Jump to content

DRAGONMOUNT

A WHEEL OF TIME COMMUNITY

[Basic] Weasley vs Malfoy at the Ministry - Game over - Weasleys win


Thorum

Recommended Posts

Posted

 

@Cloud, you lost me there.

 

1) What theory are you talking about?

2) Where did I say I knew AVM was town? I said AVM was my lover. No more, no less.

 

For the record, I believe that lynching any of us three is foolish.

 

Dude, you had your vote on me until the last few pages so don't start buddying up to me now.

 

I was talking about Tina's theory which said that there could be multiple players who had the same fake claim. I know that I'm the real Fred, and I also have him as my fake claim. AVM could be another town character, but he has to fake claim as Fred but I find the odds against him so I'm still all in for lynching him. He has also been quiet during the last page or so and I don't take that as a good sign.

 

Just WTF are you talking about?

 

Where am I buddying? Are you out your mind? I simply don't understand. What?!

 

I'll try to comprehend. So you're saying that just because I don't want to lynch any of us three, I'm buddying you?

 

For all I know, all three of us can be town. Nothing happened that had proven me otherwise. It is NOT the time to lynch any of us as the result of that lynch would yield no useful information.

 

If we lynch me or AVM, both of us die. No matter how we flip, we get no information on your alignment from that.

 

If we lynch Cloud (you), then you die. No matter how you flip, we get no information on either AVM's or Cloud's information from there.

 

So how does lynching any of us help?

  • Replies 800
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

 

@Cloud, you lost me there.

 

1) What theory are you talking about?

2) Where did I say I knew AVM was town? I said AVM was my lover. No more, no less.

 

For the record, I believe that lynching any of us three is foolish.

 

Dude, you had your vote on me until the last few pages so don't start buddying up to me now.

 

I was talking about Tina's theory which said that there could be multiple players who had the same fake claim. I know that I'm the real Fred, and I also have him as my fake claim. AVM could be another town character, but he has to fake claim as Fred but I find the odds against him so I'm still all in for lynching him. He has also been quiet during the last page or so and I don't take that as a good sign.

 

Also to the bolded. Are you even reading this game? We DO know that multiple players have the same "fake claim". You and AVM do. No doubt about that.

 

Also I'm pretty sure that it is quite possible for two TOWNIES have the same "fakeclaim". Else the whole fakeclaim thingy would make no sense, as every single Weasley in the game would still be a "Named Townie" in effect (look up the definition on mafia scum wiki). It'd be about the same as having none of this complicated stuff about claims.

Posted

In any case I have no time to deal with this now. It's 8 in the afternoon here and I still got about 6-8h of work ahead of us cause I need to finish up something by tomorrow.

 

unvote Cloud

Posted

BTW - it's about 100% sure that the lovers are Fred + George (given the setup and that Thorum actually wanted to see how lovers worked because theys fit the theme/setup so well). No other pair makes sense as lovers, given the theme.

Posted

@Salami: 

 

Yes, I consider you not wanting me lynched after all these posts buddying:

 

Unvote, vote Cloud.

Mostly his association post (and if A flips scum).

Gonna go with the flies on Des. Also, scum Despo would have dug himself a hole after a couple of votes.

Like Leelou's play so far.
Can't read Verb yet.
Leaning scum on BFG.
Always dislike Dice's game. No exception here.

AVM, Mish, Peace, Tina and GF needs to pick up.

Least I like the L-3 vote from AVM and Peace got a point.

 
 

Alright, so doing a re-read now, things that stand out to me:

  • Cloud vs Despo fight sounds - staged. Something's off about this.
    The weirdest part (the part that got me thinking down this line) was when Despo linked me and Cloud together (and called us both scum), then Cloud did the reverse - he linked me and Despo calling us both scum.
    The whole fight is coming off way too strong.
  • There's entirely too much parroting of what others said. Half of Cloud's first post is parroting of earlier reasonings. Dice harping on the same absolute thing as Cloud/Des did. Then BFG coming with some parrot job too.
  • Another thing that stood out to me is that there were just way too many meta reads on Despo (how his meta is sure town)

 
 

#Cloud (you): I don't like your exchange with Despo. I don't like your double standard post (only scum speak in absolutes) and the dismissing of me calling you out on that was off. And yea the linking stuff. I also agree with Despo about you fencing on BFG's play (even though your points on her play are ones I can agree with, the way you posted those points and the fact that you did was just wrong in my book).

 

 

How does lynching you and/ or AMV, or even me wield no information?? The rest of us will get a lot of info from your flip, and there has been enough talk going around you to evaluate other people's play. And yes I already came to the conclusion that everyone has a town fake claim, and so there must be multiple people with the same fake claim. That however doesn't make me dismiss my believe that AVM is lying (and that maybe you are his teammate), because the chances are in my favor.

Posted

BTW - it's about 100% sure that the lovers are Fred + George (given the setup and that Thorum actually wanted to see how lovers worked because theys fit the theme/setup so well). No other pair makes sense as lovers, given the theme.

