Wombat's A Song of Ice and Fire Mafia (Advanced) Game Thread

[John McClane]

Vote Smash

 

24 people left, and Smash has 5 posts. One of which was him hinting at having night action results before all night actions were submitted.

 

As for the train on me, I can't take it seriously. 4 jackholes from JN all of whom could be "voting Ape" as a trap, or to bust my balls. Ape doesn't care.

 

 

If you didn't care you wouldn't have mentioned it. You care, you care a lot. I could smell the care from here. Wait... that's not care at all you filthy kncukle dragger.

 

No. I have to mention it otherwise I'll have to defend against 2 year old metagaming that Ape has to defend against every vote against him.

 

You are the only person on my train that needs to die. This, I know.

[John McClane]

I would rather let the mod replace him before I throw a vote on Smash, as we've seen that the inactives in this game are being readily replaced. That said, I do agree that it is a little ominous that he did act like he knew the results of his night action before the night was done.

 

 

Way to straddle the fence.

[John McClane]

Vote Ape

 

 

Vote APE

 

 

vote ape

 

 

 

IS THE APE DEAD YET??

 

 

Vote JF80 for quitting.

 

 

Interesting.

 

You're interesting.

 

Vote Paperplates

 

 

Vote JF80 for quitting.

 

How do you pronounce your username? It reads as "big homo" to me. We need a pronunciation guide around here.

 

Sigh, Unvote Vote 80, before he's banned anyway.

 

 

UNVOTE VOTE APE. It's for the best.

 

Did we start back at the beginning of day 1? What a fascinating collection of votes with no attempt at an explanation.

 

Not to say that I don't think Ape deserves to die, but he does seem to be doing some good for the game right now, unlike a few other people who have contributed nothing but spam and content-less votes.

 

And he makes a very good point:

 

24 people left, and Smash has 5 posts. One of which was him hinting at having night action results before all night actions were submitted.

 

Smash has said nothing since he appeared to be threatening some sort of night action on N1.

 

wow not very active but i have a little surprise for you all tomorrow.

 

should get the ape rolling a bit. Wait .... nm

 

He's the one most in need of some pressure right now IMO.

 

Vote Smash

 

 

Personally I think the ape dying today is the way to go. First... if we kill him today he won't be here tomorrow. Second... he's an ape just like the one that tore that nice ladies face off while back Third...he was protecting Nolder like he gave birth to him. fourth... three wifs of an experomental Alzhimers drug and he and his type will rule us all fifth... Nolder was in faction my crew gots beef with sixth... good chance moneky is too seventh... killing monkeys is fun and it saves baby seals

 

 

Fist of all, in general, I don't defend team mates in thread. Ever. I come from the same line of thinking as CTM, bus team mates at every chance. Then wrap up the win on my own.

 

Second of all, your logic is flawed. We are playing in a game where people are in factions, but don't know their team mates. Look at his alignment, he was "House of Lannister" which indicates a faction. Which would mean he didn't know his team mates, and his team mates didn't know him. So explain to me how I defended him?

[John McClane]

Aiel Heart will be replacing Smash.

 

 

Ugh.

 

Unvote

 

All these quitters are really screwing up the game dynamics.

[John McClane]

WAH! I wanna vote.

 

 

Also, Pats, you are so jelly bro.

 

 

I do agree that the Ape was defending Nolder, and they were seriously buddying, but who the hell would defend Tyrion?!

 

 

Also, Aiel, I love you, but it's not safe for you here. People are dying in here. Insanity has ensued. PEOPLE ARE FLINGING POOP!

 

*offers popcorn* But, if you are gonna stay, come and enjoy the show.

 

 

Nolder was in a faction.

 

If I was in the same faction, and did know who he was, I feel Wombat would have indicated that in the coroner's report. Making it more clear that one faction is a more traditional scum team that can in fact talk offline.

 

All this Ape was defending Nolder crap is logically flawed. Nobody is using their brains and the information we have available to us about factions.

[John McClane]

Nolder claimed that he could talk to his teammates. I don't see why Ape wouldn't know that.

