Jump to content

DRAGONMOUNT

A WHEEL OF TIME COMMUNITY

[Advanced/Experimental] Game of Thrones Mafia


Kivam

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 8/17/2011 at 8:58 PM, John McClane said:
  On 8/17/2011 at 8:34 PM, DreadPirateRoberts said:

9) The only thing I'm hiding are me treasures that you a-holes keep trying to steal.

 

 

 

... and BOOM ... the Pirate shows us his ass.

 

Based on CTM trying to steal from me, me trying to steal from Pac on N1, and both of us coming up empty handed... and both CTM and Pac being my strongest reads for fellow survivors, I think its a somewhat safe hypothesis to make that the survivors started with nothing.

 

So DPR's "treasure" that he keeps referring to... has me thinking he's no survivor.

 

Red, DPR and Smash are my favorites.

 

*facepalms*

 

References to "me treasure" go along with the pirate thing, which i figured most people understood. I was referring to Hybrid's first attempt at a thief play on me, which by pure chance, turned out well for him later on. However, as he will soon learn, I am just remarking on his attempts, and not on actual treasure.

 

Also, John, just so you know - I don't actually refer to myself as "me" either, that's part of the pirate flavor as well. I say this in case you run out of ideas and try to set a grammar trap later. Sadly, I don't actually wear an eye-patch either, but for the right amount of gold, I can make my parrot talk.

 

Now, when all of the wifomers are done getting excited over each other's boners, I'll bet you can figure out why a few things have been said and why so many other players are quiet and not posting up torrents of crap filled posts.

 

So far, the newbs in this game are not newbs at all, and a fair number of the seasoned players are...figures.

 

 

 

  • Replies 3.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted
  On 8/17/2011 at 9:26 PM, BooBoo said:
  On 8/17/2011 at 9:21 PM, John McClane said:

It wasn't... I called it out as well.

 

What? You're not a wily vet? You sure act like you think you are.

 

 

I'm the worst player in the game. Haven't you heard?

Posted
  On 8/17/2011 at 9:27 PM, WWWwombat said:

Yeah let's set up a predetermined order of 5 or 6 lynches in a row in a cult game.

 

First, don't take everything at face value... second, its not like cult is going to convert any of Red, DPR or Smash at this point, if none of them aren't already cult.

Posted
  On 8/17/2011 at 9:19 PM, slats said:

Do I really need to spell out why competing trains is better? I have no problem lynching either one today, or lynching both in back to back days.

 

I agree with you, while I'm pretty confident Red is probably caught red-handed (I know, I'm good) - still thinks its smart to have another train.

 

Unvote McClane

Vote Smash

 

Once he was called out for playing differently, he's been posting in the thread a lot more.

Posted
  On 8/17/2011 at 9:25 PM, John McClane said:

I agree with CTM, I'd like Verbal to explain why he's not suspicious of Smash.

 

Also, for Slats to weigh in on DPR.

 

Speaking of weighing in... where is tubby? Might run a train on Crusher just to see if he cracks as usual in the next day or so...

 

So you and CTM have come to the brilliant conclusion Im not a survivor and you would be correct. But what is there about what Ive said that makes me the CL and why should people be suspicious of it ? Its obvious you 2 clowns want me to tell you what faction Im with and as of right now your not getting that info. I really wish you would just slow the hell down we have like 45 pages and 30 of them are from your posts alone.

Posted
  On 8/17/2011 at 9:29 PM, BooBoo said:
  On 8/17/2011 at 9:19 PM, slats said:

Do I really need to spell out why competing trains is better? I have no problem lynching either one today, or lynching both in back to back days.

 

I agree with you, while I'm pretty confident Red is probably caught red-handed (I know, I'm good) - still thinks its smart to have another train.

 

Unvote McClane

Vote Smash

 

Once he was called out for playing differently, he's been posting in the thread a lot more.

 

Once Im involved in the game and the day 1 crap is over with I do begin to post more if that helps any.

Posted
  On 8/17/2011 at 9:27 PM, John McClane said:

I'm the worst player in the game. Haven't you heard?

 

I take it people call you that? And I've noticed you pay it no mind.

