Jump to content

DRAGONMOUNT

A WHEEL OF TIME COMMUNITY

[Advanced/Experimental] Game of Thrones Mafia


Kivam

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 8/17/2011 at 9:00 PM, Pac said:
  On 8/17/2011 at 8:58 PM, John McClane said:
  On 8/17/2011 at 8:34 PM, DreadPirateRoberts said:

 

9) The only thing I'm hiding are me treasures that you a-holes keep trying to steal.

 

 

 

... and BOOM ... the Pirate shows us his ass.

 

Based on CTM trying to steal from me, me trying to steal from Pac on N1, and both of us coming up empty handed... and both CTM and Pac being my strongest reads for fellow survivors, I think its a somewhat safe hypothesis to make that the survivors started with nothing.

 

So DPR's "treasure" that he keeps referring to... has me thinking he's no survivor.

 

Red, DPR and Smash are my favorites.

 

I was successful in my steal from you yesterday a-hole.. came up empty tho.

 

and I really don't see the point in talking about if you know what I mean. DPR had already sloppily exposed himself enough.

 

 

You, CTM and I all had the same thing happen. We're all survivors. We started with nothing to be stolen, so DPR's treasure is a tell that he's got something.

 

I'm not divulging more details than that - it should be the clincher for DPR.

 

Red, DPR, Smash, then onto BG, Lanth and see what other filth we can stir up... perhaps Wombat.

  • Replies 3.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

if the factions are smart there's a few of us who aren't long for the game

 

anyway

 

i'm going to vote smash

 

if we're playing the game this way, he's made it beyond clear he has no idea what's going on

Posted
  On 8/17/2011 at 8:42 PM, slats said:

Unvote

 

vote: Smash

 

I'm gonna cut Lily's replacement some slack. The early momentum there died off, anyway.

 

fwiw, I have no problem with Red, either, but I like the idea of competing trains at this point in time. I was hoping to see Lily and Red compete, but I don't see that happening.

 

You know, this could be interpreted as a veiled attempt to bail out a teammate... starting a competing train, when Red is more or less done for...

Posted

VOTE COUNT

Sakaea (1) - Vic

McClane (3) - Red, Booboo, Smash

Red (8) - Hybrid, McClane, Barm, Wombat, Verbal, Lanth, DPR, Sakaea

JF80 (1) - Crusher

Lanth (1) - Pac

Smash (2) - Slats, CTM

 

13 to lynch

  • Moderator
Posted
  On 8/17/2011 at 8:51 PM, John McClane said:

26) sharrow (chatty, but not really giving us anything - no read)

 

Don't know why, but I lol'ed at this.

 

 

 

  On 8/17/2011 at 8:58 PM, John McClane said:
  On 8/17/2011 at 8:34 PM, DreadPirateRoberts said:

 

9) The only thing I'm hiding are me treasures that you a-holes keep trying to steal.

 

 

 

... and BOOM ... the Pirate shows us his ass.

 

Based on CTM trying to steal from me, me trying to steal from Pac on N1, and both of us coming up empty handed... and both CTM and Pac being my strongest reads for fellow survivors, I think its a somewhat safe hypothesis to make that the survivors started with nothing.

 

So DPR's "treasure" that he keeps referring to... has me thinking he's no survivor.

 

Red, DPR and Smash are my favorites.

 

Red and DPR are mine. Don't really have a third yet, actually.

 

 

 

  On 8/17/2011 at 8:59 PM, BooBoo said:

Its interesting that some of the people who've been called out for not posting much based on "meta" which I figured out was historical play, started posting a bit more namely DPR and Smash.

 

I'll openly admit, I'm not posting much because its a bit hard to grasp everything that is going on. Feel like I dont really have anything profound to offer other than some simple observations about play style - which I'm not sure yeilds great results, but thats what is coming natural.

 

This Red thing is interesting, especially because immediately after her post Bleedin Green agreed and had similar sentiments. Which makes me curious why he didnt get any votes. I like the idea of competing trains which was brought up a couple of post above. Curious why Bleedin Green wouldnt be the other train?

 

I noticed this as well. Newbie my a$$.

Posted
  On 8/17/2011 at 9:10 PM, Verbal32 said:
  On 8/17/2011 at 8:51 PM, John McClane said:

26) sharrow (chatty, but not really giving us anything - no read)

 

Don't know why, but I lol'ed at this.

 

 

 

  On 8/17/2011 at 8:58 PM, John McClane said:
  On 8/17/2011 at 8:34 PM, DreadPirateRoberts said:

 

9) The only thing I'm hiding are me treasures that you a-holes keep trying to steal.

 

 

Why not smash?

 

 

... and BOOM ... the Pirate shows us his ass.

 

Based on CTM trying to steal from me, me trying to steal from Pac on N1, and both of us coming up empty handed... and both CTM and Pac being my strongest reads for fellow survivors, I think its a somewhat safe hypothesis to make that the survivors started with nothing.

 

So DPR's "treasure" that he keeps referring to... has me thinking he's no survivor.

 

Red, DPR and Smash are my favorites.

