Monopoly Mafia [GAME OVER]

[David Hermes]

Sunday should give us enough time to vote for a card if the No lynch gets a majority, which I feel is the likely scenario.

[Nolder]

You get an entirely different deadline once the hammer falls

 

It's all arbitrary so I may hold you all to Sunday but I also might not

[David Hermes]

This is my oppinion on the whole No Lynch matter.

If we want to try it, Day 1 is the way to go, I'm not willing to risk it later in game, even if we manage to nail scum at the end of day 1.

Why wouldn't a No Lynch still be valid D2 if we bagged a scum D1 and were a step ahead?

 

 

Obviously it would be better to get a No Lynch D2 if you managed to get a scum killed D1. But imo, it's still not good because the scum will probably have killed one of us aswell.

 

And I feel that if we vote for a no lynch D1, it would only be like an extension of D1 up until D2 (except for possible cop views and other similar things).

But if we vote no lynch D2, it feels like we would disrupt the game's "speed" and stall, losing trails and so on. But hey, it's just how I feel. It can really go anyway haha xP.

We might aswell get a scum kill D1, block any potential night kill N1 and get a super good card D2.

 

But to sum up, I'd rather go for a D1 no lynch than a D2 no lynch.

Might I ask, why you are withholding your vote? Are you waiting for something?

[Nolder]

Votecount

No Lynch - Rand, Eternal Phoenix, David, Nightstrike, Wombat, BG, Basel, Blackhoof, Lenlo (9)

Peace - Andrew (1)

EP - Des (1)

Des - Razen (1)

 

Not Voting: Peacesells, Arez, Darthe, alannalynn, dicetosser1, Songstress, Lessa Nikia, Thorum (8)

 

With 20 Alive it takes 11 to Lynch.

Deadline is Sunday at 8:00 PM PST

[RandA lThor]

Its great to have someone in the same time zone as you.

[Nolder]

I know right?

[Thorum]

As promissed: no lynch

 

Who wants to be the hammer?

 

I hope to be able to read everything over the weekend.

[peacesells]

Nice to see others up when I'm working the GY shift.

[WWWwombat]

unvote

 

I can hammer if someone puts it back to 10

[peacesells]

unvote

 

I can hammer if someone puts it back to 10

 

Now this is a bit strange. Why do you want to be the hammer Wombat? Are you hoping the hammer gets the card and your scum team will benefit?

[Nolder]

Votecount

No Lynch - Rand, Eternal Phoenix, David, Nightstrike, BG, Basel, Blackhoof, Lenlo, Thorum (9)

Peace - Andrew (1)

EP - Des (1)

Des - Razen (1)

 

Not Voting: Peacesells, Arez, Darthe, alannalynn, dicetosser1, Songstress, Lessa Nikia, Wombat (8)

 

With 20 Alive it takes 11 to Lynch.

Deadline is Sunday at 8:00 PM PST

[WWWwombat]

IIRC the rules say something happens to the hammerer. I am curious to see what will happen if I hammer. I could get a cop viewing. I could be roleblocked. I could die. Time to toss the dice.

[peacesells]

IIRC the rules say something happens to the hammerer. I am curious to see what will happen if I hammer. I could get a cop viewing. I could be roleblocked. I could die. Time to toss the dice.

 

I don't see that. Are you discussing this in your QT? is that where you saw it?

[WWWwombat]

I don't see it there either but I thought Nolder said that somewhere.

[Nolder]

I may have said something to that effect in the mass PM I sent out to try to get more sign ups

It didn't occur to me that I should have said so in the rules/to everyone I'm sorry

That's totally my mistake

 

So yes what Wombat said is correct

Some cards do effect the person who hammers

[peacesells]

ok..thanks for the clarification.

[Gabriel Kross]

Well, let the game begin.

 

No lynch already Peace? Curious... very Curious.

 

this piqued my interest early but as the game progressed I got less interested in Lenlo

 

Nolder, how many of the cards are good, and how many are bad (percentage, not number)?

 

You really expected aan answer to that? I mean seriously you had to know you were going to get a PAFO

 

By the way, what's "Fight club"? I saw Nol mention it in the rules somewhere and I'm curious as to what it is..

 

You're not supposed to talk about it, Arez! Sheesh!

