Jump to content

DRAGONMOUNT

A WHEEL OF TIME COMMUNITY

[Advanced] Old West Mischief Mafia - Town Wins!


Kaylee

Recommended Posts

Posted

Reread from 25-32.  I figured anything before 25 I had already commented on though I am going to do some ISO's after I finish the reread.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

Context for my comparison for you getting used to your hydra.

Aj's hackers game. Sooh and I were hydra. First time I've ever been hydra. I know firsthand the difficulties of getting used to that.

Comparison I made was the discussing one vote and impulse voting another. I did literally this. Waited to talk to her about one person, and impulse voted another shortly afterwards.

Okay, thanks for the context. This makes a lot more sense. And yeah, it's hard. Liz and I have never actually played together before so it's a whole lot of things to figure out. Which is why I'm asking for a bit of courtesy in backing off of us and letting us explain and try to work our way through some reads. And I get it, it's probably hard for you all to try and read us since you have to read two people with two very different play styles for one slot. I really want to get everything on a better foot so we can get this game moving to where it needs to be.

I get that, but I'm stuck on not seeing how her asking who your teammates would be could come from a town pov.

 

 

Alright let me see if I can try to explain this differently than Liz did. Aside from scum, no one knows anyone else's alignment. Liz and I know we're town. We're trying to get you to open-mindedly see that. So by asking who would our scum partners be it's more to try and get people to realize that based on interactions there's not a scum connection that can be made to other people. Remember how before I died in Sooh's basic game I posted potential scum partners based on who was interacting with who and how they were interacting? I think it's along the same lines of that. Going into it with an open mind you might see okay they don't have any really scummy interactions with a player that makes me feel it could be a team mate. But player x and y over here? Man it's weird how they haven't interacted at all.  So that's how it can be pro-town, at least in mind. Liz can feel free to correct me if I'm wrong when she wakes up, but this is really just how I see it.

 

 

The italics I believe could be considered as townie motivated.  However, the bold seems more scummy, like you're deliberately trying to throw someone under the bus.  And well I know we are supposed to hunt scum and all.  We should do it based on WHAT they do ITT not WHO they interact with  ITT or in this case WHO they don't interact with ITT. Though, tbh it's kinda hard to tell who they are interacting with when the whole thread is interacting, well at least it's hard for me anyway.

 

 

 

Okay, so let's play a game of pretend.Let's pretend MrsClov and I are scum.Who are our partners?


Really? Might be the single worse question ever asked in a mafia game. Let's stop playing this game, that we are just getting some info in and play a guessing game. This tactic can provide nothing but confusion. I never played with you and won't overreact to a single post but damn this is awful.

 

 

This post has been argued over for like 30 pages.  I think that is enough.  However, since I know people will want my take on it:

 

I don't know Liz like I know Darthe.  However, I thought of it more like darthe's claims at the beginning of the game.  WHY: for the same reason that people told me darthes wasn't alignment indicative:  It'd be a stupid move to make as either wolf or townie:  because as a wolf then you would have everyone trying to figure out if you ARE scum and it would put you in the center of attention and could cause you to get lynched.  AND It would be a stupid move to make as a townie because people are gonna think you ARE scum and could cause a mislynch.

 

 

snipped

 

 

 

 

 

:huh:

Lizzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz This is DM, home of ZANDER AND CASS - you can let your ENFP fly FREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!

Also, Mrs Clov can keep you in check I'm sure  :tongue:

Okay then...if I get in trouble I'm blaming it all on you  :wink:

[v]Dice[/v]

Mmm...that felt good >:)

This bugs me. Not the vote, but the bold.

Trying to put responsibility for your actions on someone else, even jokingly, is a reason for suspicion.

 

 

 

This is actually a good point.

 

 

In that context?

 

What, if anything, do you make of the switch from the intended vote on Darthe?

 

 

 

1. I always vote Hallia on D1 - it's sort of my thing.  I've played here before - don't play often though.

 

2. What do you mean in what context - I thought I was pretty clear.  Passing the blame to someone else seems sketchy - even if it was a joke.

