Jump to content

DRAGONMOUNT

A WHEEL OF TIME COMMUNITY

[Standard] The Matrix Reloaded - Game Over


Nolder

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 4.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

Yates, we're not talking about the same thing. I don't care about clov so I ain't going to talk about him right now, no offense to clov. Far as I am concerned your question was answered. I took offense to what he said regardless of what he said in addition to that. The 'confirmed town' part did not register as honest that is. It felt like snark.

 

It doesn't matter if my interpretation was meritted because the topic was dust 12 hours ago when me and clov first had the interaction. I, obviously, retracted my read.

 

So the topic is mute, yes. There is no reason for you to bring it up. It baffles me why you think it might be important to press the issue now because it will not go anywhere, and this behaviour honestly makes me suspicious of you. I really don't like it.

 

My vote on lenlo is based on this: and I've already said this in the thread.

 

His posts were forced, they lack content, he hadn't until just now after i implied he should, addressed his wagon in a concerted way which may or may not be scum who is playing it safe and hoping the storm will pass. I obviously, being me after all, will not like this behavior. I am glad he finally addressed his wagon.

 

more later when i get home.

Posted
  On 10/24/2015 at 3:26 PM, Clovdyx said:

 

  On 10/24/2015 at 1:56 PM, rackcitysteelers said:

This feels very forced to me. I got my eye on you.

 

I like this.  I don't really think that post is forced from Zander, but I imagine it could look that way to somebody that's never played with him before.

 

Pretty townie Clov post here imo, especially if Rackcity turns out to be town. New blood tends to be easy lynchbait and I don't know that scum!Clov would be digging for an early reason to give town!Rack positive cred.

Posted
  On 10/24/2015 at 6:19 PM, Nomi Sunrider said:

Still waiting on Yates, Taborline, Parlaya, and Dice.

 

In the meantime I'm considering voting for Sili so the page isn't just Sili making quintuple posts over and over.

 

And in other news, Zander, congratulations on being a townie.

What stood out about Zander to you to make him the first player you call town?

Posted
  On 10/24/2015 at 6:20 PM, Sooh said:

 

  On 10/24/2015 at 6:19 PM, Nomi Sunrider said:

Still waiting on Yates, Taborline, Parlaya, and Dice.

 

In the meantime I'm considering voting for Sili so the page isn't just Sili making quintuple posts over and over.

 

And in other news, Zander, congratulations on being a townie.

Oh I am loving the snark in that final statement.

 

*high five*

 

Or did I miss something there? <_<

Posted
  On 10/25/2015 at 2:40 AM, Sili Quirrels said:

The 'confirmed town' part did not register as honest that is. It felt like snark.

Snark? It obviously wasn't serious but snark implies a level of maliciousness that I'm not reading.

 

  On 10/25/2015 at 2:40 AM, Sili Quirrels said:

It doesn't matter if my interpretation was meritted because the topic was dust 12 hours ago when me and clov first had the interaction. I, obviously, retracted my read.

 

So the topic is mute, yes. There is no reason for you to bring it up.

Your retraction wasn't evident to me. And I just read the whole thread when I showed up. So... But you can't just hand wave away something like intent. I was looking for clarification on if this was a misunderstanding or if there was intent in your accusation. This is the first time you made it clear TO ME that you had retracted that. And I still don't know why. So the topic isn't MOOT; it is germane to my interpretation of what just happened in the thread.

 

  On 10/25/2015 at 2:40 AM, Sili Quirrels said:

My vote on lenlo is based on this: and I've already said this in the thread.

 

His posts were forced, they lack content, he hadn't until just now after i implied he should, addressed his wagon in a concerted way which may or may not be scum who is playing it safe and hoping the storm will pass.

The bold is a fair enough statement. I guess I thought he was ignoring something specific. And honestly, he still hasn't actually addressed his wagon so much as acknowledged it. But that's kind of why I asked the question. I agree with his assessment in post 175 that it wasn't like anyone brought up any points that I saw that he needed to address. So I was wondering why you were calling him out on that. Again; it's about intent.
Posted

Incidentally by forced I don't think I mean what Rack said. All I mean is he repeated content already set out for him in an obligatory way, so there might not have been any original thought behind his (lenlo's) comments.

