Monopoly Mafia [GAME OVER]

[WWWwombat]

IIRC thre are like 22 properties.

[Nolder]

Not sure how that game lends itself to mafia

I'm still trying to figure that part out lol

[WWWwombat]

I wasn't counting railroads and utilities btw.

[Gabriel Kross]

Hmmm.... nvm my theory doesn't work then.

[hazelkrs1]

Ok I had a thought, what is the ratio of properties to players, excluding the railroads.

 

22 properties, 4 railroads, and 2 utilities. I have a feeling the utilities will be in here, so subtracting the railroads, utilities, and pennybags that leaves us with 13 players to divide the 22 properties between. Not so sure about the groups now.

 

do you get it? DO YOU?! (I'm not sure what wombat get's I just know he doesn't get the hammer!)

 

lawls

[hazelkrs1]

If you are telling the truth EP, then I have a hankering that every last property of each section will be in the game.

 

Baltic, Connecticut, Virginia, New York, Illinois, Marvin Gardens, Pennsylvania, and Boardwalk. Can't see Park Place not being in here so that would be 9 properties, or 4 players other than those to divide the remaning properties between. Or 6 if utilities aren't in here.

[hazelkrs1]

Basically, I don't think there are total groups of properties together, but then again I could be wrong. After all, I wonder what kind of mechanic would be involved in the houses and hotels...

 

Eh I think I'm looking too far into this.

[Arez Al'Loke]

Good morning U s aaaaaa, I gota feeling that it's gonna be a wonderful daaay!

 

Mm, Activity, me likey! I don't like being on scum lists, but I guess I'll have to suite myself

 

Oh Despo! You made a post earlier saying I basically scuk, and I'd like to say that I don't basically scuk =P

In all seriousness, to me it seems you always think my game is scummy

 

The part about me being so "easily persuaded" is really only based on the fact that I agreed with Alanna (and some else?) that rushing a no lynch would not be the best thing to do.

I know you brought up another example, but I didn't feel it applied at all, infact, it didn't make any sense at all

 

You wrote this "Once again Arez, you back down from your stance crazy quick. First you say you would not be willing to risk a no lynch on a separate day, then just say you prefer a day 1 no lynch."

 

What does that have to do with changing stance? I was arguing that I did not want to risk a No-vote any other day than D1. I have always been in favour of voting No lynch day1. Stop making things up against me.

Thought of something funny now aswell.

 

You wrote this "I also don't like how you go from (in two sentences) saying that you want to withold your vote from him cause you'd feel scummy, to laying groundwork for you to vote for him later on."

Yet that is exactly what you're doing to me right now, isn't it? You're basically saying this (Interpretation)

 

"Aww man, I really don't think you're scum this game, BUT your post reeeeks of scummyness"

You're witholding a vote from me, but you're laying groundwork so you can vote me later. I do not like hypocrits Despo, I really don't like hypocrits.

[WWWwombat]

I'm thinking the epicmafia Jailer role could be in the game. It sorta jives with Nolder giving us an incentive to no lynch.

[Gabriel Kross]

as far as I'm aware, there are no houses or hotels, there is no reason to suspect their can be based on my role.

[hazelkrs1]

Good morning U s aaaaaa, I gota feeling that it's gonna be a wonderful daaay!

 

Mm, Activity, me likey! I don't like being on scum lists, but I guess I'll have to suite myself

 

Oh Despo! You made a post earlier saying I basically scuk, and I'd like to say that I don't basically scuk =P

In all seriousness, to me it seems you always think my game is scummy

 

I don't think you suck, but your playstyle forces you into the limelight again and again. If you're a townie that's not thinking about what you're saying, and thus draws attention your way that could be directed at finding scum, then you're hurting town. Townies have almost as much reason to watch what they say as scum do (if not just as much in some cases).

 

Try this. Before you actually post what you're gonna say, occasionally think about how others will perceive your post first. If you think it will draw unnecessary attention to yourself, it's prob a good idea to modify the post somewhat

 

The part about me being so "easily persuaded" is really only based on the fact that I agreed with Alanna (and some else?) that rushing a no lynch would not be the best thing to do.

