[Advanced] Fight Club Mafia! - Game Thread!

[DPR]

 

 

Are you going to give us your results from last night when you get home Tress?

 

 

You ask a lot of questions for someone that won't read or answer any. 

 

These are exactly the kinds of posts I am talking about.

The kind that are aggressive, but not overbearing, and with enough truth in them that others will let this slide to see what happens.

 

By "enough truth", you mean it's just true, right? 

 

I do ask a lot of questions, it's part of the game.

I have answered a lot of questions. Since I've joined I've been active and engaged. This is a lie.

 

Answers like "why" and "does it matter" don't count. You've been stand-offish. I wouldn't use the terms "active and engaged".

 

He's attempting to conflate the fact that I didn't read back from when I subbed in with answering questions which I have been.

 

I do no think you know the meaning of that word... Regardless, you have not read the game and you've admitted to it. I pointed out that only one alignment would not need to read the game. No conflation. All simple fact.

 

And all he's trying to do is draw me into an argument over whether or not I am or am not doing this that or the other thing.

 

I've labeled you as scum and laid out my case. If you take that as an invitation to argue, well, that is what you signed up for.

 

He doesn't care whether I read anything or answered or didn't answer anything.

 

You're voting for me with no case. I did request that you read the game to put your observations into context. You chose not to. See, I do care.

 

That's not the point the point is to create as big an argument as possible (without looking like the cause of the argument) and distract everyone until a deadline approaches.

 

Of course I'm the cause of the argument - I've cased you as scum. No distraction - it's a voting game. I've voted for you. 

 

This is the meta I'm talking about.

 

You've gone to lengths in talking about it. Seems like there would be room to connect the dots to some fact based info in there somewhere, no?

 

It literally got him caught like 2 or 3 games in a row on JN recently, but only after he'd caused plenty of mayhem.

 

I honestly think I've only ever lived to see the end of 1 game on JN, so that's stretching it a bit on your part.

 

I am telling you guys you need to put a stop to it now.

He's like wormtongue from lord of the rings, he is not ineffective at what he does and it will drive the town into chaos.

 

This is being added to my sig. Just fantastic!

 

 

I'm blushing.

 

I'm also in blue above.

 

 

Is dpr this agressive as mafia when it comes to lynching people? He isn't reserved at all here which I kinda like, plus I think the speculation he is doing looks better than worse.

 

I read nolder and don't see any reason not to vote there. Besides meta, tell me why you think dpr is scum nold?

[V]nolder [/v] gang read iron now

Yes it's exactly how he acts as mafia.

I don't have a reason besides meta.

I recently saw him act this way, without change, as scum 2 or 3 times in a row.

If he isn't scum again then I need a longer hiatus from the game because this is as blatant as it gets imo.

I feel like DPR is being served on a silver platter for me it can't be wrong.

 

Put me in the ring with him I'll stake my life on it.

 

[v]Nolder[/v]

 

 

 

How very Darthe of you. You guys have a martyr clause in your contract, or what? 

 

Get ready for a longer hiatus.

[Zander?]

And nothing from Hallia I see.....

 

sadface,gif

 

speh/nold/dpr/hallia.

 

esp if Hallia doesnt #putinthework today.

 

I will be voting 2 out of there most likely barring anything crazy happening. 

[seph]

OK so 1. I have never played with big as mafia except on the same team.

You can look at any game with her and me. I have 0 trouble throwing down a read on her. In my head I constantly scrutinize it.

Technically I do this with most reads lol, but I think I explained it poorly and understand your problem with it.

[unvote] molder

[V]hallia [/v]

[Zander?]

Alright guys, got some running around to do today, Ill be back after a bit to check in as Im in and out!!!

 

Really would like to see some reads/poe's with reasoning for EVERYONE's choices today please!!!!

[DPR]

 

Is dpr this agressive as mafia when it comes to lynching people? He isn't reserved at all here which I kinda like, plus I think the speculation he is doing looks better than worse.

 

I read nolder and don't see any reason not to vote there. Besides meta, tell me why you think dpr is scum nold?

[V]nolder [/v] gang read iron now

 

DPR is aggressive as both alignments imo,

 

Ive played some with him here and on JN,

 

And whats wrong with Meta as a reasoning seph?

 

You damn well know Im a Meta player, and I doubt you'd take issue with me making a Meta read....

 

So why do you have an issue with Nolder using it as a reason?

 

I'M ALIVE

 

FFS Internet.

 

 

>.<

 

Anyone got cliffnotes?  I want to try and stay current.

 

YAY HalliaGOAT <3 <3 <3

 

Looking forward to seeing your catch-up and thoughts!!!!!

 

Tress gave me the cliffnotes, Ill find the post once i catch up from lats night at least!!!!

 

 

 

You're kinda slimy this game. You criticize my D1 vote on Darthe & Sooh as being scummish, but then you defend Nolder's blatant disregard for any other player in the game to go after me based on only meta?

 

Meta is great and all when you have nothing else to go on, or you're developing a hunch. Once you have actual fact-based evidence, meta is far less important. 

 

What are your thoughts regarding my non-meta case on Nolder?

[DPR]

Alright guys, got some running around to do today, Ill be back after a bit to check in as Im in and out!!!