 

 

I am agreeing with Kronos here.   Putting blame on someone else:  iz no gud.  :huh:  and I believe this is what supper interrupted last night. 

 

 

 

@mrsclov what are your thoughts about me/cuth/darthe at the moment?

 
I'm kind of null on you at the moment. Things are happening really fast and I haven't time to really dissect anything in my normal nerd fashion of word docs and spreadsheets.
Cuth, I feel like he's looking a bit better. He's getting around to answering questions. I'm really big on why answers, and the fact that he's answering them makes me feel okay about his posts. 
Darthe, I think he's stringing us up for lynch bait because he thinks he can. I don't really think it's alignment indicative for him, because of the games I've played with him I feel like he just does things to amuse himself.

This is a good post and is why I don't allow hydras at Jetnation. It creates way more to much think about than just a single player to read. Regardless of what Lizabeth has stated this post is a calm and rationale defense.

 

 

I agree with crusher on this.  I have never been a hydra, doesn't mean I don't want to try it at some point though.  However, they are confusing to read.

 

 
There's more to come.  I'm just slow.  sorry.
  • Replies 3.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

In short, you first claimed suspicion toward them (Kizzy Clov slot) and then you reversed your opinion based on the argument that you've never seen a situation where so many people have agreed on a point (on D1 I believe) and not mislynched.

 

You flip-flopped. And that's fine when new information is the reason for the updated opinion, but that's not the case here - you've admitted to changing your mind based on the number of players that also saw post #309 as a scum-tell. That type of reasoning, in my opinion, bears a strong likelihood to a fellow scummer who was trying to present one image and then realized their mates were building a train faster than expected.

 

After you changed your opinion, you've been consistent in reminding people why - another flag for me.

 

And, both Lizbeth and MrsClov have chatted with you, favoring you and your logic, while all three of you have cast suspicion over Darthe.

This post was confusing, because it seemed like you were answering her question, but talking to me.

 

As for your points themselves, they aren't bad ones. They come to the wrong conclusion, but I see what you're getting at.

 

But if you keep heading down this path, I see you being responsible for 1, maybe 2 mislynches.

 

Another point you've made about me is my apparent circular logic. It isn't intentional. I don't even know when I did it.

 

This whole thing is null because while it seems like good logic on the surface, it's leading to townie death. Scum!you would know that.

Posted

Letting it be known right now that if you lynch Lizclov and they flip town, and you still come after me tomorrow, I will read it as scum trying to set up mislynches and will respond in kind.

Posted

And if you are right and I'm wrong. If they do indeed flip scum. You coming after me tomorrow will be justified. I will accept the hit to clear this up for town. We have plenty of leeway left. It is only D1 after all.

Posted

Letting it be known right now that if you lynch Lizclov and they flip town, and you still come after me tomorrow, I will read it as scum trying to set up mislynches and will respond in kind.

 

so you will be scum setting up mislynches then?

Posted

 

In short, you first claimed suspicion toward them (Kizzy Clov slot) and then you reversed your opinion based on the argument that you've never seen a situation where so many people have agreed on a point (on D1 I believe) and not mislynched.

 

You flip-flopped. And that's fine when new information is the reason for the updated opinion, but that's not the case here - you've admitted to changing your mind based on the number of players that also saw post #309 as a scum-tell. That type of reasoning, in my opinion, bears a strong likelihood to a fellow scummer who was trying to present one image and then realized their mates were building a train faster than expected.

 

After you changed your opinion, you've been consistent in reminding people why - another flag for me.

 

And, both Lizbeth and MrsClov have chatted with you, favoring you and your logic, while all three of you have cast suspicion over Darthe.

This post was confusing, because it seemed like you were answering her question, but talking to me.

 

As for your points themselves, they aren't bad ones. They come to the wrong conclusion, but I see what you're getting at.

 

But if you keep heading down this path, I see you being responsible for 1, maybe 2 mislynches.

 

Another point you've made about me is my apparent circular logic. It isn't intentional. I don't even know when I did it.

 

This whole thing is null because while it seems like good logic on the surface, it's leading to townie death. Scum!you would know that.

