Jump to content



Most Nefarious Thing You've Done This Month

Recommended Posts

Hey, all. So what's the most nefarious thing you've done this month? It can be a plot, a prank, or even just something you've said to someone - as long as it's dastardly. XD


I'll edit this post to add my own evil scheme to the mix, once I confirm with the Nae’blis that I'm allowed to share the information with other Darkfriends (read: check the rules to make absolutely sure it's SG-appropriate). LOL.


[EDIT: Nothing I read in the rules explicitly banned the mention of my evil plot, but I'm gonna err on the side of caution 'til I know everyone better and share something slightly less, well, nefarious. Better not to reveal my full hand right away, anyway, from a strategic standpoint. XD So I'll just go with what I did yesterday: I conned my apartment's manager out of free donuts by reminding her that it was "national donut day." For context, the apartment's website advertises free donuts, coffee, and pizza on their respective days. I just convinced Lisa that yesterday was the day she had to give donuts to all the residents.]



Edited by Adastreia

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

The worst thing I did was lie to my boss about why I was staying on one more week. I made it look like I did it for her so I look good. 

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Illian Tear said:

I made fun of a friend because I will get my license a month before him when he's older than me.

I just turned 29 this week, and I still can't drive. LOL. I've failed my driving test three times. The last time (2016), I accidentally drove into a brick building, and the poor DMV guy told me he hadn't been so scared since Vietnam.


This is why I turned to the Shadow; I'm hoping to eventually be allowed to Travel with the True Power so I can avoid all this troublesome driving nonsense. XD

Edited by Adastreia

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, LilyElizabeth said:

15 points for starting this thread

I am in no way guilty of doing the "I'm a badass evil mage" dance upon reading this. *shifty eyes* (That makes sense if you're me. LOL.)

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Posts

    • My issue with increasing congress to that size is  A) Nothing gets done in there as is and  B) I dont want to pay 46 million more dollars a year to those vipers, not including whatever insurances, lifetime pensions, healthcare and security details they get. I already thinks its ridiculous they get paid during the shutdown, completely, while government employees are forced to work without pay.
    • how can i remove it? or could you do it for me?
    • Sure, I'll post this  again:       The data for the graphs is currently 2 election cycles old (it was run off 04 and 08) but the points stand...though it would be interesting to redo the graphics with 16 and 12 results.   Secondarily, if the porposals listed (somewhere) about "fixing congress" by increasing the size of the body (to somewhere around 800, I forget) would also help by creating more (and distributing more evenly) electoral votes around the country, or more modest proposals to award electors proportionately would also help.   The danger here is the logic of either; system is broken, why fix it or system has always worked (even though it's been broken the whole time), so don't fix it.      The best part of the video is the path to the presidency with 22%  (or said differently, a president could win if 78% of the people voted against them) of the vote, which is, um, not a fair/just/equitable/local/whatever word you want to use system at all.

    • I’ve never really liked the argument that one’s vote counts less using a percentage based on total population to EC votes when comparing states because that’s not how the EC is supposed to work.   Its not a perfect system but I don’t think it’s awful. I’d like to move away from the winner-take-all system the majority of states use, but I dislike the idea of using a straight up NPV tally.
    • As for impeachment; we don't have any hard (or direct) evidence of him committing crimes while in office, and we don't have any hard (or direct) of him committing crimes to get into office, but there is a lot of circumstalial and unproven evidence of both in the public domain.