[Advanced/Experimental] Game of Thrones Mafia

[DPR]

  On 8/16/2011 at 12:51 AM, Verbal32 said:

@dude: you weren't the first to use Cromwell in a mafia game? Who did it first?

 

He was the first to use it in a game - he just means he didn't invent the terminology.

 

 

 

[Naeann]

So....

 

Sharrow is a mean chick.

 

Ape is ... Apey.

 

Jackie D is doing his usual way out in left field notions.

 

Boo Boo thinks Sharrow is female.

 

Boo Boo is not acting at all like a new person to a heavy game and I still don't buy it.

 

DPR hasn't gotten drunk yet.

 

Barm has bad teeth and drinks alot of beer?

 

Alys and FDM are getting special treatment from the Jets boys.

 

JF80 has a goal to tell everyone to #14.

 

I think that about sums it up?

 

Oh! And Barm was very insistant that the dude is, in fact, a dude... because otherwise it would ruin his mancrush on him.

[Sedai]

How is ny thinking out of left feild?

[CTM]

is the ape dead yet?

[Sedai]

  On 8/16/2011 at 2:10 AM, CTM said:

is the ape dead yet?

 

I'm trying but people seem to want him around.

[Sharrow]

  On 8/15/2011 at 11:27 PM, BooBoo said:

Vote Sharrow

 

She doesnt seem very nice.

 

lol, I guess I deserve that.

[John McClane]

  On 8/16/2011 at 2:10 AM, CTM said:

is the ape dead yet?

 

In your wet dreams.

 

  On 8/16/2011 at 2:14 AM, Jack_D said:

I'm trying but people seem to want him around.

 

Okay, let me flip the script and ask you teh same question you ask all the time. Please, provide me an example of how I am scum in one concise post. Thank you.

[BooBoo]

  On 8/16/2011 at 1:24 AM, Naeann said:

So....

 

Sharrow is a mean chick.

 

Ape is ... Apey.

 

Jackie D is doing his usual way out in left field notions.

 

Boo Boo thinks Sharrow is female.

 

Boo Boo is not acting at all like a new person to a heavy game and I still don't buy it.

 

DPR hasn't gotten drunk yet.

 

Barm has bad teeth and drinks alot of beer?

 

Alys and FDM are getting special treatment from the Jets boys.

 

JF80 has a goal to tell everyone to #14.

 

I think that about sums it up?

 

Oh! And Barm was very insistant that the dude is, in fact, a dude... because otherwise it would ruin his mancrush on him.

 

She's not?

 

I'm flattered that you think I'm playing so well that you dont think I'm a newbie. This whole time I've hoping nobody notices how lost I am.

[Sedai]

I don't think your scum ape. I'm a survivor and I don't care who dies as long as I still alive. You were tied for most votes, so I voted you. You are a good player, but you cut your own wrists sometimes when you go into ape mode. At this time in the game, I don't care who dies as long as it isn't me. And if you are a member of a faction, which I'm starting to lean to because of others reactions, then that's a bonus in helping me pick which side I'll chose.

[Hybrid]

  On 8/16/2011 at 12:50 AM, Verbal32 said:

  On 8/15/2011 at 9:03 PM, Hybrid said:

  On 8/15/2011 at 8:42 PM, Sharrow said:

Or Ladies pretending to be men?

 

I'm a dude pretending to be a dude.

 

Though some guys once called me "Sexy Sue Richards." Jerks.

 

Hehe...isn't that from the days of the 'Chan?

 

It was the Superheroes game a couple years back on JN.

[John McClane]

  On 8/16/2011 at 2:59 AM, Jack_D said:

I don't think your scum ape. I'm a survivor and I don't care who dies as long as I still alive. You were tied for most votes, so I voted you. You are a good player, but you cut your own wrists sometimes when you go into ape mode. At this time in the game, I don't care who dies as long as it isn't me. And if you are a member of a faction, which I'm starting to lean to because of others reactions, then that's a bonus in helping me pick which side I'll chose.

 

Ape mode = being wrong about cases (which everyone does, just not with my brash style) and frankly... Ape mode >>>> routinely lying as town, with plan for it to benefit town which is how you play.

