(ADVANCED) Naruto Mafia GAME OVER!

[hotpocket2006]

Case 2.

 

 

 

Duh.

 

Duh?

[WWWwombat]

Btw, Amega eventually told me that if a tracker, doc, and I all targeted the doc, the tracker would see that the doc tried to target him/herself and was blocked. Was trying to get Hoof to say if he knew Ishy was blocked or not but it's too late now.

[amegakure]

OFFICAL VOTE COUNT:

 

MESH: (2) soy, ishy,

ISHY:(2) wombat, mesh

wombat (6)john, locke, corrosive, hoof, ishy, levity

with 11 alive it takes 6 to lynch.

 

Deadline Thursday 9:00 pm central

 

and thats a lynch: WOMBAT:

 

Its now night:

 

NARUTO DUEL:

CASE 1: (1) Mesh

CASE 2: (1) ishy

[hotpocket2006]

I'm leaning more towards voting Case 1. I don't like the part in case 2 that says something along the lines "even if they are town, they aren't useful so screw em" This is a numbers game and we're getting down to it, with possibly two kills tonight...

[John McClane]

I'm leaning more towards voting Case 1. I don't like the part in case 2 that says something along the lines "even if they are town, they aren't useful so screw em" This is a numbers game and we're getting down to it, with possibly two kills tonight...

 

I'm confused tbh.

 

I don't like that line in Case 2 either, so I thought I was supposed to vote for Case 2, as in I get rid of Case 2's author.

 

It sounds like you are thinking about it the opposite way, voting for Case 1, because you want to get rid of the Case 2 author?

 

@ MOD --- can you clear this up?

 

If we believe Case 1 is town, should we vote to kill Case 2's author by voting "Case 2"?

 

Or if we believe Case 2 is town, should we vote to kill Case 1's author by voting "Case 1"?

 

Please advise.

[hotpocket2006]

I'm leaning more towards voting Case 1. I don't like the part in case 2 that says something along the lines "even if they are town, they aren't useful so screw em" This is a numbers game and we're getting down to it, with possibly two kills tonight...

 

I'm confused tbh.

 

I don't like that line in Case 2 either, so I thought I was supposed to vote for Case 2, as in I get rid of Case 2's author.

 

It sounds like you are thinking about it the opposite way, voting for Case 1, because you want to get rid of the Case 2 author?

 

@ MOD --- can you clear this up?

 

If we believe Case 1 is town, should we vote to kill Case 2's author by voting "Case 2"?

 

Or if we believe Case 2 is town, should we vote to kill Case 1's author by voting "Case 1"?

 

Please advise.

 

Oh lol well then I'm super confused now >.<

[amegakure]

okay you vote for the case that you think is the best. And as a result the weaker case will end in an execution.

[mmeeshal]

I'm confused tbh.

 

I don't like that line in Case 2 either, so I thought I was supposed to vote for Case 2, as in I get rid of Case 2's author.

 

It sounds like you are thinking about it the opposite way, voting for Case 1, because you want to get rid of the Case 2 author?

 

@ MOD --- can you clear this up?

 

If we believe Case 1 is town, should we vote to kill Case 2's author by voting "Case 2"?

 

Or if we believe Case 2 is town, should we vote to kill Case 1's author by voting "Case 1"?

 

Please advise.

I think that's the same type of voting in both scenarios, actually.

 

I think you mean:

 

If we believe that the person described in Case 1 is town, should we vote to kill the person described in Case 2 by voting "Case 2"?

 

Or if we believe that the person described in Case 1 is town, should we vote to kill Case 1's author by voting "Case 1"?

 

That should be more clarifying.

[mmeeshal]

okay you vote for the case that you think is the best. And as a result the weaker case will end in an execution.

This honestly doesn't clear it up, Amega. What is "best," and what is "weaker?"

 

Like, if I think the case in case 1 is more solid, if I vote for case 1 and everyone does, does the person in case 2 die?

[Levity]

I assumed that it would be that voting for case one would mean that the author of case one lives, while the author of case two dies, and vice-versa.

 

Hmmm.

[John E. Kelley]

I thought it meant that the "subject" of the case died, not the "author".

[mmeeshal]

I guess that makes sense...I am too tired to be thinking about this, I guess. XD It just really confuses me for some reason. Not even joking.

[mmeeshal]

-.- My post was toward Levity, not Ishy.....

 

Now I'm confused again.

[John E. Kelley]

And I voted Case 2 due to thinking the subject would die. The subject of the case was said to support Wom, hence my vote.

[John McClane]

okay you vote for the case that you think is the best. And as a result the weaker case will end in an execution.

 

So, if we feel Case 1 is pro-town - we vote Case 1, and then Case 2's author dies?

[amegakure]

If we believe that the person described in Case 1 is town, we vote to kill the person described in Case 2 by voting Case 1

@john. correct

[John E. Kelley]

Then I will Unvote. Vote Case 1.

[John McClane]

If we believe that the person described in Case 1 is town, we vote to kill the person described in Case 2 by voting Case 1

@john. correct

 

You realize you paraphrased me, and changed the meaning making it confusing once again?

 

Listen.

 

Use the word author, please.

 

Each author is trying to convince us that they are town, and the other author is scum.

 

If you feel the author of Case 1 is town, then vote to kill the author of Case 2 - by voting "Case 2"

 

If you feel the author of Case 2 is town, then vote to kill the author of Case 1 - by voting "Case 1"

 

If there are more votes for "Case 2" that author dies. Meaning the majority felt the Case 2 author was scum and the Case 1 author is town.

 

Got it?

 

Stop talking about "people described by" it is convoluting the instructions. Just start the vote over from here, based on what I just outlined in bold.

[keyholder21]

Sorry I wasn't around today guys - crazy busy at work and at home. Only able to get on for snippets today. I'm headed to bed, so I'll catch myself up and discuss my thoughts in the morning.

[mmeeshal]

If we believe that the person described in Case 1 is town, we vote to kill the person described in Case 2 by voting Case 1

@john. correct

 

You realize you paraphrased me, and changed the meaning making it confusing once again?

 

Listen.

 

Use the word author, please.

 

Each author is trying to convince us that they are town, and the other author is scum.

 

If you feel the author of Case 1 is town, then vote to kill the author of Case 2 - by voting "Case 2"

 

If you feel the author of Case 2 is town, then vote to kill the author of Case 1 - by voting "Case 1"

 

If there are more votes for "Case 2" that author dies. Meaning the majority felt the Case 2 author was scum and the Case 1 author is town.

 

Got it?

 

Stop talking about "people described by" it is convoluting the instructions. Just start the vote over from here, based on what I just outlined in bold.

I just skimmed your post, but I think Amega was actually quoting me, since that's word-for-word what I said in my post, PLUS it has my color code.

[amegakure]

NO!

you will not mod the mod.

 

 

It is very simple. The IF 6 people vote for case 1 then the author of case 2 dies

 

IF 6 people vote for case 2 then the author of case 1 dies.

 

RESTART:

 

NARUTO DUEL COUNT:

case 1:

case 2:

 

P.S. i just relized mesh was incorrect.

[mmeeshal]

All right, now that that is clarified....

 

Case 1

 

(also, I wasn't "incorrect" because I was presenting an "either-or" option and you only quoted one. The one you picked was wrong, but I believe the other would have been correct, then)

[mmeeshal]

DANGIT.

 

Case 1

[Matty boii]

Vote: Case 1

[SBoydW]

Sorry I haven't been around much. I work third shift and all these in-depth discussions have been happening when I'm either asleep or at work (where I only have internet access on break and lunch). Any who... Case 1