Jump to content

DRAGONMOUNT

A WHEEL OF TIME COMMUNITY

[Advanced] Revenge of the Marlfox


Krakalakachkn

Recommended Posts

Posted

 

~4 Wolves in

 

Pral

Alanna

Rags

Arsis

Yates

Key

Dice

Berf

 

So let's try to clear half this list and lunch from the rest

 

Shouldn't be too hard

 

Tommy being GOAT here. That's the lynch pool. 

 

it needed to have aj on it :ph34r:

 

i would like to add hallia and take out key, then sort it as so:

 

Pral

Alanna

Rags

Arsis

Yates

Halia

Dice

Serf

Verbal

 

Rags mostly because his nudging on verb struck me the wrong way.

  • Replies 7.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

 

Hallia is not scum.

 

Because when Yates did the gambit, there was no need for her to counter him. Yeah, Yates said that she might have said it to trap him. But, most likely, if she was scum, she would have just laughed in her QT , try to get me lynched and after my flip get Yates lynched.

 

I don't follow.  Why wouldn't she try for the trap and quick lynch on Yates?

 

Because if he is scum, there is no need to reveal herself.

Go for a quick lynch on me, see me flip town and then push the notion that Yates is scum because he lied. That would have been her optimum strategy. 

Posted

actually, if you could link one of his town games that would be terrific. i want to compare tone and get a better idea of what 'awkward' is for him. i have a theory that someone's villager game is a lot more revealing of their character.

 

Here ya go

 

He was town JOAT in that game. From what I remember, it was similar to his "old" meta of being pretty inactive at the start, and starting to ramp up as the game went on.

 

Okay just skimmed over his iso in that game. Here's what I saw there that I am not seeing here:

 

Much less hedging

MUCH better tone throughout, and easy to follow progression on thoughts

MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH better ability to recall specific game events, is able to keep things like vote switches and such in mind and call people out on specifics, and call people town on specifics

 

Considering he has WAAAAAAAAAAY more posts this game than that game (like almost 3 times as many) he can't come back and argue that he had a better hande on that game than this one. He's been posting, he's been present.... he's just been scummy as well.

Posted

 

These posts don't really seem that productive Pray, at all.

 

What's up? You playing something close to the chest? I feel like since spammers have gone down more and your thread presence has gone up, you should be GOATing it up right about now. Why aint ya?

 

 

What did you think of this post? http://www.dragonmount.com/forums/topic/91500-advanced-revenge-of-the-marlfox/page-267?do=findComment&comment=3374104

 

The conclusion that I reached there matches close with what Tommy said. I have basically drilled down to two separate scum team possibilities and reading stuff based on that. 

Posted

2 things:

 

1. I don't think wagononics posts are NEARLY as effective without a scum lynch (or scum flip of any kind). Votes and the situation around votes can be spun in diff ways to present diff conclusions.

 

2. I DEF don't like you linking yourself to a dead villager in Tommy. Why should his thoughts have any relevance to yours here? Why talk about what he said at all, as if it strengthens your position?

 

Furthermore, I ask you for GOAT stuff and you point to an earlier post you already made?

 

Color me not impressed

Posted

Disagree.

 

Wagonomics with two town flips is as important. The likely motivations are presented there and I believe I am on the right track with this. 

Posted

Okay, but you could be wrong. Or you could be scum.

 

Wagonomics without a scum flip just aren't very conclusive imo. I'd take then in support of another case or something, bit I wouldn't make a decision at this point in the game based on a wagonomics post alone.

 

Also Pray- earlier I pointed out how in the past you said as scum you would just pocket me and say how good my reads are. This game you're pretty much doing exactly that.

 

Am I misclearing you? Why didn't you comment on that?

Posted

 

actually, if you could link one of his town games that would be terrific. i want to compare tone and get a better idea of what 'awkward' is for him. i have a theory that someone's villager game is a lot more revealing of their character.

 

Here ya go

 

He was town JOAT in that game. From what I remember, it was similar to his "old" meta of being pretty inactive at the start, and starting to ramp up as the game went on.

 

Okay just skimmed over his iso in that game. Here's what I saw there that I am not seeing here:

 

Much less hedging

MUCH better tone throughout, and easy to follow progression on thoughts

MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH better ability to recall specific game events, is able to keep things like vote switches and such in mind and call people out on specifics, and call people town on specifics

 

Considering he has WAAAAAAAAAAY more posts this game than that game (like almost 3 times as many) he can't come back and argue that he had a better hande on that game than this one. He's been posting, he's been present.... he's just been scummy as well.

 

at a glance i half-ways agree, but verb started off this game much the same way he did then too. jokes and small posts/hedging, he said at some point. and i can see the difference in structure being circumstantial due to his pr, and quality/volume/pace of the game. the tone isn't that different either.

 

meh. you bring up some good points, some bad. i'll probably put down the hammer, just to get an answer, but i like waiting. maybe we can lynch hallia instead? if verbal is right about her it probably means he's town.

 

to mention ~between arsis and hallia i don't know who i want to lynch more. probably arsis... even though i'm a psyduck ( 2s7yn7o_zps4ee48679.gif) about who's scum and who's not.

Posted

Disagree.

 

Wagonomics with two town flips is as important. The likely motivations are presented there and I believe I am on the right track with this. 

waganomics lead to my lynch you scumbag >.>

Posted

Okay, but you could be wrong. Or you could be scum.

