a hard time buying that

 

unvote

vote VIC

 

on a side not, if I'm right now, it means ape was probably clean a few days ago and I was wrong then.. But as you'll see we'll get a lot more accomplished with him 6 feet under so I still wish I had killed him twice that first time

bump case on Vic

 

- He never volunteered that he killed ape, ignored smash's repeated remarks and tried to let us assume.. Only after he was forced to did he acknowledge that he went to kill him

- He claims to have held on to his sword for 3 nights. 1) the would mean nobody robbed him and 2) he decided to risk being robbed by not using it.. Why not shoot someone earlier?

 

Could you clarify -- you think that Vic lied about killing McClane?

Yes.. it doesn't make a lot of sense to me that he would've shielded his sword for a few nights in a thieve game. I used mine as soon as i could

Posted
  On 8/29/2011 at 6:22 PM, CTM said:
  On 8/29/2011 at 6:19 PM, Hybrid said:
  On 8/29/2011 at 6:10 PM, CTM said:
  On 8/26/2011 at 12:43 AM, CTM said:

I dunno how much I buy 2 killers at ape's last night.. expecially since vic didn't announce it in his first post of the day (why not take credit for it??), I have to guess he was there for nefarious means and was backed into a corner by smash..

 

Further, Red/Smmash vote buying was day 2.. Vic said he was paid 135 coins for his vote, which would mean he basically held onto his one and only sword for several nights. Considering theives were in play, I have a hard time buying that

 

unvote

vote VIC

 

on a side not, if I'm right now, it means ape was probably clean a few days ago and I was wrong then.. But as you'll see we'll get a lot more accomplished with him 6 feet under so I still wish I had killed him twice that first time

bump case on Vic

 

- He never volunteered that he killed ape, ignored smash's repeated remarks and tried to let us assume.. Only after he was forced to did he acknowledge that he went to kill him

- He claims to have held on to his sword for 3 nights. 1) the would mean nobody robbed him and 2) he decided to risk being robbed by not using it.. Why not shoot someone earlier?

 

Could you clarify -- you think that Vic lied about killing McClane?

Yes.. it doesn't make a lot of sense to me that he would've shielded his sword for a few nights in a thieve game. I used mine as soon as i could

 

What do you think of Smash's claim that Vic targeted McClane last night?

Posted
  On 8/29/2011 at 6:25 PM, Hybrid said:
  On 8/29/2011 at 6:22 PM, CTM said:
  On 8/29/2011 at 6:19 PM, Hybrid said:
  On 8/29/2011 at 6:10 PM, CTM said:
  On 8/26/2011 at 12:43 AM, CTM said:

I dunno how much I buy 2 killers at ape's last night.. expecially since vic didn't announce it in his first post of the day (why not take credit for it??), I have to guess he was there for nefarious means and was backed into a corner by smash..

 

Further, Red/Smmash vote buying was day 2.. Vic said he was paid 135 coins for his vote, which would mean he basically held onto his one and only sword for several nights. Considering theives were in play, I have a hard time buying that

 

unvote

vote VIC

 

on a side not, if I'm right now, it means ape was probably clean a few days ago and I was wrong then.. But as you'll see we'll get a lot more accomplished with him 6 feet under so I still wish I had killed him twice that first time

bump case on Vic

 

- He never volunteered that he killed ape, ignored smash's repeated remarks and tried to let us assume.. Only after he was forced to did he acknowledge that he went to kill him

- He claims to have held on to his sword for 3 nights. 1) the would mean nobody robbed him and 2) he decided to risk being robbed by not using it.. Why not shoot someone earlier?

 

Could you clarify -- you think that Vic lied about killing McClane?

Yes.. it doesn't make a lot of sense to me that he would've shielded his sword for a few nights in a thieve game. I used mine as soon as i could

 

What do you think of Smash's claim that Vic targeted McClane last night?

obv true.. vic later admitted to targetting ape last night

Posted

The only possibilities I can see are:

 

1) Vic targeted McClane with an NK. In this case, he is extremely unlikely to be cult or Lannister.

 

2) Vic targeted McClane (not an NK). That doesn't leave a whole lot of possibilities. Can't be Heal b/c McClane was killed. Probably not Finder. Some other role (e.g. tracker)? That would make him a Lannister, but why would he target McClane of all people?

 

3) Vic didn't target McClane at all, so he and Smash are both lying. In this case, they're probably both cult.

 

For me, it would be a toss-up between 1 and 3. But with Smash advocating a Vic lynch, possibility 3 is looking less and less likely. So I'm a bit puzzled by your fixation on this case.

Posted
  On 8/29/2011 at 6:46 PM, WWWwombat said:

Vote: Krak

 

According to what I know, odds are over 67% that he is either Cult or Lannister.

 

Where you haven't actually told anyone what that is as of yet.

 

On the other hand, the case on Vic is an actual case. I think I prefer that than the "because I say so" case on Krak. Unvote. Convince me to put my vote back on Krak.

Posted

The 200 offer is mine. Accept it if you are ready to buy weapons and use them in the name of House Stark.

Posted
  On 8/29/2011 at 6:59 PM, Barmacral said:
  On 8/29/2011 at 6:46 PM, WWWwombat said:

Vote: Krak

 

According to what I know, odds are over 67% that he is either Cult or Lannister.

 

Where you haven't actually told anyone what that is as of yet.

 

On the other hand, the case on Vic is an actual case. I think I prefer that than the "because I say so" case on Krak. Unvote. Convince me to put my vote back on Krak.

 

I don't have to convince you of anything, you rolefishing bastard.

 

That being said, I am waiting on something and may have stuff to make a case on someone later.

Posted

VOTE KRAK I'm good with a lynch on him because he really hasn't contributed to the game hardly at all, and whether he's cult or Lannister, either is fine by me.

Posted
  On 8/27/2011 at 11:03 PM, the dude said:

just checking in - we still have a mystery death from last night, don't we?

 

That will do it for Krak.

 

Sir dude, please kill Barm tonight.

 

 

 

Posted
  On 8/29/2011 at 7:24 PM, Sakaea said:

VOTE KRAK I'm good with a lynch on him because he really hasn't contributed to the game hardly at all, and whether he's cult or Lannister, either is fine by me.

 

I can go with this . But im not sure we needed the whole unvote show to pull this off

 

unvote Vic

 

Vote Krak

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...