 

 

 

Letting it be known right now that if you lynch Lizclov and they flip town, and you still come after me tomorrow, I will read it as scum trying to set up mislynches and will respond in kind.

 

 

And if you are right and I'm wrong. If they do indeed flip scum. You coming after me tomorrow will be justified. I will accept the hit to clear this up for town. We have plenty of leeway left. It is only D1 after all.

 

 

First things first - I have no idea how I quoted Cass when responding to you. I went back to look at it and see what both of you are talking about. I meant to quote a post from you and must have hit that one instead by mistake? Never happened before, but if it happens again, somebody needs to swing by and drive me to the liquor store because I totally don't trust my ability to drive like that.

 

Now, to your posts above (which I did double check)...

 

Top post:

 

I'm getting a kind of passive-aggressive vibe here. First you give in with the old "It seems logical, but it's not" chestnut. You follow it up by foreseeing destruction and me leading mislynches across the land. Then you shrug the circular logic point off by saying you don't see it (which, ironically, is circular logic) followed by a double handed swing of the omgus stick into my face, for a circularlogictastic finish. I know I compared your earlier post to the work of a lawyer, but don't let that stop you from considering the theatre - you're a natural thespian. 

 

Middle post: 

 

I'll try to be brave.

 

And, I trust you'll follow suit on the half of the player list that have raised the same points I have. 

 

Last post:

 

Definitely the theatre. Anything Shakespeare or even a production of Gone With the Wind. You got this.

Posted

 

Letting it be known right now that if you lynch Lizclov and they flip town, and you still come after me tomorrow, I will read it as scum trying to set up mislynches and will respond in kind.

 

so you will be scum setting up mislynches then?

 

 

No no no - I'm setting up the mislynches. I do this by using logic everyone can see, but that won't work and only I will know it because I am teh scum. 

Posted

 

Letting it be known right now that if you lynch Lizclov and they flip town, and you still come after me tomorrow, I will read it as scum trying to set up mislynches and will respond in kind.

so you will be scum setting up mislynches then?

I'm not the one that said we are scum and will lynch one today and another tomorrow.

 

Do you not see how that's setting up mislynches?

Posted

 

 

Letting it be known right now that if you lynch Lizclov and they flip town, and you still come after me tomorrow, I will read it as scum trying to set up mislynches and will respond in kind.

 

so you will be scum setting up mislynches then?

 

 

No no no - I'm setting up the mislynches. I do this by using logic everyone can see, but that won't work and only I will know it because I am teh scum. 

 

 

Thats TODAY you are. TOMORROW its HIS turn!

 

 

 

Letting it be known right now that if you lynch Lizclov and they flip town, and you still come after me tomorrow, I will read it as scum trying to set up mislynches and will respond in kind.

so you will be scum setting up mislynches then?

I'm not the one that said we are scum and will lynch one today and another tomorrow.

 

Do you not see how that's setting up mislynches?

 

 

Considering im thinking the same thing I have no problem with it.

 

But more to the point what i saw in ure reply was an attempt to hold a hostage. If you do THAT i will do THIS!.

Posted

 

 

In short, you first claimed suspicion toward them (Kizzy Clov slot) and then you reversed your opinion based on the argument that you've never seen a situation where so many people have agreed on a point (on D1 I believe) and not mislynched.

You flip-flopped. And that's fine when new information is the reason for the updated opinion, but that's not the case here - you've admitted to changing your mind based on the number of players that also saw post #309 as a scum-tell. That type of reasoning, in my opinion, bears a strong likelihood to a fellow scummer who was trying to present one image and then realized their mates were building a train faster than expected.

After you changed your opinion, you've been consistent in reminding people why - another flag for me.

And, both Lizbeth and MrsClov have chatted with you, favoring you and your logic, while all three of you have cast suspicion over Darthe.

 

This post was confusing, because it seemed like you were answering her question, but talking to me.

As for your points themselves, they aren't bad ones. They come to the wrong conclusion, but I see what you're getting at.

But if you keep heading down this path, I see you being responsible for 1, maybe 2 mislynches.

Another point you've made about me is my apparent circular logic. It isn't intentional. I don't even know when I did it.

