Jump to content
We have a Patreon! Support this website and get exclusive content ×

DRAGONMOUNT

 A WHEEL OF TIME COMMUNITY

[Advanced] Dragonmount Witchhunt Mafia!!! Game over, Witches win!!!

hazelkrs1

By hazelkrs1
in DM Mafia Games

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 810
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Moderator
Verbal32 Spam Master

Verbal32

Posted
  • Moderator
Posted

 

 

 

Checking back on Dawn's D1 posts, she only seems to joke about with Hallia and Lily.  Not much game-play interaction to really drill down on.  Null.

 

Finding this abit odd. You ISO'd Dawn, but only mention Hallia and Lily, with not much more gameplay interactions? If you are gonna mention the ISO, and mention Hallia and Lily, why not mention she voted Wombat for being "too town" and then basically clear him in the same post she votes him? And Wombat naming you in his "defense" (or, counter-attack-slash-defense)? Not drawing any conclusions from it yet, but I find it odd you omitted that from your comment. 

 

 

Because I already addressed the potential for what Wombat was doing - my ISO was to identify interactions with other players that I didn't see addressed previously.

 

 

You never addressed Dawns' vote, or their interaction, you just addressed Wombat being "too town" - just like Dawn. 

 

 

Huh?

 

 

 

 

Can we lynch the hybrid lynch system.

 

Hold on, the hybrid lynch system is good.  This is not a hybrid lynch system - it is a completely new one that upon a certain trigger (everybody votes), it turns into a hybrid lynch system.

nervositee Community Regular

nervositee

Posted
Posted

 

 

 

 

 

 

Checking back on Dawn's D1 posts, she only seems to joke about with Hallia and Lily.  Not much game-play interaction to really drill down on.  Null.

 

Finding this abit odd. You ISO'd Dawn, but only mention Hallia and Lily, with not much more gameplay interactions? If you are gonna mention the ISO, and mention Hallia and Lily, why not mention she voted Wombat for being "too town" and then basically clear him in the same post she votes him? And Wombat naming you in his "defense" (or, counter-attack-slash-defense)? Not drawing any conclusions from it yet, but I find it odd you omitted that from your comment. 

 

 

Because I already addressed the potential for what Wombat was doing - my ISO was to identify interactions with other players that I didn't see addressed previously.

 

 

You never addressed Dawns' vote, or their interaction, you just addressed Wombat being "too town" - just like Dawn. 

 

 

 

 

Huh?

 

 

You (apparently) ISO'ed Dawn. You point out her interactions with Hallia and Lily and claim there are no more game interactions to take notice of. 

 

Which means you for some reason find her vote on Wombat, and their back-and-forth completely unimportant - or you left it out on purpose.

 

When I mention it you say that you already mentioned the potential of what Wombat was doing. Which is completely irrelevant if we are looking for Dawns interactions D1.

 

The only thing you mentioned with what Wombat was doing (being "too town") was also what Dawn was voting him for. But you never addressed their interaction (dawn and wombat), neither when it happened or when you "looked back at her interaction".

 

So now I'm wondering why you omitted their interaction in your comment on dawn D1. 

WWWwombat Spam Master

WWWwombat

Posted
Posted

 

I also want to announce that I would prefer no more "bah" posts of any kind since the first one was an infraction of the rules. I shall update this in the OP, but please if everyone can

 

CONFIRM

 

that they understand this new rule, I would greatly appreciate it.

 

(just bold the word confirmed in all caps to lemme know you've read this, thanks in advance)

 

 

Additionally I will say that a punishment was given for not voting at all yesterday, but I will not announce it atm, and I would prefer there to be no more discussion about what it could be. Their teammates will not appreciate it tho, that is for sure.

 

The punishments may grow more severe if the day goes to deadline without you placing a vote. Please try to keep this in mind today

 

/end mod announcements

 

I assumed the vote rule is in place to encourage activity, yes?  If so, are you going to punish myself or my team for being one of the most active players during D1?

 

Also, CONFIRM.

 

 

QQ moar scrub.

 

 

 

 

Ok, we got dawn, so we got a lynch secured today. I'm not interested in a rushed Day if we can help it though...

 

We know Lily was town, I see it as highly likely that Lenlo was town, and we know Pral is town. I'm gonna look over D1 and see if I see anything new and interesting....

 

Disagree. 

 

We need to end the day without anyone else getting town cleared. Remember, witches are also looking for information to identify our roles. Prolonging the day would help both town and witches equally.

 

 

Yep.

 

 

CONFIRM.

 

Vote dawn.

 

I think I'm seeing a downside to this lynch system...

 

Me2.

WWWwombat Spam Master

WWWwombat

Posted
Posted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Checking back on Dawn's D1 posts, she only seems to joke about with Hallia and Lily.  Not much game-play interaction to really drill down on.  Null.

 

Finding this abit odd. You ISO'd Dawn, but only mention Hallia and Lily, with not much more gameplay interactions? If you are gonna mention the ISO, and mention Hallia and Lily, why not mention she voted Wombat for being "too town" and then basically clear him in the same post she votes him? And Wombat naming you in his "defense" (or, counter-attack-slash-defense)? Not drawing any conclusions from it yet, but I find it odd you omitted that from your comment. 

 

 

Because I already addressed the potential for what Wombat was doing - my ISO was to identify interactions with other players that I didn't see addressed previously.

 

 

You never addressed Dawns' vote, or their interaction, you just addressed Wombat being "too town" - just like Dawn. 

 

 

 

 

Huh?