 

Red and DPR are mine. Don't really have a third yet, actually.

 

 

 

  On 8/17/2011 at 8:59 PM, BooBoo said:

Its interesting that some of the people who've been called out for not posting much based on "meta" which I figured out was historical play, started posting a bit more namely DPR and Smash.

 

I'll openly admit, I'm not posting much because its a bit hard to grasp everything that is going on. Feel like I dont really have anything profound to offer other than some simple observations about play style - which I'm not sure yeilds great results, but thats what is coming natural.

 

This Red thing is interesting, especially because immediately after her post Bleedin Green agreed and had similar sentiments. Which makes me curious why he didnt get any votes. I like the idea of competing trains which was brought up a couple of post above. Curious why Bleedin Green wouldnt be the other train?

 

I noticed this as well. Newbie my a$$.

Posted

I'm not reading much into DPR's "treasure" for two reasons:

 

1) We don't actually know if he had any yet.

 

2) Even if he had gold or roles, there's been time for him to acquire them.

 

So, yeah, not really a tell IMO.

Posted
  On 8/17/2011 at 9:01 PM, John McClane said:
  On 8/17/2011 at 8:59 PM, BooBoo said:

Its interesting that some of the people who've been called out for not posting much based on "meta" which I figured out was historical play, started posting a bit more namely DPR and Smash.

 

I'll openly admit, I'm not posting much because its a bit hard to grasp everything that is going on. Feel like I dont really have anything profound to offer other than some simple observations about play style - which I'm not sure yeilds great results, but thats what is coming natural.

 

This Red thing is interesting, especially because immediately after her post Bleedin Green agreed and had similar sentiments. Which makes me curious why he didnt get any votes. I like the idea of competing trains which was brought up a couple of post above. Curious why Bleedin Green wouldnt be the other train?

 

No worries. He's on the docket for tomorrow... fact is, he defended a bit better... and Red's obviousness is just more glaring.

 

First things first, ey?

 

Its hard to trust you because you're all over the place. My natural instincts say to never trust people like you. I understand this is game where you trust no one, but still. Some people are easy to take then others. Well, everyone is easier to take than you. Sorry. :)

 

That said, I agreed with how you called Red out. But really like the idea of 2 trains. Is it silly to start another train on a player for basically the same reason as the other?

Posted
  On 8/17/2011 at 9:13 PM, Hybrid said:

I'm not reading much into DPR's "treasure" for two reasons:

 

1) We don't actually know if he had any yet.

 

2) Even if he had gold or roles, there's been time for him to acquire them.

 

So, yeah, not really a tell IMO.

 

There was 1 night phase for him to acquire something via theft - which is how it would have been done if he were a survivor. If he did acquire it last night, he should tell us who he stole from because THAT person is likely not a survivor for the same reasons I stated DPR is not.

Posted
  On 8/17/2011 at 8:59 PM, Naeann said:
  On 8/17/2011 at 6:49 PM, Hybrid said:

To add to my previous post:

 

The thing that really did it for me wasn't just the NK speculation -- because I can maybe buy skepticism over the number of NKs --, it was this:

 

  On 8/17/2011 at 4:46 PM, Red2111 said:

another question on the subject of there being 3 kills, i wonder what prevented them as well. theres a slew of roles that coudl be in place that could block a Kill, but thats a whole lot of good guessing imo and i don't like coinsedences

 

No survivor would have said this.

 

Add to that Red's unwillingness or inability to address the reasons at hand and the defensiveness of her reaction and there's very little that will persuade me to vote elsewhere today.

 

 

Barm also said something along the lines of wishing there had been a NK for imformational value.

 

Glad you could join us. Care to explain how thats relevant to anything you quoted?

Posted
  On 8/17/2011 at 9:08 PM, John McClane said:
  On 8/17/2011 at 8:42 PM, slats said:

Unvote

 

vote: Smash

 

I'm gonna cut Lily's replacement some slack. The early momentum there died off, anyway.

 

fwiw, I have no problem with Red, either, but I like the idea of competing trains at this point in time. I was hoping to see Lily and Red compete, but I don't see that happening.

 

You know, this could be interpreted as a veiled attempt to bail out a teammate... starting a competing train, when Red is more or less done for...

 

Do I really need to spell out why competing trains is better? I have no problem lynching either one today, or lynching both in back to back days.

Posted
  On 8/17/2011 at 9:10 PM, Verbal32 said:

I noticed this as well. Newbie my a$$.

 

Or maybe your jealous that a newbie has as good of a grasp at whats going on as you? ;-)

 

For serious though, I dont see how that was some type of profound observation that only a wily vet like yourself would pick up.

Posted
  On 8/17/2011 at 9:17 PM, BooBoo said:
  On 8/17/2011 at 9:01 PM, John McClane said:
  On 8/17/2011 at 8:59 PM, BooBoo said:

Its interesting that some of the people who've been called out for not posting much based on "meta" which I figured out was historical play, started posting a bit more namely DPR and Smash.

