Jump to content

DRAGONMOUNT

A WHEEL OF TIME COMMUNITY

[Advanced/Experimental] Mass Effect I - Hydra Game - Game Over


csarmi

Recommended Posts

  • Moderator
Posted
  On 4/4/2014 at 7:50 PM, Darthe said:

 

  On 4/4/2014 at 7:45 PM, Verbal32 said:

If I had to guess who pulled that trigger on the Executioner, I'd guess Clarthe.

I think I would have unvoted after doing it, but we four who were on the train are good options. Im not game for your plan of lynching everyone if we ignore people outside of it to do so btw. Thats a great way to pidgeonhole a group and make mistakes. However, it seems pretty clear that at least one was on it.

 

 

4 teams.  If 1 of 4 is scum, my plan is reasonable (as we've already taken 1 down).  If there are no scum in there, well.....my plan sucks.

  • Replies 2.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted
  On 4/4/2014 at 8:01 PM, Verbal32 said:

 

  On 4/4/2014 at 7:50 PM, Darthe said:

 

  On 4/4/2014 at 7:45 PM, Verbal32 said:

If I had to guess who pulled that trigger on the Executioner, I'd guess Clarthe.

I think I would have unvoted after doing it, but we four who were on the train are good options. Im not game for your plan of lynching everyone if we ignore people outside of it to do so btw. Thats a great way to pidgeonhole a group and make mistakes. However, it seems pretty clear that at least one was on it.

 

 

4 teams.  If 1 of 4 is scum, my plan is reasonable (as we've already taken 1 down).  If there are no scum in there, well.....my plan sucks.

 

 

Your plan sucks. 

Posted

I do too im just arguing that I dont want to lynch all four for the point of going through with it if someone is really clearly mafia outside of that group.

Posted
  On 4/4/2014 at 7:59 PM, Darthe said:

 

  On 4/4/2014 at 7:57 PM, _CLOUD said:

 

  On 4/4/2014 at 7:55 PM, Lenlo said:

 

  On 4/4/2014 at 7:51 PM, Ithillian said:

You're not supposed to say that. It's in the Darthe's Great Big Little Book Of Things You Shouldn't Say In A Mafia Game.

 

or DGBLTOTYSSIAMG for short.

Can I get a copy of this?

They are 50 bucks per copy. Get one while they are still available.

You cheeky bastard! Dont undercut my market.

 

Theyre 60 Len, unless you want hardback.

 

How much for a hardback signed copy?

Posted
  On 4/4/2014 at 8:02 PM, Leelou said:

 

  On 4/4/2014 at 8:01 PM, Verbal32 said:

 

  On 4/4/2014 at 7:50 PM, Darthe said:

 

  On 4/4/2014 at 7:45 PM, Verbal32 said:

If I had to guess who pulled that trigger on the Executioner, I'd guess Clarthe.

I think I would have unvoted after doing it, but we four who were on the train are good options. Im not game for your plan of lynching everyone if we ignore people outside of it to do so btw. Thats a great way to pidgeonhole a group and make mistakes. However, it seems pretty clear that at least one was on it.

 

 

4 teams.  If 1 of 4 is scum, my plan is reasonable (as we've already taken 1 down).  If there are no scum in there, well.....my plan sucks.

 

 

Your plan sucks. 

 

 

+1

Posted
  On 4/4/2014 at 7:12 PM, Darthe said:

 

  On 4/4/2014 at 6:53 PM, Ithillian said:

 

  On 4/4/2014 at 2:33 PM, _CLOUD said:

Hallia voted for J-TAG before they revealed to be the Cop.

OMG you dobber!!

 

Yes Hallia pushed it up to 4 votes @ 3.29 ... but Despo could have unvoted it back down to 3. Why didn't you mention that?

 

 

Darthe and Despo both question Turin's logic in changing our vote from J-Tag to YOLO - in their own special ways.

 

 

This implies foresight of the event.  More Ithi implications.  This + Turinflop - logical methodology = mafia

 

 

Pretty sure that is the technical definition of it.

 

I've just read this again and you're absolutely right. Foreknowledge of the event. I think that maybe Despo knew the executioner was something he could do - hence he would have foreknown.

 

Do you know that he didn't have foreknowledge?

