Jump to content

DRAGONMOUNT

A WHEEL OF TIME COMMUNITY

MATH!!!


Locke

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 66
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted
  Quote

Correct, and you remembered the c!

 

pretty sure you use eulers formula for that one.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yep kinda.  Or you could just do what they teach in physics courses and make a good guess.  I don't like guessing much though.

Posted

Find the eigenvalues of the matrix:

 

[4 0 1 5 6]

[0 2 1 0 1]

[0 0 0 0 5]

[0 0 0 1 2]

[0 0 0 0 2]

 

There is a really easy way to do this and a harder way to do it.

Posted
  Quote

Find the eigenvalues of the matrix:

 

[4 0 1 5 6]

[0 2 1 0 1]

[0 0 0 0 5]

[0 0 0 1 2]

[0 0 0 0 2]

 

There is a really easy way to do this and a harder way to do it.

 

OK, this ones out of my depth. What on earth is an eigenvalue?

Posted
  Quote

4 2 0 1 2 they are.

 

*loves Matlab*

 

I forgot the easy method to to it. I know the determinant way though.

 

The eigenvalues of an upper triangular matrix are just the diagonal entries xD

Posted
  Quote

  Quote

Find the eigenvalues of the matrix:

 

[4 0 1 5 6]

[0 2 1 0 1]

[0 0 0 0 5]

[0 0 0 1 2]

[0 0 0 0 2]

 

There is a really easy way to do this and a harder way to do it.

 

OK, this ones out of my depth. What on earth is an eigenvalue?

 

Say you have a linear transformation T.  An eigenvector is a non-zero vector v such that Tv = λv for some scalar λ.  λ is called an eigenvalue.

Posted

A cool method of inverting a matrix is to augment it with the identity on the right and then row reduce.  If the original matrix is invertible, the left half will now be the identity and the right half will now be the inverse.

Posted
  Quote

A cool method of inverting a matrix is to augment it with the identity on the right and then row reduce.  If the original matrix is invertible, the left half will now be the identity and the right half will now be the inverse.

 

That's the way I used to know, I just forgot if there was a way to do it shorter.

Posted
  Quote

Sweet, that is a neat trick.

 

It beats working out the determinant.

 

For 3x3 and above yeah.  There's also a way to do it with cross products for 3x3 matrices.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Sometimes I just like to sit down and think about math and patterns and whatnot.  I managed to make up two formulas involving squares and cubes doing that. :D

Posted

Well it's been a few years since I've played with linear algebra. I've always liked related rates the most followed by linear algebra. The two are so practical. Differential Equations I didn't like in the least nor did I like non-euclidean geometry. I hate approximations and statistics, but they can be useful especially in modeling molecular constitutes.

 

Well here is one,

 

y"+2y'+2y=0    y(pi/4)=2 y'(pi/4)=-2 

Posted

Actually scratch that last one, I have a math question for Seanie:

 

eπi+6.66+(Sin2(x)+cos2(x))/3=?

 

[Edit]

Fixed the 'E', Thank you Crono.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...