Jump to content

DRAGONMOUNT

A WHEEL OF TIME COMMUNITY

[Advanced Mafia] Black Ajah - GAME OVER!


Alanna

Recommended Posts

Posted

Vote Count

Leelou (1) - Talmanes

Drew (7) - Blackhoof, Curt, Red, AJ, leelou, Meesh, Csarmi

Red (1) - Aust

Csarmi (1) - BG

BG (3) - Drew, Krak, MrL

 

Not Voting (1): Player

 

With 14 alive, it takes 8 to lynch

 

DEADLINE: THURSDAY, APRIL 14 @ 4PM CST.

  • Replies 758
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

Curt hasn't been the only victim of this logic, either. So here's the logic: I vote for Leelou (who wasn't on the shortlist), therefore I must be protecting someone on the shortlist.

 

This makes no sense, because if I'm protecting one person on the shortlist, I'm really protecting them all (by trying to start a bandwagon for leelou). But this would be a bad play for a mafia member. Scum would focus on one person on the shortlist that was not on their scum team, because people on that list are more vulnerable than someone not on that list.

 

okay, let me ask you something. we have a list that we know has a really good chance of having scum in it (atleast we have a better chance logically hitting scum on that list than off it imo) so the underlined portion of your quote makes no sense.

 

why would the scum want to narrow the number of possible scum on the list? this also goes for NKing anyone on the list as far as i'm concerned too. they'd be stupid to, as it makes it much easier for us to narrow it downand lycnh them. so yes, it makes perfect sense for the scum to try and distract from the list by NKing & attempting to direct a lynch towards someoen who isn't on the list.

 

thsi is also a subtle way, imo, for you to attempt to discredit lynching people off the list with giving yourself an out as well.

 

Hiya,

 

vote Drew as I said I would - for a controlled lynch

 

I'm not sure I can be back today (got a lot of work), but I'll try to login at least once more before deadline.

 

this vote pings me greatly. nothing to say in response to Drew, just a "i said i would vote him, so heres my vote"

 

and also puts Drew back at L-1.

 

Red - to your first point, yes, you're right that it narrows down the shortlist if the scum are on it, but it also buys them another day/kills another town (two after the NK if they get it), and gives them distance from the list, a chance to make a new list, etc. I think it would be worth it for the scum to try to lynch someone on the shortlist not on their scum team, especially because they have a good chance at lynching a scum from the other team. So I disagree that it makes no sense, though your point has to be taken into consideration as well. My main point, though, is that accusing me of being scum for voting for someone not on the shortlist (leelou, the hammer) wasn't fair.

 

BG makes a pretty clear defense of himself, but BG is also smart and wouldn't overreact. But my suspicion is eased a little bit. I quoted your statements about Csarmi because this is exactly what I was talking about - "well, Drew's got votes on him, and I gave myself an out earlier by saying I would vote for him, so now I'm voting for him so I don't miss the lynch." Major FOS at Csarmi if I'm lynched for voting without addressing me at all.

Posted

Sorry I've been a little scarce lately, but I'm busy so that's just the way it is.

At this point, especially when it is L-1, there is no way in hell I'm voting Drew, unless it is necessary for a controlled lynch.

Honestly I think a lot of the 'evidence' on Drew was a little weak. Yes there are Freudian slips, but I think when someone is using hypotheticals it should be a little obvious.

I hope that if Drew gets lynched, he flips scum, but at this point I don't see enough evidence to vote for him, and I won't, unless, like I said, it is that or a random lynch.

I should be able to get on just before the lynch if need be.

 

As for BG, I think better points were made on him than Drew, but I also think that some of them were reaching as well, and Drew just trying to save his own ass, which is understandable.

Posted

Talm i still suspect you cause you opened that whole can of worms on voting Leelou (who has yet to really explain her vote to make it not FOS worthy for me)

 

 

but i agree with what you said for the most part. right now my main reason for being okay with a lynch on Drew is how fast he jumped on the Leelou lynch; for that reason i'd be just as fine with lynching you as well.

 

 

another option i'm leaning towards is CS. that vote on Drew, lack of response to Drews posts & that he's on the list makes him a viable candidate for me as well. i'm willing to either switch my vote to Talm or CS; or leave it on Drew. i'll be here until 3pm CST; but as i stand we do need to make a decision. it's 3 hrs until deadline; if no ones gonna unvote Drew we might as well hammer him and move on. there will be plenty of info to gain from his lynch too no matter which way he flips

Posted

Okie so it seems I did get back in time.

I wasn't sure that I would.

 

I don't know which of you (Drew or BG) is more likely to turn up scum.

Actually, either of you is pretty likely to, given that the shortlist should contain like 2-5 maffia players out of 6.

 

Now yesterday I stated that I would support a controlled lynch and most likely I would vote Drew.

 

Why on Drew?

