[Basic] Disney Heroes vs. Villains Mafia C9++ Town Wins

[Sili Quirrels]

 

 

 

 

 

 

Are they firm or weak???

 

confusedface,gif

 

cass' first wot with reads had reads that i felt were strongly phrased.

 

she later recanted.

[Shad_]

Stupid site keeps submitting my posts when I press enter. Not sure why.

 

Anyhow. Look, you want to split hairs over semantics? go ahead. You clearly said she could be town or scum. That's null. You weren't outright scum reading her. You basically said she could either be one alignment or the other... that's equivalent to saying... well, pretty much nothing.

 

Glad we had this talk!

This is more of a villa!Nyn post. That really long one that everyone else town read her for is still tripping me out.

[Sili Quirrels]

 

 

 

 

 

 

This is weak

it's not even an argument. how in god's name is it weak!?

 

 

it was a weak response imo.

 

it was a weak question.

[Zander?]

 

 

Alright kids are asleep, I can actually read without distractions.

 

Good tell me who the Wolves are.

 

 

I thought we agreed that I just had to clean the QT and cook you bacon...

 

 

pocket attempt successful.

[Zander?]

want an answer to that zander?  cause i understood whatAJ was saying

 

Id rather hed explain it to me but I also feel like I may be missing something tho.

[Zander?]

zander i can't even tell what you think my reasons for voting cass are, but it's self-contained in one post i make at the beginning, and it's real easy to follow. cass' reads were too strong for what she had to go on and i didn't like it.

 

and she hasn't changed my mind yet.

 

You said it was fluff at first, then she backtracked iirc?

[Zander?]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Are they firm or weak???

 

confusedface,gif

 

cass' first wot with reads had reads that i felt were strongly phrased.

 

she later recanted.

 

 

Can you quote the post and show exactly which reads you felt were strongly phrased please?

[Zander?]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This is weak

it's not even an argument. how in god's name is it weak!?

 

 

it was a weak response imo.

 

it was a weak question.

 

 

Prolly

[Nynaeve]

 

Stupid site keeps submitting my posts when I press enter. Not sure why.

 

Anyhow. Look, you want to split hairs over semantics? go ahead. You clearly said she could be town or scum. That's null. You weren't outright scum reading her. You basically said she could either be one alignment or the other... that's equivalent to saying... well, pretty much nothing.

 

Glad we had this talk!

This is more of a villa!Nyn post. That really long one that everyone else town read her for is still tripping me out.

 

 

I'm sure you'll get better with more practice. Don't get discouraged.

[Sili Quirrels]

 

zander i can't even tell what you think my reasons for voting cass are, but it's self-contained in one post i make at the beginning, and it's real easy to follow. cass' reads were too strong for what she had to go on and i didn't like it.

 

and she hasn't changed my mind yet.

 

You said it was fluff at first, then she backtracked iirc?

 

no and no.

 

whether or not she technically backtracked has nothing to do with why i voted her since she backtracked after i voted her.

 

and i do not think you can cal much of cass' content fluff unless you mean she has fluff reasons for some reads and for voting me.

 

and as to her questioning me: i think the wildfire one is understandable.

 

as to her vote of me: it's clearly omgus, and afaict she's actually accusing me of poor progression: i'm not working enough with her and other people to advance my understanding of the thread.

[dicetosser1]

 

want an answer to that zander?  cause i understood whatAJ was saying

 

Id rather hed explain it to me but I also feel like I may be missing something tho.

 

 

ok  but its fairly simple really. and yes i think ure missing something and im pretty sure i know what ure missing

[Sili Quirrels]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Are they firm or weak???

 

confusedface,gif

 

cass' first wot with reads had reads that i felt were strongly phrased.

 

she later recanted.

 

 

Can you quote the post and show exactly which reads you felt were strongly phrased please?

 

it's the second or third post in my iso.

[Sili Quirrels]

it seems pretty obvious to me that you're a wolf. going after a weak player like wildfire because she reacted badly to pressure for instance? (haven't actually looked at the exact reaction though). and saying dice looks good because he asked a couple questions and is playing the game. and giving aj towny points for being logical which he might do as either allignment but probably as a wolf more in my personal opinion (but anyway) when 4 people are voting him? could easily be a wolf trying to read correctly or a wolf protecting a pal, though i'd lean toward the former for now.

 

is your allignment too good to be true though?

 

your reads seem convenient and i dont think you have enough strong reasons to make them.  and i guess i don't trust you. instinct.

nvm it was actually halfway through the first page of my iso. i've posted more than i thought.

[Sili Quirrels]

Sorry, I should explain why I'm bringing some stuff up even though you aren't asking about my various opinions about what cass has done this game.

 

I'm merely trying to get across that while I don't like some things cass has done, the things tick is taking issue with don't bug me as much because I interpreted cass' posts differently.

[Zander?]

[unvote][v]cass[/v]

 

 

are you rusty cass?

 

 

it seems pretty obvious to me that you're a wolf. going after a weak player like wildfire because she reacted badly to pressure for instance? (haven't actually looked at the exact reaction though). and saying dice looks good because he asked a couple questions and is playing the game. and giving aj towny points for being logical which he might do as either allignment but probably as a wolf more in my personal opinion (but anyway) when 4 people are voting him? could easily be a wolf trying to read correctly or a wolf protecting a pal, though i'd lean toward the former for now.

