[BASIC] Physics Mafia: GAME OVER, Town and Lenlo wins!

[LilyElizabeth]

I could read Chae's post just fine. She was concise in her comments. 

 

I don't really have any reads yet. I'm frankly having a hard time getting into this game. I think Jack is town, but I'm not 100% on him. I usually am by this point with him, so that's odd. 

[Sedai]

 

1. Lol, sounds wounded. Or maybe ambitious to lynch someone from the old school.

 

2. If actually attempting to play the game is scummy go for it.m, Lynch me, but ask yourself this. Why cause a ruckus when I could play it chill. And you see it as an in joke? How so? I've not played with Kronos and his "Why so?" Question was directed at me. Hmmmm

 

3. So you can hear posts on dm? They speak to you? It doesn't read as jumpy is what you meant, and that's just silly cause if you can't see someone's expression or hear their voice you wouldn't know if it was jumpy or not. Can be perceived as one or the other.

 

 

all i see here is misrep, wifom, and regardless of visual and audio aid being present "we do" can hardly be described as jumpy?

 

 

 

 

K so basically

 

1. Lol, sounds wounded. Or maybe ambitious to lynch someone from the old school.

 

2. If actually attempting to play the game is scummy go for it.m, Lynch me, but ask yourself this. Why cause a ruckus when I could play it chill. And you see it as an in joke? How so? I've not played with Kronos and his "Why so?" Question was directed at me. Hmmmm

 

3. So you can hear posts on dm? They speak to you? It doesn't read as jumpy is what you meant, and that's just silly cause if you can't see someone's expression or hear their voice you wouldn't know if it was jumpy or not. Can be perceived as one or the other.

 

 

Seriously weak.

 

Vote Jack

Des had a reason i had a reason, and this appears to be why vos voted you. He may not have broken it down and explained what parts but its more than the people voting him.

 

Cloud's on his own. I dont see his vote as scummy but im not going to leap to his aid either. He's a potential suspect for hoping on the wagon but it's not enough to warrant raising hell on him or a lynch.

 

 

Not liking how fast Jacks train started to build, but Vos's vote was really freakin weak. It's D1, I know, but st the time he made it he hadn't posted any reasons for the vote. FoS for that.

 

I want the day to run abit longer before votin though, get some more things goin on.

Meh just three votes. Train just started with Nervo's vote

 

And two of the votes have little to no reasoning at best.

 

Despo wants to lynch an old player

 

Nervo just my thought out explanation was weak, when I've been trying to get things rolling, and Nervo didn't even stop to consider both sides. Opportunistic bandwagon starting vote.

 

And cloud gave no reasoning. So if that's the best they are gunna string together. Doubt it's much to worry with lol.

 

Scummiest votes are clouds and Nervo's despo's is meh

Serious misrep. Some WHYME FRYME because you made a "prod" that people think was irrational and now your getting heat for it. Yet your old school so you should have expected that. So either your town and need a better strategy or your scum and thought you could talk your way out of it if the nudge on wolf didnt take off. So please do expain the side you keep going on about. What besides "reactions" was your motive. Better yet what exactly where you hoping to accomplish? Has it been successful?

 

I feel a town player wouldnt worry at all regardless of the case. town wins as a whole so if you died you would still have provided plenty of day one information that potential gives us the win over the scum team.

 

i think your jab at wolf was opportunistic. you say it was a prod but looks like your laying ground work for and Fos. Your theory on "we do" was a joke man. "no we dont" might have fit the description your trying fill but not this. So feel free to add my vote to that! You really think des is going after you because your old school.. come on duude your misreping and making mountains out of moles hils.

 

Dap i may be inexperienced but come at me bro. Ill drop you like a rock... something something gravity!

 

VOTE JACK

And your the one parroting and not coming up with original thoughts.

 

You don't have to lay ground work for an FoS. Because it's suspicion lolz. And not sure where your going with We do and We don't that seems lame and incoherent.

Misrep thats been discussed but yea my original idea.. blah blah blah.. look at me yammer on.

 

well i was the one who pointed it out but sure if thats parroting stick with it.

Pretty sure Des was buy if it was you I apologize. And I thusly bring the pot kettle argument to your attention.

 

You say I'm making a mountain from a mole hill. Yet your making my mountain into a whole mountain range.

i have yet to be convince how your prod has been turned into epic proportions, yes its the driving point of day one discussion's but it isnt being blow out of proportion like you did with a simple "we do"?