 

My shortlist:

 

leelou (that hammer)

Blackhoof (jumping around acting scummy)

Drew (most scummy on SLSP for me)

Red (keep pinging me this game)

 

Now even though I found leelou most scummy, I realized we wouldn't be lynching her, as the SLSP members are so much more likely to be scum.

 

Let's take a look at that list:

 

Talmanes, csarmi, Drew, Aust, BG (Tynaal), Song

 

Now Song had been pinging me and her 'L3' vote was quite strange, but her explanation afterwards seemed sincere.

I find Aust the least likely to be scum. I like his posts and seems pro-town for me, even though he seems a little bit inactive.

I don't have a good read on Talmanes.

I find BG scummy with those distracting statistics, but he talks a lot and I don't know what to make of his vote on me.

I like that he's active, however.

 

Actually, I don't find Drew more scummy than others on this list. I believe that he's still better than a random lynch, however.

 

I voted him because he was the only viable alternative as a non-random lynch for me.

 

I also think there is a reasonable chance that he would turn up scum. If he doesn't, we can continue with the next one on the list. That could be BG, most likely?

 

As for lynches building up slow or fast:

 

I don't agree that a lynch building slowly means maffia. Everyone has teammates in this game and I suppose teammates wouldn't be very likely to vote each other, now would they? While we cannot/should not speculate on who's teamed with who (and wouldn't be wise either for several reasons), I thought I should point that out.

 

Now I'll be online till deadline so I'm gonna do some readup here and address some points directly.

Posted

I've got a question for Drew.

 

What would you do when

 

1) there are 11 hours left till the deadline

2) thread is not too active (in # of different people posting)

3) only one person has a reasonable amount of votes on him

4) you're not sure you can be back before the deadline

 

Vote? Not vote?

Vote someone with less votes to provide an alternative or vote someone who is at L-2?

 

I've just had a strange thought, by the way.

What happens if there is a random lynch?

Alanna?

Posted

There's an hour and fifteen minutes left til deadline.

 

If no one is lynched, there might be a random modkill. There might not be. Either way, please remember that if, at any point in this game, no lynch is achieved twice, I will end this game. I take that as a sign that people don't want to play anymore.

Posted

I've got a question for Drew.

 

What would you do when

 

1) there are 11 hours left till the deadline

2) thread is not too active (in # of different people posting)

3) only one person has a reasonable amount of votes on him

4) you're not sure you can be back before the deadline

 

Vote? Not vote?

Vote someone with less votes to provide an alternative or vote someone who is at L-2?

 

I've just had a strange thought, by the way.

What happens if there is a random lynch?

Alanna?

 

Csarmi, you are misleading town in a major way here. Town votes who they think is scum, and a common scum tactic is to convince others that there is only one choice. 11 hours is a loooong time. You could have made a compelling case against someone else, or not voted at all. I was at L-2 when you voted - there would have been no shortage of votes (and likely will be no shortage of votes) before the deadline to get a hammer - 11 hours is too far away to be that concerned about a random lynch. And now, with this comment, done only after Red and I cast suspicion on you...

 

UNVOTE

VOTE CSARMI

 

Maybe now it's too late, but I'm Vanilla Town, unfortunately, and I don't deserve to be lynched. Praying for a miracle here, guys. Three town lynches in a row is bad news bears for this game. There could be 2 NKs tonight.

Posted

Csarmi, you are misleading town in a major way here. Town votes who they think is scum, and a common scum tactic is to convince others that there is only one choice.

 

Yea well there's a good chance that you ARE scum.

 

11 hours is a loooong time.

 

Not in my experience. Maybe it's just that I've played the wrong games so far, but I ran into deadline missed, inacrivity, deadline just met...

 

 

You could have made a compelling case against someone else, or not voted at all.

 

Well I couldn't. Lack of time today + I really don't know... The people pinging me most are leelou and Red. Are you suggesting I should have cased them with so low time left and zero chance to get a lynch on them anyway?

 

 

I was at L-2 when you voted - there would have been no shortage of votes (and likely will be no shortage of votes) before the deadline to get a hammer - 11 hours is too far away to be that concerned about a random lynch. And now, with this comment, done only after Red and I cast suspicion on you...

 

Really? Now there is half an hour left. How many posts, how many votes have you seen today?

Posted

I hate random lynches... but...

 

I don't feel justified voting out Drew right now. I guess we need to take the risk.

Posted

NO LYNCH HAS BEEN ACHIEVED.

 

The Aes Sedai spent the entire day squabbling and could never decide who might be Black Ajah.

 

No one has been lynched today.

 

It is now Night. Please send in your actions by Saturday, April 16 @ Noon CST.

 

I can't find where I originally said it to quote, however, please note: If another day goes by without reaching a lynch, this game will be over. I take that as a sign that players don't want to play anymore. This game can't move forward without lynches. No lynches benefit no one, whether you're mafia or town (except maybe Drew, in this case, since he was up for a lynch :biggrin: )

Posted

if there is, we will know one of two things

-one mafia team has gained a permanent lynch

-there is a third party player running around

 

if there isnt, we know that there is no third party player (assuming that they cannot avoid NK'ing)

 

at least we will have learned something from this.