[Smash]

  On 8/15/2011 at 11:29 PM, DreadPirateRoberts said:

  On 8/15/2011 at 11:24 PM, Smash said:

  On 8/15/2011 at 7:18 PM, CTM said:

  On 8/15/2011 at 7:16 PM, John McClane said:

Your obsession with me and my insecurity is laughable... you planning to play this game? Or just embarrass yourself by further scheming ways to further sell your theory that I am insecure... a behavior that punctuates your own insecurity I might add.

No it doesn't.. you fool.. If I were insecure I'd be boasting about all my accomplishments and putting it in my avatar

 

 

  On 8/15/2011 at 7:22 PM, John McClane said:

  On 8/15/2011 at 7:18 PM, CTM said:

  On 8/15/2011 at 7:16 PM, John McClane said:

Your obsession with me and my insecurity is laughable... you planning to play this game? Or just embarrass yourself by further scheming ways to further sell your theory that I am insecure... a behavior that punctuates your own insecurity I might add.

No it doesn't.. you fool.. If I were insecure I'd be boasting about all my accomplishments and putting it in my avatar

 

Your incessant need to chase me around in games you aren't even playing in, trying to chip away at my ego, and point out my insecurity... speaks volumes about you, no matter what your signature says you dink.

 

Are you 2 idiots going to be carrying on all game ?

 

That is probably the most incriminating post I have ever seen.

 

Unvote - Vote Smash

 

LOL

 

Tag me Ape

[Sedai]

I just like to lie in this game. It works for me, just as much as Ape mode doesnt work for you. I'm to noble to keep this up with you this game John. I've said my peace.

[John McClane]

  On 8/16/2011 at 3:45 AM, Jack_D said:

I just like to lie in this game. It works for me, just as much as Ape mode doesnt work for you. I'm to noble to keep this up with you this game John. I've said my peace.

 

Keep what up you buffoon? You are voting me, and trying to convince others to do the same... and now you are acting like the victim, because I clarified for others that don't know me exactly what Ape mode is, and also shared with them your tendency to lie as town with reckless abandon.

[slats]

  On 8/16/2011 at 3:10 AM, John McClane said:

  On 8/16/2011 at 2:59 AM, Jack_D said:

I don't think your scum ape. I'm a survivor and I don't care who dies as long as I still alive. You were tied for most votes, so I voted you. You are a good player, but you cut your own wrists sometimes when you go into ape mode. At this time in the game, I don't care who dies as long as it isn't me. And if you are a member of a faction, which I'm starting to lean to because of others reactions, then that's a bonus in helping me pick which side I'll chose.

 

Ape mode = being wrong about cases (which everyone does, just not with my brash style) and frankly... Ape mode >>>> routinely lying as town, with plan for it to benefit town which is how you play.

 

Ape mode = behaving in an over the top belligerent manner, then later claiming it was all a clever ruse.

 

You're arguing a lot with Jack here, but not voting him. Why not?

[Barmacral]

  On 8/16/2011 at 4:40 AM, slats said:

Ape mode = behaving in an over the top belligerent manner, then later claiming it was all a clever ruse.

 

You're arguing a lot with Jack here, but not voting him. Why not?

 

Its probably a part of his clever ruse to get CTM and Pac killed.

[John McClane]

  On 8/16/2011 at 4:40 AM, slats said:

Ape mode = behaving in an over the top belligerent manner, then later claiming it was all a clever ruse.

 

You're arguing a lot with Jack here, but not voting him. Why not?

 

Since when is it a given that you must vote everyone you argue with? Meh.

 

Regardless, I guess its just lost in the details here, but he is voting me and trying to convince others to do so as well. So... I'm defending myself. I'm not making a case on him, I am shooting down any possibility that anyone might take him seriously as he persists in telling others they should vote me.

 

In the process he's revealed and taken on the tone of the victim, read the thread - he drew first blood.

[Lanthirrhos]

  On 8/15/2011 at 9:56 PM, Alys Kinch said:

  On 8/15/2011 at 9:38 PM, Lanthirrhos said:

In fact the only really legitimate argument against no lynching that anyone has proffered, is the existence of a recruiting cult (or other recruiting scum group, although that isn't applicable in this game)

 

Just curious Wombat--does it matter if Die Hard is on a team? Don't you win with him anyways? or are you hinting at being on a team again?

[The subjective argument] Which is why the caveat of “in a mafia game” is necessary. Let’s also go ahead and point out the difference in subjectivity and objectivity of a lynch train with coroner vs lynch train without. Coroner info makes a more solid case. Mod info trumps not mod info every time.

 

How is a recruiting cult not applicable to this game?