 

Or is it the fact that im not letting go of it as fast as you would like me to?

Colored and bfef got your convenience. See how annoying massive quotes are.

[Sedai]

Lily. What do you think of Ameg saying he basically wants to lynch me no matter what. Lolz

[Sedai]

Bfef=bold btw lol

[LilyElizabeth]

Lily. What do you think of Ameg saying he basically wants to lynch me no matter what. Lolz

I'm sorry, Bro, but I can't make heads or tails out of that quoted post. 

[amegakure]

 

 

I feel a town player wouldnt worry at all regardless of the case. town wins as a whole so if you died you would still have provided plenty of day one information that potential gives us the win over the scum team. 

 

lolz this is the post he is trying to misrep.. and all i see is jack grasping at straws. no where does it state that i want to lynch you if your proven town. the thing is your not proving that your town. 

[LilyElizabeth]

I don't believe Jack said "proven" town. That's the kind of slip that makes me wary of someone. You just moved up my list, Amega. 

[_CLOUD]

Chae, I was replying to Jack in that post and not Despo.

 

 

Cloud I don't care if you post them or not. Just saying. I don't read dm. So if anything is addressed to me it'll go unanswered.

So basically vos voted without reason, which is scummy. And people called him on it and voted him for it. But since they all aren't voting me and vos agrees with your line of thinking his train looked bad. Gotcha.

 

Well that's certainly helpfull...

 

Voting without giving a reason isn't as scummy as you like to believe it is and it certainly didn't deserve four votes. People do it all the time. Vos found your response to be weak and after you asked him to eloborate on it he did and I happen to agree with his line of thinking.

[LilyElizabeth]

And if you truly think that a town player wouldn't worry about getting lynched, you aren't considering power roles. Also, you don't know Jack. He fights to stay alive and play and have fun. All in all that statement is ridiculous, imo. 

[Sedai]

@cloud it I'd scummy because the voters don't have to be held accountable. Because you think it isn't is just apparent gross negligence.

[_CLOUD]

 

 

 

I feel a town player wouldnt worry at all regardless of the case. town wins as a whole so if you died you would still have provided plenty of day one information that potential gives us the win over the scum team. 

 

lolz this is the post he is trying to misrep.. and all i see is jack grasping at straws. no where does it state that i want to lynch you if your proven town. the thing is your not proving that your town. 

 

 

While I don't completly agree with the statement it doesn't read like you want to lynch him no matter like he claims that you do. Context is everything.

[Hayl3y]

Chae, I was replying to Jack in that post and not Despo.

 

 

 

sorry my bad

[_CLOUD]

@cloud it I'd scummy because the voters don't have to be held accountable. Because you think it isn't is just apparent gross negligence.

 

He said that your response was weak and eleborated on it when you asked him to. If he wouldn't have said anything while voting for you and refused to give a proper explanation then I would have agreed with you. As it stands however your case against him is weak and you apparently didn't even bother to read his reply to you.

[Sedai]

 

 

I feel a town player wouldnt worry at all regardless of the case. town wins as a whole so if you died you would still have provided plenty of day one information that potential gives us the win over the scum team.

lolz this is the post he is trying to misrep.. and all i see is jack grasping at straws. no where does it state that i want to lynch you if your proven town. the thing is your not proving that your town.

That whole post is basically saying. If your town shut up and get lunched cause you can still win and town will get info.

 

I say to that lolz

 

If I'm grasping at straws it's because I'm dealing with people who can't possibly be wrong and votes with flippant reasoning because the person they are voting uses a line of rationale that doesn't equate to what the people voting him agrees with.

 

How can I prove I'm town?

 

1. Quote my mod PM. But that'll get me mod killed. Effective but inconvenient.

 

2. Post actively, garner reactions. Promote activity and point out suspicious behavior and scum hunt? Well I've been doing that.

 

3. Or the all important rule three? Give you laurels and agree with whatever your saying. Lolz

[nervositee]

So basically vos voted without reason, which is scummy. And people called him on it and voted him for it. But since they all aren't voting me and vos agrees with your line of thinking his train looked bad. Gotcha.