 

But, Jaime is Cersei's buddy. If any Lannister defended Tyrion, it would be... Kevan? Kevan is my best bet. Or Tommen. Tommen likes his Uncle, right?

 

Oh, did he? Haha... oh well.

 

Listen all I did to defend Nolder was point out his one post early on struck me as the type of thing he'd do as a scumhunting trap. That's all.

 

From there, the legend of me "defending" him has been extrapolated on by others.

 

As for the conjecture about which character "tommen, cersie, jaime, whatever" woudl defend the character that Nolder was... there is NO relevance to this. Not even sure where you are going with it.

[hazelkrs1]

Really weaksauce defense Ape. Discard the "anyone arguing the merits of my case are logically flawed" bs and try again. Wombat gave us plenty of info with the coroner report, and it with everything else that's happened is more than enough to link you with Nolder. And you really think at this point you can get us to believe Nolder didn't know who his teammates were, or that his teammates didn't know who he was? I'm sure yalls QT has gotten good

 

Watch out everyone -

 

 

 

Ape is going out on a limb here

[John McClane]

Actually I think I'm overthinking this. I didn't want to vote for Ape since his train mainly consists of his JN bosom buddies, but honestly he was defending Nol so since Nol flipped Lannister this is really kind of simple.

 

Vote Ape

 

And once I get around to that reread I'll figure out who it was that defended Nol, saying it was a trap statement. Or was that Ape? Gawd my head needs clearing.

 

I said Nol's early post was an attempted trap, in the style of his usual scumhunting.

 

You typed a lot of blather up there, and didn't say much. You should have just voted me, I feel like you put on a song and dance and talk about pressuring others and yadda yadda, and gave that about one evening and then voted me.

 

Lame.

[hazelkrs1]

So I take it you didn't review my case on you? I pointed out several times when you not only defended the infamous Nolder statement, but also said you had a "strong town read" on him and that you can tell when he's scum or not.

 

You might wanna lube up those gears before you start backpedaling

[Songstress]

mini WoT incoming, skim at your own peril!

 

Oh my. BG warned me in my last game I'd find your WoTs impressive. I like you, indeed.

 

Please consider being my new bosom buddy. YOU=AWESOME LOL

 

/agreed.

 

 

As for who to vote for, Goin after inactives now seems a little unnecessary. I'd say we got good targets without diving into the inactives pool (although I'm worried like others are about Smash's NA hint). Personally, I think Nolder is a good choice to go for today. That whole business about him questioning other's ability to speak on a QT with their teammates thing is what worries me. It might have been a trap statement, but if so we can always go after others that fell in with him. Either way it could have been a slip on his part, admitting he had a QT when he thought every faction would have one. It's become apparent that not every faction has a QT or know who their members are, so the ones who do are prob either the "true" scum (the Lannisters imo) or possibly Cult.

 

I agree that there are some very good targets out there... and while I agree with you on Ape, he's also made his position pretty clear. I'm a little more concerned about the people who have been lingering in the thread and have not been giving us any clues as to their alignment. The cult is clearly listed in the faction list at the beginning of the thread, and none of them so far have been identified. While I'm on board with eliminating the Lannister threat, I'm just a little more concerned about the people who I can't peg at all. Unless Ape has been turned by the cult already, I'm willing to wait on him. The cult is not going to get any easier to deal with later in the game.

 

Oh, one more thing I think everyone is forgetting about. I'm not the biggest fan of setup talk this early in the game either, but has no one thought of the possibility that the Others would be the Cult? I mean, fits in perfectly, they LITERALLY turn you to their side and everything. They could be some other kind of hidden threat I suppose, but I'd be surprised if they weren't in this game at all

 

Hadn't considered the Others as the cult TBH, although it would make sense with the theme. Before I decided to try playing mafia myself I read through several completed games including Kivam's GOT game from last year, and I was thinking Targaryens would be a pretty likely choice. Not only because Dany was one of the cult leaders in Kivam's game, but because they are very, very prominent in the series and it would be almost disappointing not to have at least one Targaryen in the game.