Posted
  On 4/4/2014 at 8:02 PM, Leelou said:

 

  On 4/4/2014 at 8:01 PM, Verbal32 said:

 

 

  On 4/4/2014 at 7:50 PM, Darthe said:

 

 

  On 4/4/2014 at 7:45 PM, Verbal32 said:

If I had to guess who pulled that trigger on the Executioner, I'd guess Clarthe.

I think I would have unvoted after doing it, but we four who were on the train are good options. Im not game for your plan of lynching everyone if we ignore people outside of it to do so btw. Thats a great way to pidgeonhole a group and make mistakes. However, it seems pretty clear that at least one was on it.

4 teams. If 1 of 4 is scum, my plan is reasonable (as we've already taken 1 down). If there are no scum in there, well.....my plan sucks.

Your plan sucks.

Hmph. Isnt it more likely that you have a read wrong? I think so and we all seem to have thought pretty well of one another up to this point. It was either a good scum play or a really dumb one but we cant know without putting some pressure on the area.
Posted
  On 4/4/2014 at 8:05 PM, Ithillian said:

 

  On 4/4/2014 at 7:12 PM, Darthe said:

 

  On 4/4/2014 at 6:53 PM, Ithillian said:

 

  On 4/4/2014 at 2:33 PM, _CLOUD said:

Hallia voted for J-TAG before they revealed to be the Cop.

OMG you dobber!!

 

Yes Hallia pushed it up to 4 votes @ 3.29 ... but Despo could have unvoted it back down to 3. Why didn't you mention that?

 

 

Darthe and Despo both question Turin's logic in changing our vote from J-Tag to YOLO - in their own special ways.

This implies foresight of the event. More Ithi implications. This + Turinflop - logical methodology = mafia

 

 

Pretty sure that is the technical definition of it.

I've just read this again and you're absolutely right. Foreknowledge of the event. I think that maybe Despo knew the executioner was something he could do - hence he would have foreknown.

 

Do you know that he didn't have foreknowledge?

Obviously not. You see my point though? The reasoning used is assumptive, sort of like tryi g to prove the lack of something existing.

Posted
  On 4/4/2014 at 8:05 PM, _CLOUD said:

 

  On 4/4/2014 at 8:02 PM, Leelou said:

 

 

  On 4/4/2014 at 8:01 PM, Verbal32 said:

 

 

  On 4/4/2014 at 7:50 PM, Darthe said:

 

 

  On 4/4/2014 at 7:45 PM, Verbal32 said:

If I had to guess who pulled that trigger on the Executioner, I'd guess Clarthe.

I think I would have unvoted after doing it, but we four who were on the train are good options. Im not game for your plan of lynching everyone if we ignore people outside of it to do so btw. Thats a great way to pidgeonhole a group and make mistakes. However, it seems pretty clear that at least one was on it.

4 teams. If 1 of 4 is scum, my plan is reasonable (as we've already taken 1 down). If there are no scum in there, well.....my plan sucks.

Your plan sucks.

+1

-.-

Posted
  On 4/4/2014 at 8:02 PM, Leelou said:

 

  On 4/4/2014 at 8:01 PM, Verbal32 said:

 

 

  On 4/4/2014 at 7:50 PM, Darthe said:

 

 

  On 4/4/2014 at 7:45 PM, Verbal32 said:

If I had to guess who pulled that trigger on the Executioner, I'd guess Clarthe.

I think I would have unvoted after doing it, but we four who were on the train are good options. Im not game for your plan of lynching everyone if we ignore people outside of it to do so btw. Thats a great way to pidgeonhole a group and make mistakes. However, it seems pretty clear that at least one was on it.

4 teams. If 1 of 4 is scum, my plan is reasonable (as we've already taken 1 down). If there are no scum in there, well.....my plan sucks.

Your plan sucks.

How do you know there are no mafia.on that train?

Posted
  On 4/4/2014 at 8:08 PM, Darthe said:

 

  On 4/4/2014 at 8:05 PM, _CLOUD said:

 

  On 4/4/2014 at 8:02 PM, Leelou said:

 

  On 4/4/2014 at 8:01 PM, Verbal32 said:

 

  On 4/4/2014 at 7:50 PM, Darthe said:

 

  On 4/4/2014 at 7:45 PM, Verbal32 said:

If I had to guess who pulled that trigger on the Executioner, I'd guess Clarthe.