 

The interaction between clov and him might have been staged as well, but I am more reserved about this notion.

Posted
  On 10/25/2015 at 3:19 AM, Yates said:

 

  On 10/25/2015 at 2:40 AM, Sili Quirrels said:

The 'confirmed town' part did not register as honest that is. It felt like snark.

Snark? It obviously wasn't serious but snark implies a level of maliciousness that I'm not reading.

 

  On 10/25/2015 at 2:40 AM, Sili Quirrels said:

It doesn't matter if my interpretation was meritted because the topic was dust 12 hours ago when me and clov first had the interaction. I, obviously, retracted my read.

 

So the topic is mute, yes. There is no reason for you to bring it up.

Your retraction wasn't evident to me. And I just read the whole thread when I showed up. So... But you can't just hand wave away something like intent. I was looking for clarification on if this was a misunderstanding or if there was intent in your accusation. This is the first time you made it clear TO ME that you had retracted that. And I still don't know why. So the topic isn't MOOT; it is germane to my interpretation of what just happened in the thread.

 

  On 10/25/2015 at 2:40 AM, Sili Quirrels said:

My vote on lenlo is based on this: and I've already said this in the thread.

 

His posts were forced, they lack content, he hadn't until just now after i implied he should, addressed his wagon in a concerted way which may or may not be scum who is playing it safe and hoping the storm will pass.

The bold is a fair enough statement. I guess I thought he was ignoring something specific. And honestly, he still hasn't actually addressed his wagon so much as acknowledged it. But that's kind of why I asked the question. I agree with his assessment in post 175 that it wasn't like anyone brought up any points that I saw that he needed to address. So I was wondering why you were calling him out on that. Again; it's about intent.

 

So, if I am piecing together your pov right, until just now you thought I was attacking Clov still over this issue?

Posted
  On 10/25/2015 at 3:08 AM, cory caboose said:

I can't even aorn

 

Hydra influence ofc

I am going to level with you.

 

I am clearing laine because idc about your slot, but if i did care I think you would be trending down rapidly right now for not offering input.

Posted
  On 10/25/2015 at 2:40 AM, Sili Quirrels said:

My vote on lenlo is based on this: and I've already said this in the thread.

 

His posts were forced, they lack content, he hadn't until just now after i implied he should, addressed his wagon in a concerted way which may or may not be scum who is playing it safe and hoping the storm will pass. I obviously, being me after all, will not like this behavior. I am glad he finally addressed his wagon.

 

more later when i get home.

Forced/Lacked content - I assume your talking about post #51? That post wasnt even 3 pages into the game and it was my first post. Your using that to say im forcing my posts/lacking content? Whats your opinion on Pral, Nomi or say Dice then? None of them have posted much and what they have hasnt been content. Id like to see if you have a similar opinion about them or are singling me out for some reason.

 

The wagon -  Concerted? So a planned way? You mean I ignored something that was just two people ranting at me without telling me what for? Now that you have actually told me what im being bothered about I can answer it, but you cant expect someone to respond to something that was never mentioned. 

Posted

I have expectations for Rack and we'll see if they pan out. Sili is doing his town thing but has overinflated a few points imo--made it sound like things have happened repeatedly when I only noticed them once--which might be different from his usual 'overinflation' of blowing up benign posts into major talking points. Generally feeling town on him though.

 

Yates being more combative than I'm used to this early, not sure what to take from it yet.

 

Kind of digging Sooh so far, Zander's off to a good start and while I'm not going to underestimate him I've probably never tinfoiled on any town as hard as I did on him last game and I'm not going to let that happen again. I got a few bad vibes from him when I've seen him as scum and until that happens towny Zander is town Zander imo. Hallia taking Clov seriously was weird. I didn't get the issue with Lenlo but then this post:

 

  On 10/25/2015 at 1:41 AM, Lenlo said:

Also Sili, whats up? You drunk or something? Your posts are all over the place tonight.

was terrible in the wake of Dice's, and Sili nailed why. It kind of dropped me from thinking he'd resolved the situation well to needing to see more.

