MAFIA KART WII [BASIC] - Mafia Sweep

[Darthe]

Im talking about sili's hypocritical rhetoric Clov.

 

You're still not really giving like id expect

[Sili Quirrels]

 

Probably played 15+ games with Hallia. It's been two years.

Ive prob played twice that many with her. I think she looks townish so far, prob just a nudge above null.

 

noted?

 

honestly i read hallia less well than most because I rely on thread presence, but I don't disagree with you.

[Sili Quirrels]

Im talking about sili's hypocritical rhetoric Clov.

 

You're still not really giving like id expect

it's not hypocritical, ya know. you know.

[Darthe]

@Zander

 

Why does everyone keep asking me who I want lynched? IT'S SEPH.

 

Do i have to construct a shrine showing my victory over his evil prescence for people to know I am serious?

Ooh. Derivative! I like that. Whats your case?

[Calder]

I never thought about it before, but Clov is prob the best at reading me of anyone I have ever played with. Not saying he takes a stance that frequently and dont think he is doing that now. But, gun to my head it is him I think.

 

Maybe Gong.

[Darthe]

 

Im talking about sili's hypocritical rhetoric Clov.

 

You're still not really giving like id expect

it's not hypocritical, ya know. you know.

"My AtE means nothing regarding my alignment and it cant because it's who I am but Hallys condemns her"

 

Yeah. No hypocrisy, I can see that now.

[Calder]

 

@Zander

Why does everyone keep asking me who I want lynched? IT'S SEPH.

Do i have to construct a shrine showing my victory over his evil prescence for people to know I am serious?

Ooh. Derivative! I like that. Whats your case?

Initially I voted him bc his opening post to me felt forced as hell. The generic opener and two immediate town reads. Then he gets light questioning over it and bends over backwards to overanswer things (while making it very clear he wasnt suspecting me for the questioning). Too cautious and trying to hard imo.

 

But, the argument that he is active and thats gonna be his gameplay would be valid, except as soon as his case isnt getting brought up he drops off the map. So his activity now suggests my initial points were true. His over eagerness was driven by suspicion being cast on him and overreacting. Bc he sure hasnt been around hunting has he?

[Clovdyx]

Im talking about sili's hypocritical rhetoric Clov.

 

You're still not really giving like id expect

 

I didn't pay any attention to the comment about Sili.  I was just interested in what you meant about me being reserved.  You said that was it, so I assumed it was a meaningless comment.

 

 

But on the topic of Sili, I don't have any issue with you calling him hypocritical.  God knows I've done it enough times since he and I have started playing together.  Sili doesn't use the same kind of logic players like you and I do.  Does it rub me the wrong way a lot of the time?  Yeah.  But he and I can disagree on things, or agree with different reasons, and that doesn't make him mafia.  Nothing he's said so far seemed so off the wall I need to string him up, and he seems genuine enough that I'm giving him room to work.  He seemed legitimately trying to work with Zander last night, for example, and I pictured him sitting there banging his head against the deck when his points weren't coming across.  I have a hard time imagining Sili would do that as mafia

[Calder]

Also his activity plummets and who talked about it? No one. No one at all. Just poor old Calder. Well not old. Youthful strapping Calder.

[Darthe]

 

Im talking about sili's hypocritical rhetoric Clov.

 

You're still not really giving like id expect

I didn't pay any attention to the comment about Sili. I was just interested in what you meant about me being reserved. You said that was it, so I assumed it was a meaningless comment.

 

 

But on the topic of Sili, I don't have any issue with you calling him hypocritical. God knows I've done it enough times since he and I have started playing together. Sili doesn't use the same kind of logic players like you and I do. Does it rub me the wrong way a lot of the time? Yeah. But he and I can disagree on things, or agree with different reasons, and that doesn't make him mafia. Nothing he's said so far seemed so off the wall I need to string him up, and he seems genuine enough that I'm giving him room to work. He seemed legitimately trying to work with Zander last night, for example, and I pictured him sitting there banging his head against the deck when his points weren't coming across. I have a hard time imagining Sili would do that as mafia

Good post, we are roughly on the same page irt him though I couldn't write it out that well

[Darthe]

Also his activity plummets and who talked about it? No one. No one at all. Just poor old Calder. Well not old. Youthful strapping Calder.

Yes. your youth is admirable and your accomplishments are many.