This whole thing is null because while it seems like good logic on the surface, it's leading to townie death. Scum!you would know that.

 

 

Letting it be known right now that if you lynch Lizclov and they flip town, and you still come after me tomorrow, I will read it as scum trying to set up mislynches and will respond in kind.

 

 

 

And if you are right and I'm wrong. If they do indeed flip scum. You coming after me tomorrow will be justified. I will accept the hit to clear this up for town. We have plenty of leeway left. It is only D1 after all.

 

 

 

First things first - I have no idea how I quoted Cass when responding to you. I went back to look at it and see what both of you are talking about. I meant to quote a post from you and must have hit that one instead by mistake? Never happened before, but if it happens again, somebody needs to swing by and drive me to the liquor store because I totally don't trust my ability to drive like that.

 

Now, to your posts above (which I did double check)...

 

Top post:

 

I'm getting a kind of passive-aggressive vibe here. First you give in with the old "It seems logical, but it's not" chestnut. You follow it up by foreseeing destruction and me leading mislynches across the land. Then you shrug the circular logic point off by saying you don't see it (which, ironically, is circular logic) followed by a double handed swing of the omgus stick into my face, for a circularlogictastic finish. I know I compared your earlier post to the work of a lawyer, but don't let that stop you from considering the theatre - you're a natural thespian. 

 

Middle post: 

 

I'll try to be brave.

 

And, I trust you'll follow suit on the half of the player list that have raised the same points I have. 

 

Last post:

 

Definitely the theatre. Anything Shakespeare or even a production of Gone With the Wind. You got this.

"Hey, I'm from the Uber, anybody see a pirate?

Posted

 

 

 

In short, you first claimed suspicion toward them (Kizzy Clov slot) and then you reversed your opinion based on the argument that you've never seen a situation where so many people have agreed on a point (on D1 I believe) and not mislynched.

You flip-flopped. And that's fine when new information is the reason for the updated opinion, but that's not the case here - you've admitted to changing your mind based on the number of players that also saw post #309 as a scum-tell. That type of reasoning, in my opinion, bears a strong likelihood to a fellow scummer who was trying to present one image and then realized their mates were building a train faster than expected.

After you changed your opinion, you've been consistent in reminding people why - another flag for me.

And, both Lizbeth and MrsClov have chatted with you, favoring you and your logic, while all three of you have cast suspicion over Darthe.

This post was confusing, because it seemed like you were answering her question, but talking to me.

As for your points themselves, they aren't bad ones. They come to the wrong conclusion, but I see what you're getting at.

But if you keep heading down this path, I see you being responsible for 1, maybe 2 mislynches.

Another point you've made about me is my apparent circular logic. It isn't intentional. I don't even know when I did it.

This whole thing is null because while it seems like good logic on the surface, it's leading to townie death. Scum!you would know that.

 

 

Letting it be known right now that if you lynch Lizclov and they flip town, and you still come after me tomorrow, I will read it as scum trying to set up mislynches and will respond in kind.

 

 

And if you are right and I'm wrong. If they do indeed flip scum. You coming after me tomorrow will be justified. I will accept the hit to clear this up for town. We have plenty of leeway left. It is only D1 after all.

 

 

First things first - I have no idea how I quoted Cass when responding to you. I went back to look at it and see what both of you are talking about. I meant to quote a post from you and must have hit that one instead by mistake? Never happened before, but if it happens again, somebody needs to swing by and drive me to the liquor store because I totally don't trust my ability to drive like that.

 

Now, to your posts above (which I did double check)...

 

Top post:

 

I'm getting a kind of passive-aggressive vibe here. First you give in with the old "It seems logical, but it's not" chestnut. You follow it up by foreseeing destruction and me leading mislynches across the land. Then you shrug the circular logic point off by saying you don't see it (which, ironically, is circular logic) followed by a double handed swing of the omgus stick into my face, for a circularlogictastic finish. I know I compared your earlier post to the work of a lawyer, but don't let that stop you from considering the theatre - you're a natural thespian. 

 

Middle post: 

 

I'll try to be brave.