 

 

You (apparently) ISO'ed Dawn. You point out her interactions with Hallia and Lily and claim there are no more game interactions to take notice of. 

 

Which means you for some reason find her vote on Wombat, and their back-and-forth completely unimportant - or you left it out on purpose.

 

When I mention it you say that you already mentioned the potential of what Wombat was doing. Which is completely irrelevant if we are looking for Dawns interactions D1.

 

The only thing you mentioned with what Wombat was doing (being "too town") was also what Dawn was voting him for. But you never addressed their interaction (dawn and wombat), neither when it happened or when you "looked back at her interaction".

 

So now I'm wondering why you omitted their interaction in your comment on dawn D1. 

 

 

I'm wondering that too.  It was a pretty substantive sequence imo.

WWWwombat Spam Master

WWWwombat

Posted
Posted

 

HYPERLYNCH PLZ

I'm not going to vote myself OR anyone else.

 

 

 

I'll just do this:

 

Petition to the mods:  Please amend the rules so that n - 1 votes is sufficient for instant lynch where n = number of living players.

dicetosser1 Spam Master

dicetosser1

Posted
Posted

CONFIRM

 

I agree with mish   if we have a confirmed witch and we have to wait three days lets cool our jets a little and look at people. Ask questions and stuff and gauge reactions.

 

I wanna start with Hallia but is she even around? She is off to the Con about now isnt she?

 

 

So lets start with Alanna. She has, if i counted right 2 posts all game. One saying about what an awesome group of players, and one cornfirming and voting Dawn. 

 

Thoughts on Alanna?

 

Alanna thoughts on the game?

hazelkrs1 Spam Master

hazelkrs1

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Official Vote Count

 

 

 
Dawn (9): Pray, Leelou, Verbal, Jack, Vos, Hally, Alanna, Wombat
 
Not voting (3): Mish, Dawn, Dice
 
(the "not voting" group is the same as those who have not voted yet today)
 
With 11 alive it takes 6 to hammer, if all votes have been cast
 
Day 2 deadline
 
Votes since last VC:
 

 

 

CONFIRM.

 

Vote dawn.

 

I think I'm seeing a downside to this lynch system...

 

 

CONFIRM

 

Vote Dawn

 

 

 

 

 

Blech. Funny how much DM has gotten addicted to being able to see instant results.

 

:rolleyes:

 

W/e, we'll do Wombat's idea. To "hyperlynch", N-1 votes are needed, where N=number of players alive. So Dawn is at L-1.

dawnflower8 Veteran

dawnflower8

Posted
Posted

 

 

HYPERLYNCH PLZ

I'm not going to vote myself OR anyone else.

 

 

 

I'll just do this:

 

Petition to the mods:  Please amend the rules so that n - 1 votes is sufficient for instant lynch where n = number of living players.

 

He'd better not change it.

  • Moderator
Verbal32 Spam Master

Verbal32

Posted
  • Moderator
Posted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Checking back on Dawn's D1 posts, she only seems to joke about with Hallia and Lily.  Not much game-play interaction to really drill down on.  Null.

 

Finding this abit odd. You ISO'd Dawn, but only mention Hallia and Lily, with not much more gameplay interactions? If you are gonna mention the ISO, and mention Hallia and Lily, why not mention she voted Wombat for being "too town" and then basically clear him in the same post she votes him? And Wombat naming you in his "defense" (or, counter-attack-slash-defense)? Not drawing any conclusions from it yet, but I find it odd you omitted that from your comment. 

 

 

Because I already addressed the potential for what Wombat was doing - my ISO was to identify interactions with other players that I didn't see addressed previously.

 

 

You never addressed Dawns' vote, or their interaction, you just addressed Wombat being "too town" - just like Dawn. 

 

 

 

 

Huh?

 

 

You (apparently) ISO'ed Dawn. You point out her interactions with Hallia and Lily and claim there are no more game interactions to take notice of. 

 

Which means you for some reason find her vote on Wombat, and their back-and-forth completely unimportant - or you left it out on purpose.

 

When I mention it you say that you already mentioned the potential of what Wombat was doing. Which is completely irrelevant if we are looking for Dawns interactions D1.

 

The only thing you mentioned with what Wombat was doing (being "too town") was also what Dawn was voting him for. But you never addressed their interaction (dawn and wombat), neither when it happened or when you "looked back at her interaction".

 

So now I'm wondering why you omitted their interaction in your comment on dawn D1. 

 

 

Because I was looking for interactions (or name drops) that were not involved in the major discussion topics of the day - to see what may have squeaked by unnoticed.  You, sir, are trying to drum up a cheesy case on me when you know my intent of the ISO.

 

 

 

 

QQ moar scrub.

 

 

CONFIRM.

 

Vote dawn.

 

I think I'm seeing a downside to this lynch system...

 

Me2.

 

 

Hypocrite.  I don't want the town harmed - that is called caring about your team.  You going to ride Vos' coattails on the cheesy case he's trying to build?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

About Dragonmount

Dragonmount is a fan-maintained website dedicated to Robert Jordan's Wheel of Time fantasy series. It is an online community of people from all over the world who have come here to experience the series to the fullest.

Twitter

Facebook

Copyright © 2024, Dragonmount Powered by Invision Community

© All borrowed artwork is used with permission. The Wheel of Time books & franchise are © Robert Jordan & the Bandersnatch Group.

The phrases "The Wheel of Time‚" and "The Dragon Reborn", and the snake-wheel symbol are trademarks of Robert Jordan & the Bandersnatch Group.

×
×
  • Create New...