You're In Good Hands: The Beau Tomteer Law Firm Mafia GAME THREAD

[Andrej]

15 minutes ago, Katiora said:

I could...  though I would probably get Colorado and Wyoming wrong. I never have been able to get them right. But the rest I think I could do. 

 

Too bad this isn’t a geography test ☺️

[Andrej]

21 minutes ago, Lenlo said:

I mean... "lynching" someone isnt really a thing anymore in this game. Votes are actually good. If you get votes, it means people trust your judgement on who to accuse in a court of GOAT.

 

So really... you want votes. Right?

 

Essentially yes. We collectively vote someone to give them an OP FOS and then we all get to vote up or down on whoever gets accused.

 

(hint: if you’re doing seer cover, you wanna be voting the person you peek)

[TrippedOnReality]

1 minute ago, Andrej said:

 

Essentially yes. We collectively vote someone to give them an OP FOS and then we all get to vote up or down on whoever gets accused.

 

(hint: if you’re doing seer cover, you wanna be voting the person you peek)

 

I was going to ask if seer cover was a thing people do here.  I've only seen it done a couple of times on PerC.  

[Andrej]

[bold]Vote Seph[/b]

 

?

[Andrej]

TFW you watch your phone take forever to reload and then you got the code wrong anyway

[Andrej]

1 minute ago, TrippedOnReality said:

I was going to ask if seer cover was a thing people do here.  I've only seen it done a couple of times on PerC.  

 

Vanilla seer games aren’t super common here but they’ve been ran enough where most of this roster should ~get the concept

[Clovdyx]

5 minutes ago, Andrej said:

 

Essentially yes. We collectively vote someone to give them an OP FOS and then we all get to vote up or down on whoever gets accused.

 

(hint: if you’re doing seer cover, you wanna be voting the person you peek)

 

Hint: if you're the seer, you wanna be voting yourself.

[Andrej]

4 minutes ago, Clovdyx said:

Hint: if you're the seer, you wanna be voting yourself.

 

Genius

[Cory Caboose]

1 hour ago, TrippedOnReality said:

 

Better than a kangaroo court...

We won't tell our presiding judge, the honorable Mac Hopper, that you said this.
But you may want to be careful with this kind of hate speech when court is in session...

 

[TrippedOnReality]

11 minutes ago, Cory Caboose said:

We won't tell our presiding judge, the honorable Mac Hopper, that you said this.
But you may want to be careful with this kind of hate speech when court is in session...

 

 

lol...

[Clovdyx]

1 hour ago, Andrej said:

 

Essentially yes. We collectively vote someone to give them an OP FOS and then we all get to vote up or down on whoever gets accused.

 

(hint: if you’re doing seer cover, you wanna be voting the person you peek)

 

On a serious note (not that my other comment wasn't serious, because it's probably the most +EV thing you can do this game), I've actually given a lot of thought to the best strategy for this kind of game since I signed up.  I get the argument for why you would be voting your peek, but ideally people will be stating who they will accuse prior to voting closing.  If your peek is going to accuse somebody you're strongly townreading, that's probably a bad thing.  Similarly, if you know that X is going to accuse your biggest scumread, you might vote them.

 

It's weird.  But voting with your top townreads isn't necessarily the best approach

[dicetosser1]

due to what seems like personal enjoyment, dicetosser1 will not be punished using the cat o nine tails.

sadface I was looking forward to a Kaylee with a whip!

 

 

[Andrej]

2 minutes ago, Clovdyx said:

 

On a serious note (not that my other comment wasn't serious, because it's probably the most +EV thing you can do this game), I've actually given a lot of thought to the best strategy for this kind of game since I signed up.  I get the argument for why you would be voting your peek, but ideally people will be stating who they will accuse prior to voting closing.  If your peek is going to accuse somebody you're strongly townreading, that's probably a bad thing.  Similarly, if you know that X is going to accuse your biggest scumread, you might vote them.

 

It's weird.  But voting with your top townreads isn't necessarily the best approach

 

I’ve thought a lot about it too (since we waited so long to start tbh). I agree that at a later point when we’re really deciding who to nominate that yes, people are going to have to say who they’re going to accuse and then we go from there. My thing was more early game/intro mode while I think you’re thinking of more advanced down the line theory. I wasn’t advocating blindly nominating your TRs for lulz.

 

It could be fun tho.

[Clovdyx]

Mostly I was planning on drawing names out of a hat.

[dicetosser1]

5 hours ago, Clovdyx said:

 

First of all, I was prepared.to post minutes before Kat but cory was slow opening.

 

Second. Kat is from the south and therefore does not count as a person

 

Kat is from the North actually....

 

 

1 hour ago, TrippedOnReality said:

 

Better than a kangaroo court...

 

 

Points to the Coat of Arms on the Wall 

 

 

 

so did you want to say something Tripped???   

Glares...

 

 

Vote Cass

[Clovdyx]

AJ, are you going to be insulted if I say I'm kinda sorta leaning town on you?

[TrippedOnReality]

11 minutes ago, Clovdyx said:

 

On a serious note (not that my other comment wasn't serious, because it's probably the most +EV thing you can do this game), I've actually given a lot of thought to the best strategy for this kind of game since I signed up.  I get the argument for why you would be voting your peek, but ideally people will be stating who they will accuse prior to voting closing.  If your peek is going to accuse somebody you're strongly townreading, that's probably a bad thing.  Similarly, if you know that X is going to accuse your biggest scumread, you might vote them.

 

It's weird.  But voting with your top townreads isn't necessarily the best approach

 

This is pretty much where I ended up, too.  

[Cory Caboose]

STILL DAY 1

 

An unfamiliar... person? waddles walks into the lobby and sits down in a metal chair with an attached desk across the vending machines.

"Sorry I'm late, I couldn't beak the morning traffic!"

 

He sets down his briefcase.

 

 

"I am Todd Fowler, if you are looking for a public defendant for the day look no feather! I can provide you legal counsel or represent you in your case, so please reach out to me if you need eider.

 

Also, does anyone have any grapes?"

 

the day continues...

[dicetosser1]

Im pretty sure a lawyer like that called me at work multiple times.....

[TrippedOnReality]

3 minutes ago, dicetosser1 said:

Points to the Coat of Arms on the Wall 

 

 

so did you want to say something Tripped???   
 

I'm sure kangaroos are lovely people.

[Andrej]

4 minutes ago, Clovdyx said:

Mostly I was planning on drawing names out of a hat.

 

That will probably work about as well since it’s gonna depend on everyone else voting to execute them anyway

 

this game lol

[Andrej]

4 minutes ago, Clovdyx said:

AJ, are you going to be insulted if I say I'm kinda sorta leaning town on you?

 

Just say you peeked me so I can pretend you’re the seer like we did that other game

[dicetosser1]

1 minute ago, TrippedOnReality said:

I'm sure kangaroos are lovely people.

 

reaches out the back door and scratches Skippys head

"you here that skip?? "  Skippy nods  " yes you can go box him now."  Skippy runs off for her gloves

 

 

 

Trip  you might wanna run bro .....  

[TrippedOnReality]

2 minutes ago, dicetosser1 said:

 

reaches out the back door and scratches Skippys head

"you here that skip?? "  Skippy nods  " yes you can go box him now."  Skippy runs off for her gloves

 

 

 

Trip  you might wanna run bro .....  

I'm not that worried about it.  I don't know how well kangaroos can swim...but I'm doubting they can swim all the way across the pacific ocean.  

[dicetosser1]

dude....  they just hop from Sharks head to Sharks head.