 

Okay enough blubbering, Unvote... not sure yet who to vote for. I want to see if I can find any others who unwittingly admitted to having a QT... which means a frikkin reread. Already. FML

 

I see you've pegged a few... here are other possibles I've noted during my read:

 

So, Trench, in a discussion on the topic of whether faction members are aware of each other you find it suspicious that someone responds that they, in fact, do not know who their faction members are? That logic has a few wholes in it. That said, there is only one faction that I see being in that situation: unaligned survivor. Since I am curious to find out if that is the case and probably won't trust her if she says that's what she is...

 

VOTE CHRISTINE

 

Also keeping my eye on Trench for that seriously flawed logic.

 

Alright. You know what. Here is a reveal.

 

 

I am in a faction, and I have no idea who else is in it.

 

This bothers me. Going by source material, I'm afraid you're aligned with The Spider. His little birds don't all know who each other are...and I may think of who else you could be aligned with later, but for now I'm going to Vote Christine

 

Tip: click inside this box to load the editorour <----- Can someone explain how this appeared when I was typing?

 

-----------------

Anyway what I was trying to say;

I dont know the source material (haven't had a chance to read or watch them yet) so I would also like to know what The Spider is and why you think Christine would be part of that.

 

My understanding was that we would have mason groups, survivors, and a cult. I assumed that only the survivors wouldn't know who the others in their faction were. So Christine I has thrown me a bit. I just cant think as to why she would claim it if it was a lie though.

[John McClane]

It's funny to me that Despo is fresh off of quoting Nolders' coroner report, BUT voting him too. Now he's talking about "enough infor in the coroner report" as if he read it? I guess there wasn't enough info to figure out the guy was dead.

[John McClane]

So I take it you didn't review my case on you? I pointed out several times when you not only defended the infamous Nolder statement, but also said you had a "strong town read" on him and that you can tell when he's scum or not.

 

You might wanna lube up those gears before you start backpedaling

 

 

I'm not backpedalling. I made a single observation about a single post from Nolder, all the other discussion was fallout from that. It wasn't multiple defenses of Nolder, it was an ongoing defense of making an observation about the type of post her made.

 

Semantic difference, that I still stand by. I don't think he knew his team mates, I think he was trying to trap those who do. Going back to the points I made when defending to Crusher.

[hazelkrs1]

It's funny how Ape is clinging to whatever thread he can to try to unravel my case, when I'm far from the first to present it. You defended Nolder, plain and simple. I don't care how obvious it would be for you or anything. That WIFOM can die along with your lifeline.

 

@ Songstress

 

Good catch on aemon and Kae. Honestly though, this game is going to play out so differently from regular mafia. With several faction NK's a night, we don't have to be as picky with our lynches because we got enough killing roles to catch whoever slips through the cracks. Either way we should remember all those who fell for Nolder's trap statement that wasn't a trap statement but still worked like one

[hazelkrs1]

This doesn't break down into semantics either, Ape. You were convinced that Nolder was town, or at least that's how you were acting. And saying you're not backpedaling doesn't change the fact that you're, well, backpedaling.

 

I'd like my eggs scrambled please, with a side of cold sweat and a glass of tight sphincter

[John McClane]

This doesn't break down into semantics either, Ape. You were convinced that Nolder was town, or at least that's how you were acting. And saying you're not backpedaling doesn't change the fact that you're, well, backpedaling.

 

I'd like my eggs scrambled please, with a side of cold sweat and a glass of tight sphincter

 

 

In a game with no town, as many people pointed out to me early after I made the initial observation.

 

I'll restate what I said earlier, it was a "townie" post - which to me is indicative of the desire to catch scum, or liars. It didn't strike me as divisive or as a slip.

 

End of story.

 

I'm defending you, because you are replying to my every other post. I was in the middle of chatting with Crusher... you've stolen my attention away from him. Why?

[The Crusher]

Also I agree with Red - very scummy Nolder.

 

 

But not scummy enough for you to vote him... just nudge suspicion to him and see if it sticks?

 

That post by Nolder resonated with me as a "get reactions" post. Which is what he does as town.

 

When he's scum, he isn't purposeful, especially not D1. When scum, he usually latches onto someone D1 for no reason - and advocates that D1 are pointless and we should just get it over with with a quick lynch.

