Jump to content

DRAGONMOUNT

A WHEEL OF TIME COMMUNITY

Ten days after Samhain, 1057: Night 5 (CONCLUDED)


WWWwombat

Recommended Posts

Posted

 

I'm not trolling you and I agree you made them on purpose.

I'm glad that we established that. So you believe that I'm dumb? Cause trying to establish the same meta this way would be seriously stupid.

 

 

No..I actually think you are too smart for your own good.  :wink:

 

Anyway, I'll be back in an hour or two.

 

I'm Selma Ross, Vanilla Town in this game.

 

Claims in this game will tell us nothing.  Selma Ross could be a dirty little whore for all we know.

  • Replies 1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

Ahh

 

Peace this is what I'm referring too

 

 

Vote Yates

 

For self voting. Ugh.

  

Vote Csarmi

 

Let's just run him up and see what comes out of it.

Vote Csarmi

 

He must be scum in at least one of them or he wouldn't use the same strategy three times, heh.

Leelou I was wrong

This is where cloud is mafia. Csarmi and cloud are both mafia in this thread IMO

Bag 'em and tag 'em

(For kinda evidence. Look at the clod votes. This is the only thread he attempts to vote elsewhere and he is trying to be as nonchalant as possible in this thread) vote salami

Also isnt it amazing that cloud went from thread to thread at the same time, making sure to read them all equally rather than concentrating on a specific thread at a time. Trying to have a nice even meta

Wait...

Didnt he accuse Csarmi of that and dub him mafia over it? I think he did lol

Posted

Good. I'm town in all three threads though.

 

Don't treat "csarmi being scum in at least one thread" as a fact. Just saying.

Posted

I'm not

Unless did a 1/3 mafia and fudged the numbers there is no way everyone is mafia in atleast one thread

 

But as far as your play goes I'm inclined to think you are a good bet, especially for thread 1

Posted

Are you going to explain that or just vanish?

 

Sure. I've read up this thread and I found your posts suspicious. They don't add up to me, somehow. Don't expect a case, it's Day 1. Keep smiling, scum.

Posted

 

Are you going to explain that or just vanish?

 

Sure. I've read up this thread and I found your posts suspicious. They don't add up to me, somehow. Don't expect a case, it's Day 1. Keep smiling, scum.

 

 

What about his posts are suspicious? 

Posted

Come on leelou

It's day 1. He can't be expected to have a reason yet. It's just a gut feeling that he can't place and might turn out to be gas later. But for now he's suspicious

Posted

 

Are you going to explain that or just vanish?

 

Sure. I've read up this thread and I found your posts suspicious. They don't add up to me, somehow. Don't expect a case, it's Day 1. Keep smiling, scum.

 

 

atleast explain what that means!

 

your failed attempt at moving suspicion towards me is noted  

Posted

Come on leelou

It's day 1. He can't be expected to have a reason yet. It's just a gut feeling that he can't place and might turn out to be gas later. But for now he's suspicious

 

Chuckles must have fallen for the "TRAP."

Posted

 

Come on leelou

It's day 1. He can't be expected to have a reason yet. It's just a gut feeling that he can't place and might turn out to be gas later. But for now he's suspicious

 

 

Chuckles must have fallen for the "TRAP."

Rofl
Posted

Okay, let's go through the BS.

 

So you say that early play and a lot of discussion helps town, but then you call my reasoning for voting for you scummy? :rolleyes: I also find it amusing that you first mention that your votes across the three threads were a trap, and then it was just a townie move because they have nothing to hide, and now they are joke votes? Make up your mind dude.

Story = changing

 

vote salami, peeps.

How was my story changing?

 

I started the game with making the exact same play in all three threads: I made a bandwagon vote with the very same reasoning, the only difference was the names. I used copy-paste and replace.

 

Some things were a given, obvious the minute I posted them.

 

1) The votes are obviously joke votes.

2) The posts will get attention for sure and they're likely to stir up some discussion.

3) There must be a plan I'm pursuing with it.

 

So yes, Cloud, they are joke votes, they are there to stir up discussion (which is good for town) and they're a trap. 3 in 1 :)

 

I don't think it takes a big logical step to come to these conclusions and I'm sure several players did.

 

Now on to the meta argument.

 

Vote Csarmi

 

He must be scum in at least one of them or he wouldn't use the same strategy three times, heh.

 

He's probably scum in one and setting some kind of meta using the other two where he's town. No way to differentiate so just kill'em three times.

[...]

From trying to maintain the same strategy in all three games? Why would you do that if you weren't mafia?

 

 

Why would the Csarmi train take off so fast. Did I miss something?

The premise is simple.  Csarmi posted the exact same way in all three threads.  If he were Town, why would he do that?  As scum, it makes perfect sense.

 

Since we don't know which game(s) he is scum in, we just lynch him in all 3.  The serves a second purpose in exposing votes on his wagon across all three games.  If he flips scum in one game, for example, and that's the only of the two games that you didn't vote for him what would that say about you?  Scum buddy.  So this is a really a trap to find his scum buddies in whichever game(s) he's scum in.

 

We're obviously overlooking the remote possibility he's Town in all 3 and risking it in favor of the home run swing.

 

Total BS.

 

1) Setting meta with one post? Really?

2) The "let's lynch someone in all threads cause he might just be scum in one of those" argument holds for everybody. It has the obvious flow. Town lynches.

3) Is it just possible that I have another reason to do this?

 

 

 

I liked the voting people till they tell us what thread they are mafia in.  Very Reservoir doggish.  Problem is your trains gained a little to much speed this early.  Trains that gain speed early in mafia are usually crappy and bogus.  I think we should try it at some point though.  Maybe on Verb?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...