 

now let us compare the days, with an NK unlikely.

 

Day 3

Vote Count

Leelou (1) - Talmanes

Drew (7) - Blackhoof, Curt, Red, AJ, leelou, Meesh, Csarmi

Red (1) - Aust

Csarmi (1) - BG

BG (3) - Drew, Krak, MrL

 

Not Voting (1): Player

 

 

Day 2

Vote Count:

Blackhoof (3) - Red, Berf, Curt

Drew (1) - Meesh

Wombat (1) - Blackhoof

Berf (9) - Talmanes, Aust, Wombat, Krak, csarmi, Drew, Song, BG, leelou

 

Not Voting (2): Player, AJ

 

Day 1

Vote Count:

Aust (2) - Meesh, Phelix

Meesh (1) - Thorum(AJ)

Red (2) - Player, Wombat

Phelix (10) - Berf, Song, Blackhoof, Tynaal(BG), Aust, Drew, Curt, Talmanes, csarmi, Red

Blackhoof (1) - Krak

 

Not Voting (1): Mav, leelou

 

Okay, i have divided the players into three categories:

Brown: On all lynches

Pink: On two lynches

Blue: On one lynch

Green: On none

 

We can see now that there was ONE person on every single lynch...

csarmi

 

Major FOS@csarmi.

 

also, one person was on NONE of the lynches

Player

 

i think that we can safely say that Player is innocent.... or is making his mafia teammates tear their hair out in frustration. :P

 

i will make changes if there is an NK. lets hope not :P

Posted

I missed the lynch. this time that wasnt my intention at all. Im so sorry guys I thought I had more time. Ill be here all guns blazing tomorrow.

Ive got my performance tonight and after that im on holiday so ill have heaps of time to get my head in gear

Posted

Blackhoof,

 

1) I don't think you should treat those three days the same in your coloring (I suppose that voting days 1/2 shouldn't be the same as voting on days 1/3, for example)

2) Show the Song/MrL change.

3) Major FOS @ me for playing the game?

If I'm the only one on all the three lynches, no wonder we didn't get a lynch today. Note how all the other five of the 'Scary Six' went for some not-very-meaningful votes. If 5 players out of 14 kind of refuse to vote (refuse to be on a lynch, rather), what are the chances to get 8 players on a lynch?

Posted

In all fairness I have to say that Drew couldn't be expected to vote for himself so that's rather 4 players spreading their votes all around.

Posted

I dont like pink, can we use another color?

 

*mutters angrily under his breath*

 

I missed the lynch. this time that wasnt my intention at all. Im so sorry guys I thought I had more time. Ill be here all guns blazing tomorrow.

Ive got my performance tonight and after that im on holiday so ill have heaps of time to get my head in gear

 

dont worry, this means that either you are a very cunning scum who purposefully missed lynches to look innocent, a hopeless scum playerwho keeps costing his team NK's or innocent.

 

so missing the lynches isnt a bad thing, really.

 

Blackhoof,

 

1) I don't think you should treat those three days the same in your coloring (I suppose that voting days 1/2 shouldn't be the same as voting on days 1/3, for example)

2) Show the Song/MrL change.

3) Major FOS @ me for playing the game?

If I'm the only one on all the three lynches, no wonder we didn't get a lynch today. Note how all the other five of the 'Scary Six' went for some not-very-meaningful votes. If 5 players out of 14 kind of refuse to vote (refuse to be on a lynch, rather), what are the chances to get 8 players on a lynch?

 

1) well, i suppose i could go more in depth, but that would just be confusing for everyone... even me :P

2)why? we know it happened, and Alanna didnt include it, so it isn't important enough to include, especially since everyone knows it happened.

3) no, major FOS at you for being the sole person on every lynch, and being on lynches is good for... you guessed it, the mafia! yay! :D

an interesting point you raise, csarmi. several possibilities for the mass-move away

-coincidence

-seeing their trouble, they all coordinate in their scum QT to avoid the lynch, to avoid suspicion

-seeing their trouble, they all decide independently to avoid the lynch, to avoid suspicion

 

if reason 1 or 3 is the right one, you are still suspicious as theonly one on all lynches.

if reason 2 is right, you are free.

 

unfortunately we have no way of knowing.

Posted

2) why? we know it happened, and Alanna didnt include it, so it isn't important enough to include, especially since everyone knows it happened.

 

Because your list is confusing as it shows 'Song' on one list and MrL on the other?

Posted

3) no, major FOS at you for being the sole person on every lynch, and being on lynches is good for... you guessed it, the mafia! yay! :D

 

Well lynching is the town's way to win the game ...

No lynch, no maffia down.

No lynch, no game.

 

Sorry Blackhoof, but not voting is just something that I will NOT do just to not look scummy - even if others seem to.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...