 

Wagonomics without a scum flip just aren't very conclusive imo. I'd take then in support of another case or something, bit I wouldn't make a decision at this point in the game based on a wagonomics post alone.

 

Also Pray- earlier I pointed out how in the past you said as scum you would just pocket me and say how good my reads are. This game you're pretty much doing exactly that.

 

Am I misclearing you? Why didn't you comment on that?

 

Which is what I would have done as scum, yeah.

 

But, to that point, whether you believe or not, I hadn't even read your N1 posts when I gave my reads. I wasn't caught up with any night talks and all my reads were just based on EoD1 posts. So, that's that. It was a co-incidence that your reads matched mine.

Posted

 

practically the entire game is calling rags scum

 

but we all avoid voting him

 

*whoosh*

 

It is? I must have missed that...

 

And apart from associative stuff and claim stuff, he's prob my strongest town read atm fyi

 

 

That's the issue.  I'm not sure right now.  If I had a good idea, I'd be all over them.

 

 

Which is why I want to lynch someone who I think has been scummy in Verb so that we can try to use night actions to sort this out. 

 

honestly I think this might actually be the most villagery thing I've seen in this thread so far

 

which is strange

 

 

It's also a sentiment I heavily agree with and support (lynching Verb, scummiest player atm, and letting NA's sort out other stuff to hopefully clear up situation better)

 

Verb. Hallia. Silix2 being the most guilty imo with des a close second in complete lack of town tells.

 

*barklaugh*

 

Cory is gone but he was terribad early on.

 

Yeah I don't really think so. He wasn't obvtown, but he certainly wasn't anywhere near terribad. You're slinging the same schlepped pile of goods Verb is, cause yall are scumbros.

 

allright im willing to try this

 

unvote ##vote verbal

 

post-30824-Jack-Nicholson-Creepy-Nodding

 

Just for this Dice I'm going to iso you tonight and see if I can resolve your slot better besides just the connection with Verb thing. It's POSSIBLE he was just acting awkward with his read on you all game cause he thought you'd be a good backup lynch at some point and could be like "yeah, I had off feelings about him all game"

 

 

i was gonna say go ahead but you already have lol

 

 

that last post of mine you quoted that you didnt like. it had a purpose but i never followed thru on it. I was tinfoiling about key/bfg after tommy got killed. was thinking about why tommy died but no key/bfg. if it was me id have killed the jailer. takes out a town protective role and leaves tommy for later where i might get a better advantage out of him.

 

but im not the best tactician around so i wanted to see if people agreed. if the answer was overwhelming yes id have voted them. but i got lazy and never followed up

Posted

 

Okay, but you could be wrong. Or you could be scum.

 

Wagonomics without a scum flip just aren't very conclusive imo. I'd take then in support of another case or something, bit I wouldn't make a decision at this point in the game based on a wagonomics post alone.

 

Also Pray- earlier I pointed out how in the past you said as scum you would just pocket me and say how good my reads are. This game you're pretty much doing exactly that.

 

Am I misclearing you? Why didn't you comment on that?

 

Which is what I would have done as scum, yeah.

 

But, to that point, whether you believe or not, I hadn't even read your N1 posts when I gave my reads. I wasn't caught up with any night talks and all my reads were just based on EoD1 posts. So, that's that. It was a co-incidence that your reads matched mine.

 

 

See, you're saying you are a 1 shot rber, but you've been behind a lot of the game. Doesn't sound very effective of you with your role claim. You'd think you'd want to be caught up before night in case you could pick up on something to stop. 

Posted
See, you're saying you are a 1 shot rber, but you've been behind a lot of the game. Doesn't sound very effective of you with your role claim. You'd think you'd want to be caught up before night in case you could pick up on something to stop.

 

That's... an incredibly good point. Pral, rebuttal !!

Posted

 

See, you're saying you are a 1 shot rber, but you've been behind a lot of the game. Doesn't sound very effective of you with your role claim. You'd think you'd want to be caught up before night in case you could pick up on something to stop.

 

That's... an incredibly good point. Pral, rebuttal !!

 

 

To add further - if he's a 1 shot scum rb, he doesn't have to be caught up. His scum buddies can just tell him who to block. 

Posted

 

 

Okay, but you could be wrong. Or you could be scum.

 

Wagonomics without a scum flip just aren't very conclusive imo. I'd take then in support of another case or something, bit I wouldn't make a decision at this point in the game based on a wagonomics post alone.

 

Also Pray- earlier I pointed out how in the past you said as scum you would just pocket me and say how good my reads are. This game you're pretty much doing exactly that.

 

Am I misclearing you? Why didn't you comment on that?

 

Which is what I would have done as scum, yeah.

 

But, to that point, whether you believe or not, I hadn't even read your N1 posts when I gave my reads. I wasn't caught up with any night talks and all my reads were just based on EoD1 posts. So, that's that. It was a co-incidence that your reads matched mine.

 

 

See, you're saying you are a 1 shot rber, but you've been behind a lot of the game. Doesn't sound very effective of you with your role claim. You'd think you'd want to be caught up before night in case you could pick up on something to stop. 

 

 

I know I was behind a lot of the game but 200+ pages was just too much. I could only manage to catch up till end of D1 before I submitted my holster.

Posted

 

Pral Is >>> rand town

 

I trust your instincts. What makes you think that?

I have it at about 3% that hallia fake claimed joat with an innocent view on her scumbuddy

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...