 

Really would like to see some reads/poe's with reasoning for EVERYONE's choices today please!!!!

 

Love to see yours as well! 

[Zander?]

OK so 1. I have never played with big as mafia except on the same team.

You can look at any game with her and me. I have 0 trouble throwing down a read on her. In my head I constantly scrutinize it.

Technically I do this with most reads lol, but I think I explained it poorly and understand your problem with it.

[unvote] molder

[V]hallia [/v]

 

lolololololol @ MOLDER

 

And I know how you sometimes (often, i still love you boo) have trouble expressing your thoughts clearly and have been ML'd for it.

 

So I am keeping that in mind as well as Im looking into who I want to see fight today.

[Nolder]

 

 

Is dpr this agressive as mafia when it comes to lynching people? He isn't reserved at all here which I kinda like, plus I think the speculation he is doing looks better than worse.

 

I read nolder and don't see any reason not to vote there. Besides meta, tell me why you think dpr is scum nold?

[V]nolder [/v] gang read iron now

Yes it's exactly how he acts as mafia.

I don't have a reason besides meta.

I recently saw him act this way, without change, as scum 2 or 3 times in a row.

If he isn't scum again then I need a longer hiatus from the game because this is as blatant as it gets imo.

I feel like DPR is being served on a silver platter for me it can't be wrong.

 

Put me in the ring with him I'll stake my life on it.

 

[v]Nolder[/v]

 

 

FML

 

Another Nolder self vote...

 

Im almost willing to give you your wish Nol atp.

 

Can you reeeally call it a self vote though? This isn't a normal game.

I am willing to go toe to toe with the damn dirty pirate.

[Zander?]

 

 

Is dpr this agressive as mafia when it comes to lynching people? He isn't reserved at all here which I kinda like, plus I think the speculation he is doing looks better than worse.

 

I read nolder and don't see any reason not to vote there. Besides meta, tell me why you think dpr is scum nold?

[V]nolder [/v] gang read iron now

 

DPR is aggressive as both alignments imo,

 

Ive played some with him here and on JN,

 

And whats wrong with Meta as a reasoning seph?

 

You damn well know Im a Meta player, and I doubt you'd take issue with me making a Meta read....

 

So why do you have an issue with Nolder using it as a reason?

 

I'M ALIVE

 

FFS Internet.

 

 

>.<

 

Anyone got cliffnotes?  I want to try and stay current.

 

YAY HalliaGOAT <3 <3 <3

 

Looking forward to seeing your catch-up and thoughts!!!!!

 

Tress gave me the cliffnotes, Ill find the post once i catch up from lats night at least!!!!

 

 

 

You're kinda slimy this game. You criticize my D1 vote on Darthe & Sooh as being scummish, but then you defend Nolder's blatant disregard for any other player in the game to go after me based on only meta?

 

Meta is great and all when you have nothing else to go on, or you're developing a hunch. Once you have actual fact-based evidence, meta is far less important. 

 

What are your thoughts regarding my non-meta case on Nolder?

 

 

Im not slimy brother, Im me and Town and Im behind still like 40 or so pages.

 

Where do i DEFEND Nolder?!!?!?!?

 

He's in my PoE for today ffs.....lolololololol

[Zander?]

 

Alright guys, got some running around to do today, Ill be back after a bit to check in as Im in and out!!!

 

Really would like to see some reads/poe's with reasoning for EVERYONE's choices today please!!!!

 

Love to see yours as well! 

 

 

Then try reading my posts, you know its only the post right before this one you quoted that i gave my list....

[Zander?]

 

 

 

Is dpr this agressive as mafia when it comes to lynching people? He isn't reserved at all here which I kinda like, plus I think the speculation he is doing looks better than worse.

 

I read nolder and don't see any reason not to vote there. Besides meta, tell me why you think dpr is scum nold?

[V]nolder [/v] gang read iron now

Yes it's exactly how he acts as mafia.

I don't have a reason besides meta.

I recently saw him act this way, without change, as scum 2 or 3 times in a row.

If he isn't scum again then I need a longer hiatus from the game because this is as blatant as it gets imo.

I feel like DPR is being served on a silver platter for me it can't be wrong.

 

Put me in the ring with him I'll stake my life on it.

 

[v]Nolder[/v]

 

 

FML

 

Another Nolder self vote...

 

Im almost willing to give you your wish Nol atp.

 

Can you reeeally call it a self vote though? This isn't a normal game.

I am willing to go toe to toe with the damn dirty pirate.

 

 

Thats true, hence why I said Im almost willing atp to give you your wish!!!!

[DPR]

 

 

 

Is dpr this agressive as mafia when it comes to lynching people? He isn't reserved at all here which I kinda like, plus I think the speculation he is doing looks better than worse.

 

I read nolder and don't see any reason not to vote there. Besides meta, tell me why you think dpr is scum nold?

[V]nolder [/v] gang read iron now

 

DPR is aggressive as both alignments imo,

 

Ive played some with him here and on JN,

 

And whats wrong with Meta as a reasoning seph?

 

You damn well know Im a Meta player, and I doubt you'd take issue with me making a Meta read....

 

So why do you have an issue with Nolder using it as a reason?