 

Sure, mod info trumps non-mod info, but the townie one saves by no lynching (again: that's a statistic assumption, assuming that people are just voting for the sake of a lynch, rather than on a definable logic train) keeps the numbers in the town's favour where they would normally hit an immediate disadvantage by losing one of their number. A live, thinking townie trumps a dead townie every time, epecially when it comes down to a numbers game later. The temporary lack of mod information generally is made up for by a live townie later in the game. (presuming that the townie is active and useful, if not, no lynching to save their life is kinda pointless ) It's not like I push no lynching every game day, just day one when the random is a bit too random. Of course, that's in a more vanilla game anyways. The no lynch debate isn't of much use here at all... (So why am I bothering?)

 

"(or other recruiting scum group, although that isn't applicable in this game)"--by Lanth. That was meant to be separate from the recruiting cult. The cult exists in this game, it is applicable. Other recruiting scum groups are not. My parentheses and their content were erronious I will admit.

 

 

 

  On 8/15/2011 at 9:57 PM, Alys Kinch said:

Lol, Lanth. I just read the caption under your name. I know who you are from waaaaaay back in the day. :)

 

Yeah, people in this game know me better as Lanth. Probably why I'm not dead yet, even if Verbal tries half-heartedly day one every time we play together.

 

 

_______________________________

 

 

I'm not feeling anything particular about lynching McClane. It's not like normal town-mafia dynamics apply here. With so many survivors in the build, a lot of the detriment for a mis-lynch is gone. It really doesn't matter who is lynched to a survivor. Which makes me wonder, who would stick up for a survivor who is being lynched? is anyone defending McClane? (beides me Oh hush, you know you were about to say it) The logic here is meek to be sure, but by that account, we're likely on the path to lynching a survivor, which doesn't really do ANYTHING for anyone, even other survivors (perhaps epecially). so now I'm asking, why do people appear to be interested in accomplishing almost nothing (by the admitedly meek logic that I just spewed out) with today's lynch? That would certainly help some teams now wouldn't it? (before people feel the need to post it; yes, he could just have teamates who wont risk their necks for him, and rightly so. I'm just throwing out one of the alternatives.)

 

I still favour lynching Jack. He's trying a bit too much to appear as a survivor. Why go there on day one unless it's to detract from omething else? Like being on a team for example. Using your own logic Jack, if you are a survivor, your death wont matter to anyone else, and if you are on a team, then it only helps everyone else except those on your team. You appear to be on a team more than anyone else so far, if only for the incessant survivor-hinting.

[Adella]

I would honestly prefer if we lynched a cult member, because while it doesn't matter to me if anyone else dies, as a survivor the game functions the same as normal, I still want the scum to die. While most of us aren't on the same team, as teams of 1, it would still benefit us all more if we would get rid of the cult instead of just anyone. So those who have suggested that they couldn't care less who dies, such as Jack (he is the only one I remember off the top of my head), seem more like the people who are on one of the family teams. Just a thought.

[CTM]

  On 8/16/2011 at 4:40 AM, slats said:

Ape mode = behaving in an over the top belligerent manner, then later claiming it was all a clever ruse.

Pretty much, unless he turned out to be right, then it wasn't a ruse, it was his real thoughts

[CTM]

  On 8/16/2011 at 7:14 AM, Adella said:

I would honestly prefer if we lynched a cult member, because while it doesn't matter to me if anyone else dies, as a survivor the game functions the same as normal, I still want the scum to die. While most of us aren't on the same team, as teams of 1, it would still benefit us all more if we would get rid of the cult instead of just anyone. So those who have suggested that they couldn't care less who dies, such as Jack (he is the only one I remember off the top of my head), seem more like the people who are on one of the family teams. Just a thought.

I don't know which one of you weirdo's laid it out earlier, but eliminating one of the factions seems like a good secondary goal, then the town could focus on killing off the cult... Most likely there's 1 cult member at this point and in a game of 26 we'd have to be extremely lucky to find him. To me it's better to remove as many variables as possible and simplify the game.. So whose a lannister or a stark?