I think I would have unvoted after doing it, but we four who were on the train are good options. Im not game for your plan of lynching everyone if we ignore people outside of it to do so btw. Thats a great way to pidgeonhole a group and make mistakes. However, it seems pretty clear that at least one was on it.

4 teams. If 1 of 4 is scum, my plan is reasonable (as we've already taken 1 down). If there are no scum in there, well.....my plan sucks.

Your plan sucks.

+1

-.-

 

 

l2p

Posted
  On 4/4/2014 at 8:07 PM, Darthe said:

 

  On 4/4/2014 at 8:05 PM, Ithillian said:

 

  On 4/4/2014 at 7:12 PM, Darthe said:

 

  On 4/4/2014 at 6:53 PM, Ithillian said:

 

  On 4/4/2014 at 2:33 PM, _CLOUD said:

Hallia voted for J-TAG before they revealed to be the Cop.

OMG you dobber!!

 

Yes Hallia pushed it up to 4 votes @ 3.29 ... but Despo could have unvoted it back down to 3. Why didn't you mention that?

 

 

Darthe and Despo both question Turin's logic in changing our vote from J-Tag to YOLO - in their own special ways.

 

This implies foresight of the event. More Ithi implications. This + Turinflop - logical methodology = mafia

 

 

Pretty sure that is the technical definition of it.

 

I've just read this again and you're absolutely right. Foreknowledge of the event. I think that maybe Despo knew the executioner was something he could do - hence he would have foreknown.

 

Do you know that he didn't have foreknowledge?

 

Obviously not. You see my point though? The reasoning used is assumptive, sort of like tryi g to prove the lack of something existing.

 

Well ... Cloud was pointing out that Hallia placed the 4th vote - so I said that it could have gone back to three. If I think that Despo is mafia then I would say that I think he didn't unvote on purpose.

 

Does everyone else have an absolutely Town read on Despo that they wouldn't think this could happen.

 

You're trying to be all Vulcan ice logic on me but it won't work.

 

The possibilities are endless.

Posted
  On 4/4/2014 at 8:09 PM, Turin Turambar said:

 

  On 4/4/2014 at 8:02 PM, Leelou said:

 

  On 4/4/2014 at 8:01 PM, Verbal32 said:

 

  On 4/4/2014 at 7:50 PM, Darthe said:

 

  On 4/4/2014 at 7:45 PM, Verbal32 said:

If I had to guess who pulled that trigger on the Executioner, I'd guess Clarthe.

I think I would have unvoted after doing it, but we four who were on the train are good options. Im not game for your plan of lynching everyone if we ignore people outside of it to do so btw. Thats a great way to pidgeonhole a group and make mistakes. However, it seems pretty clear that at least one was on it.

4 teams. If 1 of 4 is scum, my plan is reasonable (as we've already taken 1 down). If there are no scum in there, well.....my plan sucks.

Your plan sucks.

How do you know there are no mafia.on that train?

 

I don't, just felt like telling Verbal his plan sucked to see what he would retort back to me. 

Posted
  On 4/4/2014 at 8:06 PM, Darthe said:

 

  On 4/4/2014 at 8:02 PM, Leelou said:

 

  On 4/4/2014 at 8:01 PM, Verbal32 said:

 

 

  On 4/4/2014 at 7:50 PM, Darthe said:

 

 

  On 4/4/2014 at 7:45 PM, Verbal32 said:

If I had to guess who pulled that trigger on the Executioner, I'd guess Clarthe.

I think I would have unvoted after doing it, but we four who were on the train are good options. Im not game for your plan of lynching everyone if we ignore people outside of it to do so btw. Thats a great way to pidgeonhole a group and make mistakes. However, it seems pretty clear that at least one was on it.

4 teams. If 1 of 4 is scum, my plan is reasonable (as we've already taken 1 down). If there are no scum in there, well.....my plan sucks.

Your plan sucks.
Hmph. Isnt it more likely that you have a read wrong? I think so and we all seem to have thought pretty well of one another up to this point. It was either a good scum play or a really dumb one but we cant know without putting some pressure on the area.
I would say Despo's posts prior to the event suggest he did have knowledge of what was going to happen.
Posted

Logic always works in mafia ithi. Your ruling with des applies to both of us as we were definitely around and had the opportunity to unvote. However, it also applies to thise we cant be sure were around which is why we cant seperate or point fingers at such a limited group. Thats not the point I was making anyways. Your post was a show at examining people and a way to hype negative reads in light of the event. It was fearmongering.