 

I'M ALIVE

 

FFS Internet.

 

 

>.<

 

Anyone got cliffnotes?  I want to try and stay current.

 

YAY HalliaGOAT <3 <3 <3

 

Looking forward to seeing your catch-up and thoughts!!!!!

 

Tress gave me the cliffnotes, Ill find the post once i catch up from lats night at least!!!!

 

 

 

You're kinda slimy this game. You criticize my D1 vote on Darthe & Sooh as being scummish, but then you defend Nolder's blatant disregard for any other player in the game to go after me based on only meta?

 

Meta is great and all when you have nothing else to go on, or you're developing a hunch. Once you have actual fact-based evidence, meta is far less important. 

 

What are your thoughts regarding my non-meta case on Nolder?

 

 

Im not slimy brother, Im me and Town and Im behind still like 40 or so pages.

 

Where do i DEFEND Nolder?!!?!?!?

 

He's in my PoE for today ffs.....lolololololol

 

 

 

Defend in the sense that you criticize Seph for questioning Nolder's use of meta. How do you act like that's not defending? 

 

Also, PSA:

 

As it stands right now, the game is only 65 pages in total. For all of you that are still "catching up", take 10 minutes & read up. Thx.

[Nolder]

 

 

 

Are you going to give us your results from last night when you get home Tress?

 

 

You ask a lot of questions for someone that won't read or answer any. 

 

These are exactly the kinds of posts I am talking about.

The kind that are aggressive, but not overbearing, and with enough truth in them that others will let this slide to see what happens.

 

By "enough truth", you mean it's just true, right? 

 

I do ask a lot of questions, it's part of the game.

I have answered a lot of questions. Since I've joined I've been active and engaged. This is a lie.

 

Answers like "why" and "does it matter" don't count. You've been stand-offish. I wouldn't use the terms "active and engaged".

 

He's attempting to conflate the fact that I didn't read back from when I subbed in with answering questions which I have been.

 

I do no think you know the meaning of that word... Regardless, you have not read the game and you've admitted to it. I pointed out that only one alignment would not need to read the game. No conflation. All simple fact.

 

And all he's trying to do is draw me into an argument over whether or not I am or am not doing this that or the other thing.

 

I've labeled you as scum and laid out my case. If you take that as an invitation to argue, well, that is what you signed up for.

 

He doesn't care whether I read anything or answered or didn't answer anything.

 

You're voting for me with no case. I did request that you read the game to put your observations into context. You chose not to. See, I do care.

 

That's not the point the point is to create as big an argument as possible (without looking like the cause of the argument) and distract everyone until a deadline approaches.

 

Of course I'm the cause of the argument - I've cased you as scum. No distraction - it's a voting game. I've voted for you. 

 

This is the meta I'm talking about.

 

You've gone to lengths in talking about it. Seems like there would be room to connect the dots to some fact based info in there somewhere, no?

 

It literally got him caught like 2 or 3 games in a row on JN recently, but only after he'd caused plenty of mayhem.

 

I honestly think I've only ever lived to see the end of 1 game on JN, so that's stretching it a bit on your part.

 

I am telling you guys you need to put a stop to it now.

He's like wormtongue from lord of the rings, he is not ineffective at what he does and it will drive the town into chaos.

 

This is being added to my sig. Just fantastic!

 

 

I'm blushing.

 

I'm also in blue above.

 

 

Is dpr this agressive as mafia when it comes to lynching people? He isn't reserved at all here which I kinda like, plus I think the speculation he is doing looks better than worse.

 

I read nolder and don't see any reason not to vote there. Besides meta, tell me why you think dpr is scum nold?

[V]nolder [/v] gang read iron now

Yes it's exactly how he acts as mafia.

I don't have a reason besides meta.

I recently saw him act this way, without change, as scum 2 or 3 times in a row.

If he isn't scum again then I need a longer hiatus from the game because this is as blatant as it gets imo.

I feel like DPR is being served on a silver platter for me it can't be wrong.

 

Put me in the ring with him I'll stake my life on it.

 

[v]Nolder[/v]

 

 

 

How very Darthe of you. You guys have a martyr clause in your contract, or what? 

 

Get ready for a longer hiatus.

 

I'll give you a one time pass since you probably don't know but normally I don't read responses inside quotes.

I stopped after getting a massive headache from it once. People just went way overboard responding to each other in different colors and such.

So now I just don't do it. I'll make an exception this time but in the future if you have something to say to me put it outside a quote or I'm just going to ignore it.

 

 

By "enough truth", you mean it's just true, right? 

Ha!

 

 

Answers like "why" and "does it matter" don't count. You've been stand-offish. I wouldn't use the terms "active and engaged".

I was trying to drive home a point which was that I had thought me and Tress were both on the same page regarding you and shouldn't be bickering about how we both got there.

I found out that wasn't the case and moved on.

 

 

I do no think you know the meaning of that word... Regardless, you have not read the game and you've admitted to it. I pointed out that only one alignment would not need to read the game. No conflation. All simple fact.

