Jump to content

DRAGONMOUNT

A WHEEL OF TIME COMMUNITY

Ragnarok Game Thread - Game Over, Town Wins!


Kivam

Recommended Posts

Posted

VOTE COUNT

 

Sili (1) - KeyBOOSE

John Snow (2) - Ocicat, Dicetosser

Eldrick (1)  - Lenlo

Ocicat (2) - Eldrick, TinaHel

Lenlo (2) - John Snow, Misheru

Dicetosser (1) - Sili

 

Not voting (8): Songstress, Leelou, Verbal, Taborline, Pralaya, Wishleste, Sooh, Talya

 

9 to lynch

  • Replies 4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

 

 

I look forward to it!

And I am returned! With cramped hands, I had forgotten how difficult correct piano finger posturing is.

Fellow pianist!

Posted

 

 

How experienced are wishtree, celeste, and Ocicat?

I want to make the following bets.

 

Wishtree: 10-30 games

Celeste: 10 games

Ocicat: 10 games

Hahaha. Ocicat is probably at least as experienced as Celeste.

 

It all blurs. Guess I lost my bets.

Posted

 

 

No idea what you're saying about mish and why i should react to her reads. I don't really care unless they are informative.

 

Her read was the opposite of yours, yet you didn't care that she seemed to be seeing something completely different than you?

 

 

Can you quote it for me?

 

The quote system here is irritating (is there a way to switch to straight bbcode?), but here:

 

 

Also feeling good about Wisheste, Celeste seems more "on"

 

Posted

 

I meant to put a vote in there....

 

[unvote]

[v]Ocicat[/v]

 

Also, early game Sili came off as really weird to me. It was very different than what I expect from him. The only other time that happened was when he was a cop, but this can't be a similar case, because the cop doesn't know they're a cop. I don't know what to do with this information. I'm glad that he has improved recently, though.

 

Note to Mod: 

Is unvoting required?

 

Kiv's a JNer, and this is same as JN rules, so mostly likely no. 

 

 

LOL.  Been on this site since the mid-90s (holy *&^%, almost 20 years), and started playing mafia here.  But since I'm the one who brought it to JN, that's cool, too.

 

Re unvoting: : Unvoting is requested but not required; I'll count your vote even if you forget it, but including "unvote" helps make sure I don't miss that you were already voting and mistakenly leave your vote where it was previously as well.  So please include the unvote.

 

 

Posted

Also feeling good about Wisheste, Celeste seems more "on" and Wish more relaxed than TUS.

 

Might be significant. I haven't found CEleste to be particularly 'on the ball' regardless of her alignment. Could be confirmation bias. meh.

 

@Mish* can you elaborate?

Posted

@Celeste - if it's easier to tell his alignment when he's pressured, why would you give him an out right now vs. Putting more pressure on him?

Agree with this.

I'm willing to put Ocicat between a rock and a hard place, even if he's Celeste's offsite friend (another forum, not IRL).

 

I am curious as to why Sili moved Celeste and I lower down the scum list and Ocicat up higher.

 

Ocicat, what would you say that your strategy for this game is? I don't know your meta, because during the only game I played with you, you posted only once. How do you think that you are contributing to this game/being pro town?

 

Actually, good question for everyone. Answer? Thanks :wink:

 

 

Ugh. My back hurts. I'm like an old crone.

 

Posted

If I had three shots at this moment I would take out Verbal/Pral/Taborline and I'm confident that I'd hit at least two non-town

 

Which might be an overestimation of myself but it's what I really believe so yolo

Posted

 

the questions about verb stuff is cause im trying to figure you out Sili 

 

 

and because the stuff like he is online and how many posts this person has p's me off

 

how is skipping over verb's posts informative?

 

you are wrong, but the more you focus on that stuff the more I think you're scum. :rolleyes:

 

 

I think you might be misunderstanding me.

 

What i was saying is that Verbs posts also provide info not only on him but on OTHER PEOPLE.  Like Cory in this instance. like leelou all the time. If you havent read verbs posts then you have missed info that could inform YOUR reads on those people as well as him.

 

Im trying to figure out how you think here. Im sick to death of not being able to read you. Ive got you right here in front of me so im trying to ask questions to figure you out.

Posted

On your post box there's a little switch button on the top left that you can press and it disables the pre-scripted text formatting Ocicat

That helps, thanks ^^

Posted

If I had three shots at this moment I would take out Verbal/Pral/Taborline and I'm confident that I'd hit at least two non-town

 

Which might be an overestimation of myself but it's what I really believe so yolo

Could you explain? All three have been inactive (if I'm not mistaken). What makes them scummy?