 

 

See, this is why I'm still reading you as scummy. First of all, I did give a reason. I quoted your text and called it weak. Second, when you didn

[nervositee]

't get what I was saying, I explained. Fine that you voted me right back, I don't have a problem with that. I don't even have a problem with a couple of follow up votes since it's day 1. It was a straw and we're all grabbing at those today. But that you still can't let it go? And then goes and misrep Clouds' words as badly as you just did? Meh. Don't know your meta at all, but you are playing anti-townie here. 

[Sedai]

Vos I was just responding to clouds post. Where he still insisted you voted without reason. I was explaining his logic back to him and why it was false.

[_CLOUD]

Vos I was just responding to clouds post. Where he still insisted you voted without reason. I was explaining his logic back to him and why it was false.

 

You got it backwards.

[Sedai]

Chae, I was replying to Jack in that post and not Despo.

 

 

 

Cloud I don't care if you post them or not. Just saying. I don't read dm. So if anything is addressed to me it'll go unanswered.

 

So basically vos voted without reason, which is scummy. And people called him on it and voted him for it. But since they all aren't voting me and vos agrees with your line of thinking his train looked bad. Gotcha.

Well that's certainly helpfull...

 

Voting without giving a reason isn't as scummy as you like to believe it is and it certainly didn't deserve four votes. People do it all the time. Vos found your response to be weak and after you asked him to eloborate on it he did and I happen to agree with his line of thinking.

So you didn't insinuate vos voted without reason?

[nervositee]

Vos I was just responding to clouds post. Where he still insisted you voted without reason. I was explaining his logic back to him and why it was false.

 

Wow man, you are seriously twisting events here

 

## Unvote

## Vote Jack_D

[_CLOUD]

@Jack: No, I didn't. His reason was that he found your reply to Despo to be weak. I don't consider that voting without a reason. That would be voting for someone else without giving ANY kind of explanation. Even that however is more annoying than it is a scum tell. You didn't explain why he wasn't voting without a reason. You were attacking him for it.

[Sedai]

 

Chae, I was replying to Jack in that post and not Despo.

 

 

 

Cloud I don't care if you post them or not. Just saying. I don't read dm. So if anything is addressed to me it'll go unanswered.

 

So basically vos voted without reason, which is scummy. And people called him on it and voted him for it. But since they all aren't voting me and vos agrees with your line of thinking his train looked bad. Gotcha.

Well that's certainly helpfull...

 

Voting without giving a reason isn't as scummy as you like to believe it is and it certainly didn't deserve four votes. People do it all the time. Vos found your response to be weak and after you asked him to eloborate on it he did and I happen to agree with his line of thinking.

So you didn't insinuate vos voted without reason?

The part I bolded is you saying he voted with no reason. And it didn't deserve 4 votes. You said it I didn't. Vos and I already discussed his reasoning etc.

[LilyElizabeth]

 

 

 

Vote Chae

 

Your number 11. We all know what that means

We do?

11 according to my day 1 tradition is always scum. I've self voted and voted every single person to placed at that spot

 

However your jumpy questioning to an obvious joke vote is noted. Hmmmm

 

jumpy questioning? where talking a total of two syllables. Are you that desperate for reactions?

 

 

Reading through, I found this interesting. Defense of Kronos? Maybe.

[LilyElizabeth]

He is old school mafia

No one remembers the old ways anymore

 

I do somewhat.

 

I remember they weren't as good as many like remembering them lol

 

 

 

Des, you weren't around in the old days. How can you remember them?

[_CLOUD]

 

 

Chae, I was replying to Jack in that post and not Despo.

 

Cloud I don't care if you post them or not. Just saying. I don't read dm. So if anything is addressed to me it'll go unanswered.

 

So basically vos voted without reason, which is scummy. And people called him on it and voted him for it. But since they all aren't voting me and vos agrees with your line of thinking his train looked bad. Gotcha.

Well that's certainly helpfull...

 

Voting without giving a reason isn't as scummy as you like to believe it is and it certainly didn't deserve four votes. People do it all the time. Vos found your response to be weak and after you asked him to eloborate on it he did and I happen to agree with his line of thinking.

So you didn't insinuate vos voted without reason?

The part I bolded is you saying he voted with no reason. And it didn't deserve 4 votes. You said it I didn't. Vos and I already discussed his reasoning etc.

 

 

That was a general statement about voting without reasons and how it doesn't deserve four votes. Check the blue part.