Jump to content

DRAGONMOUNT

A WHEEL OF TIME COMMUNITY

[ADVANCED/KITCHEN SINK] The Axe or the Hammer - GAME OVER


Amadine

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

@VERBAL--Scummy Skimming is SCUMMY, kthxbai.

 

Yeah, Nol, assuming Kae isn't making her list up (ie, if she wasn't recruited), there was no vote control submitted last night.

 

I dunno about your "cult going after scum under the direction of a former member" theory... I think if the cult can successfully recruit mafia, it might be easier for them to just plan on recruiting only scum for the next few nights. It's also much more advantageous--they increase their numbers at the same time as they're eliminating an enemy faction. So yeah, I get that you didn't say you think that's what's going on, I just wanted to address it--I highly doubt that's what's happening.

 

 

I've been feeling not-good about Wombat for a while.

Posted

Also @Verbal, casing to me is where you bring up all the posts that support your theory and point out why you think you're legitimately onto something. I was just reviewing, and pointing out what had pinged me in the first place. As I pointed out, there was even some stuff I forgot Womby had said, so it was a good thing I reviewed, because otherwise I would have been going by inaccurate memory alone.

Posted

@Wombat, what you pointed out about Turin does actually have some merit (the consolidation and then no-deadline stuff).

 

Also, I agree about Nolder.

 

unvote

vote Nolder

 

Let's see where this gets us...

Posted

I believe someone wanted me to answer some questions

 

(Im going out for a few hours but ill answer what ever you want when I get back)

 

 

 

 

I wasn't here over the last few days cos my wisdom teeth were getting removed

Posted

Sorry to hear about your teeth, Player. When I had mine out it was awful. Hope yours went better than mine.

 

I'll be scarce most of the weekend guys. Just letting you all know :happy:

Posted

Turin (4) - Ed, Womby, Des, Kae

Nolder (2) - Maw, Meesh

Not Voting: Verb, Ishy, Turin, BG, Player, Ledinna 2.0, Nolder, Kate, Tina

15 players = 8 to lynch

Posted

Mine are ok now. I'm only allowed soup and Jelly atm but when they did it I seem to be fairly immune to local so they had to keep dosing me.

 

 

So back to mafia. At this point when I was going through my notes I found they are oddly lacking on Turin. This worries me. Especially since he has a fairly high post count. So tomorrow I shall reread and do a case on him I think.

I had intended to do it today but the pain killers I'm on make me sleepy and I fell asleep and was out of most of the afternoon lol

 

As for Nolder I don't believe he is scum but I could easily see him being recruited to the cult. I'll watch him closely when I do the reread

  • Moderator
Posted

Also @Verbal, casing to me is where you bring up all the posts that support your theory and point out why you think you're legitimately onto something. I was just reviewing, and pointing out what had pinged me in the first place. As I pointed out, there was even some stuff I forgot Womby had said, so it was a good thing I reviewed, because otherwise I would have been going by inaccurate memory alone.

 

Have you ever heard of semantics? Cause that's what you are using. You cased Wombat...no biggie. It isn't incriminating for you to have done that.

 

Also, I never saw a vote count from Ama that had you voting Wombat. I missed your vote on him.....you had a ton of posts in the last few pages - I'm sure you understand.

Posted

Also @Verbal, casing to me is where you bring up all the posts that support your theory and point out why you think you're legitimately onto something. I was just reviewing, and pointing out what had pinged me in the first place. As I pointed out, there was even some stuff I forgot Womby had said, so it was a good thing I reviewed, because otherwise I would have been going by inaccurate memory alone.

 

Have you ever heard of semantics? Cause that's what you are using. You cased Wombat...no biggie. It isn't incriminating for you to have done that.

 

Also, I never saw a vote count from Ama that had you voting Wombat. I missed your vote on him.....you had a ton of posts in the last few pages - I'm sure you understand.

Re: Casing, I'm not defending myself, merely explaining my definition of the word. Everyone's all like "I wanna see this case, it should be interesting, cos I personally don't think there's anything there" and I'm like "no, dude, I'm not casing, I'm just pointing out what made me have a bad feeling about him originally just to see if there's still anything there for me or not" and you're like "yeah, that's totally casing" and I'm like, "not to me personally, just FYI" and you're like "semantics, blah blah blah." So yeah. Let me have my own definition, it doesn't hurt anyone, does it?

 

I don't really understand, no. Post 1673 was yours, saying you agreed with Wombat's theory but were thinking about it differently, and that you were on the fence about it.... Post 1678 was my vote for Wombat, a mere 5 POSTS after yours. 1681 was where Kate asked me, among others, to elaborate on our less-than-eloquent votes.... 1684 was where I said "going to bed, but hmm, I don't have anything solid off the top of my head so I'll go dig through the thread and pull up what it was that bugged me in the first place." Your next post was 1689, where you said you were looking forward to my "case," because you had a good feeling about Wombat.

 

That is 15 posts made between your posts at the time, only 2 of which were mine. Furthermore, you responded to the Wombat issue that I was involved in, so tell me how my "tons of posts," which started with post 1703 (14 posts after your last one, and a full 25 posts after my vote for Wombat), made it hard for you to catch my vote on Wombat.

  • Moderator
Posted

Simple.....I came back to the thread a while later....which was dominated with your case on Wombat. Not to mention you post in red(ish) font, which helped me to miss your vote when I began getting caught up. Even in bold and more "red", I still missed it on my phone.

Posted

OH MY GOSH I AM SO MAD!!!