[Clovdyx]

I never thought about it before, but Clov is prob the best at reading me of anyone I have ever played with. Not saying he takes a stance that frequently and dont think he is doing that now. But, gun to my head it is him I think.

 

Maybe Gong.

 

Wow.  I...don't even know what to say to that.  That's actually a pretty big compliment.

[Sili Quirrels]

 

 

Im talking about sili's hypocritical rhetoric Clov.

 

You're still not really giving like id expect

it's not hypocritical, ya know. you know.

"My AtE means nothing regarding my alignment and it cant because it's who I am but Hallys condemns her"

 

Yeah. No hypocrisy, I can see that now.

 

Well you got a number of things wrong when attempting to paraphrase what I said.

 

In fact I do not use AtE, but I understand the confusion because I like to explain why I am reacting a certain way.

 

Second, even if what I did was called AtE, it would be AtE in a very different sense than what I accuse wolf Hallia of doing. So these two cases are not comparable so it is not inconsistent to townread me for 'AtE' and condemn Hallia for 'AtE'.

 

Lastly, I am not condemning Hallia for AtE because it is not abnormal yet.

[Clovdyx]

 

Also his activity plummets and who talked about it? No one. No one at all. Just poor old Calder. Well not old. Youthful strapping Calder.

Yes. your youth is admirable and your accomplishments are many.

 

 

So, uh, I might have read that as "your mouth" and it completely changed the meaning of the post.

[Zander?]

Is darthe town, clov?  

 

why is he pushing me like this?

 

You're questioning of why people are sussing you and your reasoning is laughable imo.

 

 

 

No I have her as town. Said so a few pages back. But that is the issue I have with her. She finds me disconcerting and thinks that is enough to lynch. Her arguments against me apply to half the game, which is how you can see they were backed in to.

 

She wants answers without providing me with a question.

 

 

Fair enough.

 

 

Ftr im resisting the urge to push celeste right now. I don't think my motivation to do so is based in any rational evidence.

 

Sili, ive mostly let up on you. I dont have enough to warrant the confidence I want in my read, but your logic sucks either way so ill call that every time I see it.

 

Clov you seem a bit reserved so far and Calder you seem too friendly. Both are hardly worth mention usually but hell with it im gonna do so anyhow.

 

I like this post. 

 

Darthe at least feeling that Celeste isnt obv Town as some are suggesting.

 

And he feels the same way I do about Sili.

 

And I actually like that Darthe kinda calls out stuff against Calder and Clov that others havent mentioned.

[Calder]

 

 

Also his activity plummets and who talked about it? No one. No one at all. Just poor old Calder. Well not old. Youthful strapping Calder.

 

Yes. your youth is admirable and your accomplishments are many.

 

So, uh, I might have read that as "your mouth" and it completely changed the meaning of the post.

So I am not the only one....

[Sili Quirrels]

Pretty sure you do not know my reasoning yet Z so I am not going to take offense.

[Clovdyx]

 

 

 

Im talking about sili's hypocritical rhetoric Clov.

 

You're still not really giving like id expect

it's not hypocritical, ya know. you know.

"My AtE means nothing regarding my alignment and it cant because it's who I am but Hallys condemns her"

 

Yeah. No hypocrisy, I can see that now.

 

Well you got a number of things wrong when attempting to paraphrase what I said.

 

In fact I do not use AtE, but I understand the confusion because I like to explain why I am reacting a certain way.

 

Second, even if what I did was called AtE, it would be AtE in a very different sense than what I accuse wolf Hallia of doing. So these two cases are not comparable so it is not inconsistent to townread me for 'AtE' and condemn Hallia for 'AtE'.

 

Lastly, I am not condemning Hallia for AtE because it is not abnormal yet.

 

 

Okay, I actually disagree with pretty much this entire post, but the blue is really, blatantly wrong.  Maybe you haven't done it THIS game - I'd have to go back and check to be sure - but you very much have used AtE in the past.  A lot.

 

I don't know how you can say you aren't condemning Hallia for AtE.  You very much called out several of her posts for being that way in your ISO last night.  I know because I pointed them out for how much you were reaching.

[Calder]

 

I never thought about it before, but Clov is prob the best at reading me of anyone I have ever played with. Not saying he takes a stance that frequently and dont think he is doing that now. But, gun to my head it is him I think.

Maybe Gong.

 

 

Wow.  I...don't even know what to say to that.  That's actually a pretty big compliment.

I think our most recent game was one of those turbos that you steadfastly demanded no one let me escape. The thought stuck with me.