 

(Google is your friend, dear)

 

I'm not a fan of the no lynch idea. Nor the no lunch idea, thanks auto-correct ... Although with the amended rule #7 I guess I can't have lunch either.

 

I am curious about the cards, but from the way they were described in the OP it sounds like there is at least an even chance the result will be bad for the town.

 

At very least we ought to take some time about it. Rushing to a no lynch to pick a card isn't going to get us anywhere in scumhunting, in addition to giving the mafia a free day.

 

If there were not a shiny new curiosity inspiring game mechanic involved, some of you would be all over FOS'ing anyone who thought a no lynch was a good thing right out of the gate.

 

A very hesitant Songstress is a scum Songstress, remember the FF and pokemon games.

 

you should be afraid Darthe very afeared, Tress is prolly mafia...

 

Your reasoning for that statement?

 

While yes I did have reasoning, but for you to automatically jump to the conclusion that I was being serious this early in the game is a big ping

this reads as a guilty conscience statement that Tress realised she spoke a little to hesitently in her previous post

 

Sitting at my work.. Having a "Super duper fun time".

 

I can definatly see the what you're saying Tress.. But I think it's better that we try now, and possibly fail, than try later and fail. It won't be as devestating if we get a bad card now, as it would be if we got it later ^^

And we might get something to help us find scum easier so we don't have to bloody Day1 lynch again -.-

 

I can see the point you're making, Arez... I just think we need to talk more before going that route. If we get nothing useful to town, or indeed if it's harmful to town, everyone piling on no lynch without discussion is going to give very little information for scumhunting.

 

looking for info to build cases on townies Tress?

 

Actually we already have alot of info, we have the same info we'd have had if the no lynch option wasnt there, because we got the "skeptical reserved" people chiming in being like hey guys wait a minute... and the "gung ho" people that are all like LETS DOOOOOO IT!!! it's all about reactions, the conditions may be different but the situation is the same... and you guys are all missing the possibility of night actions being fruitful

 

here is where I stated we had information already

 

Rand is fence sitting with this comment.

I see what you mean but my curiosity is so strong right now.

 

He says that he can see the points addressed by Tress, Darthe and myself as to why we should discuss before going the no lynch route, but has kept his vote there. You can talk the talk, but you gotta walk the walk too. He looks good either way - if we do go the no lynch route by saying he was there, and if we decide against it, he just has to point here to say he agreed with what the three of us pointed out.

 

very far stretch here Razen

 

Actually we already have alot of info, we have the same info we'd have had if the no lynch option wasnt there, because we got the "skeptical reserved" people chiming in being like hey guys wait a minute... and the "gung ho" people that are all like LETS DOOOOOO IT!!! it's all about reactions, the conditions may be different but the situation is the same... and you guys are all missing the possibility of night actions being fruitful

 

I'm not going to deny that we don't have info - you are correct when you say that it divides us up into those categories.

 

What I want to point out is the last line - night actions. I'm dividing this up into two types - the cards and then the abilities of the players. Even if the card that is drawn is good (which I have no idea if it will be or not - it's all up to chance and how Nol has the cards arranged). I get the feeling that this is what you mean, but by wording it as night actions, I get the picture that you're talking about people who can kill, protect, and what not. And the only way people will know whether night actions of the traditional sense are fruitful or not are those who have them.

 

very tricky Razen, I don't know whether to acredit this to grammatical error or if you did this on purpose you basically said you deny that we have info the way that reads.

 

 

 

and for an update my consience has been cleared on the rule 14 reference, so I will be remaining in the game.

[Gabriel Kross]

Oh and since you want my suspect list, it's:

 

Tress

Razen

AlannaLynn

[WWWwombat]

Rest assured, if we run no lynch up to L1, I will hammer him into oblivion with a quickness.

 

/Pac'd

[Gabriel Kross]

LOL you gonna fail just as much as Pac on the hammer?

[WWWwombat]

xD

[Gabriel Kross]

quick we need 2 people to vote no lynch rq so wombat can really Pac it out!

[WWWwombat]

ROFL

[Thorum]

Nolder, how many of the cards are good, and how many are bad (percentage, not number)?

 

You really expected aan answer to that? I mean seriously you had to know you were going to get a PAFO

 

A no you already have, a yes can come.

[Gabriel Kross]

wtf does that even mean?