This is obviously wrong. In a game where mafia try to blend in by appearing as townie as possible and where hypothetically I am mafia I would, in your view, need to read the game to keep up my townie appearance. But of course it's wrong for the simple fact that townies don't always do the townie thing. I don't want to catch up on 40 pages of gameplay. If I do that I am going to get bored and just stop posting and ask Clov to replace me which would make joining in the first place pointless. I think everyone would rather have an active player who, maybe, lacks a little context in the game than someone who's going to need to be replaced because by the time they catch up they're burnt out and don't want to play "in the moment".

 

 

You're voting for me with no case. I did request that you read the game to put your observations into context. You chose not to. See, I do care.

Would be a waste of my time. I've already caught you it's just a matter of selling it to everyone else.

 

 

This is being added to my sig. Just fantastic!

Credit where it's due.

[DPR]

 

 

Alright guys, got some running around to do today, Ill be back after a bit to check in as Im in and out!!!

 

Really would like to see some reads/poe's with reasoning for EVERYONE's choices today please!!!!

 

Love to see yours as well! 

 

 

Then try reading my posts, you know its only the post right before this one you quoted that i gave my list....

 

 

 

And nothing from Hallia I see.....

 

sadface,gif

 

speh/nold/dpr/hallia.

 

esp if Hallia doesnt #putinthework today.

 

I will be voting 2 out of there most likely barring anything crazy happening. 

 

 

Are you talking about this? Because you asked for reasoning...

[Nolder]

 

 

 

 

Is dpr this agressive as mafia when it comes to lynching people? He isn't reserved at all here which I kinda like, plus I think the speculation he is doing looks better than worse.

 

I read nolder and don't see any reason not to vote there. Besides meta, tell me why you think dpr is scum nold?

[V]nolder [/v] gang read iron now

Yes it's exactly how he acts as mafia.

I don't have a reason besides meta.

I recently saw him act this way, without change, as scum 2 or 3 times in a row.

If he isn't scum again then I need a longer hiatus from the game because this is as blatant as it gets imo.

I feel like DPR is being served on a silver platter for me it can't be wrong.

 

Put me in the ring with him I'll stake my life on it.

 

[v]Nolder[/v]

 

 

FML

 

Another Nolder self vote...

 

Im almost willing to give you your wish Nol atp.

 

Can you reeeally call it a self vote though? This isn't a normal game.

I am willing to go toe to toe with the damn dirty pirate.

 

 

Thats true, hence why I said Im almost willing atp to give you your wish!!!!

 

LOL oh ok

[Nolder]

I'm going to bed

[DPR]

 

 

 

 

Are you going to give us your results from last night when you get home Tress?

 

 

You ask a lot of questions for someone that won't read or answer any. 

 

These are exactly the kinds of posts I am talking about.

The kind that are aggressive, but not overbearing, and with enough truth in them that others will let this slide to see what happens.

 

By "enough truth", you mean it's just true, right? 

 

I do ask a lot of questions, it's part of the game.

I have answered a lot of questions. Since I've joined I've been active and engaged. This is a lie.

 

Answers like "why" and "does it matter" don't count. You've been stand-offish. I wouldn't use the terms "active and engaged".

 

He's attempting to conflate the fact that I didn't read back from when I subbed in with answering questions which I have been.

 

I do no think you know the meaning of that word... Regardless, you have not read the game and you've admitted to it. I pointed out that only one alignment would not need to read the game. No conflation. All simple fact.

 

And all he's trying to do is draw me into an argument over whether or not I am or am not doing this that or the other thing.

 

I've labeled you as scum and laid out my case. If you take that as an invitation to argue, well, that is what you signed up for.

 

He doesn't care whether I read anything or answered or didn't answer anything.

 

You're voting for me with no case. I did request that you read the game to put your observations into context. You chose not to. See, I do care.

 

That's not the point the point is to create as big an argument as possible (without looking like the cause of the argument) and distract everyone until a deadline approaches.

 

Of course I'm the cause of the argument - I've cased you as scum. No distraction - it's a voting game. I've voted for you. 

 

This is the meta I'm talking about.

 

You've gone to lengths in talking about it. Seems like there would be room to connect the dots to some fact based info in there somewhere, no?

 

It literally got him caught like 2 or 3 games in a row on JN recently, but only after he'd caused plenty of mayhem.

 

I honestly think I've only ever lived to see the end of 1 game on JN, so that's stretching it a bit on your part.

 

I am telling you guys you need to put a stop to it now.

He's like wormtongue from lord of the rings, he is not ineffective at what he does and it will drive the town into chaos.

 

This is being added to my sig. Just fantastic!

 

 

I'm blushing.

 

I'm also in blue above.

 

 

Is dpr this agressive as mafia when it comes to lynching people? He isn't reserved at all here which I kinda like, plus I think the speculation he is doing looks better than worse.

 

I read nolder and don't see any reason not to vote there. Besides meta, tell me why you think dpr is scum nold?

[V]nolder [/v] gang read iron now

Yes it's exactly how he acts as mafia.

I don't have a reason besides meta.

I recently saw him act this way, without change, as scum 2 or 3 times in a row.

If he isn't scum again then I need a longer hiatus from the game because this is as blatant as it gets imo.

I feel like DPR is being served on a silver platter for me it can't be wrong.

 

Put me in the ring with him I'll stake my life on it.

 

[v]Nolder[/v]

 

 

 

How very Darthe of you. You guys have a martyr clause in your contract, or what? 