Posted
  On 8/17/2011 at 9:27 PM, DreadPirateRoberts said:
  On 8/17/2011 at 8:58 PM, John McClane said:
  On 8/17/2011 at 8:34 PM, DreadPirateRoberts said:

9) The only thing I'm hiding are me treasures that you a-holes keep trying to steal.

 

 

 

... and BOOM ... the Pirate shows us his ass.

 

Based on CTM trying to steal from me, me trying to steal from Pac on N1, and both of us coming up empty handed... and both CTM and Pac being my strongest reads for fellow survivors, I think its a somewhat safe hypothesis to make that the survivors started with nothing.

 

So DPR's "treasure" that he keeps referring to... has me thinking he's no survivor.

 

Red, DPR and Smash are my favorites.

 

*facepalms*

 

References to "me treasure" go along with the pirate thing, which i figured most people understood. I was referring to Hybrid's first attempt at a thief play on me, which by pure chance, turned out well for him later on. However, as he will soon learn, I am just remarking on his attempts, and not on actual treasure.

 

Also, John, just so you know - I don't actually refer to myself as "me" either, that's part of the pirate flavor as well. I say this in case you run out of ideas and try to set a grammar trap later. Sadly, I don't actually wear an eye-patch either, but for the right amount of gold, I can make my parrot talk.

 

Now, when all of the wifomers are done getting excited over each other's boners, I'll bet you can figure out why a few things have been said and why so many other players are quiet and not posting up torrents of crap filled posts.

 

So far, the newbs in this game are not newbs at all, and a fair number of the seasoned players are...figures.

 

 

"me treasure" really? that's what you are going with there? lol

Posted
  On 8/17/2011 at 9:25 PM, Barmacral said:

Then she'll have to explain it to me Lanth, cause I don't see it.

 

You and red both want an NK for information. That's the only connection I can see. I wanted one too, so I don't see the big deal. I don't understand why no survivor would want an NK either. Frankly, if one house hits another, or the cult, it can only be a good thing. And if the houes hit a survivor... well it sucks for them and no one else. (may help the cult a bit, losing 3 people a night tho)

 

  On 8/17/2011 at 9:27 PM, WWWwombat said:
  On 8/17/2011 at 9:05 PM, John McClane said:
  On 8/17/2011 at 9:00 PM, Pac said:
  On 8/17/2011 at 8:58 PM, John McClane said:
  On 8/17/2011 at 8:34 PM, DreadPirateRoberts said:

 

9) The only thing I'm hiding are me treasures that you a-holes keep trying to steal.

 

 

 

... and BOOM ... the Pirate shows us his ass.

 

Based on CTM trying to steal from me, me trying to steal from Pac on N1, and both of us coming up empty handed... and both CTM and Pac being my strongest reads for fellow survivors, I think its a somewhat safe hypothesis to make that the survivors started with nothing.

 

So DPR's "treasure" that he keeps referring to... has me thinking he's no survivor.

 

Red, DPR and Smash are my favorites.

 

I was successful in my steal from you yesterday a-hole.. came up empty tho.

 

and I really don't see the point in talking about if you know what I mean. DPR had already sloppily exposed himself enough.

 

 

You, CTM and I all had the same thing happen. We're all survivors. We started with nothing to be stolen, so DPR's treasure is a tell that he's got something.

 

I'm not divulging more details than that - it should be the clincher for DPR.

 

Red, DPR, Smash, then onto BG, Lanth and see what other filth we can stir up... perhaps Wombat.

 

Yeah let's set up a predetermined order of 5 or 6 lynches in a row in a cult game.

 

Oh look, someone else sees the folly... :rolleyes: That isn't even a survivor play. He should want to hit a house member (one tops) flop to the other side and cult hunt. Or flip the cult hunt with the family hunting.

Posted

VOTE COUNT

Sakaea (1) - Vic

McClane (2) - Red, Smash

Red (8) - Hybrid, McClane, Barm, Wombat, Verbal, Lanth, DPR, Sakaea

JF80 (1) - Crusher

Lanth (1) - Pac

Smash (2) - Slats, CTM, Booboo

 

13 to lynch

Posted
  On 8/17/2011 at 9:32 PM, Smash said:

Once Im involved in the game and the day 1 crap is over with I do begin to post more if that helps any.

