[STANDARD] Alanna's Robin Hood Mafia - Congrats to the Town!

[dapianoplay3r]

*nudges alanna*

Im on two people

*cough*

[Alanna]

Ahem. Fixed ;D

[dapianoplay3r]

where is everyone?

[Alanna]

Everyone spent the entire day wondering if they had any spies in their midst. Despite Pookie's protests, many people found her suspicious, and wanted to do away with her. But others protected her, pointing their fingers at different people. In the end, it was decided no one seemed suspicious enough to kill.

 

NO LYNCH REACHED.

 

It is now Night. Please PM me your night actions by Sunday, May 16 @ 11PM EST.

 

(Yes, that is Eastern USA time. I'll be in Boston for the weekend.)

[Talya]

We only needed one more to make a lynch, But then if Pookie was telling the truth we at least haven't lost her, however we have no info until tomorrow!

[Pookie]

Actually, there's one piece of info I think we might have.  Unless there's someone who hasn't been on in the last two days when the vote was clearly looking to swing my way (besides Kati) then I'm pretty sure the mafia were all on me.  Otherwise they would have swapped there to make that last vote and get rid of an innocent. 

[dapianoplay3r]

ooh

thats good. Im going to use that in other games too. It makes so much sense

[Talya]

Actually, there's one piece of info I think we might have.  Unless there's someone who hasn't been on in the last two days when the vote was clearly looking to swing my way (besides Kati) then I'm pretty sure the mafia were all on me.  Otherwise they would have swapped there to make that last vote and get rid of an innocent. 

 

Maybe, or those on there were more worried about getting a lynch, realising that changing would have more than likely have left us with a no lynch. We were actually only one off getting a lynch. Doesn't mean there wasn't a mafia or two on you, but to assume that they mafia were all on there and didn't unvote because they wanted an easy lynch. NO ONE unvoted, because at the end of the day a no lynch doesn't give us anyway as near enough info as a lynch does. If anything the mafia would have prefered a no lynch in some ways!

[Guest dragonsworn1991]

Actually, there's one piece of info I think we might have.  Unless there's someone who hasn't been on in the last two days when the vote was clearly looking to swing my way (besides Kati) then I'm pretty sure the mafia were all on me.  Otherwise they would have swapped there to make that last vote and get rid of an innocent. 

 

Pookie that logic is brilliant. I tend to agree with that statement and to further it on, I think Talya, Rose, and Aemon is where we should cast our eyes towards.

[Tigraine]

I have learned to completely trust Pete's instincts.  :-*

 

 

[aemonkristen]

Funny thing about that, Pete. One reason why no one hammered her could be because she is scum and her scum buddies didn't want to hammer her.

[mnwhiterose]

That could be true, as well. All this mafia play makes me want to drink. Anyone else willing to get drunk with me during the night phase?

[Moghedian]

Funny thing about that, Pete. One reason why no one hammered her could be because she is scum and her scum buddies didn't want to hammer her.

 

... Or because they believe in using a 'No Lynch' when the only other option is to kill a (presumably) vanilla townie in a game where there is only a limited number of townies you can lynch before the mafia win.

 

For the record, I don't trust any of you- 'specially Talya- you can never trust those Black Tower denizens... *Nodnod* ;D

 

 

[Alanna]

MODSPEAK: Lily will be replacing Kati.

[LilyElizabeth]

I am here, and have some reading to do....

 

[LilyElizabeth]

I have learned to completely trust Pete's instincts.  :-*

 

Me, too, ONCE I've figured out that he isn't mafia. Watch him. He's slippery when he is. Yeah, yeah, bro, I know -- pot/kettle. :-* But, just remember who taught me to play.  :P Love you!

 

[Talya]

Funny thing about that, Pete. One reason why no one hammered her could be because she is scum and her scum buddies didn't want to hammer her.

 

... Or because they believe in using a 'No Lynch' when the only other option is to kill a (presumably) vanilla townie in a game where there is only a limited number of townies you can lynch before the mafia win.

 

For the record, I don't trust any of you- 'specially Talya- you can never trust those Black Tower denizens... *Nodnod* ;D

 

 

 

I'm outraged! ;)

 

I wouldn't trust me neither...

 

Welcome Lily sweetie...you must be mafia, you always are logic dictates :D

 

Okay seriously, I actually misread Pookies post, I thought she was meant why those didn't unvote her and vote someone else...which I could see why not when there didn't seem enough people around to get a lynch that way. I can't see the mafia prefering a 'no lynch' to 'a lynch an innocent' Actually the votes may become more useful if/when Pookie dies, we will be able to look back then. We can try and second guess the mafia, but until we know the alignment on Pookie it's hard to tell. She could well have been telling the truth, but to claim a vanilla townie, when at the time not really close to being lynched is a little odd. It's not as though we can attest that. If she had a role then the real roled person (if she was lying) would know that, but a vanilla townie, every person apart from those with a role (innocents that is) will claim vanilla townie, even a mafia.