 

Get ready for a longer hiatus.

 

I'll give you a one time pass since you probably don't know but normally I don't read responses inside quotes.

I stopped after getting a massive headache from it once. People just went way overboard responding to each other in different colors and such.

So now I just don't do it. I'll make an exception this time but in the future if you have something to say to me put it outside a quote or I'm just going to ignore it.

 

 

By "enough truth", you mean it's just true, right? 

Ha!

 

 

Answers like "why" and "does it matter" don't count. You've been stand-offish. I wouldn't use the terms "active and engaged".

I was trying to drive home a point which was that I had thought me and Tress were both on the same page regarding you and shouldn't be bickering about how we both got there.

I found out that wasn't the case and moved on.

 

 

I do no think you know the meaning of that word... Regardless, you have not read the game and you've admitted to it. I pointed out that only one alignment would not need to read the game. No conflation. All simple fact.

This is obviously wrong. In a game where mafia try to blend in by appearing as townie as possible and where hypothetically I am mafia I would, in your view, need to read the game to keep up my townie appearance. But of course it's wrong for the simple fact that townies don't always do the townie thing. I don't want to catch up on 40 pages of gameplay. If I do that I am going to get bored and just stop posting and ask Clov to replace me which would make joining in the first place pointless. I think everyone would rather have an active player who, maybe, lacks a little context in the game than someone who's going to need to be replaced because by the time they catch up they're burnt out and don't want to play "in the moment".

 

 

You're voting for me with no case. I did request that you read the game to put your observations into context. You chose not to. See, I do care.

Would be a waste of my time. I've already caught you it's just a matter of selling it to everyone else.

 

 

This is being added to my sig. Just fantastic!

Credit where it's due.

 

 

 

There is so much wrong with so many things of the things you say in this post. I do feel bad for you that you had to be on the scum team with Darthe - nobody deserves that.

[Zander?]

 

 

 

 

Is dpr this agressive as mafia when it comes to lynching people? He isn't reserved at all here which I kinda like, plus I think the speculation he is doing looks better than worse.

 

I read nolder and don't see any reason not to vote there. Besides meta, tell me why you think dpr is scum nold?

[V]nolder [/v] gang read iron now

 

DPR is aggressive as both alignments imo,

 

Ive played some with him here and on JN,

 

And whats wrong with Meta as a reasoning seph?

 

You damn well know Im a Meta player, and I doubt you'd take issue with me making a Meta read....

 

So why do you have an issue with Nolder using it as a reason?

 

I'M ALIVE

 

FFS Internet.

 

 

>.<

 

Anyone got cliffnotes?  I want to try and stay current.

 

YAY HalliaGOAT <3 <3 <3

 

Looking forward to seeing your catch-up and thoughts!!!!!

 

Tress gave me the cliffnotes, Ill find the post once i catch up from lats night at least!!!!

 

 

 

You're kinda slimy this game. You criticize my D1 vote on Darthe & Sooh as being scummish, but then you defend Nolder's blatant disregard for any other player in the game to go after me based on only meta?

 

Meta is great and all when you have nothing else to go on, or you're developing a hunch. Once you have actual fact-based evidence, meta is far less important. 

 

What are your thoughts regarding my non-meta case on Nolder?

 

 

Im not slimy brother, Im me and Town and Im behind still like 40 or so pages.

 

Where do i DEFEND Nolder?!!?!?!?

 

He's in my PoE for today ffs.....lolololololol

 

 

 

Defend in the sense that you criticize Seph for questioning Nolder's use of meta. How do you act like that's not defending? 

 

Also, PSA:

 

As it stands right now, the game is only 65 pages in total. For all of you that are still "catching up", take 10 minutes & read up. Thx.

 

 

Its not defending I dont think I dont notice trying to manipulate events to fit your narrative,

 

I sussed seph's reasoning for sussing nol, it could have been ANYONE seph was sussing because it was his REASONING that I called him out on, which if you took 1O SECONDS to read my post you'd know that, but instead you try to sell the fact im defending Nol when Ive been sussing that spot since i subbed in.

 

And no, Ive got rl stuff to deal with and Im doing the best i can, I just subbed in yesterday ffs.  

 

Ill get it read when I get it read on my time not yours, Thx

[Zander?]

 

 

 

 

 

Is dpr this agressive as mafia when it comes to lynching people? He isn't reserved at all here which I kinda like, plus I think the speculation he is doing looks better than worse.

 

I read nolder and don't see any reason not to vote there. Besides meta, tell me why you think dpr is scum nold?

[V]nolder [/v] gang read iron now

 

DPR is aggressive as both alignments imo,

 

Ive played some with him here and on JN,

 

And whats wrong with Meta as a reasoning seph?

 

You damn well know Im a Meta player, and I doubt you'd take issue with me making a Meta read....

 

So why do you have an issue with Nolder using it as a reason?

 

I'M ALIVE

 

FFS Internet.

 

 

>.<

 

Anyone got cliffnotes?  I want to try and stay current.

 

YAY HalliaGOAT <3 <3 <3

 

Looking forward to seeing your catch-up and thoughts!!!!!

 

Tress gave me the cliffnotes, Ill find the post once i catch up from lats night at least!!!!