 

1st defense of Nol. Note how he already starts going on about how you can spot if Nol is scum or not. This theme continues.

 

Also I agree with Red - very scummy Nolder.

 

 

But not scummy enough for you to vote him... just nudge suspicion to him and see if it sticks?

 

That post by Nolder resonated with me as a "get reactions" post. Which is what he does as town.

 

When he's scum, he isn't purposeful, especially not D1. When scum, he usually latches onto someone D1 for no reason - and advocates that D1 are pointless and we should just get it over with with a quick lynch.

 

 

Agree with this. So if you will excuse me Im gonna go shoot myself and burn the remains.

 

unvote

 

vote tinahell

 

 

 

Crusher has spent the entire game talkin junk about Ape, using their relationship on JN as a pretext. Distancing much, especially when acting exasperated about ACTUALLY agreeing with him?

 

 

I agree that Nol is acting like Nol D1 town.

 

Tina, you are coming off slightly scummy.

 

I have to go to a 2 hour meeting *shoot me now*. BBL

 

more defense of Nol

 

if she was part of your faction wo9uldn't you alwready know it?

 

and this right here is the best ping all game.

 

VOTE: NOL

 

Really, Red? Seems like an interesting choice for "best ping," especially for someone that's played a billion games like you have.

 

Key comes out to semi-defend Nol, attacking Red's case at the same time. Key has me worried this game, there were a couple of other posts I didn't grab cause I was already pulling so many, but at one point she came on thread to admonish an inactive, when she's been fairly inactive as well. Add to that the fact that she also brought back up the whole greyjoy argument right when more people were starting to pay attention to Nol. Strong FOS so far at everyone I've quoted.

 

Also I agree with Red - very scummy Nolder.

 

 

But not scummy enough for you to vote him... just nudge suspicion to him and see if it sticks?

 

That post by Nolder resonated with me as a "get reactions" post. Which is what he does as town.

 

When he's scum, he isn't purposeful, especially not D1. When scum, he usually latches onto someone D1 for no reason - and advocates that D1 are pointless and we should just get it over with with a quick lynch.

funny, I thought it was more of a "I'm drunk and I want to know what the hell this guy is talking about" post

 

Nol admits himself it wasn't a trap statement (slippin and slidin away!)

 

Alright, 2 things.

 

 

1. Tina is pinging me on the Greyjoy thing. Pushing that just a little hard. I mean, it's one thing to kind of breadcrumb who you are, but you're just going for overkill, as though... There is 32 people in this game, not enough to have all of house Greyjoy as part of the characters. I am betting that the role you were given as a fake claim is a Greyjoy. So, yeah.

 

2. I never thought I would agree with Red, but FoS Nolder. THIS post. I have no idea who else is in my faction. I am more than certain that I am not the only one like that. Given that statement, it seems to me as though you must known who is in your faction, which means you are probably a hindrance against others.

 

 

Unvote: Red

 

VOTE: NOLDER

 

 

it's funny that you take my question as confirmation that I'm aligned with anyone when it's just as likely I asked because I have no idea how the factions work and was digging for info

just looking for an excuse to pile on pressure obviously

Unvote: Panda

Vote: Christine

 

 

I've got to agree with the Nolderp here. Christine's drawing short-sighted conclusions about why Nolder would have asked that question. The fact she's played way more games with him than I have, and I see what he was doing and she doesn't makes me question her actual agenda... seems like she's building a presumptuous case on an easy lynch candidate. When the reality is he just asked a trap-style question to see how peeps react.

 

If we were to lynch either of them, I'd go Christine. Frankly, IF Nolderp is up to no good, it will become obvious sooner than later, and he's easy to take out later. For now though, I am getting a strong town read on him.

 

Elementary Dear Watson: anyone who has a "strong town read" on someone on day 1, ESPECIALLY in a game like this, is just screaming out "please lynch me!!!" OP says it, the lines between town and mafia are somewhat blurred for this game. Because of that, I'm really not spending any time thinking of who I have "town" reads on.

 

Been awhile since I played here so not much to Meta on other than you being an ape that is fun to kill, pac being a mule that is fun to kill, nolder being nolder easy to kill and tx being hess and not so much fun to kill but fun anyways.