 

Not really, seems pretty convenient. The truth is, you started posting more when the group started to "meta" you.

 

Why?

Posted
  On 8/17/2011 at 9:18 PM, Barmacral said:
  On 8/17/2011 at 8:59 PM, Naeann said:
  On 8/17/2011 at 6:49 PM, Hybrid said:

To add to my previous post:

 

The thing that really did it for me wasn't just the NK speculation -- because I can maybe buy skepticism over the number of NKs --, it was this:

 

  On 8/17/2011 at 4:46 PM, Red2111 said:

another question on the subject of there being 3 kills, i wonder what prevented them as well. theres a slew of roles that coudl be in place that could block a Kill, but thats a whole lot of good guessing imo and i don't like coinsedences

 

No survivor would have said this.

 

Add to that Red's unwillingness or inability to address the reasons at hand and the defensiveness of her reaction and there's very little that will persuade me to vote elsewhere today.

 

 

Barm also said something along the lines of wishing there had been a NK for imformational value.

 

Glad you could join us. Care to explain how thats relevant to anything you quoted?

 

 

I found it odd that you even bothered to say "sucks we didn't have any kills.. the info would have been nice"... Why say that? I'm always suspicious of people who feel the need to say things about nks or lack there of... like "damn.. we lost the doc"... It's a crocodile tears sort of situation and it always makes me take a closer look at those who say things.

Posted
  On 8/17/2011 at 9:31 PM, Smash said:
  On 8/17/2011 at 9:25 PM, John McClane said:

I agree with CTM, I'd like Verbal to explain why he's not suspicious of Smash.

 

Also, for Slats to weigh in on DPR.

 

Speaking of weighing in... where is tubby? Might run a train on Crusher just to see if he cracks as usual in the next day or so...

 

So you and CTM have come to the brilliant conclusion Im not a survivor and you would be correct. But what is there about what Ive said that makes me the CL and why should people be suspicious of it ? Its obvious you 2 clowns want me to tell you what faction Im with and as of right now your not getting that info. I really wish you would just slow the hell down we have like 45 pages and 30 of them are from your posts alone.

 

I never said you were the CL. That said...

 

My goal, which I think aligns with other people's is to 1.) find cult, 2.) find a house member, kill them and then join the opposing family... and if you haven't noticed, I'm voting Red.

 

At this point, anyone that surfaces as a non-survivor can easily be cult and lie about not knowing survivor intel because they are a house member.

Posted
  On 8/17/2011 at 9:20 PM, BooBoo said:
  On 8/17/2011 at 9:10 PM, Verbal32 said:

I noticed this as well. Newbie my a$$.

 

Or maybe your jealous that a newbie has as good of a grasp at whats going on as you? ;-)

 

For serious though, I dont see how that was some type of profound observation that only a wily vet like yourself would pick up.

 

What I think he's getting at.. as well as several of us.. is that there's no way in hell Kivs would put a total baby to mafia into this game. And you are NOT acting like a total baby to mafia. Cut the "i'm new what's this red button do" crap and just play?

  • Moderator
Posted
  On 8/17/2011 at 9:20 PM, BooBoo said:
  On 8/17/2011 at 9:10 PM, Verbal32 said:

I noticed this as well. Newbie my a$$.

 

Or maybe your jealous that a newbie has as good of a grasp at whats going on as you? ;-)

 

For serious though, I dont see how that was some type of profound observation that only a wily vet like yourself would pick up.

 

To be 100% honest, it was a weak attempt on my part to try and figure you out. You are a puzzle for me, and I like puzzles.

 

 

 

 

  On 8/17/2011 at 9:25 PM, John McClane said:

I agree with CTM, I'd like Verbal to explain why he's not suspicious of Smash.

 

Also, for Slats to weigh in on DPR.

 

Speaking of weighing in... where is tubby? Might run a train on Crusher just to see if he cracks as usual in the next day or so...

 

He's just not in my top 3 - simple. I think Red & DPR are DTD (yeah, I totally went Jersey Shore there).

Posted
  On 8/17/2011 at 9:34 PM, BooBoo said:
  On 8/17/2011 at 9:32 PM, Smash said:

Once Im involved in the game and the day 1 crap is over with I do begin to post more if that helps any.