 

 

 

You're kinda slimy this game. You criticize my D1 vote on Darthe & Sooh as being scummish, but then you defend Nolder's blatant disregard for any other player in the game to go after me based on only meta?

 

Meta is great and all when you have nothing else to go on, or you're developing a hunch. Once you have actual fact-based evidence, meta is far less important. 

 

What are your thoughts regarding my non-meta case on Nolder?

 

 

Im not slimy brother, Im me and Town and Im behind still like 40 or so pages.

 

Where do i DEFEND Nolder?!!?!?!?

 

He's in my PoE for today ffs.....lolololololol

 

 

 

Defend in the sense that you criticize Seph for questioning Nolder's use of meta. How do you act like that's not defending? 

 

Also, PSA:

 

As it stands right now, the game is only 65 pages in total. For all of you that are still "catching up", take 10 minutes & read up. Thx.

 

 

Its not defending and dont think I dont notice trying to manipulate events to fit your narrative,

 

I sussed seph's reasoning for sussing nol, it could have been ANYONE seph was sussing because it was his REASONING that I called him out on, which if you took 1O SECONDS to read my post you'd know that, but instead you try to sell the fact im defending Nol when Ive been sussing that spot since i subbed in.

 

And no, Ive got rl stuff to deal with and Im doing the best i can, I just subbed in yesterday ffs.  

 

Ill get it read when I get it read on my time not yours, Thx

 

 

FTFM

[Lizabeth]

Vote Count!

• DreadPirateRoberts - 1 - Nolder,
  
• Nolder - 1 - Nolder
  
• Ironeyes - 1 - Seph
  
• Hallia - 1 - Seph
  

[Zander?]

 

 

 

 

 

 

Is dpr this agressive as mafia when it comes to lynching people? He isn't reserved at all here which I kinda like, plus I think the speculation he is doing looks better than worse.

 

I read nolder and don't see any reason not to vote there. Besides meta, tell me why you think dpr is scum nold?

[V]nolder [/v] gang read iron now

 

DPR is aggressive as both alignments imo,

 

Ive played some with him here and on JN,

 

And whats wrong with Meta as a reasoning seph?

 

You damn well know Im a Meta player, and I doubt you'd take issue with me making a Meta read....

 

So why do you have an issue with Nolder using it as a reason?

 

I'M ALIVE

 

FFS Internet.

 

 

>.<

 

Anyone got cliffnotes?  I want to try and stay current.

 

YAY HalliaGOAT <3 <3 <3

 

Looking forward to seeing your catch-up and thoughts!!!!!

 

Tress gave me the cliffnotes, Ill find the post once i catch up from lats night at least!!!!

 

 

 

You're kinda slimy this game. You criticize my D1 vote on Darthe & Sooh as being scummish, but then you defend Nolder's blatant disregard for any other player in the game to go after me based on only meta?

 

Meta is great and all when you have nothing else to go on, or you're developing a hunch. Once you have actual fact-based evidence, meta is far less important. 

 

What are your thoughts regarding my non-meta case on Nolder?

 

 

Im not slimy brother, Im me and Town and Im behind still like 40 or so pages.

 

Where do i DEFEND Nolder?!!?!?!?

 

He's in my PoE for today ffs.....lolololololol

 

 

 

Defend in the sense that you criticize Seph for questioning Nolder's use of meta. How do you act like that's not defending? 

 

Also, PSA:

 

As it stands right now, the game is only 65 pages in total. For all of you that are still "catching up", take 10 minutes & read up. Thx.

 

 

Its not defending and dont think I dont notice you trying to manipulate events to fit your narrative,

 

I sussed seph's reasoning for sussing nol, it could have been ANYONE seph was sussing because it was his REASONING that I called him out on, which if you took 1O SECONDS to read my post you'd know that, but instead you try to sell the fact im defending Nol when Ive been sussing that spot since i subbed in.

 

And no, Ive got rl stuff to deal with and Im doing the best i can, I just subbed in yesterday ffs.  

 

Ill get it read when I get it read on my time not yours, Thx

 

 

FTFM

 

 

FML the typing is hard...lolololol

[Zander?]

 

 

 

Alright guys, got some running around to do today, Ill be back after a bit to check in as Im in and out!!!

 

Really would like to see some reads/poe's with reasoning for EVERYONE's choices today please!!!!

 

Love to see yours as well! 

 

 

Then try reading my posts, you know its only the post right before this one you quoted that i gave my list....

 

 

 

And nothing from Hallia I see.....

 

sadface,gif

 

speh/nold/dpr/hallia.

 

esp if Hallia doesnt #putinthework today.

 

I will be voting 2 out of there most likely barring anything crazy happening. 

 

 

Are you talking about this? Because you asked for reasoning...

 

 

Ive explained my issues with you seph and nold and I did have a list posted but fair enough.

 

 

Hallia- Inactivity, pops in and then does nothing.

 

Nolder/Wifi- Stated some of the issues I had with then ie WIfi weird pop in vote on Me and I forget who else but pretty sure it was someone who flipped Town or Tress who i think is very likely to be Town.

 

seph- His progression on BFG is not great, and some of his stances/views/reasoning I dont agree with,.