I know you brought up another example, but I didn't feel it applied at all, infact, it didn't make any sense at all

 

You backed off your stance that you wouldn't consider a no lynch vote after day 1.

 

You wrote this "Once again Arez, you back down from your stance crazy quick. First you say you would not be willing to risk a no lynch on a separate day, then just say you prefer a day 1 no lynch."

 

What does that have to do with changing stance? I was arguing that I did not want to risk a No-vote any other day than D1. I have always been in favour of voting No lynch day1. Stop making things up against me.

 

You didn't say that you "did not want to risk" a no lynch vote any other day, you said you flat out wouldn't risk it. Then you changed it to "Well, I prefer a day 1 lynch over a day 2 lynch."

 

I'm def not making things up about you man, it's right there in your posts.

 

Thought of something funny now aswell.

 

You wrote this "I also don't like how you go from (in two sentences) saying that you want to withold your vote from him cause you'd feel scummy, to laying groundwork for you to vote for him later on."

Yet that is exactly what you're doing to me right now, isn't it? You're basically saying this (Interpretation)

 

"Aww man, I really don't think you're scum this game, BUT your post reeeeks of scummyness"

You're witholding a vote from me, but you're laying groundwork so you can vote me later. I do not like hypocrits Despo, I really don't like hypocrits.

 

Def not the same thing. You said you didn't want to vote EP cause you didn't want to feel scummy. Two seconds later, you imply that you actually ARE contemplating voting for him.

 

I said that you're pinging, but you kinda always ping so right now I've got bigger fish to fry, as in peeps that I think there are stronger cases on than you. Completely diff thing altogether.

 

You did something similar to this earlier, saying that someone said something that was basically the same thing you said, when they were completely different. (Interpretation) can let you get away with a lot apparently.

 

 

^ My responses in blue

 

I'm thinking the epicmafia Jailer role could be in the game. It sorta jives with Nolder giving us an incentive to no lynch.

 

How did that role work?

 

as far as I'm aware, there are no houses or hotels, there is no reason to suspect their can be based on my role.

 

 

Care to elaborate?

[hazelkrs1]

Oh and Wombat, visit the BT moar. Someone just referenced you in a thread there

[Gabriel Kross]

except for a picture of the property card, there really is no reference to being able to aquire or use houses or hotels

[WWWwombat]

The way it works is if the decision to no lynch is made, the Jailer gets to choose someone to jail right after the no lynch and before night begins. The person who is jailed is both roleblocked and protected from visiting roles and kills (similar to the standard jailkeeper role). In addition, the Jailer can talk privately (and anonymously) with the prisoner during the night. The Jailer also has the ability to kill the prisoner. This takes place at the end of night. Most Jailer conversations involve the Jailer asking the prisoner for a roleclaim. The Jailer then decides based on the claim whether or not to kill the prisoner.

 

It's a really powerful pro-town role. Recently. an anti-town version was made and this muddies things up as the Jailer is no longer always clear from the point of view of the prisoner.

[Nightstrike]

Vote community chest .

[Nolder]

Votecount

Chance: Peace, Wombat, EP, Thorum (4)

Community Chest: Des, Nightstrike (2)

Neither:

 

Not Voting: Rand, David, BG, Basel, Blackhoof, Lenlo, Arez, Andrew, Razen, Darthe, alannalynn, dicetosser1, Songstress, Lessa Nikia (14)

 

With 20 alive it takes 11 to choose. Deadline is on Friday at 5:00 AM PST.

[hazelkrs1]

except for a picture of the property card, there really is no reference to being able to aquire or use houses or hotels

 

Well then. I didn't have any reference to houses or hotels in mine either, but that doesn't preclude the possibility that they still might exist

 

The way it works is if the decision to no lynch is made, the Jailer gets to choose someone to jail right after the no lynch and before night begins. The person who is jailed is both roleblocked and protected from visiting roles and kills (similar to the standard jailkeeper role). In addition, the Jailer can talk privately (and anonymously) with the prisoner during the night. The Jailer also has the ability to kill the prisoner. This takes place at the end of night. Most Jailer conversations involve the Jailer asking the prisoner for a roleclaim. The Jailer then decides based on the claim whether or not to kill the prisoner.