Posted

Sili has Loki equity but I really doubt he's a wolf in a wolfgroup

 

But AFAICT we all have Loki equity

 

I am not a third party hunter, I usually cannot tell the difference and I think it's super easy to act like you would as a villager as TP

Posted

 

@Celeste - if it's easier to tell his alignment when he's pressured, why would you give him an out right now vs. Putting more pressure on him?

Agree with this.

I'm willing to put Ocicat between a rock and a hard place, even if he's Celeste's offsite friend (another forum, not IRL).

 

I am curious as to why Sili moved Celeste and I lower down the scum list and Ocicat up higher.

 

Ocicat, what would you say that your strategy for this game is? I don't know your meta, because during the only game I played with you, you posted only once. How do you think that you are contributing to this game/being pro town?

 

Actually, good question for everyone. Answer? Thanks :wink:

 

 

Ugh. My back hurts. I'm like an old crone.

 

Being easy to read, and sensible analysis.

Posted

Could you explain? All three have been inactive (if I'm not mistaken). What makes them scummy?

 

Only Pral has been inactive and that's much more a measure of "has the thread been villagery enough to where inactive players are >> rand scum?"

 

And Pral did have one post IIRC that was like a weird-feeling "I'm here" kind of post whereas I've seen him numerous times as a villager drop into the thread, make a weird read and leave as opposed to just trying to say something "light-hearted"

 

Like WITD I remember he wasn't very active but dropped in early, gave an intelligent but personal read on Tina being a villager (which was correct) and then left

 

You would be in my potential rand for a fourth shot

Posted

 

 

^@Dice

 

I assume this is whats at me? 

 

If so

 

You seem to be a bit aggro over me simply asking you questions relating to your thinking. Paranoid?  Can be read that way.  especially as I havent even called you scum yet, i havent even attacked you yet. yet you throw that out?

Posted

Ocicat, what would you say that your strategy for this game is?

My approach in general, simply put: Look for contradictions, logic errors, and slips, point them out, and identify and eliminate scum.

Posted

 

 

the questions about verb stuff is cause im trying to figure you out Sili 

 

 

and because the stuff like he is online and how many posts this person has p's me off

 

how is skipping over verb's posts informative?

 

you are wrong, but the more you focus on that stuff the more I think you're scum. :rolleyes:

 

 

I think you might be misunderstanding me.

 

What i was saying is that Verbs posts also provide info not only on him but on OTHER PEOPLE.  Like Cory in this instance. like leelou all the time. If you havent read verbs posts then you have missed info that could inform YOUR reads on those people as well as him.

 

Im trying to figure out how you think here. Im sick to death of not being able to read you. Ive got you right here in front of me so im trying to ask questions to figure you out.

 

-_-

 

Fine. My process goes like this.

 

Open forum. Read a few posts on the page I am on. Go back to where I was last at. Scan for important content. Comment on relevant things I find. Tone read. Build knowledge on specific players.

 

I did not focus very much on cory or leelou by the time of my first list so I didn't have to read verbal. And besides, all I saw of verbal was short and cute posts. Normally reactions to that sort of content isn't very informative without a flip or two.

Posted

 

 

Could you explain? All three have been inactive (if I'm not mistaken). What makes them scummy?

Only Pral has been inactive and that's much more a measure of "has the thread been villagery enough to where inactive players are >> rand scum?"

 

And Pral did have one post IIRC that was like a weird-feeling "I'm here" kind of post whereas I've seen him numerous times as a villager drop into the thread, make a weird read and leave as opposed to just trying to say something "light-hearted"

 

Like WITD I remember he wasn't very active but dropped in early, gave an intelligent but personal read on Tina being a villager (which was correct) and then left

 

You would be in my potential rand for a fourth shot

Aww thanks <3

But you might suck at reading me. You trusted me last game, did you not? :wink:

Well, it was multiball, so idk if that counts.

 

 

My body is ready.

 

Posted

I think one of the mistakes players make very often is deciding

"Well, player x is a scummy villager, and he seems scummy, so he's probably a villager!"

 

or

 

"Well, player x is inactive all the time, and he's inactive here, so he's probably not a wolf!"

 

It's obviously not surefire but in general it seems like a mistake to purport a defense of a player for not being villagery because it's their modus operandi because these players still, in fact, rand wolf sometimes

 

Pral has plenty of time to prove me wrong, but if I had three shots he'd be one of them

Posted

 

 

 

^@Dice

 

I assume this is whats at me? 

 

If so

 

You seem to be a bit aggro over me simply asking you questions relating to your thinking. Paranoid?  Can be read that way.  especially as I havent even called you scum yet, i havent even attacked you yet. yet you throw that out?

 

You misunderstand. I have no doubt you take post count and activity with a grain of salt so I was teasing you.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...