 

DPR- His early vote, his push on Nolder, the way Darthe treated him.  And since i posted the list his attempt to sell his BS narrative that I was somehow defending Nolder by questioning seph's reasoning for it.

 

This is where Im at till i get a chance to read over everything

 

Your turn.

[Zander?]

 

 

 

 

 

Are you going to give us your results from last night when you get home Tress?

 

 

You ask a lot of questions for someone that won't read or answer any. 

 

These are exactly the kinds of posts I am talking about.

The kind that are aggressive, but not overbearing, and with enough truth in them that others will let this slide to see what happens.

 

By "enough truth", you mean it's just true, right? 

 

I do ask a lot of questions, it's part of the game.

I have answered a lot of questions. Since I've joined I've been active and engaged. This is a lie.

 

Answers like "why" and "does it matter" don't count. You've been stand-offish. I wouldn't use the terms "active and engaged".

 

He's attempting to conflate the fact that I didn't read back from when I subbed in with answering questions which I have been.

 

I do no think you know the meaning of that word... Regardless, you have not read the game and you've admitted to it. I pointed out that only one alignment would not need to read the game. No conflation. All simple fact.

 

And all he's trying to do is draw me into an argument over whether or not I am or am not doing this that or the other thing.

 

I've labeled you as scum and laid out my case. If you take that as an invitation to argue, well, that is what you signed up for.

 

He doesn't care whether I read anything or answered or didn't answer anything.

 

You're voting for me with no case. I did request that you read the game to put your observations into context. You chose not to. See, I do care.

 

That's not the point the point is to create as big an argument as possible (without looking like the cause of the argument) and distract everyone until a deadline approaches.

 

Of course I'm the cause of the argument - I've cased you as scum. No distraction - it's a voting game. I've voted for you. 

 

This is the meta I'm talking about.

 

You've gone to lengths in talking about it. Seems like there would be room to connect the dots to some fact based info in there somewhere, no?

 

It literally got him caught like 2 or 3 games in a row on JN recently, but only after he'd caused plenty of mayhem.

 

I honestly think I've only ever lived to see the end of 1 game on JN, so that's stretching it a bit on your part.

 

I am telling you guys you need to put a stop to it now.

He's like wormtongue from lord of the rings, he is not ineffective at what he does and it will drive the town into chaos.

 

This is being added to my sig. Just fantastic!

 

 

I'm blushing.

 

I'm also in blue above.

 

 

Is dpr this agressive as mafia when it comes to lynching people? He isn't reserved at all here which I kinda like, plus I think the speculation he is doing looks better than worse.

 

I read nolder and don't see any reason not to vote there. Besides meta, tell me why you think dpr is scum nold?

[V]nolder [/v] gang read iron now

Yes it's exactly how he acts as mafia.

I don't have a reason besides meta.

I recently saw him act this way, without change, as scum 2 or 3 times in a row.

If he isn't scum again then I need a longer hiatus from the game because this is as blatant as it gets imo.

I feel like DPR is being served on a silver platter for me it can't be wrong.

 

Put me in the ring with him I'll stake my life on it.

 

[v]Nolder[/v]

 

 

 

How very Darthe of you. You guys have a martyr clause in your contract, or what? 

 

Get ready for a longer hiatus.

 

I'll give you a one time pass since you probably don't know but normally I don't read responses inside quotes.

I stopped after getting a massive headache from it once. People just went way overboard responding to each other in different colors and such.

So now I just don't do it. I'll make an exception this time but in the future if you have something to say to me put it outside a quote or I'm just going to ignore it.

 

 

By "enough truth", you mean it's just true, right? 

Ha!

 

 

Answers like "why" and "does it matter" don't count. You've been stand-offish. I wouldn't use the terms "active and engaged".

I was trying to drive home a point which was that I had thought me and Tress were both on the same page regarding you and shouldn't be bickering about how we both got there.

I found out that wasn't the case and moved on.

 

 

I do no think you know the meaning of that word... Regardless, you have not read the game and you've admitted to it. I pointed out that only one alignment would not need to read the game. No conflation. All simple fact.

This is obviously wrong. In a game where mafia try to blend in by appearing as townie as possible and where hypothetically I am mafia I would, in your view, need to read the game to keep up my townie appearance. But of course it's wrong for the simple fact that townies don't always do the townie thing. I don't want to catch up on 40 pages of gameplay. If I do that I am going to get bored and just stop posting and ask Clov to replace me which would make joining in the first place pointless. I think everyone would rather have an active player who, maybe, lacks a little context in the game than someone who's going to need to be replaced because by the time they catch up they're burnt out and don't want to play "in the moment".

 

 

You're voting for me with no case. I did request that you read the game to put your observations into context. You chose not to. See, I do care.

Would be a waste of my time. I've already caught you it's just a matter of selling it to everyone else.

 

 

This is being added to my sig. Just fantastic!

Credit where it's due.

 

 

 

There is so much wrong with so many things of the things you say in this post. I do feel bad for you that you had to be on the scum team with Darthe - nobody deserves that.

 

 

ok i have to admit i legit lolololol'd in rl.

 

ok now i really have to get going for now, be back after!!!!