Posted
  On 10/25/2015 at 3:24 AM, Sili Quirrels said:

So, if I am piecing together your pov right, until just now you thought I was attacking Clov still over this issue?

Attacking? No. I just didn't know if it was resolved because I didn't see a resolution. And that kind of stuff sticks out.
Posted
  On 10/25/2015 at 3:51 AM, Shad_ said:

Yates being more combative than I'm used to this early, not sure what to take from it yet.

Combative?
Posted

Whats wrong with it? I was pokin fun, cause things were gettin misspelled. If thats a sore spot I didnt know about for some reason, im sorry.

Posted
  On 10/25/2015 at 3:56 AM, Yates said:

 

  On 10/25/2015 at 3:51 AM, Shad_ said:

Yates being more combative than I'm used to this early, not sure what to take from it yet.

Combative?

 

The way you've been digging at Sili. You've analyzed some of his statements in a way that's... I don't know, lawyerly? Said some things that honestly just flew over my head and I'm sure if I put in the effort they all make sense regardless of your alignment, but I didn't feel the motivation to because Sili's a unique cat and I don't think that kind of analysis reveals much about him. Kind of scratching my head about your motive.

Posted
  On 10/25/2015 at 4:09 AM, Lenlo said:

Whats wrong with it? I was pokin fun, cause things were gettin misspelled. If thats a sore spot I didnt know about for some reason, im sorry.

Basically in #175 you correctly noted that there were no real accusations against you worth responding to. Trap laid, bait not taken, you progressed out of the situation smoothly instead of bulking at weakly-conceived pressure. Then in #176 you piggie-backed Dice's negative comment irt Sili and nullified what you just accomplished. Left me wondering if you were nervous after all and felt the need to remind us of the notion that Sili was performing sub-par.

Posted
  On 10/25/2015 at 4:12 AM, Shad_ said:

Kind of scratching my head about your motive.

My motive is pretty clear, I think. I was trying to understand him because, using your words, "Sili's a unique cat."

 

I think those couple of things you are trying to define as "lawerly" are really just me trying to understand his language. Like - I didn't think Clov was being snarky. So do I just sit there wondering if Sili means it in the literal sense [which might suggest one thing] or do I try to determine if he's playing fast and loose with a word [which could impy any number of other things]?

 

I would think the only post you could characterize [from your perspective] as "combative" was my post to Rack.

Posted

Oh I get what your saying. I just meant it as a playful jab, but I can understand how you got to the conclusion you did, since there wasnt anything in it to make it clear I was simply poking fun rather than trying to discredit him. 

Posted
  On 10/25/2015 at 4:23 AM, Yates said:

 

  On 10/25/2015 at 4:12 AM, Shad_ said:

Kind of scratching my head about your motive.

My motive is pretty clear, I think. I was trying to understand him because, using your words, "Sili's a unique cat."

 

I think those couple of things you are trying to define as "lawerly" are really just me trying to understand his language. Like - I didn't think Clov was being snarky. So do I just sit there wondering if Sili means it in the literal sense [which might suggest one thing] or do I try to determine if he's playing fast and loose with a word [which could impy any number of other things]?

 

I would think the only post you could characterize [from your perspective] as "combative" was my post to Rack.

 

Eh maybe "combative" wasn't the best word for it. I generally think that about half of what Sili says as town either carries a double meaning or is a straight-up lie (including "yes, I was dead serious" statements) but he can also get pretty emotional at times, and it's next to impossible to distinguish the two. I measure him on what he accomplishes. He's incredibly effective at helping me get reads on other players and when that's happening he's normally town.

Posted

Votecount

Lenlo - Rack, Sili, Zander (3)

Corlanna - Shad, Lenlo (2)

Shad - Clov (1)
Thane - Sooh (1)
Sooh - Corlanna (1)
Sili - Nomi (1)

Zander - Dice (1)

 
With 16 alive it takes 9 to lynch.
Deadline: Friday 30th 3PM PST.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...