Hackers Mafia - Game Thread [Game Over]

[Eldrick4221]

I'm curious about you bringing it up again though, dice.

 

What did you expect him to say about it? Why is his not mentioning it weird to you?

[Shad_]

NotBob is offline already.  >_>

[randomh3r0]

 

 

I'm inclined to agree but I can't let my emotions rule my game play anymore or I won't have fun when I play

So I will wait for nyn to calm down and then post some more

Zander btw, having exactly one town read is not as good a look for someone I want in my town core

Gimme MOAR

 

Its guilty till proven innocent in my world brother.

There are 9 villagers and 3 wolves

 

You have 3 to 1 odds on villagers

 

Seriously just find villagers and win games

 

 

You keep talking about finding villagers, but I've been waiting for pages now to hear why the names you've picked currently are your "villagers". If you have some insight that we've missed or some vetting process you've put them through, it would help town to know it. 

 

You can claim you're being proactive, but alienating half the players off the bat doesn't exactly seem like the best way to find townies OR scum - just a way to form a clique that could be full of both. Unless you bring your logic / reads to the whole group, you're not really helping. 

[monstrman]

Every villager in this game picks a name out of a hat it's a villager 8/11 times

 

Add reads in to that and I wonder how often you will successfully reason villagers

 

Innocent until proven guilty > guilty until proven innocent

[Shad_]

You can claim you're being proactive, but alienating half the players off the bat doesn't exactly seem like the best way to find townies OR scum - just a way to form a clique that could be full of both.

What did you read that you would consider alienating?

[monstrman]

 

 

 

I'm inclined to agree but I can't let my emotions rule my game play anymore or I won't have fun when I play

So I will wait for nyn to calm down and then post some more

Zander btw, having exactly one town read is not as good a look for someone I want in my town core

Gimme MOAR

 

 

Its guilty till proven innocent in my world brother.

There are 9 villagers and 3 wolves

You have 3 to 1 odds on villagers

Seriously just find villagers and win games

 

You keep talking about finding villagers, but I've been waiting for pages now to hear why the names you've picked currently are your "villagers". If you have some insight that we've missed or some vetting process you've put them through, it would help town to know it. 

 

You can claim you're being proactive, but alienating half the players off the bat doesn't exactly seem like the best way to find townies OR scum - just a way to form a clique that could be full of both. Unless you bring your logic / reads to the whole group, you're not really helping.

 

 

 

I'm inclined to agree but I can't let my emotions rule my game play anymore or I won't have fun when I play

So I will wait for nyn to calm down and then post some more

Zander btw, having exactly one town read is not as good a look for someone I want in my town core

Gimme MOAR

 

 

Its guilty till proven innocent in my world brother.

There are 9 villagers and 3 wolves

You have 3 to 1 odds on villagers

Seriously just find villagers and win games

 

You keep talking about finding villagers, but I've been waiting for pages now to hear why the names you've picked currently are your "villagers". If you have some insight that we've missed or some vetting process you've put them through, it would help town to know it. 

 

You can claim you're being proactive, but alienating half the players off the bat doesn't exactly seem like the best way to find townies OR scum - just a way to form a clique that could be full of both. Unless you bring your logic / reads to the whole group, you're not really helping.

Playing again with randoms was a bad choice

 

I stick to my site from now on

 

I have been helpful, sorry you don't see it that way.

[Eldrick4221]

 

 

 

I'm inclined to agree but I can't let my emotions rule my game play anymore or I won't have fun when I play

So I will wait for nyn to calm down and then post some more

Zander btw, having exactly one town read is not as good a look for someone I want in my town core

Gimme MOAR

Its guilty till proven innocent in my world brother.

There are 9 villagers and 3 wolves

 

You have 3 to 1 odds on villagers

 

Seriously just find villagers and win games

You keep talking about finding villagers, but I've been waiting for pages now to hear why the names you've picked currently are your "villagers". If you have some insight that we've missed or some vetting process you've put them through, it would help town to know it.

 

You can claim you're being proactive, but alienating half the players off the bat doesn't exactly seem like the best way to find townies OR scum - just a way to form a clique that could be full of both. Unless you bring your logic / reads to the whole group, you're not really helping.

Or he's scum and therefore not fully trying in the first place.

[monstrman]

I explained already why having a wolf in the group doesn't matter at all but he's not reading my posts

[randomh3r0]

 

You can claim you're being proactive, but alienating half the players off the bat doesn't exactly seem like the best way to find townies OR scum - just a way to form a clique that could be full of both.

What did you read that you would consider alienating?

 

 

He picked out about 5 names claiming them as his "town core" - for anyone not asked to weigh in, or not mentioned as the target of his question, that is alienating at this point. IMO

[monstrman]

Ok no one is reading my posts

 

Well so much for ever being taken seriously

 

I keep reading then carry on village

 

[V]randomhero[/v] for shading me on the sideline

[randomh3r0]

I explained already why having a wolf in the group doesn't matter at all but he's not reading my posts

 

Oh trust me, I'm reading every one of your posts. I don't care if you think having a wolf in the group doesn't matter, what I care about is that you tell us why you chose those particular names in the first place. Which you have NOT answered yet

[Eldrick4221]

 

You can claim you're being proactive, but alienating half the players off the bat doesn't exactly seem like the best way to find townies OR scum - just a way to form a clique that could be full of both.

What did you read that you would consider alienating?

He asked 5 (3+hydra) people for their read on Nyce. He didn't ask the rest. He won't say why he asked us.

 

That doesn't sound like alienating to you?

[randomh3r0]

Eldrick, Shad, Zander, Calder what do you think of nyce?

 

Since Man is voting me now, I'll point this out again: all I'm asking is why you asked the names posted above that question without asking anyone else. 