 

It's a really powerful pro-town role. Recently. an anti-town version was made and this muddies things up as the Jailer is no longer always clear from the point of view of the prisoner.

 

Ahh I see. Pretty epic role indeed. Basically a regular jailer that can vig kill if he/she wants to.

 

You go see that thread yet?

[Arez Al'Loke]

Some of you guys where in the "Game of thrones" mafia game. Wasn't one of the main reasons to lynch (EP I believe?) that he was trying to figure out the game mechanics?

 

Vote Chance

 

I always get better things in chance than I do in community ^^

 

@Despo

 

I'm tired of you trying so hard to make me look scummy. But what I'm about to post is going to make your plan backfire so hard. You see, I've quoted everything I've written about the no-lynch that matters. Now we'll analyze it and see if I've "changed my mind" about D1 no-lynching.. Shall we? Chronological order (hopefully I got everything).

 

 

Vote No lynch

 

MAAN!! I love Nolder's games xDDD

 

Here is where it started ^

 

Sitting at my work.. Having a "Super duper fun time".

 

I can definatly see the what you're saying Tress.. But I think it's better that we try now, and possibly fail, than try later and fail. It won't be as devestating if we get a bad card now, as it would be if we got it later ^^

And we might get something to help us find scum easier so we don't have to bloody Day1 lynch again -.-

 

Read it and weep Despo.

 

To be honest, my curiosity is tearing me apart Tress.. You're very logical, and I agree to some degree (see what I did there? I am awesome..) about the scumhunting part.

 

But I just can't force myself to unvote xD

 

I still want a D1 lynch, but Alanna is making sense.

 

Herp derp xD Glad you could make it ;)

 

I totally missed the part where Wombat said me and Tress blipped his scumdar, I remember reading the whole "75% or worse" thing. Anyway, as someone suggested earlier, I'll unvote so we can get a little scumhunting done before we decide to go for either a lynch or a no-lynch

 

Here I simply unvote for the exact reason stated, do some scumhunting first.

 

Meltdowns... Meltdowns everywhere!

 

When did people start forgetting this is a game?

I wish I could policy lynch without feeling like scum.. Because right now, I want to prove to EP that faking an meltdown is not going to scare me away.. Infact, faking a meltdown when you have ONE vote smells veeery fishy.

There was a player doing something similar recently, but that wasn't faking and he/she leaved every mafia que and asked to be replaced, that's a real meltdown, not a faked one.

 

This is my oppinion on the whole No Lynch matter.

If we want to try it, Day 1 is the way to go, I'm not willing to risk it later in game, even if we manage to nail scum at the end of day 1.

 

Once again, In favour of a D1 no-lynch

 

This is my oppinion on the whole No Lynch matter.

If we want to try it, Day 1 is the way to go, I'm not willing to risk it later in game, even if we manage to nail scum at the end of day 1.

Why wouldn't a No Lynch still be valid D2 if we bagged a scum D1 and were a step ahead?

 

 

Obviously it would be better to get a No Lynch D2 if you managed to get a scum killed D1. But imo, it's still not good because the scum will probably have killed one of us aswell.

 

And I feel that if we vote for a no lynch D1, it would only be like an extension of D1 up until D2 (except for possible cop views and other similar things).

But if we vote no lynch D2, it feels like we would disrupt the game's "speed" and stall, losing trails and so on. But hey, it's just how I feel. It can really go anyway haha xP.

We might aswell get a scum kill D1, block any potential night kill N1 and get a super good card D2.

 

But to sum up, I'd rather go for a D1 no lynch than a D2 no lynch.