 

Not really, seems pretty convenient. The truth is, you started posting more when the group started to "meta" you.

 

Why?

 

already answered the question anyone on JN could confrim this for you if you like ...once im involved in the game I post pretty frequently.

Posted
  On 8/17/2011 at 9:22 PM, John McClane said:
  On 8/17/2011 at 9:19 PM, slats said:
  On 8/17/2011 at 9:08 PM, John McClane said:
  On 8/17/2011 at 8:42 PM, slats said:

Unvote

 

vote: Smash

 

I'm gonna cut Lily's replacement some slack. The early momentum there died off, anyway.

 

fwiw, I have no problem with Red, either, but I like the idea of competing trains at this point in time. I was hoping to see Lily and Red compete, but I don't see that happening.

 

You know, this could be interpreted as a veiled attempt to bail out a teammate... starting a competing train, when Red is more or less done for...

 

Do I really need to spell out why competing trains is better? I have no problem lynching either one today, or lynching both in back to back days.

 

No, but that's exactly why its a great way to veil other motivations for not voting Red. Just sayin.

 

What do you think about DPR?

 

I mentioned DPR a while ago in reference to Pac's post count thread. I feel he's not contributing the way he usually does. As for a sure-fire tell that he's not a survivor? I'd have to go back and read.

 

  On 8/17/2011 at 9:31 PM, Smash said:
  On 8/17/2011 at 9:25 PM, John McClane said:

I agree with CTM, I'd like Verbal to explain why he's not suspicious of Smash.

 

Also, for Slats to weigh in on DPR.

 

Speaking of weighing in... where is tubby? Might run a train on Crusher just to see if he cracks as usual in the next day or so...

 

So you and CTM have come to the brilliant conclusion Im not a survivor and you would be correct. But what is there about what Ive said that makes me the CL and why should people be suspicious of it ? Its obvious you 2 clowns want me to tell you what faction Im with and as of right now your not getting that info. I really wish you would just slow the hell down we have like 45 pages and 30 of them are from your posts alone.

 

Haha! I have a feeling we're going to have it pretty soon. :laugh:

Posted
  On 8/17/2011 at 9:38 PM, slats said:
  On 8/17/2011 at 9:22 PM, John McClane said:
  On 8/17/2011 at 9:19 PM, slats said:
  On 8/17/2011 at 9:08 PM, John McClane said:
  On 8/17/2011 at 8:42 PM, slats said:

Unvote

 

vote: Smash

 

I'm gonna cut Lily's replacement some slack. The early momentum there died off, anyway.

 

fwiw, I have no problem with Red, either, but I like the idea of competing trains at this point in time. I was hoping to see Lily and Red compete, but I don't see that happening.

 

You know, this could be interpreted as a veiled attempt to bail out a teammate... starting a competing train, when Red is more or less done for...

 

Do I really need to spell out why competing trains is better? I have no problem lynching either one today, or lynching both in back to back days.

 

No, but that's exactly why its a great way to veil other motivations for not voting Red. Just sayin.

 

What do you think about DPR?

 

I mentioned DPR a while ago in reference to Pac's post count thread. I feel he's not contributing the way he usually does. As for a sure-fire tell that he's not a survivor? I'd have to go back and read.

 

  On 8/17/2011 at 9:31 PM, Smash said:
  On 8/17/2011 at 9:25 PM, John McClane said:

I agree with CTM, I'd like Verbal to explain why he's not suspicious of Smash.

 

Also, for Slats to weigh in on DPR.

 

Speaking of weighing in... where is tubby? Might run a train on Crusher just to see if he cracks as usual in the next day or so...

 

So you and CTM have come to the brilliant conclusion Im not a survivor and you would be correct. But what is there about what Ive said that makes me the CL and why should people be suspicious of it ? Its obvious you 2 clowns want me to tell you what faction Im with and as of right now your not getting that info. I really wish you would just slow the hell down we have like 45 pages and 30 of them are from your posts alone.

 

Haha! I have a feeling we're going to have it pretty soon. :laugh:

 

:p

Posted
  On 8/17/2011 at 9:36 PM, Naeann said:
  On 8/17/2011 at 9:20 PM, BooBoo said:
  On 8/17/2011 at 9:10 PM, Verbal32 said:

I noticed this as well. Newbie my a$$.

