Freemasons vs. Illuminati - LOOKING FOR ONE MORE PLAYER, QUICK GAME

[Yates]

I'm galactus this game btw

Well, you just got yourself mod killed. GG.

[Lenlo]

I'm galactus this game btw

Lies, Tom is always Galactus, even if hes not in the game.

[Arsis]

 

I'm galactus this game btw

Well, you just got yourself mod killed. GG.

He didn't say that I couldn't talk about my comic-con costume. I'm dressed as galactus irl.

[Andrej]

What response did it really draw from me though? We had like ~8 posts in the game and I was responding to you.

 

You said Lenlo justifying his RVS was vote worth which should imply you found it scummy. I disagreed saying I didn't see it as him doing that. How is voting someone 'for the lulz' justifying?

 

YOUR immediate reaction was to spin around and attack me over it which feels completely overdone. Like I really don't understand the immediate counter aggressive over my simple statement that I didn't agree with you.

 

I'll pull quotes for emphasize but I think now you're more playing spin doctor then really explaining yourself.

 

What about me saying "I don't see any justification" is 'interesting'?

[Andrej]

I still think you're reaching on the Len vote.

 

I could've voted you or Despot or whoever with some corny line that could *technically* be called justification. I find zero wrong with how he voted Arsis and I do think it looks bad that you're implying it's scummy since Lenlo would be 'vote worthy' for it.

[Andrej]

Clov, the friendliest mafia player saying hi to everyone.

AJ, engaging him but without much...oomph? 

 

Clov and AJ are underwhelming. 

 

Lenlo justifying RVS is vote-worthy.

This is the post you made that implies Len saying 'for the lulz' is scummy.

  

I didn't see much justification.

Me responding to you in a very simple manner. I still feel this way. Sure, justification could be used here in its pure definition because Len said ~words along with his vote but it didn't feel self conscious or overdone in any fashion to me.  

 

 

Forgot I was still signed up for this. 

[v]Arsis[/v] for the luls.

 

 

Really AJ?  In a game with about a page worth of posts you failed to see that?

This might have been just a misunderstanding. In this case I was saying I don't see justification as Lenlo saying 'for the lulz'. Apparently you meant it in the context that any explanation was overkill. I couldn't disagree more and I actually really think this looks bad for you.

 

Also - I don't understand the immediate aggression towards me. Even if I hadn't actually seen what you were referring to, how does that indicate anything about my alignment??

 

 

[unvote][v]AJ[/v]

Followed by a vote for ??? 

 

I'm saying 'for the luls' doesn't sound like justification to me. Obviously I saw the post if I'm able to comment on it.

You're reaching imo and your vote on me now is for what? Potentially skimming? Lol

Looking shaky right now bro.

My response to your vote.

[Yates]

I'm dressed as galactus irl.

Pix or lynch all liars, imo.

[Arsis]

 

I'm dressed as galactus irl.

Pix or lynch all liars, imo.

A/s/l

[Andrej]

 

I'm saying 'for the luls' doesn't sound like justification to me. Obviously I saw the post if I'm able to comment on it.

You're reaching imo and your vote on me now is for what? Potentially skimming? Lol

Looking shaky right now bro.

 

 

[v]TG[/v]

Confirmed shook ITT.

I really just don't follow the thought process. Len goes from being 'vote worthy' for supposedly justifying his RVS (which I don't see) to turning on me for... what?

 

 

Why did Lenlo vote?  "For the lulz".  Giving a reason for the joke vote is the very definition of justification.  AJ, the fact that you're waffling on this, saying you saw it but it didn't really look like it, but that maybe you were potentially skimming isnt' a good look.  And then you retort but wait for Yates to vote me before taking action? 

 

AJ conf scum.

This is garbage btw.

 

You're focusing on semantics. I don't feel that Lenlo "justified" his vote, screw the definition of the word. I am applying it in context.

 

If I said "Vote: Random player cause he's my bro" would you consider that justification as well? I doubt it.

 

In this instance I am referring to justification as over explaining ones vote, which I don't think Len did.

 

I am not waffling on this matter. I am saying that I think you are reaching because I don't see any subliminal meaning behind it.

 

Also the skimming comment was more in response to your aggro HOW DID YOU NOT SEE THIS reaction. Is skimming alignment indicative?

[Yates]

14/F/Canarsie

[Yates]

This is garbage btw.