 

Tinahell and Christine seem to stick out to me. I agree with Nolders post being set to draw a reaction as well as him being a soft target.

 

Crusher even says this after Nol said it was him reacting honestly while drunk mafiaing. Ping

 

I think Tina is acting slightly scummy and could vote for her. Christine is also sticking out. Like I said earlier, Nol appears to be day 1 town. He's easy to spot as scum.

 

I don't have time to look through the thread for anything solid since I have to go run some errands for work. I'll hopefully have time during lunch and after 3 this afternoon.

 

Repeats the party line of "Nol is easy to read as scum, he's most assuredly town in this game" when town means... what exactly? Town means they're part of your faction? Well mebbe Ape and Leelers are right in a sense, Nol was town... part of THEIR town :pointsfingeraccusingly:

 

So, I think we have a fairly good shot of taking out some more Lannisters by studying this group of peeps. Ape is obviously at the top of the list so I'll keep my vote on him, but Crusher, Leelou, and Keyholder all have my attention as well. I don't think it takes a rocket scientist either to figure out that the Lannisters are probably EVERYONE'S enemy and are the closest thing we have to scum in this game, so fire away factions!

 

 

 

And yes, I realize I'll prob get NK'ed now by the Lannisters. Well go ahead you mangy lions! Waste a shot on me!

 

 

The potential for Nolder to be getting lynched just cause he is Nolder is always their. At the point these post where made I DID agree with Ape. When Nolder flipped Lannister I changed my tune. At JN Crusher and Ape brawling is normal.

[The Crusher]

Vote Ape

 

 

Vote APE

 

 

vote ape

 

 

 

IS THE APE DEAD YET??

 

 

Vote JF80 for quitting.

 

 

Interesting.

 

You're interesting.

 

Vote Paperplates

 

 

Vote JF80 for quitting.

 

How do you pronounce your username? It reads as "big homo" to me. We need a pronunciation guide around here.

 

Sigh, Unvote Vote 80, before he's banned anyway.

 

 

UNVOTE VOTE APE. It's for the best.

 

Did we start back at the beginning of day 1? What a fascinating collection of votes with no attempt at an explanation.

 

Not to say that I don't think Ape deserves to die, but he does seem to be doing some good for the game right now, unlike a few other people who have contributed nothing but spam and content-less votes.

 

And he makes a very good point:

 

24 people left, and Smash has 5 posts. One of which was him hinting at having night action results before all night actions were submitted.

 

Smash has said nothing since he appeared to be threatening some sort of night action on N1.

 

wow not very active but i have a little surprise for you all tomorrow.

 

should get the ape rolling a bit. Wait .... nm

 

He's the one most in need of some pressure right now IMO.

 

Vote Smash

 

 

Personally I think the ape dying today is the way to go. First... if we kill him today he won't be here tomorrow. Second... he's an ape just like the one that tore that nice ladies face off while back Third...he was protecting Nolder like he gave birth to him. fourth... three wifs of an experomental Alzhimers drug and he and his type will rule us all fifth... Nolder was in faction my crew gots beef with sixth... good chance moneky is too seventh... killing monkeys is fun and it saves baby seals

 

 

Fist of all, in general, I don't defend team mates in thread. Ever. I come from the same line of thinking as CTM, bus team mates at every chance. Then wrap up the win on my own.

 

Second of all, your logic is flawed. We are playing in a game where people are in factions, but don't know their team mates. Look at his alignment, he was "House of Lannister" which indicates a faction. Which would mean he didn't know his team mates, and his team mates didn't know him. So explain to me how I defended him?

 

I might be wrong but from what we have seen the Lannisters seem to closest thing we have to scum in this game. Seems so from what I have seen. So I would imagine they would have a QT and be allowed to communicate off thread. In the beginning of the game it was obvious at least one faction could communicate off thread just by peoples reaction to stuff. Maybe it was just the cops (cult). But I think the Lannisters could too.

 

My logic isn;t flawed just incomplete dude.

 

Truth is monkey I was kinda cool with you play and even Nolders until he flipped.

[鲍勃不是我的名字]

Aiel Heart will be replacing Smash.