 

And, I trust you'll follow suit on the half of the player list that have raised the same points I have. 

 

Last post:

 

Definitely the theatre. Anything Shakespeare or even a production of Gone With the Wind. You got this.

"Hey, I'm from the Uber, anybody see a pirate?

 

 

 

I had no idea Uber dealt in ships these day.

 

I'll load the bar. Prepare to set sail.

Posted

So you also intend to vote me if they flip town? Is that what you're saying?

 

I'm trying to save someone who I think is town because the buildup on them was too easy. And you intend to kill me over it?

Posted

 

 

 

 

In short, you first claimed suspicion toward them (Kizzy Clov slot) and then you reversed your opinion based on the argument that you've never seen a situation where so many people have agreed on a point (on D1 I believe) and not mislynched.

You flip-flopped. And that's fine when new information is the reason for the updated opinion, but that's not the case here - you've admitted to changing your mind based on the number of players that also saw post #309 as a scum-tell. That type of reasoning, in my opinion, bears a strong likelihood to a fellow scummer who was trying to present one image and then realized their mates were building a train faster than expected.

After you changed your opinion, you've been consistent in reminding people why - another flag for me.

And, both Lizbeth and MrsClov have chatted with you, favoring you and your logic, while all three of you have cast suspicion over Darthe.

 

This post was confusing, because it seemed like you were answering her question, but talking to me.

As for your points themselves, they aren't bad ones. They come to the wrong conclusion, but I see what you're getting at.

But if you keep heading down this path, I see you being responsible for 1, maybe 2 mislynches.

Another point you've made about me is my apparent circular logic. It isn't intentional. I don't even know when I did it.

This whole thing is null because while it seems like good logic on the surface, it's leading to townie death. Scum!you would know that.

 

 

Letting it be known right now that if you lynch Lizclov and they flip town, and you still come after me tomorrow, I will read it as scum trying to set up mislynches and will respond in kind.

 

 

 

And if you are right and I'm wrong. If they do indeed flip scum. You coming after me tomorrow will be justified. I will accept the hit to clear this up for town. We have plenty of leeway left. It is only D1 after all.

 

 

 

First things first - I have no idea how I quoted Cass when responding to you. I went back to look at it and see what both of you are talking about. I meant to quote a post from you and must have hit that one instead by mistake? Never happened before, but if it happens again, somebody needs to swing by and drive me to the liquor store because I totally don't trust my ability to drive like that.

 

Now, to your posts above (which I did double check)...

 

Top post:

 

I'm getting a kind of passive-aggressive vibe here. First you give in with the old "It seems logical, but it's not" chestnut. You follow it up by foreseeing destruction and me leading mislynches across the land. Then you shrug the circular logic point off by saying you don't see it (which, ironically, is circular logic) followed by a double handed swing of the omgus stick into my face, for a circularlogictastic finish. I know I compared your earlier post to the work of a lawyer, but don't let that stop you from considering the theatre - you're a natural thespian. 

 

Middle post: 

 

I'll try to be brave.

 

And, I trust you'll follow suit on the half of the player list that have raised the same points I have. 

 

Last post:

 

Definitely the theatre. Anything Shakespeare or even a production of Gone With the Wind. You got this.

"Hey, I'm from the Uber, anybody see a pirate?

 

 

I had no idea Uber dealt in ships these day.

 

I'll load the bar. Prepare to set sail.

 

Well I am naturally buoyant.

Posted

So you also intend to vote me if they flip town? Is that what you're saying?

 

I'm trying to save someone who I think is town because the buildup on them was too easy. And you intend to kill me over it?

 

nope i think their scum and that if they flip scum that your a partner.

 

if they flip town i will have to reevaluate

Posted

 

So you also intend to vote me if they flip town? Is that what you're saying?

 

I'm trying to save someone who I think is town because the buildup on them was too easy. And you intend to kill me over it?

nope i think their scum and that if they flip scum that your a partner.

 

if they flip town i will have to reevaluate

And that is perfectly fine. I would expect nothing less from how hard I defended them today.

 

But I got the vibe from DPR that he would lynch me tomorrow regardless of their flip.