Nobody else [meaning me, Lenlo, or Arsis] seems too concerned with what TG thinks of you. It's semantics. We get it.

 

Who, of the inactives, are you most concerned with having not commented on this game yet?

[Clovdyx]

AJ and TG seems like town-on-town violence.  The case on Lenlo is awful, but it's the kind of early over analysis I wouldn't put past TG as town, and I doubt he tries to roll onto AJ for "not seeing it" as mafia.

[Andrej]

Too early to say imo. Game started last night, so I'm not surprised some haven't checked in. Give it some more time and I'll be able to better answer that for you.

 

Back to the core of my problem right now though.

 

People make random commentary for their joke votes all the time. Like all the time. Hell I bet I could go pull specifics from TG himself where there is "justification" in his RVS from past games. At the very least it should be null. TG casting it as suspect is really bad imo.

[Clovdyx]

Arsis, why did you vote Lenlo, and why did you immediately switch to AJ?

[keyholder21]

If I said "Vote: Random player cause he's my bro" would you consider that justification as well? I doubt it.

 

In this instance I am referring to justification as over explaining ones vote, which I don't think Len did.

 

I agree with these points.

 

 

I like TG's getting the game started and his sticking to his argument though. Slight townread on both.

 

 

This is garbage btw.

Nobody else [meaning me, Lenlo, or Arsis] seems too concerned with what TG thinks of you. It's semantics. We get it.

 

Who, of the inactives, are you most concerned with having not commented on this game yet?

 

First line kinda rubs me the wrong way, especially after you and I both spent so much time defending ourselves last game.

 

Second line....eh. Normally I would say that it also rubs me the wrong way, but after getting burned in Pral's game, I can see some value in looking at inactives .

[Arsis]

Arsis, why did you vote Lenlo, and why did you immediately switch to AJ?

Lenlo is Lenlo. I vote him day 1 every game. It's a thing now.

 

 

Aj seemed to need a little bit of pressure on him. Look at how he overreacted to a tiny bit of pressure. What do you think that means?

[Andrej]

LolArsis

 

Show me how I overreacted.

 

If anything TG is the one who looks jumpy for how he immediate turned on me after one post.

[Yates]

First line kinda rubs me the wrong way, especially after you and I both spent so much time defending ourselves last game.

It's actually BECAUSE of that game I'm trying to slow the roll. It looked like emotional posting/responding rather than game solving play.

 

Second line....eh. Normally I would say that it also rubs me the wrong way, but after getting burned in Pral's game, I can see some value in looking at inactives .

Yeah. That's also really more of a call to post for people [LIKE YOU!] that might have been skimming but not posting.

[Clovdyx]

 

Arsis, why did you vote Lenlo, and why did you immediately switch to AJ?

Lenlo is Lenlo. I vote him day 1 every game. It's a thing now.

 

 

Aj seemed to need a little bit of pressure on him. Look at how he overreacted to a tiny bit of pressure. What do you think that means?

 

 

I don't think AJ's reaction was bad.  He addressed the issue TG brought up in a way that seemed appropriate and made sense to me.  TG continued to push the issue, so AJ got more defensive.  But the entire time, he focused on responding to TG's argument and did it in a way that I see where he's coming from.  What's wrong with that?

[keyholder21]

 

First line kinda rubs me the wrong way, especially after you and I both spent so much time defending ourselves last game.

It's actually BECAUSE of that game I'm trying to slow the roll. It looked like emotional posting/responding rather than game solving play.

 

Second line....eh. Normally I would say that it also rubs me the wrong way, but after getting burned in Pral's game, I can see some value in looking at inactives .

Yeah. That's also really more of a call to post for people [LIKE YOU!] that might have been skimming but not posting.

 

 

I suppose I can see that argument, but it still strikes me as a bit off due to last game.  

 

 

LOL.  Sometimes I actually DO have to work you know.  

[Yates]

LOL.  Sometimes I actually DO have to work you know.

Bah. Go moderate a thread...  

[Yates]

LOL.  Sometimes I actually DO have to work you know.

Real quick question; would you have posted when you did if I hadn't said anything? Or was it a coincidence that you and Clov both spoke up right after?

 

Same question for Clov, I guess.

[Arsis]

Close, Key, aj... Your scum team ladies and gentlemen.

[Darthe]

I have to work too!  So, ya know.  Bye and stuffs.

[Arsis]

I have to work too! So, ya know. Bye and stuffs.

Is that a scum claim?