Freemasons vs. Illuminati - LOOKING FOR ONE MORE PLAYER, QUICK GAME

[Hallia]

Put me out of my misery ; . ;

 

I'll be more vocal soon as I feel human

[Tyler Glembo]

I'm saying 'for the luls' doesn't sound like justification to me. Obviously I saw the post if I'm able to comment on it.

 

You're reaching imo and your vote on me now is for what? Potentially skimming? Lol

 

Looking shaky right now bro.

 

[v]TG[/v]

 

Confirmed shook ITT.

 

I really just don't follow the thought process. Len goes from being 'vote worthy' for supposedly justifying his RVS (which I don't see) to turning on me for... what?

 

Why did Lenlo vote?  "For the lulz".  Giving a reason for the joke vote is the very definition of justification.  AJ, the fact that you're waffling on this, saying you saw it but it didn't really look like it, but that maybe you were potentially skimming isnt' a good look.  And then you retort but wait for Yates to vote me before taking action? 

 

AJ conf scum.

[Yates]

[Tyler Glembo]

 

[Yates]

Where did you find that footage?  I was PROMISED it would never make it back from Kandahar!

[Andrej]

I'm not waffling on anything. I said plainly that I don't see Lenlo over justifying his vote. Your immediate response is "Really?!" and turn around to vote me with some commentary about how I couldn't see it.

 

I saw the post. I disagree with your conclusion and have said as much with "you're reaching imo"

 

Also vote order is a crap argument. In this situation I think you would've tried turning it in either situation so whatever. I was contemplating a vote but wanted you to respond first but with Yates down to clown I figured I might as well add to the pressure.

[Tyler Glembo]

Where did you find that footage?  I was PROMISED it would never make it back from Kandahar!

 

Dude, you know I got all your greatest scenes on DVD.  Director's cut. 

[Tyler Glembo]

I'm not waffling on anything. I said plainly that I don't see Lenlo over justifying his vote. Your immediate response is "Really?!" and turn around to vote me with some commentary about how I couldn't see it.

 

I saw the post. I disagree with your conclusion and have said as much with "you're reaching imo"

 

Also vote order is a crap argument. In this situation I think you would've tried turning it in either situation so whatever. I was contemplating a vote but wanted you to respond first but with Yates down to clown I figured I might as well add to the pressure.

 

Since when are you not willing to early tone read people's OPs?  Reaching on Lenlo?  Sure, it was a page into the game.  You jumping in on it about a tone read?  That isn't the AJ I know.

[Tyler Glembo]

 

You Make Me miss the 80's Yates.  Classic movie.

[Yates]

Classic movie.

Would never be made today. Never.

 

I'm going to step out of the game for a bit since it looks like it's just the three of us.

 

Need more posters.

[Lenlo]

Yo

 

Doin the whole "game thread in the signup thread" thing, huh? Cool.

 

[v]Lenlo[/v]

I see with you, Arsis and TG around the Lynch Lenlo cult is still going strong. Makes me glad.

 

Im also glad to see that my ploy to kickstart the game by joke voting Arsis D1/Pg1/Post1 is going well. Yup entirely planned. No one can say otherwise.

[Andrej]

TG what are you even talking about? You are making zero sense right now.

 

Like I feel you are trying to just spin everything and anything I say or do to look negative. Looks really bad on you.

 

Where did I say anywhere I'm unwilling to make early tone reads?

 

YOU are the one who said Len 'justifying' his vote on RVS is vote worthy. IE scummy. I said that I don't see it as justification and you immediately turn on me. You have still yet to explain the change in stance and have since just spun everything and say that I'm conf. scum. Kinda laughable imo.

 

Help me understand.

 

Obviously if I was commenting on Lenlo 1) I had read the post so you're whole "REALLY AJ ITS ONLY 1 PAGE" thing is just really strange to me and 2) if I am in disagreeance with your conclusion then I have already analyzed the tone. I even specifically looked back at the post after looking at your 'vote worthy' comment to see if I agreed. So...?

[Arsis]

[unvote lenlo]

 

 

[v]vote lenlo[/v]

 

 

[unvote lenlo]

 

 

[v]vote lenlo[/v]

[Tyler Glembo]

Follow me here AJ. 

 

You and I make tone reads and OP analysis type reads all the time.  I did one on Lenlo that probably shouldn't have raised your eyebrows, IMO.  Instead it did.  So I'm trying to figure out why.  Are you scum team?  Are you mason partners?  What is it that prompted your response to such an early vote with so little behind it?  Moreover, why did you mention skimming, coupled with saying you read it and it wasn't really scummy?  You don't really need multiple lines of defense so early in a game.  So yes, I'm going to turn on your for the early (unnecessary) defense of Lenlo coupled with your strange reasoning.

 

And don't answer about the mason thing, no need to get MK'd. 

[Tyler Glembo]

Arsis, like this.  Remove spaces.

 

[   unvote    ]

 

 

[     v     ]   Player    [    /v   ]

[Arsis]

[unvote]

 

[V]AJ[/V]

[Lenlo]

Wait this is a serious argument? Im confused as to why you think thats justification TG, for what was a joke vote. "For the lulz" isnt an argument for anything nor is it justification. I dont need justification for a joke vote. Its the equivalent of me going "Hey Arsis remember that game you were a survivor? I do. With love."

[Tyler Glembo]

I dont need justification for a joke vote.

 

Exactly, you don't.   So why did you say it was "for the lulz"?

[Yates]

It looks like he's saying "joke vote" is your justification, Len. I'm not looking forward to 4 pages of this semantic argument so there it is.

 

While I agree that "for the lulz" isn't a reason reason, it *is* - technically speaking - a "justification." Saying "Vote X - for the lulz" is different from simply saying "Vote X." It's similar but it *is* subtly different. And mafia is a game of subtly. So, I'm actually okay with his line of questioning even if I think he's chasing shadows, personally.

[Yates]

X-post. But yes. I agree with TG on the above.

[Lenlo]

 

I dont need justification for a joke vote.

 

Exactly, you don't.   So why did you say it was "for the lulz"?

 

Because it was for the lulz...? The statement is exactly what the vote was for. I voted Arsis because it would be funny for me because of a previous game we played together in. I dont understand why your pushing this so much, this isnt your first time playing with me.

[Tyler Glembo]

[Arsis]

I'm galactus this game btw

[Yates]

I voted Arsis because it would be funny for me because of a previous game we played together in.

This sounds curiously like justification to me.

[Tyler Glembo]

Because it was for the lulz...? The statement is exactly what the vote was for. I voted Arsis because it would be funny for me because of a previous game we played together in. I dont understand why your pushing this so much, this isnt your first time playing with me.

 

It was minor on your part, but the way it drew a response from AJ was more interesting.