 

As for Pete, I have played with him and I don't alway trust his instincts, he has been off many times before. and right a few times, I would say very much like the rest of us. No offence Pet,e I don't follow you blindly and I never will... :-*

 

 

[aemonkristen]

 

Alright, here's my thoughts on the matter at hand. Our mafia consists of Pete, Pookie and either Tigs (who I am 90% sure of) or Moggy (who just pinged my radar with an odd post)

 

 

Funny thing about that, Pete. One reason why no one hammered her could be because she is scum and her scum buddies didn't want to hammer her.

 

... Or because they believe in using a 'No Lynch' when the only other option is to kill a (presumably) vanilla townie in a game where there is only a limited number of townies you can lynch before the mafia win.

 

For the record, I don't trust any of you- 'specially Talya- you can never trust those Black Tower denizens... *Nodnod* ;D

 

 

 

Moggy is a close runner up on Tigs for this post. A No Lynch would normally give us no information about the game and Day 1 is ALL about information. I have never heard anyone say it was better to have a No Lynch than a lynch. It is generally believed that a No Lynch just gives the mafia a free kill.

 

 

I think we should finish what we started with Pookie tomorrow then move on to Pete and finish with Tigs.

[aemonkristen]

Just fixing that post I messed up.

 

 

Alright, here's my thoughts on the matter at hand. Our mafia consists of Pete, Pookie and either Tigs (who I am 90% sure of) or Moggy (who just pinged my radar with an odd post)

 

Actually, there's one piece of info I think we might have.  Unless there's someone who hasn't been on in the last two days when the vote was clearly looking to swing my way (besides Kati) then I'm pretty sure the mafia were all on me.  Otherwise they would have swapped there to make that last vote and get rid of an innocent. 

 

Looks like an attempt to further project innocence after the vanilla claim. Also makes people focus on the people who voted for her rather than those who did not

 

Pookie that logic is brilliant. I tend to agree with that statement and to further it on, I think Talya, Rose, and Aemon is where we should cast our eyes towards.

 

Pete accepted that so easily it scares me. When he is town, he suspects EVERYONE. This looks like supporting a teammate. Becasue of that I did aa little investigating. On the day of the lynch he was posting in other forum and games, but never came by here. Between 5 and 6 he posted in DPR's vampire game and at 9:22 (CST) he posted in Lily's game. He could have come in to hammer Pookie, but decided to let it go to a No Lynch. That is scummy. Not even a reason for why he didn't want to vote.

 

I have learned to completely trust Pete's instincts.  :-*

 

Also seems a lot like giving a teammate a helping hand. Why would she completely trust Pete on Day 1? Most people are highly suspicious of everyone on Day 1, yet she comes out declaring his innocence and throwing her support behind his factless (and somewhat odd) declaration of Pookies innocence.

 

 

Funny thing about that, Pete. One reason why no one hammered her could be because she is scum and her scum buddies didn't want to hammer her.

 

... Or because they believe in using a 'No Lynch' when the only other option is to kill a (presumably) vanilla townie in a game where there is only a limited number of townies you can lynch before the mafia win.

 

For the record, I don't trust any of you- 'specially Talya- you can never trust those Black Tower denizens... *Nodnod* ;D

 

 

 

Moggy is a close runner up on Tigs for this post. A No Lynch would normally give us no information about the game and Day 1 is ALL about information. I have never heard anyone say it was better to have a No Lynch than a lynch. It is generally believed that a No Lynch just gives the mafia a free kill.

 

 

I think we should finish what we started with Pookie tomorrow then move on to Pete and finish with Tigs.

[aemonkristen]

Got the games mixed up on those times for Pete's posting. 9:22 was the vampire game and between 5 and 6 for Lily's game. Just wanted to set the record straight.

 

[Guest dragonsworn1991]

Just fixing that post I messed up.

 

 

Alright, here's my thoughts on the matter at hand. Our mafia consists of Pete, Pookie and either Tigs (who I am 90% sure of) or Moggy (who just pinged my radar with an odd post)

 

Actually, there's one piece of info I think we might have.  Unless there's someone who hasn't been on in the last two days when the vote was clearly looking to swing my way (besides Kati) then I'm pretty sure the mafia were all on me.  Otherwise they would have swapped there to make that last vote and get rid of an innocent. 

 

Looks like an attempt to further project innocence after the vanilla claim. Also makes people focus on the people who voted for her rather than those who did not

 

Pookie that logic is brilliant. I tend to agree with that statement and to further it on, I think Talya, Rose, and Aemon is where we should cast our eyes towards.

 

Pete accepted that so easily it scares me. When he is town, he suspects EVERYONE. This looks like supporting a teammate. Becasue of that I did aa little investigating. On the day of the lynch he was posting in other forum and games, but never came by here. Between 5 and 6 he posted in DPR's vampire game and at 9:22 (CST) he posted in Lily's game. He could have come in to hammer Pookie, but decided to let it go to a No Lynch. That is scummy. Not even a reason for why he didn't want to vote.

 

I have learned to completely trust Pete's instincts.  :-*

 

Also seems a lot like giving a teammate a helping hand. Why would she completely trust Pete on Day 1? Most people are highly suspicious of everyone on Day 1, yet she comes out declaring his innocence and throwing her support behind his factless (and somewhat odd) declaration of Pookies innocence.