Posted

perhaps he thinks your scum independantly.

That's a possibility. But I saw it as getting another mislynch up already.

 

Which I think I explained why well enough.

Posted

So it's not a hostage thing like you claimed. I saw what looked like a scum move and intend to react properly.

 

Akin to what you did at the beginning of the game, making it clear it's not omgus.

Posted

So you also intend to vote me if they flip town? Is that what you're saying?

 

I'm trying to save someone who I think is town because the buildup on them was too easy. And you intend to kill me over it?

 

 

 

@Cass why are you still voting Darthe?What's your current read on him?

 

 

 

 

So you also intend to vote me if they flip town? Is that what you're saying?

 

I'm trying to save someone who I think is town because the buildup on them was too easy. And you intend to kill me over it?

nope i think their scum and that if they flip scum that your a partner.

 

if they flip town i will have to reevaluate

And that is perfectly fine. I would expect nothing less from how hard I defended them today.

 

But I got the vibe from DPR that he would lynch me tomorrow regardless of their flip.

 

 

 

This is picture-painting and lynch-baiting.

 

Bad play. 

Posted

perhaps he thinks your scum independantly. 

 

I'm already on record as suspecting that they're working together. 

Posted

 

So you also intend to vote me if they flip town? Is that what you're saying?

 

I'm trying to save someone who I think is town because the buildup on them was too easy. And you intend to kill me over it?

 

@Cass why are you still voting Darthe?What's your current read on him?

 

 

So you also intend to vote me if they flip town? Is that what you're saying?

 

I'm trying to save someone who I think is town because the buildup on them was too easy. And you intend to kill me over it?

nope i think their scum and that if they flip scum that your a partner.

 

if they flip town i will have to reevaluate

And that is perfectly fine. I would expect nothing less from how hard I defended them today.

 

But I got the vibe from DPR that he would lynch me tomorrow regardless of their flip.

 

This is picture-painting and lynch-baiting.

 

Bad play.

And what is wrong with it?

 

Quote 1. How I feel you are approaching the game and thought dice agreed with.

 

Quote 2. Worried about Cass' vote on darthe. If the reason is because of the joke vote at the beginning it looks terrible.

 

Quote 3. Exactly as it reads. Willing to take the hit for town if I'm wrong and they're scum.

Posted

 

I liked it better when my name included Zander *sniff*

 

*Saunters into Rosie's Saloon with a grin and a twinkling eye, channels up some Zass*

 

Lone_ranger_silver_1965.JPG

 

 

Hi Ho Bunyan!!!!!! Lets lynch them scallywags!

 

 

and im First!

FIRST TO GET LYNCHED WHILE YOU SLEEP IMO LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!

 

1. WHY YOU WEARING A MASK?????!?!

 

 

 

giphy.gif

 

So ready!

TOWNY AF!!!

HAPPY B'DAY!

Yeehaw, lets ruff up some scallions yall

Claim: vigilante.

 

Discuss.

WOLFY AF IMO!!!

 

[V]Darthe Wade[/v]

 

Wild-Bill-Hickok-deadwood-16933561-324-5

 

Wild Bill here. Who needs killing?

 

I take payment in whiskey.

SCUM need killing!!!!! AND KILLING SCUM IS PAYMENT ENOUGH ITSELF LDO!!!!!

 

[insert drinking/slaying gif here]

 

Howdy Partners!

[insert enthusiastic HI gif here]

 

 

Yay another game with MrsClov!

 

You were so obviously town last game. I look forward to you hopefully being easy to read.

Well, thank you <3 I'll do my best!

AWKWARD AF IMO!!!!!

 

(Why comment on this?)

 

 

[V]Sooh [/v]

 

HAPPY BIRTHDAY!!!

[unvote]

 

That's a horrible present. What WAS I thinking?

Be nice to BirthdaySooh!

 

Yay another game with MrsClov!

 

You were so obviously town last game. I look forward to you hopefully being easy to read.

Well, thank you <3 I'll do my best!

See above imo

 

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!

 

 

 

 

 

@Zander

 

 

\m/ :wub \m/

 

QFR

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...