[monstrman]

Yes, I have. When I first made them

 

So you're not reading my posts

 

They are playing in line with how I generally put them when I see them playing in other games based on past experience and it's not wolfy

 

I am picking people as villagers because I have good odds

 

Combine the two

 

What do you have

 

Peanut Butter and jelly not an ostrich as you're trying to imply

[Eldrick4221]

[V]manbat [/v]

 

Ignoring random's questioning isn't being helpful. His asking some and not others is weird.

 

If manbat is scum, random likely town.

[randomh3r0]

Yes, I have. When I first made them

 

So you're not reading my posts

 

They are playing in line with how I generally put them when I see them playing in other games based on past experience and it's not wolfy

 

I am picking people as villagers because I have good odds

 

Combine the two

 

What do you have

 

Peanut Butter and jelly not an ostrich as you're trying to imply

 

I think I'm probably reading your posts as carefully as anyone in this game. I've quoted enough of them to prove that. If you'd already explained this, then why was it so difficult to simply quote back to me, or say again? And then you vote me for what, trying to understand your logic on something? I'm not shading you man, I'm making you explain / support your decisions. 

[dicetosser1]

 

 

 

 

 

@monstr   Nyce is Town. Simple.

 

Notice tho that I voted Zander and he hasnt said a WORD about it despite replying to things posted after it.

 

I sais you were awful.  I thought that summed it up.

 

 

Another Dice vs Zander game, fantastic. 

 

 

actually you have never seen a Zander v Dice game.

 

 

 

 

@monstr Nyce is Town. Simple.

 

Notice tho that I voted Zander and he hasnt said a WORD about it despite replying to things posted after it.

.....

 

You omgus voted him. After a game where you were jokingly trying to lynch him when he was IC and you were town.

 

I didn't read anything into the vote. I'm not surprised if he didn't either.

 

 

yep. now tell me what does Town Zander do when people vote him?? Considering how well I tend to read him what do you THINK a Town Zander should be doing when i vote him and its not in the joke phase?

[monstrman]

Alas sweet mafia I hardly knew ye

 

I try to be nice and it gets me suspected

 

Sorry that I don't conform to your standards of play guys, looks like this game isn't gonna work out for me

 

Keeping all my reads as they are and I'm out for a full day prolly

 

Gl everyone still love you all

[Eldrick4221]

Yes, I have. When I first made them

 

So you're not reading my posts

 

They are playing in line with how I generally put them when I see them playing in other games based on past experience and it's not wolfy

 

I am picking people as villagers because I have good odds

 

Combine the two

 

What do you have

 

Peanut Butter and jelly not an ostrich as you're trying to imply

Thats explains why you asked us. It doesn't explain why you didn't ask others (you could have asked everyone). It doesn't explain why you refused to answer random for so long.

[dicetosser1]

screwed up that post  will redo

[monstrman]

 

Yes, I have. When I first made them

So you're not reading my posts

They are playing in line with how I generally put them when I see them playing in other games based on past experience and it's not wolfy

I am picking people as villagers because I have good odds

Combine the two

What do you have

Peanut Butter and jelly not an ostrich as you're trying to imply

 

 

I think I'm probably reading your posts as carefully as anyone in this game. I've quoted enough of them to prove that. If you'd already explained this, then why was it so difficult to simply quote back to me, or say again? And then you vote me for what, trying to understand your logic on something? I'm not shading you man, I'm making you explain / support your decisions.

I already did and I have had the worst year of my life, so I don't feel like talking

 

I just want to make my reads and play my Internet yelling game in peaceful chaos as a villager but it's always too much to ask always and always too stressful

[monstrman]

 

Yes, I have. When I first made them

So you're not reading my posts

They are playing in line with how I generally put them when I see them playing in other games based on past experience and it's not wolfy

I am picking people as villagers because I have good odds

Combine the two

What do you have

Peanut Butter and jelly not an ostrich as you're trying to imply

Thats explains why you asked us. It doesn't explain why you didn't ask others (you could have asked everyone). It doesn't explain why you refused to answer random for so long.

Who tf cares

 

Not me

[randomh3r0]

Alas sweet mafia I hardly knew ye

 

I try to be nice and it gets me suspected

 

Sorry that I don't conform to your standards of play guys, looks like this game isn't gonna work out for me

 

Keeping all my reads as they are and I'm out for a full day prolly

 

Gl everyone still love you all

 

I'm not voting you yet. I'm trying to keep you engaged, and would like to hear what you have to say. That's not shading or sussing, this is me - a player who hasn't played with you before - asking you to discuss a decision you made. If you can't do that, sure it looks bad, but I'm not going to vote you yet on that. I want to hear what you have to say first

[dicetosser1]

oh no i didnt screw up  thought id quoted monstr too

 

@monstr  dont get lost in ATE bro  stay with us.
 

 

re monstrs core  he asked people he has meta with is how i looked at it and whose responses he was happy with. It is a common thing to ask opinions of people you are trusting or who are on the same wavelength as you.

[monstrman]

 

Alas sweet mafia I hardly knew ye

I try to be nice and it gets me suspected

Sorry that I don't conform to your standards of play guys, looks like this game isn't gonna work out for me

Keeping all my reads as they are and I'm out for a full day prolly

Gl everyone still love you all

 

 

I'm not voting you yet. I'm trying to keep you engaged, and would like to hear what you have to say. That's not shading or sussing, this is me - a player who hasn't played with you before - asking you to discuss a decision you made. If you can't do that, sure it looks bad, but I'm not going to vote you yet on that. I want to hear what you have to say first

Sorry but I just can't do it

 

Maybe tomorrow or at EoD but right now just not happening

 

I have an issue where I can't leave threads though so you're stuck with me