 

 

Funny thing about that, Pete. One reason why no one hammered her could be because she is scum and her scum buddies didn't want to hammer her.

 

... Or because they believe in using a 'No Lynch' when the only other option is to kill a (presumably) vanilla townie in a game where there is only a limited number of townies you can lynch before the mafia win.

 

For the record, I don't trust any of you- 'specially Talya- you can never trust those Black Tower denizens... *Nodnod* ;D

 

 

 

Moggy is a close runner up on Tigs for this post. A No Lynch would normally give us no information about the game and Day 1 is ALL about information. I have never heard anyone say it was better to have a No Lynch than a lynch. It is generally believed that a No Lynch just gives the mafia a free kill.

 

 

I think we should finish what we started with Pookie tomorrow then move on to Pete and finish with Tigs.

 

I am flattered you cased me on day one based solely on metagaming. That means if I were scum, I have given you nothing to go on. Pookie's logic sounded a lot like something I would say. I liked the sound of it, I don't think Pookie is mafia. Plus I never suspect everyone there are always some people that I think are innocent just by the way they post.

 

Aemon I don't know how to feel about the casing, I can see it as both an innocent and scum move. What makes me think you are innocent is you strung together a whole mafia team, and didn't focus solely on one person.

 

You have done the mafia a favor however. They could kill you and then set up myself and your other suspects for quick lynches, or they could kill one of the people you suspect and set you up for a lynch.

 

Funny thing about that, Pete. One reason why no one hammered her could be because she is scum and her scum buddies didn't want to hammer her.

 

... Or because they believe in using a 'No Lynch' when the only other option is to kill a (presumably) vanilla townie in a game where there is only a limited number of townies you can lynch before the mafia win.

 

For the record, I don't trust any of you- 'specially Talya- you can never trust those Black Tower denizens... *Nodnod* ;D

 

 

 

I'm outraged! ;)

 

I wouldn't trust me neither...

 

Welcome Lily sweetie...you must be mafia, you always are logic dictates :D

 

Okay seriously, I actually misread Pookies post, I thought she was meant why those didn't unvote her and vote someone else...which I could see why not when there didn't seem enough people around to get a lynch that way. I can't see the mafia prefering a 'no lynch' to 'a lynch an innocent' Actually the votes may become more useful if/when Pookie dies, we will be able to look back then. We can try and second guess the mafia, but until we know the alignment on Pookie it's hard to tell. She could well have been telling the truth, but to claim a vanilla townie, when at the time not really close to being lynched is a little odd. It's not as though we can attest that. If she had a role then the real roled person (if she was lying) would know that, but a vanilla townie, every person apart from those with a role (innocents that is) will claim vanilla townie, even a mafia.

 

As for Pete, I have played with him and I don't alway trust his instincts, he has been off many times before. and right a few times, I would say very much like the rest of us. No offence Pet,e I don't follow you blindly and I never will... :-*

 

 

 

Looks like you are trying discredit me to just another voice in the crowd. Pinged my radar Talya, I still love you though.

 

[aemonkristen]

Hardlt meta-gaming, Pete. I confirmed your presence on DM several times before the deadline, yet you never came here tol change your vote to Pookie or explain why you thought she was innocent. Instead you just waited and let us go to a no-lynch. You are scum and need to be taken down. But I'll go after Pookie first. I'll let you stick around a little bit longer. I like to watch you squirm.

[Talya]

You are getting touchy Pete, if you think I was trying to discredit you. I don't follow your every word in any game I have played with you. If you do think that, maybe you are believing too much in your own self importance in these games. I have caught you out before! I was making the point because I NEVER blindly follow anyone, and I think it is dangerous to do so.

 

In fact what Tigs was doing is meta-gaming, what Aemon was doing was not meta-gaming, but wondering why you posted in other games on this board and yet you didn't come on here to make a vote. Meta gaming is about play styles, not checking out where you have posted and wondering why you didn't in this game?

 

Just to put the record straight, oh and I still love you too ... ;)

[Guest dragonsworn1991]

I FELT LIKE POOKIE WAS INNOCENT

 

Why would I be the deciding vote on a lynch of a person I presumed to be innocent, when someone would have surely said I was scum for casting the hammer.

[Guest dragonsworn1991]

 

Vote Count:

Pookie (6) - Tigs, Talya, Rose, Bela, Aemon, Player

Rose (2) - Som1, Moggy

Moggy (1) - Lia

Tigs (1) - Pookie

Aemon (1) - Pete

 

 

Not Voting (1): Kati

 

Deadline is Friday, May 14 @ 10PM CST. That's in 3 hours.

 

With 12 alive, it takes 7 to lynch.

 

 

Some1 and Moggy could have unvoted and voted to hammer. Lia could have done so also. Kati could have placed a vote to hammer also. So I am one and five discounting pookie, because no one is going to hammer themselves, that could have changed the outcome during the day. Yet I am being hounded like I was the only one who could of changed things.

 

I consider metagaming to encompass anything not pertaining to the current game. Like posting in another thread. My definition is a little broader then some.