 

Or maybe your jealous that a newbie has as good of a grasp at whats going on as you? ;-)

 

For serious though, I dont see how that was some type of profound observation that only a wily vet like yourself would pick up.

 

What I think he's getting at.. as well as several of us.. is that there's no way in hell Kivs would put a total baby to mafia into this game. And you are NOT acting like a total baby to mafia. Cut the "i'm new what's this red button do" crap and just play?

 

<3 Nae

Posted
  On 8/17/2011 at 9:36 PM, Naeann said:

What I think he's getting at.. as well as several of us.. is that there's no way in hell Kivs would put a total baby to mafia into this game. And you are NOT acting like a total baby to mafia. Cut the "i'm new what's this red button do" crap and just play?

 

Not that this should be an alarming statement, but I think 90% of this game thinks way to highly of themselves and their intellect. Its not that hard. Its a guessing game with some structure and roles involved. I'm pretty sure I could teach this to a 10 year old and s/he'd figure out how to play as well as any of you.

 

I really dont think I'm using being new as a crutch. I've mentioned it maybe twice. I'm just playing the game. Curious why you're so worked about it?

Posted
  On 8/17/2011 at 9:36 PM, John McClane said:
  On 8/17/2011 at 9:31 PM, Smash said:
  On 8/17/2011 at 9:25 PM, John McClane said:

I agree with CTM, I'd like Verbal to explain why he's not suspicious of Smash.

 

Also, for Slats to weigh in on DPR.

 

Speaking of weighing in... where is tubby? Might run a train on Crusher just to see if he cracks as usual in the next day or so...

 

So you and CTM have come to the brilliant conclusion Im not a survivor and you would be correct. But what is there about what Ive said that makes me the CL and why should people be suspicious of it ? Its obvious you 2 clowns want me to tell you what faction Im with and as of right now your not getting that info. I really wish you would just slow the hell down we have like 45 pages and 30 of them are from your posts alone.

 

I never said you were the CL. That said...

 

My goal, which I think aligns with other people's is to 1.) find cult, 2.) find a house member, kill them and then join the opposing family... and if you haven't noticed, I'm voting Red.

 

At this point, anyone that surfaces as a non-survivor can easily be cult and lie about not knowing survivor intel because they are a house member.

 

You are not acting like that is your agenda. Most of your arguments are about tying people together which is a House hunting strategy imo.

Posted
  On 8/17/2011 at 9:35 PM, Naeann said:

I found it odd that you even bothered to say "sucks we didn't have any kills.. the info would have been nice"... Why say that? I'm always suspicious of people who feel the need to say things about nks or lack there of... like "damn.. we lost the doc"... It's a crocodile tears sort of situation and it always makes me take a closer look at those who say things.

 

I get what you're saying, but it doesn't bother me that much. Especially not when there are more egregious tells going on.

  • Moderator
Posted
  On 8/17/2011 at 9:44 PM, WWWwombat said:
  On 8/17/2011 at 9:36 PM, John McClane said:
  On 8/17/2011 at 9:31 PM, Smash said:
  On 8/17/2011 at 9:25 PM, John McClane said:

I agree with CTM, I'd like Verbal to explain why he's not suspicious of Smash.

 

Also, for Slats to weigh in on DPR.

 

Speaking of weighing in... where is tubby? Might run a train on Crusher just to see if he cracks as usual in the next day or so...

 

So you and CTM have come to the brilliant conclusion Im not a survivor and you would be correct. But what is there about what Ive said that makes me the CL and why should people be suspicious of it ? Its obvious you 2 clowns want me to tell you what faction Im with and as of right now your not getting that info. I really wish you would just slow the hell down we have like 45 pages and 30 of them are from your posts alone.

 

I never said you were the CL. That said...

 

My goal, which I think aligns with other people's is to 1.) find cult, 2.) find a house member, kill them and then join the opposing family... and if you haven't noticed, I'm voting Red.

 

At this point, anyone that surfaces as a non-survivor can easily be cult and lie about not knowing survivor intel because they are a house member.

 

You are not acting like that is your agenda. Most of your arguments are about tying people together which is a House hunting strategy imo.

 

^ This.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...