 

Unvote

 

Rereading now.

[Songstress]

@ Songstress

 

Good catch on aemon and Kae. Honestly though, this game is going to play out so differently from regular mafia. With several faction NK's a night, we don't have to be as picky with our lynches because we got enough killing roles to catch whoever slips through the cracks. Either way we should remember all those who fell for Nolder's trap statement that wasn't a trap statement but still worked like one

 

You have a point there... and with the focus on Ape and his utterly fascinating reactions this morning it may be difficult to pry anything out of the lurkers today.

 

By the time I get home from work this afternoon, if the situation has not changed drastically, I'll likely change my vote. If nothing else, I want to see how close my notes are to reality.

[JF80]

As backup tree stump I declare that we should kill the Ape.

 

Unvote vote Ape

[鲍勃不是我的名字]

Alright. You know what. Here is a reveal.

 

 

I am in a faction, and I have no idea who else is in it.

 

This post stinks. I dont buy this reveal at all. Its way to convenient to claim you do not know your Teammates, but are on a faction. Right after discussion of, if all factions are aware of each other. I want to see what you are hiding, by making this flimsy reveal. Vote Christine.

 

As for lynching inactivity, I dont know if I am ready to head down that road yet, I would rather give the Mod time to replace them if they cant stay active.

 

 

So, Trench, in a discussion on the topic of whether faction members are aware of each other you find it suspicious that someone responds that they, in fact, do not know who their faction members are? That logic has a few wholes in it. That said, there is only one faction that I see being in that situation: unaligned survivor. Since I am curious to find out if that is the case and probably won't trust her if she says that's what she is...

 

VOTE CHRISTINE

 

Also keeping my eye on Trench for that seriously flawed logic.

 

On the re-read from Day 2. Trench's logic made absolutely zero sense and its a discussion I would like to return to.

 

Vote: Trench

[trench]

Alright. You know what. Here is a reveal.

 

 

I am in a faction, and I have no idea who else is in it.

 

This post stinks. I dont buy this reveal at all. Its way to convenient to claim you do not know your Teammates, but are on a faction. Right after discussion of, if all factions are aware of each other. I want to see what you are hiding, by making this flimsy reveal. Vote Christine.

 

As for lynching inactivity, I dont know if I am ready to head down that road yet, I would rather give the Mod time to replace them if they cant stay active.

 

 

So, Trench, in a discussion on the topic of whether faction members are aware of each other you find it suspicious that someone responds that they, in fact, do not know who their faction members are? That logic has a few wholes in it. That said, there is only one faction that I see being in that situation: unaligned survivor. Since I am curious to find out if that is the case and probably won't trust her if she says that's what she is...

 

VOTE CHRISTINE

 

Also keeping my eye on Trench for that seriously flawed logic.

 

On the re-read from Day 2. Trench's logic made absolutely zero sense and its a discussion I would like to return to.

 

Vote: Trench

 

Zero sense? I already said it once, just because you dont agree with the post, does not make the logic faulty. I saw a claim I did not buy and I voted for it. What more is there to talk about.

 

Also I dont like the Ape train going on right now. Both night kills point to 2 factions setting up Ape for an easy kill, and I would bet money that the people who sent those kills in already have teammates on Ape's train.

[鲍勃不是我的名字]

Alright. You know what. Here is a reveal.

 

 

I am in a faction, and I have no idea who else is in it.

 

This post stinks. I dont buy this reveal at all. Its way to convenient to claim you do not know your Teammates, but are on a faction. Right after discussion of, if all factions are aware of each other. I want to see what you are hiding, by making this flimsy reveal. Vote Christine.

 

As for lynching inactivity, I dont know if I am ready to head down that road yet, I would rather give the Mod time to replace them if they cant stay active.

 

 

So, Trench, in a discussion on the topic of whether faction members are aware of each other you find it suspicious that someone responds that they, in fact, do not know who their faction members are? That logic has a few wholes in it. That said, there is only one faction that I see being in that situation: unaligned survivor. Since I am curious to find out if that is the case and probably won't trust her if she says that's what she is...

 

VOTE CHRISTINE

 

Also keeping my eye on Trench for that seriously flawed logic.