[Clovdyx]

And the middle part pretty much directly contradicts the bottom.

 

"My AtE is different than what I accuse wolf Hallia of doing."

 

"I am not condemning Hallia for AtE."

[Clovdyx]

 

Im talking about sili's hypocritical rhetoric Clov.

 

You're still not really giving like id expect

 

I didn't pay any attention to the comment about Sili.  I was just interested in what you meant about me being reserved.  You said that was it, so I assumed it was a meaningless comment.

 

 

But on the topic of Sili, I don't have any issue with you calling him hypocritical.  God knows I've done it enough times since he and I have started playing together.  Sili doesn't use the same kind of logic players like you and I do.  Does it rub me the wrong way a lot of the time?  Yeah.  But he and I can disagree on things, or agree with different reasons, and that doesn't make him mafia.  Nothing he's said so far seemed so off the wall I need to string him up, and he seems genuine enough that I'm giving him room to work.  He seemed legitimately trying to work with Zander last night, for example, and I pictured him sitting there banging his head against the deck when his points weren't coming across.  I have a hard time imagining Sili would do that as mafia

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Im talking about sili's hypocritical rhetoric Clov.

 

You're still not really giving like id expect

it's not hypocritical, ya know. you know.

"My AtE means nothing regarding my alignment and it cant because it's who I am but Hallys condemns her"

 

Yeah. No hypocrisy, I can see that now.

 

Well you got a number of things wrong when attempting to paraphrase what I said.

 

In fact I do not use AtE, but I understand the confusion because I like to explain why I am reacting a certain way.

 

Second, even if what I did was called AtE, it would be AtE in a very different sense than what I accuse wolf Hallia of doing. So these two cases are not comparable so it is not inconsistent to townread me for 'AtE' and condemn Hallia for 'AtE'.

 

Lastly, I am not condemning Hallia for AtE because it is not abnormal yet.

 

 

Okay, I actually disagree with pretty much this entire post, but the blue is really, blatantly wrong.  Maybe you haven't done it THIS game - I'd have to go back and check to be sure - but you very much have used AtE in the past.  A lot.

 

I don't know how you can say you aren't condemning Hallia for AtE.  You very much called out several of her posts for being that way in your ISO last night.  I know because I pointed them out for how much you were reaching.

 

 

And the middle part pretty much directly contradicts the bottom.

 

"My AtE is different than what I accuse wolf Hallia of doing."

 

"I am not condemning Hallia for AtE."

 

Sick read in that top post, Chris.

[Sili Quirrels]

 

 

 

 

Im talking about sili's hypocritical rhetoric Clov.

 

You're still not really giving like id expect

it's not hypocritical, ya know. you know.

"My AtE means nothing regarding my alignment and it cant because it's who I am but Hallys condemns her"

 

Yeah. No hypocrisy, I can see that now.

 

Well you got a number of things wrong when attempting to paraphrase what I said.

 

In fact I do not use AtE, but I understand the confusion because I like to explain why I am reacting a certain way.

 

Second, even if what I did was called AtE, it would be AtE in a very different sense than what I accuse wolf Hallia of doing. So these two cases are not comparable so it is not inconsistent to townread me for 'AtE' and condemn Hallia for 'AtE'.

 

Lastly, I am not condemning Hallia for AtE because it is not abnormal yet.

 

 

Okay, I actually disagree with pretty much this entire post, but the blue is really, blatantly wrong.  Maybe you haven't done it THIS game - I'd have to go back and check to be sure - but you very much have used AtE in the past.  A lot.

 

I don't know how you can say you aren't condemning Hallia for AtE.  You very much called out several of her posts for being that way in your ISO last night.  I know because I pointed them out for how much you were reaching.

 

How I define the term is if you use emotion to persuade someone,  perhaps attract sympathy, but this is different from being emotional.

 

I retracted the AtE line of reasoning within an hour of my ISO I believe. Hell I retracted my push on Hallia in its entirety.

 

So I am not condemning hallia for AtE.

[Sili Quirrels]

And the middle part pretty much directly contradicts the bottom.

 

"My AtE is different than what I accuse wolf Hallia of doing."

 

"I am not condemning Hallia for AtE."

Wolf hallia is a meta hypothetical.

[Sili Quirrels]

I really dislike it when someone reads my post finds all the flaws that aren't there. IT's probably a me problem though, but it still rubs me the wrong way lol.

[seph]

Derp