 

I state yet again that a D1 no lynch is better than a D2 no lynch

 

 

 

Oh.. Now I want to hammer =/

 

Fine, You can have the bloody hammer Wombat..

 

Vote no lynch

 

Still wanting to get the No Lynch.

[Basel Gill]

Vote Community Chest

 

I've just taken a look at a board thanks to Google Images. Virginia Avenue is directly next to Pennsylvania Railroad. We know from Nol's opening scene that the railroad barons are bad guys. Could EP be making a traitor signal to the scum here?

[Nolder]

Votecount

Chance: Peace, Wombat, EP, Thorum, Arez, Basel (6)

Community Chest: Des, Nightstrike (2)

Neither:

 

Not Voting: Rand, David, BG, Blackhoof, Lenlo, Andrew, Razen, Darthe, alannalynn, dicetosser1, Songstress, Lessa Nikia (12)

 

With 20 alive it takes 11 to choose. Deadline is on Friday at 5:00 AM PST.

[peacesells]

Vote Community Chest

 

I've just taken a look at a board thanks to Google Images. Virginia Avenue is directly next to Pennsylvania Railroad. We know from Nol's opening scene that the railroad barons are bad guys. Could EP be making a traitor signal to the scum here?

 

You mean symp?

[David Hermes]

Firstly I would like to vote community chest, and from playing monopoly I find that community chest is small risk but small gain, and chance is large risk but large gain.

[David Hermes]

The way it works is if the decision to no lynch is made, the Jailer gets to choose someone to jail right after the no lynch and before night begins. The person who is jailed is both roleblocked and protected from visiting roles and kills (similar to the standard jailkeeper role). In addition, the Jailer can talk privately (and anonymously) with the prisoner during the night. The Jailer also has the ability to kill the prisoner. This takes place at the end of night. Most Jailer conversations involve the Jailer asking the prisoner for a roleclaim. The Jailer then decides based on the claim whether or not to kill the prisoner.

 

It's a really powerful pro-town role. Recently. an anti-town version was made and this muddies things up as the Jailer is no longer always clear from the point of view of the prisoner.

Nice reveal Wombat. Too much detail, although the role could be intuitive, you added some details that would be hard to just guess which I have underlined. Firstly, that was a specific range in time that you mentioned the jailer could use his role between No lynch hammer till night. And you said "recently an anti-town version", I would like the link to that game so I can see this for myself.

[peacesells]

I'm thinking the epicmafia Jailer role could be in the game. It sorta jives with Nolder giving us an incentive to no lynch.

 

He was just saying he thinks it is in the game..he wasn't claiming.

[Gabriel Kross]

Vote Community Chest

 

I've just taken a look at a board thanks to Google Images. Virginia Avenue is directly next to Pennsylvania Railroad. We know from Nol's opening scene that the railroad barons are bad guys. Could EP be making a traitor signal to the scum here?

 

I didn't even read the opening scene, I rarely do and like I said I haven't played the game since I was 8 so I wouldn't have known what I was next to either

 

The way it works is if the decision to no lynch is made, the Jailer gets to choose someone to jail right after the no lynch and before night begins. The person who is jailed is both roleblocked and protected from visiting roles and kills (similar to the standard jailkeeper role). In addition, the Jailer can talk privately (and anonymously) with the prisoner during the night. The Jailer also has the ability to kill the prisoner. This takes place at the end of night. Most Jailer conversations involve the Jailer asking the prisoner for a roleclaim. The Jailer then decides based on the claim whether or not to kill the prisoner.

 

It's a really powerful pro-town role. Recently. an anti-town version was made and this muddies things up as the Jailer is no longer always clear from the point of view of the prisoner.

Nice reveal Wombat. Too much detail, although the role could be intuitive, you added some details that would be hard to just guess which I have underlined. Firstly, that was a specific range in time that you mentioned the jailer could use his role between No lynch hammer till night. And you said "recently an anti-town version", I would like the link to that game so I can see this for myself.

 

As far as I can tell he is not talking about the role as if he has it, he is saying it'd be interesting if it was in the game, you're reaching here.