[Sedai]

Lanth, I'm just trying to state the obvious. If John, isn't already a member of a team he will join one. If he chooses an opposite team of the one I choose, then we will be enemies, if he is recruited by the cult we will be enemies, if he stays a survivor, I don't care one bit about him. The only way I would not be interested in lynching him or anyone else is if I ha knowledge of to the team they began as or the team they have chosen. I'm no big loss to the majority, but I'm a major loss to me if I'm lynched this game, so therefore I'm suggesting a viable lynch candidate and giving reason base on game schematics for people to vote the player I suggested. I'm using myself as a survivor because a) it's true, and b) to work out my way of thinking

[John McClane]

  On 8/16/2011 at 11:55 AM, Jack_D said:

Lanth, I'm just trying to state the obvious. If John, isn't already a member of a team he will join one. If he chooses an opposite team of the one I choose, then we will be enemies, if he is recruited by the cult we will be enemies, if he stays a survivor, I don't care one bit about him. The only way I would not be interested in lynching him or anyone else is if I ha knowledge of to the team they began as or the team they have chosen. I'm no big loss to the majority, but I'm a major loss to me if I'm lynched this game, so therefore I'm suggesting a viable lynch candidate and giving reason base on game schematics for people to vote the player I suggested. I'm using myself as a survivor because a) it's true, and b) to work out my way of thinking

 

While this is "the obvious" it is still lazy, and short-sighted. Cult is who we should be hunting. Your assessment that I am a "viable" lynch candidate because CTM and Pac both voted me early, as they do every game, is nothing short of absurd. 2-3 votes doesn't make me any more "viable" than the next train with 1-3 votes on it and at the time there were about 5 trains with 1-3 votes (from memory).

 

If what you've posted above is truly your take on the game, then you'd have been better off quietly hopping ANY bandwagon and keeping quiet about why. Because your agenda can be applied to anyone, tbh. Your insistence pushing my lynch only makes you look shady. The fact that you are pushing lynching survivors so hard, and not cult is why I think your interests align with a cult agenda moreso than any other. Survivors

[DPR]

  On 8/16/2011 at 11:55 AM, Jack_D said:

Lanth, I'm just trying to state the obvious. If John, isn't already a member of a team he will join one. If he chooses an opposite team of the one I choose, then we will be enemies, if he is recruited by the cult we will be enemies, if he stays a survivor, I don't care one bit about him. The only way I would not be interested in lynching him or anyone else is if I ha knowledge of to the team they began as or the team they have chosen. I'm no big loss to the majority, but I'm a major loss to me if I'm lynched this game, so therefore I'm suggesting a viable lynch candidate and giving reason base on game schematics for people to vote the player I suggested. I'm using myself as a survivor because a) it's true, and b) to work out my way of thinking

 

 

I'm strongly considering placing my first real vote on you for using the term "game schematics" and general ass-hattery. Dumping a load of crap logic into D1 isn't helping anyone (and by anyone, I mean anyone). Untie your tongue, lay off the sugar, and quit making faces at the ape just to spam it up.

 

 

[DPR]

  On 8/16/2011 at 12:10 PM, John McClane said:

  On 8/16/2011 at 11:55 AM, Jack_D said:

Lanth, I'm just trying to state the obvious. If John, isn't already a member of a team he will join one. If he chooses an opposite team of the one I choose, then we will be enemies, if he is recruited by the cult we will be enemies, if he stays a survivor, I don't care one bit about him. The only way I would not be interested in lynching him or anyone else is if I ha knowledge of to the team they began as or the team they have chosen. I'm no big loss to the majority, but I'm a major loss to me if I'm lynched this game, so therefore I'm suggesting a viable lynch candidate and giving reason base on game schematics for people to vote the player I suggested. I'm using myself as a survivor because a) it's true, and b) to work out my way of thinking

 

While this is "the obvious" it is still lazy, and short-sighted. Cult is who we should be hunting. Your assessment that I am a "viable" lynch candidate because CTM and Pac both voted me early, as they do every game, is nothing short of absurd. 2-3 votes doesn't make me any more "viable" than the next train with 1-3 votes on it and at the time there were about 5 trains with 1-3 votes (from memory).

 

If what you've posted above is truly your take on the game, then you'd have been better off quietly hopping ANY bandwagon and keeping quiet about why. Because your agenda can be applied to anyone, tbh. Your insistence pushing my lynch only makes you look shady. The fact that you are pushing lynching survivors so hard, and not cult is why I think your interests align with a cult agenda moreso than any other. Survivors

 

The only way he is Cult is if he can't die. And, even then, there is no point to drawing this much attention to himself. This strikes me as more of a Jester role, or at least it would if he didn't do this every game. heh