 

LOL. This is mafia. Character claims are random, and so are Lover pairs. The Weasleys are one big family for crying out loud; they could all be Lovers.

Posted

In any case I have no time to deal with this now. It's 8 in the afternoon here and I still got about 6-8h of work ahead of us cause I need to finish up something by tomorrow.

 

unvote Cloud

 

Ah so what happened to "lynching any of us three is foolish"? :rolleyes:

Posted

 

 

 

I don't believe him, or if he is a lover, I don't think he's town.

Any reasons for that?

 

 

I feel your play has been off all game, why I am voting you to start with and the claim just is not sitting right with your play.

 

So your reasoning is that you think I'm scum (you got your reasons), and the rest follows from that. I can live with that, but I have to tell you that your read on me is completely off the mark. Actually, I don't know how I could play an any more obvious town game, to be honest.

 

So your jumping on my sarcastic case on Des and then your ISO review of his posts is an obvious town game? No. 

Posted

 

 

 

 

I don't believe him, or if he is a lover, I don't think he's town.

Any reasons for that?

 

 

I feel your play has been off all game, why I am voting you to start with and the claim just is not sitting right with your play.

 

So your reasoning is that you think I'm scum (you got your reasons), and the rest follows from that. I can live with that, but I have to tell you that your read on me is completely off the mark. Actually, I don't know how I could play an any more obvious town game, to be honest.

 

So your jumping on my sarcastic case on Des and then your ISO review of his posts is an obvious town game? No. 

 

 

To add to this. The AtE posts saying Des is all over you...he's really not being that aggressive. 

Posted

EBWOP

 

@Salami: 

 

Yes, I consider you not wanting me lynched after all these posts buddying: (...)

That was before you cc'd Fred on AVM. That changes the situation a lot. For one thing, I find you being town more likely now. For another, I think it's a bad idea to pursue this avenue NOW. We'll have much more information later. Cop views, flips, more info on how the claims are distributed in general, etc.

 

 

BTW - it's about 100% sure that the lovers are Fred + George (given the setup and that Thorum actually wanted to see how lovers worked because theys fit the theme/setup so well). No other pair makes sense as lovers, given the theme.

 

LOL. This is mafia. Character claims are random, and so are Lover pairs. The Weasleys are one big family for crying out loud; they could all be Lovers.

 

BS. Only one pair makes sense as lovers and if you have read (or even watched) Harry Potter, you'll know exactly which pair (Fred/George) and also why.

Of course I happen to know that I'm right about this (as being half of the lover pair), but anyone can figure this out. The theme. That Thorum specifially wantzed to use lovers in this game in particular as it made the most sense for him, etc.

 

And then I didn't even mention our claim which would push that already 100% certainty even higher if such a thing were possible.

Posted

Also, speculating on who would be the perfect lovers pair isn't helping. There is a married couple. And if you have read the books/seen the movies Fred and George, make sense yes, but not exactly. They are twins. 

Posted

Cloud, I´m not saying anything about your alignments (your, AVM´s or Csarmi´s) but you are putting AVM in a bad spot. You say that you are the real Fred but AVM must say that too, wether it´s true or not. He can´t say that he is another town character and have to claim Fred because then he breaks the rules. 

Posted

The AtE was fake as hell. Despo was hardly playing agressive, and besides Salami is used to more than that. There also remain those two posts where he was commenting on Leelou's case where he was obviously contradicting himself.

Posted

Cloud, I´m not saying anything about your alignments (your, AVM´s or Csarmi´s) but you are putting AVM in a bad spot. You say that you are the real Fred but AVM must say that too, wether it´s true or not. He can´t say that he is another town character and have to claim Fred because then he breaks the rules. 

 

No, AVM can say that his real character is someone else but he may not specify or hint to that character. I believe Thorum has already said this. @MOD could you confirm what I just said regarding the game mechanics to be true?

Posted

So to summarize

 

Csarmi says:
George Weasley
Town
Lover
True Claim
confirms AVM is partner

 

AVM says:
Fred weasley
Lover with Csarmi
Thinks Csarmi is Town due to QT - since he doesn't know that suggests that on their QT they are only alowed to use the 'fake' claims.

 

Cloud says:
Fred Weasley
True Claim

 

Thorum posted after all this which confirms that all the character claims are correct.  And since we now have two claims for the same character I think I was right earlier and that there are 6 characters with 2 claims on each.

 

There's no way for all of the above to be true, as there can't be 2 'real' Freds.

 

Fred & George as lovers make sense, given that Thorum confirmed the 9 Weasley players the only other option would be Molly & Arthur. 

 

So it's possible that Csarmi & AVM have a false 'fake claim' and are Molly & Arthur in which case Cloud is (almost certainly) Town.

It's possible that both Csarmi & AVM are mafia, but I really struggle to believe that they'd be that open about defending a scum buddy.

 

If one of Csarmi or AVM are mafia then at the moment I'm inclined to believe it more likely to be AVM.