 

On the re-read from Day 2. Trench's logic made absolutely zero sense and its a discussion I would like to return to.

 

Vote: Trench

 

Zero sense? I already said it once, just because you dont agree with the post, does not make the logic faulty. I saw a claim I did not buy and I voted for it. What more is there to talk about.

 

Also I dont like the Ape train going on right now. Both night kills point to 2 factions setting up Ape for an easy kill, and I would bet money that the people who sent those kills in already have teammates on Ape's train.

 

Are you still thinking that factions know who each other and they can communicate? Or have you changed your story?

[John McClane]

 

The potential for Nolder to be getting lynched just cause he is Nolder is always their. At the point these post where made I DID agree with Ape. When Nolder flipped Lannister I changed my tune. At JN Crusher and Ape brawling is normal.

 

 

Yeah, this dawned on me while I was walking to my office just now.

 

You were the first to agree with me about Nolder's post sounding "townie", which could have been you using my stupid inclination to say every thought out loud to protect YOUR own teammate in Nolder... and now that he turns up dead you are immediately using my so-called "defense" of him against me.

 

That or you killed Nolder to frame me.

 

The way you've come out on this day phase against me, it definitely feels manufactured. Like a setup.

[John McClane]

Vote Ape

 

 

Vote APE

 

 

vote ape

 

 

 

IS THE APE DEAD YET??

 

 

Vote JF80 for quitting.

 

 

Interesting.

 

You're interesting.

 

Vote Paperplates

 

 

Vote JF80 for quitting.

 

How do you pronounce your username? It reads as "big homo" to me. We need a pronunciation guide around here.

 

Sigh, Unvote Vote 80, before he's banned anyway.

 

 

UNVOTE VOTE APE. It's for the best.

 

Did we start back at the beginning of day 1? What a fascinating collection of votes with no attempt at an explanation.

 

Not to say that I don't think Ape deserves to die, but he does seem to be doing some good for the game right now, unlike a few other people who have contributed nothing but spam and content-less votes.

 

And he makes a very good point:

 

24 people left, and Smash has 5 posts. One of which was him hinting at having night action results before all night actions were submitted.

 

Smash has said nothing since he appeared to be threatening some sort of night action on N1.

 

wow not very active but i have a little surprise for you all tomorrow.

 

should get the ape rolling a bit. Wait .... nm

 

He's the one most in need of some pressure right now IMO.

 

Vote Smash

 

 

Personally I think the ape dying today is the way to go. First... if we kill him today he won't be here tomorrow. Second... he's an ape just like the one that tore that nice ladies face off while back Third...he was protecting Nolder like he gave birth to him. fourth... three wifs of an experomental Alzhimers drug and he and his type will rule us all fifth... Nolder was in faction my crew gots beef with sixth... good chance moneky is too seventh... killing monkeys is fun and it saves baby seals

 

 

Fist of all, in general, I don't defend team mates in thread. Ever. I come from the same line of thinking as CTM, bus team mates at every chance. Then wrap up the win on my own.

 

Second of all, your logic is flawed. We are playing in a game where people are in factions, but don't know their team mates. Look at his alignment, he was "House of Lannister" which indicates a faction. Which would mean he didn't know his team mates, and his team mates didn't know him. So explain to me how I defended him?

 

I might be wrong but from what we have seen the Lannisters seem to closest thing we have to scum in this game. Seems so from what I have seen. So I would imagine they would have a QT and be allowed to communicate off thread. In the beginning of the game it was obvious at least one faction could communicate off thread just by peoples reaction to stuff. Maybe it was just the cops (cult). But I think the Lannisters could too.

 

My logic isn;t flawed just incomplete dude.

 

Truth is monkey I was kinda cool with you play and even Nolders until he flipped.

 

 

What makes you say the Lannisters are the closest thing to scum this game? There is nothing in the information we have at our disposal to suggest this.

 

Nolder might have lied about being able to talk to his teammates. In fact, I'd bet he did. He was vanilla, that's exactly the type of thing he does as vanilla.

 

So we have no idea if Nolder was lying or not. Other than that, what do you know that makes it conclusive that Lannister = scum?