[DPR]

 

 

 

 

 

Is dpr this agressive as mafia when it comes to lynching people? He isn't reserved at all here which I kinda like, plus I think the speculation he is doing looks better than worse.

 

I read nolder and don't see any reason not to vote there. Besides meta, tell me why you think dpr is scum nold?

[V]nolder [/v] gang read iron now

 

DPR is aggressive as both alignments imo,

 

Ive played some with him here and on JN,

 

And whats wrong with Meta as a reasoning seph?

 

You damn well know Im a Meta player, and I doubt you'd take issue with me making a Meta read....

 

So why do you have an issue with Nolder using it as a reason?

 

I'M ALIVE

 

FFS Internet.

 

 

>.<

 

Anyone got cliffnotes?  I want to try and stay current.

 

YAY HalliaGOAT <3 <3 <3

 

Looking forward to seeing your catch-up and thoughts!!!!!

 

Tress gave me the cliffnotes, Ill find the post once i catch up from lats night at least!!!!

 

 

 

You're kinda slimy this game. You criticize my D1 vote on Darthe & Sooh as being scummish, but then you defend Nolder's blatant disregard for any other player in the game to go after me based on only meta?

 

Meta is great and all when you have nothing else to go on, or you're developing a hunch. Once you have actual fact-based evidence, meta is far less important. 

 

What are your thoughts regarding my non-meta case on Nolder?

 

 

Im not slimy brother, Im me and Town and Im behind still like 40 or so pages.

 

Where do i DEFEND Nolder?!!?!?!?

 

He's in my PoE for today ffs.....lolololololol

 

 

 

Defend in the sense that you criticize Seph for questioning Nolder's use of meta. How do you act like that's not defending? 

 

Also, PSA:

 

As it stands right now, the game is only 65 pages in total. For all of you that are still "catching up", take 10 minutes & read up. Thx.

 

 

Its not defending I dont think I dont notice trying to manipulate events to fit your narrative,

 

I sussed seph's reasoning for sussing nol, it could have been ANYONE seph was sussing because it was his REASONING that I called him out on, which if you took 1O SECONDS to read my post you'd know that, but instead you try to sell the fact im defending Nol when Ive been sussing that spot since i subbed in.

 

And no, Ive got rl stuff to deal with and Im doing the best i can, I just subbed in yesterday ffs.  

 

Ill get it read when I get it read on my time not yours, Thx

 

 

 

So emotional.

 

Anyway, you are defending the use of meta to build cases and it looks like you are willing to trust meta over actual evidence. 

[Zander?]

 

 

 

 

 

 

Is dpr this agressive as mafia when it comes to lynching people? He isn't reserved at all here which I kinda like, plus I think the speculation he is doing looks better than worse.

 

I read nolder and don't see any reason not to vote there. Besides meta, tell me why you think dpr is scum nold?

[V]nolder [/v] gang read iron now

 

DPR is aggressive as both alignments imo,

 

Ive played some with him here and on JN,

 

And whats wrong with Meta as a reasoning seph?

 

You damn well know Im a Meta player, and I doubt you'd take issue with me making a Meta read....

 

So why do you have an issue with Nolder using it as a reason?

 

I'M ALIVE

 

FFS Internet.

 

 

>.<

 

Anyone got cliffnotes?  I want to try and stay current.

 

YAY HalliaGOAT <3 <3 <3

 

Looking forward to seeing your catch-up and thoughts!!!!!

 

Tress gave me the cliffnotes, Ill find the post once i catch up from lats night at least!!!!

 

 

 

You're kinda slimy this game. You criticize my D1 vote on Darthe & Sooh as being scummish, but then you defend Nolder's blatant disregard for any other player in the game to go after me based on only meta?

 

Meta is great and all when you have nothing else to go on, or you're developing a hunch. Once you have actual fact-based evidence, meta is far less important. 

 

What are your thoughts regarding my non-meta case on Nolder?

 

 

Im not slimy brother, Im me and Town and Im behind still like 40 or so pages.

 

Where do i DEFEND Nolder?!!?!?!?

 

He's in my PoE for today ffs.....lolololololol

 

 

 

Defend in the sense that you criticize Seph for questioning Nolder's use of meta. How do you act like that's not defending? 

 

Also, PSA:

 

As it stands right now, the game is only 65 pages in total. For all of you that are still "catching up", take 10 minutes & read up. Thx.

 

 

Its not defending I dont think I dont notice trying to manipulate events to fit your narrative,

 

I sussed seph's reasoning for sussing nol, it could have been ANYONE seph was sussing because it was his REASONING that I called him out on, which if you took 1O SECONDS to read my post you'd know that, but instead you try to sell the fact im defending Nol when Ive been sussing that spot since i subbed in.

 

And no, Ive got rl stuff to deal with and Im doing the best i can, I just subbed in yesterday ffs.  

 

Ill get it read when I get it read on my time not yours, Thx

 

 

 

So emotional.

 

Anyway, you are defending the use of meta to build cases and it looks like you are willing to trust meta over actual evidence. 

 

 

I am for better or for worse, its something I try to work on.

 

And yes Im a Meta first player, you know this, youve played enough with me now between here and JN to know what.

 

Also find it funny you didnt address the fact you said I was defending Nolder and I proved otherwise tho,