 

It's possible that Cloud is mafia and slipped with his claim, but his reaction seemed genuine.

 

Can you each confirm that your claim is true?

 

 

 

 

 

Tina - that's not quite right.  If I understand correctly we have to claim and hint our 'fake' claim, but there's nothing to stop someone from saying if their 'fake' claim is true or not, just that if it's false they can't hint towards their 'true' claim. 

Posted

So your jumping on my sarcastic case on Des and then your ISO review of his posts is an obvious town game? No.

Yes.

 

To add to this. The AtE posts saying Des is all over you...he's really not being that aggressive.

Just re-read his posts. Seriously. In every bloody post of his he's repeating that I'm obvious scum. Not sure why that hits me so deep and hard, but I hate that and it ruins my game here. I was 100% serious about being replaced out, even asked Thorum if he could make an exception. He didn't, he posted there's no replacement period.

 

Also, speculating on who would be the perfect lovers pair isn't helping. There is a married couple. And if you have read the books/seen the movies Fred and George, make sense yes, but not exactly. They are twins.

That's not the only reason why they are supposed to be 'lovers'. No idea if there's anyone to spoil here about the series. Probably no one. HP spoilers.

 

 

Note the reactions to one of them dying.

 

 

Also I'm not just speculating. I know this for SURE.

Posted

The AtE was fake as hell. Despo was hardly playing agressive, and besides Salami is used to more than that. There also remain those two posts where he was commenting on Leelou's case where he was obviously contradicting himself.

I can't give a PG-13 answer to this. You know exactly where to go, and what you should put and where.

Posted

EBWOP

 

@Salami: 

 

Yes, I consider you not wanting me lynched after all these posts buddying: (...)

That was before you cc'd Fred on AVM. That changes the situation a lot. For one thing, I find you being town more likely now. For another, I think it's a bad idea to pursue this avenue NOW. We'll have much more information later. Cop views, flips, more info on how the claims are distributed in general, etc.

 

 

BTW - it's about 100% sure that the lovers are Fred + George (given the setup and that Thorum actually wanted to see how lovers worked because theys fit the theme/setup so well). No other pair makes sense as lovers, given the theme.

 

LOL. This is mafia. Character claims are random, and so are Lover pairs. The Weasleys are one big family for crying out loud; they could all be Lovers.

 

BS. Only one pair makes sense as lovers and if you have read (or even watched) Harry Potter, you'll know exactly which pair (Fred/George) and also why.

Of course I happen to know that I'm right about this (as being half of the lover pair), but anyone can figure this out. The theme. That Thorum specifially wantzed to use lovers in this game in particular as it made the most sense for him, etc.

 

And then I didn't even mention our claim which would push that already 100% certainty even higher if such a thing were possible.

 

 

Meh I don't feel like waiting for any potential Cop views.

 

Like Leelou also mentioned it isn't true that only one pair would make sense as Lovers.

 

Yes, Thorum admitted that there were Lovers in this game, but that doesn't mean that they are Fred and George. The theme isn't often followed that strict in mafia games (which I know is also the case here because I'm Fred), and besides there is a married couple who I think do a better job at being Lovers.

Posted

Alright, so to summarize my claim:

  • George Weasley, Town, Lover
  • This is my true character (I have to claim as myself).
  • I will not give you any sort of hints or information about who my lover is. It's their choice. They are free to do so any given time.

@BFG - I believe you got everything you need from me in this post. Do I understand that right?

Posted

@BFG: Salami and AVM can't be Arthur and Molly because Salami claimed that his true character was George. AVM hasn't said anything about a true character, and I find it more likely that he is mafia out of the two. If both of them don't die when we lynch AVM then we obviously know that Salami is also mafia.

Posted

Yes, I just wanted to check that you were still saying it was a true claim, same from AVM and Cloud.

 

Also, can I ask about your QT?  Were you only able to use 'fake' claims in there? 

Posted

 

In any case I have no time to deal with this now. It's 8 in the afternoon here and I still got about 6-8h of work ahead of us cause I need to finish up something by tomorrow.

 

unvote Cloud

 

Ah so what happened to "lynching any of us three is foolish"? :rolleyes:

 

Can you even read?!

 

I have unvoted you. What else do you want from me? Ask you to marry me?*

You're not my lover, AVM is.

 

(not sure if that saying exists in english, it's a hungarian saying, you can guess the usage and meaning just fine I suppose)

Posted

 

 

In any case I have no time to deal with this now. It's 8 in the afternoon here and I still got about 6-8h of work ahead of us cause I need to finish up something by tomorrow.

 

unvote Cloud

 

Ah so what happened to "lynching any of us three is foolish"? :rolleyes:

 

Can you even read?!

 

I have unvoted you. What else do you want from me? Ask you to marry me?*

You're not my lover, AVM is.

 

(not sure if that saying exists in english, it's a hungarian saying, you can guess the usage and meaning just fine I suppose)

 

 

I know that you were just unvoting, but I didn't see that at the time when I posted that, so calm down.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...