 

is your allignment too good to be true though?

 

your reads seem convenient and i dont think you have enough strong reasons to make them.  and i guess i don't trust you. instinct.

 

I think i got you and Tinks reasoning for sussing Cass mixed up.

 

But I think I may have even commented on it but its funny about your firm read suss on Cass with the Bolded

[Zander?]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Are they firm or weak???

 

confusedface,gif

 

cass' first wot with reads had reads that i felt were strongly phrased.

 

she later recanted.

 

 

Can you quote the post and show exactly which reads you felt were strongly phrased please?

 

it's the second or third post in my iso.

 

 

No Cass reads post and highlight/explain which reads you felt were strongly worded.

[Zander?]

 

 

want an answer to that zander?  cause i understood whatAJ was saying

 

Id rather hed explain it to me but I also feel like I may be missing something tho.

 

 

ok  but its fairly simple really. and yes i think ure missing something and im pretty sure i know what ure missing

 

 

OK

 

Ill see what he says.

 

Any reads thus far Dice?

[Sili Quirrels]

is that bold underlined supposed to be a dig at my hypocrisy?

 

lol

[Sili Quirrels]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Are they firm or weak???

 

confusedface,gif

 

cass' first wot with reads had reads that i felt were strongly phrased.

 

she later recanted.

 

 

Can you quote the post and show exactly which reads you felt were strongly phrased please?

 

it's the second or third post in my iso.

 

 

No Cass reads post and highlight/explain which reads you felt were strongly worded.

 

i'm not going to do your homework for you, you know.

 

besides you just quoting the post you were looking for initially, you can find cass bigger wot above that one.

[Zander?]

is that bold underlined supposed to be a dig at my hypocrisy?

 

lol

 

it wasnt obv enough?

 

sadface.gif

[Zander?]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Are they firm or weak???

 

confusedface,gif

 

cass' first wot with reads had reads that i felt were strongly phrased.

 

she later recanted.

 

 

Can you quote the post and show exactly which reads you felt were strongly phrased please?

 

it's the second or third post in my iso.

 

 

No Cass reads post and highlight/explain which reads you felt were strongly worded.

 

i'm not going to do your homework for you, you know.

 

besides you just quoting the post you were looking for initially, you can find cass bigger wot above that one.

 

 

Do my homework???

 

lolololol

 

You said iirc one of the reasons youre sussing Cass is that you felt she shouldnt have strong or firm reads.

 

Obv dig at your hypocrisy aside, Im asking you to show me from her reads list which strong worded reads lead you to that conclusion.

 

Im asking YOU to show YOUR work.

[Shad_]

How come?

 

I didn't have an issue with his content as I was reading up. I don't agree with the Cass push but his meta on me was pretty accurate after the Spirited Away game. Sili calling someone's reads generic/weak/easy or whatever without taking account for the fact that there wasn't a ton of a good content to make them on is very Sili like. His approach didn't feel predatory imo.

I expected a broader focus at that point, basically. Still one of those early 'this isn't going to be relevant in the long run but I'll throw it out there things' but I thought he'd drop some reads on more than just Cass. He's a player to find intro stuff important.

[Sili Quirrels]

 

I expected a broader focus at that point, basically. Still one of those early 'this isn't going to be relevant in the long run but I'll throw it out there things' but I thought he'd drop some reads on more than just Cass. He's a player to find intro stuff important.

 

i've no reads worth espousing.

[Sili Quirrels]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Are they firm or weak???

 

confusedface,gif

 

cass' first wot with reads had reads that i felt were strongly phrased.

 

she later recanted.

 

 

Can you quote the post and show exactly which reads you felt were strongly phrased please?

 

it's the second or third post in my iso.

 

 

No Cass reads post and highlight/explain which reads you felt were strongly worded.

 

i'm not going to do your homework for you, you know.

 

besides you just quoting the post you were looking for initially, you can find cass bigger wot above that one.

 

 

Do my homework???

 

lolololol

 

You said iirc one of the reasons youre sussing Cass is that you felt she shouldnt have strong or firm reads.

 

Obv dig at your hypocrisy aside, Im asking you to show me from her reads list which strong worded reads lead you to that conclusion.

 

Im asking YOU to show YOUR work.

 

it's very obvious what i mean. cass makes her posts very formulaic. she doesn't make one read, then a few others, and then explain the first read after. she says a read and then explains it or else sets aside the explanation. you do not need my help to understand what i'm referring to Z. all it'll do is waste my time and not save any of yours.

[Shad_]

@Dice - yeah, I know that you'll forever refer to that game where Tommy claimed scum and was actually scum. I think the action itself is null at best and by now I think WiFi should know that.

No offense to Wifi but she's already misrepped like half a dozen events in games that ended weeks ago. She'll develop at her own pace and it's going to be atypical but "a villager shouldn't think this" is a line I tossed in the trash irt reading Wifi a long time ago. She's done nothing to make me think she's a wolf so far.