 

Sorry, I typed something up and then the internet went away but I was using "Fast Reply" so it didn't save what I typed. >:(

 

*says lots of filthy things*

 

Anyway, so I'm kinda pissed right now so if I seem a bit abrasive, that's why.

 

Basically, I said that I can accept the color thing, since I don't know what it looks like on mobile and I didn't say "vote" before "Wombat" so that's a fairly feasible explanation for missing my vote--it might have just blended in.

 

BUT, you need to just stop blaming my number of Wombat-related posts on your missing my vote. The whole reason I "cased" Wombat at all was that someone asked me WHY I VOTED FOR HIM. You said you were interested in seeing my "case" BEFORE it came, which means you posted AFTER my vote and BEFORE my "case," so by that, you should have read the post where I voted already. I didn't vote during or after my marathon of posts. I voted nearly a whole day beforehand.

 

That's why I was even suspicious of you "missing" my vote; because you are using an invalid excuse for missing it. It was not buried at the time of your last check-in prior to my "tons of posts." It was in plain sight, plenty of other people caught it, it was the REASON for my "tons of posts," so yeah.... Looked rather fishy that you would blame it on me.

Posted

jk

anyway yeah I'm just really not seeing the case on Turin and both you and Wombat are being kind of ridiculous so I'm not even gonna argue with you anymore

I dunno I keep gazing over the player list trying to figure this out and the only name standing out to me right now is Maw

I'm probably biased since it's me he was voting but I thought the vote was very...off and random

not necessarily like he was trying to build a train on me but more like he was trying to toss his vote out for later so he wouldn't have to join a bandwagon against a teammate or something but he was still voting someone

I also found it kind of strange that he didn't use the convenient excuse of being vote controlled (which is what I thought was going on at first because the vote was so out there)

I dunno

it's the only thing that's coming to mind right now

the rest of the game is kind of fading from memory since it's been going on for awhile now you know?

anyway I'll cross with Maw and see what happens

 

Vote: Maw

Posted

*says lots of filthy things*

oh Meesh you know just how I like it

let's take this somewhere private :wub:

:laugh:

Sorry, I'm taken. I think I'd get quite the talking-to if I were to stray...not to mention all the dirty looks and whatnot from everyone else.... >.>

 

I also found it kind of strange that he didn't use the convenient excuse of being vote controlled (which is what I thought was going on at first because the vote was so out there)

This whole post feels really weird to me, but this part in particular I think is really pointless...this has already been addressed, Nolder. If he were to falsely claim his vote being controlled, he'd instead be going up against Kae, since the vote control action was not on the list she gave us, and that would be much harder to do than going up against you, because there's much more evidence in favor of Kae than there is in favor of you.

 

So, assuming Maw is scum or cult, which is what you're insinuating you believe if you think he would have used an excuse to cover his vote (because that would have been lying), what possible, logical reason would he have had for lying about something that would draw so much more attention to him?

 

So yeah...again...that whole post of yours doesn't really even make sense. You seem a bit...graspy.

Posted

Also, I don't really think the vote was "out there..." Not many other people have all that much to go on right now, PLUS you've brought negative attention on yourself in this game before, so it didn't even look like an "eeny meeny miney mo"-random vote. Regardless of reasons given, you're not exactly on the list of totally clean or totally invisible.

Posted

This whole post feels really weird to me, but this part in particular I think is really pointless...this has already been addressed, Nolder. If he were to falsely claim his vote being controlled, he'd instead be going up against Kae, since the vote control action was not on the list she gave us, and that would be much harder to do than going up against you, because there's much more evidence in favor of Kae than there is in favor of you.

sorry I like to fully explain my thought process when I vote

unlike some people

 

So, assuming Maw is scum or cult,...what possible, logical reason would he have had for lying about something that would draw so much more attention to him?

he probably didn't think about it at first

 

So yeah...again...that whole post of yours doesn't really even make sense. You seem a bit...graspy.

more so than the guy who votes without a reason?

 

...PLUS you've brought negative attention on yourself in this game before, so it didn't even look like an "eeny meeny miney mo"-random vote. Regardless of reasons given, you're not exactly on the list of totally clean or totally invisible.

to you maybe

but I'm writing you off as crazy this game

for now anyway

Posted

so it didn't even look like an "eeny meeny miney mo"-random vote.

I'm terrible at this game and he looked like a good vote at the time. For some reason. don't look at me like that. IT IS TOTALLY A LEGIT VOTE!

:rolleyes:

Posted

LOL

 

Aww, keep it coming, buddy.

 

Who here has said they totally think you're lightsworn, Nol?

 

Who here has said you are acting or have acted really strangely?

 

If no one at all except for myself has said either, then you qualify for invisible.

 

If more people have said the former, you qualify as just about "totally clean."

 

If more people have said the latter, or anyone at all has said either one, you're neither totally clean nor totally invisible, so don't pretend you're making sense when you say it's just me thinking you're weird.

 

So yeah...you keep calling people crazy, or throwing barbs at them, without giving solid, legit reasons for people being wrong in their thoughts. I'm sure this strategy of yours to make yourself look better will work eventually.

Posted

the only person I'm calling crazy is you

I'm sure Wombat has his reasons for saying and doing the things he does

although what those might be I can't begin to fathom

 

you're still bent out of shape because I wouldn't read your WoTs when you were attacking BG earlier in the game that's all

Posted

I think nearly 90 pages in we should be able to form some rational cases here

even if it's just a "gut feeling" there must have been a post that made you feel that way about me Maw

what did I say or do that seemed off to you?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...