Posted

Well yes ... but then I find myself asking if he would be so very very very obvious about it.

 

he is SO LOUD.

 

Unless he was the elephant in the room and so everyone saw it but no-one saw nothing.

Posted

Correct me if I am wrong. The mafiascum link for executioner says that the executioner can kill a person who has half the votes on a given day. 6/2 = 3. Why are we assuming that the executioner needed 4 votes to kill?

Posted
  On 4/4/2014 at 8:13 PM, Turin Turambar said:

 

  On 4/4/2014 at 8:06 PM, Darthe said:

 

  On 4/4/2014 at 8:02 PM, Leelou said:

 

  On 4/4/2014 at 8:01 PM, Verbal32 said:

 

  On 4/4/2014 at 7:50 PM, Darthe said:

 

  On 4/4/2014 at 7:45 PM, Verbal32 said:

If I had to guess who pulled that trigger on the Executioner, I'd guess Clarthe.

I think I would have unvoted after doing it, but we four who were on the train are good options. Im not game for your plan of lynching everyone if we ignore people outside of it to do so btw. Thats a great way to pidgeonhole a group and make mistakes. However, it seems pretty clear that at least one was on it.
4 teams. If 1 of 4 is scum, my plan is reasonable (as we've already taken 1 down). If there are no scum in there, well.....my plan sucks.
Your plan sucks.
Hmph. Isnt it more likely that you have a read wrong? I think so and we all seem to have thought pretty well of one another up to this point. It was either a good scum play or a really dumb one but we cant know without putting some pressure on the area.
I would say Despo's posts prior to the event suggest he did have knowledge of what was going to happen.

 

 

Care to explain how his posts prior to the event suggest that he knew what was going to happen?

Posted
  On 4/4/2014 at 8:15 PM, Darthe said:

Logic always works in mafia ithi. Your ruling with des applies to both of us as we were definitely around and had the opportunity to unvote. However, it also applies to thise we cant be sure were around which is why we cant seperate or point fingers at such a limited group. Thats not the point I was making anyways. Your post was a show at examining people and a way to hype negative reads in light of the event. It was fearmongering.

Are you afraid?

 

Are you worried that other people are afraid?

 

Do you really think that everyone else wasn't thinking it - but didn't want to be the one to mention it?

 

:smile:

 

It seemed quite obvious to me that the timeline of events needed to be displayed.

 

Do you think it was someone who was not visible at the time the action went through and if so who? What time did this all happen in America btw? That would help me figure out if most of the USA were sleeping or not.

Posted
  On 4/4/2014 at 8:17 PM, Pralaya said:

Correct me if I am wrong. The mafiascum link for executioner says that the executioner can kill a person who has half the votes on a given day. 6/2 = 3. Why are we assuming that the executioner needed 4 votes to kill?

 

Good point.

Posted
  On 4/4/2014 at 8:15 PM, Darthe said:

Logic always works in mafia ithi. Your ruling with des applies to both of us as we were definitely around and had the opportunity to unvote. However, it also applies to thise we cant be sure were around which is why we cant seperate or point fingers at such a limited group. Thats not the point I was making anyways. Your post was a show at examining people and a way to hype negative reads in light of the event. It was fearmongering.

Oh lol - you were about as well and didn't unvote? I didn't even spot you on the lynch hahaha.

 

Why didn't you want to unvote then?

 

Is that why you didn't like my post? Dear me - I honestly thought it was Despo.

Posted
  On 4/4/2014 at 8:15 PM, Darthe said:

Logic always works in mafia ithi. Your ruling with des applies to both of us as we were definitely around and had the opportunity to unvote. However, it also applies to thise we cant be sure were around which is why we cant seperate or point fingers at such a limited group. Thats not the point I was making anyways. Your post was a show at examining people and a way to hype negative reads in light of the event. It was fearmongering.

Are you afraid?

 

It was simply pointing out a fact. Those online at the time ate correctly labelled as suspects as they were at the scene of the crime. It would be similar to if a watcher saw all of you visit someone that was killed during that night. It is possible someone else did it but less likely.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...