 

I'll openly admit, I'm not posting much because its a bit hard to grasp everything that is going on. Feel like I dont really have anything profound to offer other than some simple observations about play style - which I'm not sure yeilds great results, but thats what is coming natural.

 

This Red thing is interesting, especially because immediately after her post Bleedin Green agreed and had similar sentiments. Which makes me curious why he didnt get any votes. I like the idea of competing trains which was brought up a couple of post above. Curious why Bleedin Green wouldnt be the other train?

 

No worries. He's on the docket for tomorrow... fact is, he defended a bit better... and Red's obviousness is just more glaring.

 

First things first, ey?

 

Its hard to trust you because you're all over the place. My natural instincts say to never trust people like you. I understand this is game where you trust no one, but still. Some people are easy to take then others. Well, everyone is easier to take than you. Sorry. :)

 

That said, I agreed with how you called Red out. But really like the idea of 2 trains. Is it silly to start another train on a player for basically the same reason as the other?

 

 

Yeah, newbie my butt... vote how you like, stop asking stupid questions like that. Nobody buys that you are new to this game.

Posted
  On 8/17/2011 at 9:20 PM, BooBoo said:
  On 8/17/2011 at 9:10 PM, Verbal32 said:

I noticed this as well. Newbie my a$$.

 

Or maybe your jealous that a newbie has as good of a grasp at whats going on as you? ;-)

 

For serious though, I dont see how that was some type of profound observation that only a wily vet like yourself would pick up.

 

It wasn't... I called it out as well.

Posted
  On 8/17/2011 at 9:19 PM, slats said:
  On 8/17/2011 at 9:08 PM, John McClane said:
  On 8/17/2011 at 8:42 PM, slats said:

Unvote

 

vote: Smash

 

I'm gonna cut Lily's replacement some slack. The early momentum there died off, anyway.

 

fwiw, I have no problem with Red, either, but I like the idea of competing trains at this point in time. I was hoping to see Lily and Red compete, but I don't see that happening.

 

You know, this could be interpreted as a veiled attempt to bail out a teammate... starting a competing train, when Red is more or less done for...

 

Do I really need to spell out why competing trains is better? I have no problem lynching either one today, or lynching both in back to back days.

 

No, but that's exactly why its a great way to veil other motivations for not voting Red. Just sayin.

 

What do you think about DPR?

Posted
  On 8/17/2011 at 9:07 PM, CTM said:

if the factions are smart there's a few of us who aren't long for the game

 

anyway

 

i'm going to vote smash

 

if we're playing the game this way, he's made it beyond clear he has no idea what's going on

 

could you explain this in english ? I have no idea wtf your talking about

Posted
  On 8/17/2011 at 9:23 PM, Smash said:
  On 8/17/2011 at 9:07 PM, CTM said:

if the factions are smart there's a few of us who aren't long for the game

 

anyway

 

i'm going to vote smash

 

if we're playing the game this way, he's made it beyond clear he has no idea what's going on

 

could you explain this in english ? I have no idea wtf your talking about

 

Don't bother. I tried that.

Posted
  On 8/17/2011 at 9:20 PM, John McClane said:

Yeah, newbie my butt... vote how you like, stop asking stupid questions like that. Nobody buys that you are new to this game.

 

Why was it a stupid question? ...but judging by that response. I guess not.

Posted

I agree with CTM, I'd like Verbal to explain why he's not suspicious of Smash.

 

Also, for Slats to weigh in on DPR.

 

Speaking of weighing in... where is tubby? Might run a train on Crusher just to see if he cracks as usual in the next day or so...

Posted
  On 8/17/2011 at 9:21 PM, John McClane said:

It wasn't... I called it out as well.

 

What? You're not a wily vet? You sure act like you think you are.

Posted
  On 8/17/2011 at 9:05 PM, John McClane said:
  On 8/17/2011 at 9:00 PM, Pac said:
  On 8/17/2011 at 8:58 PM, John McClane said:
  On 8/17/2011 at 8:34 PM, DreadPirateRoberts said:

 

9) The only thing I'm hiding are me treasures that you a-holes keep trying to steal.

 

 

 

... and BOOM ... the Pirate shows us his ass.

 

Based on CTM trying to steal from me, me trying to steal from Pac on N1, and both of us coming up empty handed... and both CTM and Pac being my strongest reads for fellow survivors, I think its a somewhat safe hypothesis to make that the survivors started with nothing.

 

So DPR's "treasure" that he keeps referring to... has me thinking he's no survivor.

 

Red, DPR and Smash are my favorites.

 

I was successful in my steal from you yesterday a-hole.. came up empty tho.

 

and I really don't see the point in talking about if you know what I mean. DPR had already sloppily exposed himself enough.

 

 

You, CTM and I all had the same thing happen. We're all survivors. We started with nothing to be stolen, so DPR's treasure is a tell that he's got something.

 

I'm not divulging more details than that - it should be the clincher for DPR.

 

Red, DPR, Smash, then onto BG, Lanth and see what other filth we can stir up... perhaps Wombat.

 

Yeah let's set up a predetermined order of 5 or 6 lynches in a row in a cult game.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...